|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 1:11:21 GMT -5
ines of millionaires.................... Re: Anything from ACCA in Paltalk? « Reply #13 on Yesterday at 10:52pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acca Intern. Rm. Mon. 10-29-07~ www.zshare.net/audio/454285077dd8a2/Recap for 1943: When are we going to really celebrate in this room and have a reason to celebrat? November 18 big date. Later asked why was said it will be the information date. Also it was said that we are waiting on 3 companies to get paid. During the discussion in the room about it.. some said that Guru2 talked about companies that are connected to cmxk and that could be those 3 companies. pcbm was one of them.. will report if more. Hiker asked if it has possibly something to do with companies going into new fiscal year of 2008, and for some that starts in oct, some nov.. some december.. he said yes. « Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:56pm by ines »
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 6:15:24 GMT -5
ines from millionaires................. Spiderman mp3 an hour long >> « Thread Started on Today at 1:59am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.zshare.net/audio/4545304f66cb69/ spidy intl room oct 30 2007 Spidy talks about where the value is .. 2 cmkx companies: cmkx vegas, cmkx canada private company 2 sggm companies: sggm usa, sggm canada private company cim, juina mining that is 100% subsidiary of uscn us canadian minearals.. etc etc.. also about sol on cmkx runing out on nov 1 2007 to sue any gov agency or gov..2 years from revocation on oct 28 2005 and the first day of non trading on nov 1. In his opinion.. you have to file the intent to sue.. in any federal court by nov 1. Then you have a year to actualy follow up on it etc. Re: Spiderman mp3 an hour long >> « Reply #1 on Today at 2:10am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi?board=PR2page and links to all usca prs .. it will make it easer to follow the spidy mp3 also on the same board find other companies connected to cmkx saga and their prs. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1193727594
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 6:38:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 7:03:15 GMT -5
By: mkaykay0 29 Oct 2007, 11:27 PM EDT Msg. 618708 of 618742 Jump to msg. # Anyone hear of this name before? It was brought up in PT tonight, and acca left the room immediately. www.evolvinggold.com/images/Bill%20Majcher%20article%20Sept07.pdf Bill Majcher By: CHICPICK 29 Oct 2007, 11:53 PM EDT Msg. 618711 of 618742 (This msg. is a reply to 618708 by mkaykay0.) Jump to msg. # mkay, Good man on the case, but Canadian White collar law is like a strainer.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 7:18:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 30, 2007 7:49:14 GMT -5
By: mclt_jing 30 Oct 2007, 12:31 AM EDT Msg. 618722 of 618746Jump to msg. # AN OPEN WAGER OFFER FOR ACCA Tonight, Acca and his "Team Acca" members,put on another show for the poor and misguided shareholders, giving them yet another BS story about the shareholder party to be on the 18th of November - and thus indicating that some payment of money to CMKX shareholders would be forthcoming before November 18, 2007. Hey Acca, are you willing to bet $10,000.00 on it? Oh yeah, I forgot, you already lost $1,0000.00 to SaltyDog on the same bet and in spite of your wild claims that Urban paid you a $200,000 salary for pumping CMKX, you never honored your word and paid your $1,000.00 debt. WHAT A SHOCKER!! ACCA DOES NOT HONOR HIS WORD..... AGAIN! I guess we can place the money at the transfer agent's office as an escrow with an instruction that she must distribute the funds to the winner and the order can not be revoked under any cicumstances. Are you game Acca or are you just another miserable paid liar with no cahones and/or morality? Hey sheep, are you all brain dead or do you simply like it that the rest of the world laughs at you because of Acca?
|
|
|
Post by jackofdiamonds on Oct 30, 2007 8:06:11 GMT -5
To JoeRockss Re : the following post by yourself. Can you provide Official Document or Link to Official Document issued by USA SEC
URGENTLY REQUIRED FOR SEC HEARING in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Wed, Oct 31st, 2007
Also, searching for a Link I had to a Website that Alphabetically listed by individuals and Brokerage Firms ALL CMKX transactions, I'm assuming from Day 1.
The Listings consisted of approx. 500 pages of transactions amounting to Billions (possibly Trillions) of Shares bought and sold.
I had reviewed several pages of these Listings to see if any of the 200 M shares we had purchased were listed, but they wern't, which leads me to believe the Listings pre-dated Sept 2004.
Unfortunately, I lost the Link to yhis Website during a computer crash and haven't been able, as yet, to locate it again.
If JoeRockss, or anyone else can help find these 2 items it would be much appreciated ASAP
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator)
By: seatech3 29 Oct 2007, 07:41 AM EDT Msg. 27001 of 27002 Jump to msg. # Anyone like anniversaries? October 28, 2005 The time goes by fast!
The order contained in that decision revoking the registration of the securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. is hereby declared effective.
Jonathan G. Katz Secretary
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 14:26:27 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 30 Oct 2007, 12:00 PM EDT Msg. 618856 of 618882 Jump to msg. # Why would Kevin take a job from a crook?
cal
By: calvinwinters 30 Oct 2007, 12:02 PM EDT Msg. 618857 of 618882 (This msg. is a reply to 618856 by calvinwinters.) Jump to msg. # Especially after he'd seen the situation as interim...cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 14:27:08 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 30 Oct 2007, 11:25 AM EDT Msg. 618836 of 618883 (This msg. is a reply to 618826 by 07isback.) Jump to msg. # 07 we hired a lawyer to make sure that the assets of cmkx and its' shareholders were protected, bill was here and saw everything that looked shady three years ago like you and me and wouldn't have done a cert pull if he wasn't assured with evidence that we were fine, end of story. The money is fine or our lawyer didn't do his job
By: factanonverba13 30 Oct 2007, 01:06 PM EDT Msg. 618883 of 618883 (This msg. is a reply to 618836 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Wrong, the scope of frizzy's work three years ago was to intercede for share holders at the SEC hearing. He then went on to promote the useless cert pull under the guise of filing an Interpead. Furthermore, why would you assume he had access to any sensitive info? Obviously you are completely ignorant about legal matters.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 14:27:51 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 30 Oct 2007, 02:45 PM EDT Msg. 618934 of 618938 (This msg. is a reply to 618924 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced:When the boxes arrived, as I recall, there was no court order of delivery. KW, had plenty of time to know where he was, so why would he take a job from a crook who'd ripped him off.
Then to accept absolute responsibility as CEO, after the fact. What did you say you thought he saw?
The last person to know they were conned is the mark, so if its me, I'll pay for my lesson with a 33% IRS recovery.
If not, I'll never see my children's children have to work for anyone else. What father would not take that shot.... cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 30, 2007 19:11:47 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 30 Oct 2007, 04:26 PM EDT Msg. 619003 of 619060 Jump to msg. # I agree with Spiderman on the SOL. Always have. Always stated my feelings on the "DELAYS." Where you have large valuation, and large damages, many thousands of potential claims from many thousands of investors that were harmed you would have a reasonable amount of time to file a lawsuit against state, company," Government "(2 Years Revoked status), or Country. There is no indefinite amount of time IMHO, even though the crime ran rampant for decades Federally by the preponderance of those that say that it did. As well it makes sense to me that the company needs to move on, waited this out along with our Regulators for an amicable solution of no contestable sums of punitive restitution, disputes, or legal entanglements. It's as I said a matter of accepting what was prescribed by those that had the vision to enact a plan, execute a plan, corral corruption, extinguish the flames of corruption, and enact new reform in legislation with penalties to those who were held accountable. That did not leave room for any negotiations with the damaged public. Whatever settlement comes out of this will remain IMHO NON NEGOTIABLE, and required an SOL as I previously stated to mitigate the liability, and the legal recourse.
Mega/Oil
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 31, 2007 6:37:36 GMT -5
thanks ines: AccaIntrnRmTues~ 10-30-07~ www.zshare.net/audio/4566294ba415d5/Very upbeat and good session. Ok for those that cant listen to mp3 short recap. Acca said that Nov 18th is the date and i believe news.. ( letter, etc ) is implied would come to us any time by that date. One man is in charge of deciding when it will happen. ( maheu was implied) Also interesting thing said was that sec and hedge funds .. dont know what is waiting for them, implying some kind of surprize is still in the works for them. ( shareholders discussed that it is the way maheu works. does not leave it open for anybody, even in the end ) when asked why do we have to endure listening to Mark faulk and how is it that he was alowed to go on and badger Emerson Koch, answer was: that he( mark faulk ) is a kind of a free agent, and he can do what he wants. That he has been carefull not to libel or .. do things in a way to hurt himself, and that we will have to endure something else coming from him too. ( no idea what ) Acca talked about how we need to be positive. He said that our date has nothign to do with dates sec put out for nss cover.. because "that one guy" or one man, is in charge of when things are coming out.. and its not about waiting for 35 days to end. When asked about .. do we still expect communication first.. from whatever company will commuicate to us.. ( meaning envelopes ) he said, yes in a nutshell , it is correct. So we are basicaly expecting somethign to happen .. something now.. any time and date of november 18 it the outher limit date for it to happen.. - is what i get out of it. He mentioned that things would happen,, before a certain lawsuit.. and i dont know which one he was reffering to. He talked about cim.. and how some have disapeared out of shareholdres accounts.. and iheard he said that has been taken care of. He said he agreed with some/much of the things spidy said.. but not with sol. He also said.. that spidy missed some .. actualy positive things. And that he was incorrect on some too. You can hear the specifics in the mp3.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 31, 2007 6:47:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 31, 2007 7:42:27 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 30 Oct 2007, 10:15 PM EDT Msg. 619127 of 619222 (This msg. is a reply to 619091 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # well nufced they gave some "answers" to the questions without answering the questions again, nice, it is almost like they post on this board. They should have answered if what they say is true why they didn't do anything about it long ago and why they even did the cert pull in the first place if it was such a complete waste of time. Nice try this time at least, but not even close to satisfactory as usual. - - - - - By: GGroovy 30 Oct 2007, 11:47 PM EDT Msg. 619167 of 619222 (This msg. is a reply to 619127 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # gus, ever think that if UC was gagged from exposing info, and KW is heavily involved with the company's info, then KW should have the same gag order as UC? My guess is he has to be careful what he says and doesn't divulge sensitive information about the nss, valuation, and any way the gov/sec is involved. That would mean that everything that is "answered" by KW has to pass by the eyes of those that have authority over the security of this economy/market.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 31, 2007 7:48:37 GMT -5
By: starbase70 31 Oct 2007, 08:09 AM EDT Msg. 619204 of 619228 Jump to msg. # lilburrito0~ You are abit off the mark! PUMP and DUMP?? You had one chance to dump this stock and that was long ago! To stand here today and call it a pump and dump is foolish! You know it and the world knows it! So cut the crap and move on.
By: cmkm14 31 Oct 2007, 08:24 AM EDT Msg. 619209 of 619225 Jump to msg. # Starbase..I agree. If this was a pump and dump it would have been over long ago and a lot of people would be in jail. Idon't have any great theories on what will happen but I look foward to seeing the outcome of all of this. - - - - -
|
|