|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 9:25:16 GMT -5
luci Queen of Diamonds
By: Bellingus 13 Nov 2007, 07:13 AM EST Msg. 27539 of 27539 Jump to msg. # This week in 1961... ...the number one tune was by the Marvelettes ~ Please Mr. Postman ~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 9:32:11 GMT -5
xxdiamondchildxx Ace of Diamonds
IMO: "Financial Fruition" is not IF, BUT WHEN.« Thread Started on Nov 9, 2007, 8:34am »
...There...that's my Friday gut feeling/message of the day. Take it or leave it.
For those CMKXers that think this CMKM Diamonds, Inc. saga...with what I feel still involves HUGE valuable mineral-natural resource assets/multiple GOOD influential individuals/a proved illegal manipulation via naked shorting...and ALL of the tremendous implications contained within...will just vaporize into thin air/be swept under the carpet/be completely forgotten...THINK AGAIN. Something with this many variables, immense financial implications of "neuron blowing" proportions, and multiple influential individuals of wealth/power/egos (in government and big business (some good, some bad)) locking horns...takes TIME as well as QUIET behavior via meeting BEHIND CLOSED DOORS to resolve these MAJOR ISSUES...plain and simple IMO. Silence/time elapsed does not equal the death of this "saga" more than it is the water/sun that nourishes the tree that will one day bear an abundance of fruit.
ALL OF THE ABOVE IS IMHO...so please take it as such.
God Bless those with "Righteous" intent!
Peter (Dxild)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 9:39:30 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 13 Nov 2007, 09:22 AM EST Msg. 623683 of 623693 Jump to msg. #
Last years Huge Bonuses by leading Brokerage Firm's executives really was amazing to watch with what was going on in the news. It looked like the only way for these Directors to compensate themselves for bad business practices that would not be scrutinized today. They must have had an unsettling realization that this was going to be a tuff year. Those bonuses of 2006 looked more like cash out, and retirement plans than percentage rent on a good year. Seemed way over the top in todays climate when I first saw it on CNBC. Choked on my dry corn muffin. Do not anticipate these gifts coming around again this year unless of course "THEY" had the cen$s to buy a.) CMKX, or b.) a "level III" Hazard INSURANCE policy-for their own personal gratification. IMHO Ferrari sales will be down in Manhattan until CMKXR'S get there.
AIMHO2
Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 11:10:53 GMT -5
From millionaires Board
pennypauly DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Gossip Discussion 11/13/07 « Reply #4 on Today at 10:34am »
f4d and Pedro both are racking up posts in record time the last two weeks.
this tells me we are getting closer but not close enough
I hate to see them although it is some what comforting.
? where did spidermans great news go... Does BHollenegg or anyone else know???
Thanks to this great board i still have some sanity
take care
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 11:20:22 GMT -5
From Millionaires Board
rgsports DIAMOND DIGGER Vegas (the TV show). Major Coincidence!!! « Thread Started on Today at 10:39am »
This may or not be OT, but it is really strange. The TV show, Las Vegas, was on last week. Now I am sure that the writers have consultants from LV to get some information and write the shows.
In the episode, two major tycoons were competing over some land. But, here is the weird part. They were competing over land in "Sasks Canada" Sorry, I don't know how to spell Sasks.
I do not thinkt the writers just randomly picked SASK, Canada out of a hat. So wouldn't it make sense that the consultants hired to assist the writters (that know about the real LV) mentioned highly sought after land with tremendous valuation in SASK? Maybe I am reading into it too much, but I really don't think so. Has anyone else seen last weeks episode of LV?
Please let me know what you think, thanks for reading.
Russ
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2007 14:05:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:51:48 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 11:16 AM EST Msg. 623744 of 623747 Jump to msg. # oil level three thursday, right before the 35 days of grandfather are up, and by the way like some predicted not one attempt to cover, strange hey, not really. And notice they gave them since sept 2006 to out these numbers/hide these numbers. And remember the sec's own words were they covered most old fails by the end of 2006, so much of what really happened happened behind the scenes, but the accounting although hidden has to come out in some fashion or another:
FASB... SEC... FASB 157... ECONOMY KNOCK-OUT PUNCH??
Posted By: DocMercer Date: Tuesday, 13 November 2007, 2:55 a.m.
FASB... SEC... FASB 157... ECONOMY KNOCK-OUT PUNCH??
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) replaced its two-part predecessor in 1973. It is supposedly a private, not-for-profit organization. Its alleged function is to serve the public interest by establishing accounting standards for public companies in the US.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has long held statutory authority over that function but has traditionally chosen to go to the private sector for the creation of standards. It designated the FASB as the official standards bearer.
I have some problems with those non-government organizations that have so much influence on money matters.
The FASB was established in 1973. What other essential NWO repositioning tactics were being carried out in that same time frame?
The SEC, going to the private sector for standards, is just creating more smokescreen and cover... and a "take the heat off the SEC" scapegoat... for their own criminal shenanigans including negligence. There's a partnership there, between the FASB and the SEC. It smells like partners in crime to me. Isn't there enough evidence to support that?
So what about FASB 157?
FASB 157 was announced in September of last year, 2006, to go into effect November 15, this year. That's right about now, folks.
So what does it do?
Though trying to wrap one's mind around all the different jargon by all the different authors is enough to make a head hurt, in my own limited sense FASB 157 says that financial institutions must post their assets more in terms of consumer pricing and less in terms of highly inflated banker dollar prices.
That being the case, a lot of banks and who knows what else is about to take a beating on the books. It is sure to drive some number of them out of business. Their assets will then be basically up for grabs except you can bet your granny that this has all been planned and executed for maximum profit for the planners.
So who are the planners? How are they, the designated buyers, going to acquire massive assets, which should be our assets, and do it with our money which they have already taken?
Is this likely pending transfer of ownership of untold billions going to be the knockout punch for the American economy?
Which bloodsuckers are behind it? When you consider how much it might take to acquire all those notes, it kind of limits the field of options, doesn't it?
There are financial analysts bouncing in here once in a while who have a good grip on this kind of thing. Maybe one of them will help put this in perspective.
At the very least, look for developments that could very easily make the old S & L scam look like a tea party.
It is bound to accelerate an economic crash and it looks to me as if the same old money is gonna come out with even more money... that they have taken in the same old way... from all the decent folks.
Minimally, this could precipitate a stock market crisis. Who is all set to capitalize on that? I'll bet you somebody is and it will be the same old club grossly profiting off all of it.
That's what makes me wonder about the real reason behind the state and fate of The Fed. Then again, maybe I'm just getting too cynical in my senior years.
Good luck to us.
DocMercer
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:52:22 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 11:47 AM EST Msg. 623751 of 623788 Jump to msg. # THIS WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION NOBODY talks about, and tell me where they hid this information, level three is my bet, it has to be somewhere doesn't it. You can't clear old fails like many have said on here without buying them, so where is the records for all of this:
"I can't leave the topic of "fails" without touching on one more highly important issue currently facing the Commission. This goes back to the meaning of "fail" as a noun. The SEC has recently been involved in a very proactive (some might even say prudential) exercise with respect to the issue of fails in the OTC derivatives markets. In response to reports of widespread documentation problems in those markets, the SEC has joined forces with other regulators, most notably the Federal Reserve Board and Britain's FSA, to encourage OTC market participants to clean up years of incomplete and inaccurate trade documentation. The need to act was clear. From all reports, the backlog of unconfirmed trades, which essentially are fails, and the widespread and unchecked use of novations in the credit derivatives markets had crippled risk management efforts and set the stage for a massive meltdown in certain default scenarios. Given the multi-trillion dollar aggregate notional amounts of the contracts involved, it was easy to see that the OTC derivatives dealers and their counterparties had created an operational problem similar in scope to the late 1960's back-office crisis on Wall Street.
In September 2005, the Federal Reserve Board and other regulators including the SEC called together 14 major OTC derivatives dealers to address these operational issues. The focus at that time was on OTC credit derivatives. Of course, the SEC does not necessarily have jurisdiction over OTC credit derivatives, but the firms subject to SEC supervision through our Consolidated Supervised Entity program are dealers in that market, and so it was important for the SEC be involved in overseeing the cleanup process. In addition, the SEC does regulate OTC equity derivatives, which were affected by many of the same operational maladies suffered by credit derivatives.
The dealers agreed after the 2005 meeting to develop processes for reducing the operational risks associated with the documentation backlog, and established a timeline that would allow regulators to track their progress. At a follow-up meeting in early 2006, the dealers reported significant progress in cleaning up aged unconfirmed trades, and committed to future deadlines for further reductions. The dealers also committed to objectives for increasing the electronic settlement of eligible trades, and began to work with DTCC to build upon its Deriv/SERV platform by establishing a "Trade Information Warehouse" to automate and standardize post-trade processes and to store copies of each contract. I understand that new enterprises, such as Swapswire, have entered the market to provide centralized, automated trade processing, and I assume that such competition will encourage and drive innovation in this area.
Today, due in large part to the increased use of electronic settlement systems and standardized contracts, the number of aged unconfirmed OTC credit derivative trades at the CSE firms supervised by the SEC has been reduced by approximately 90% since the September 2005 high. That is truly a success story, and I applaud both the principled regulatory approach and the tremendous efforts of the market participants.
In the Fall of 2006, attention turned to documentation failures in the OTC equity derivatives markets. According to a recent report by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the notional amount of OTC equity derivatives held by banks in the fourth quarter of 2006 was just shy of $2.3 trillion dollars.2 Amazingly, that figure pales in comparison to the $9 trillion dollar notional value of credit derivatives — and the $131 trillion dollar aggregate notional value of all derivatives held by banks in that same period. But, despite a relatively small notional value, equity derivatives represented almost one-third of the banks' trading revenues. And these figures only represent a small slice of the world markets for OTC derivatives. According to a March 2007 report by the Bank for International Settlements, the global notional amount of OTC equity and credit derivatives were approximately $7 trillion and $20 trillion dollars, respectively, at the end of June, 2006.3
As with the credit derivative documentation cleanup, the process for equity derivatives is being overseen by regulators but implemented by the dealers. Although the equity derivatives markets have experienced documentation problems similar to those of the credit derivatives markets, it appears that the problems are not as severe. However, inherent differences in the credit and equity derivatives markets have made some aspects of the cleanup effort for equities derivatives more challenging.
now you know why kevin said it is bigger than cmkx but we were the precedent setter, changes were forced they just didn't happen on their own, and where is the money for all this covering of old fails, all the stocks shorted are in the toilet, the money is sitting with ours. � - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:53:15 GMT -5
From millionaires..................
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 11:49 AM EST Msg. 623752 of 623789 Jump to msg. # PROBABLY THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT INFO TO ME BESIDES our cert pull of course:
By: gusjarvis 10 Sep 2007, 05:43 PM EDT Msg. 30550 of 30967 (This msg. is a reply to 30537 by venlaw.) Jump to msg. # venlaw the group as a collective have this evidence all of them my friend, and as long as gwgo was shorted like they say they had the evidence as well, it all leads to massive fraud all documented. This my friend caused the covering of all viable naked shorted companies imo, non of the nobo list companies are whining or pulicly suing are they, but yet they have all the proof, weird:
this is the same evidence we have and all the rest have and bill had before the cert pull and the interplead imo, evidence enough to force what happened behind the scenes, deals:
15 In an August of 2004 luncheon meeting with a potential witness in Eagletech’s civil case a member of the CIA showed up un-announced to me wanting details of the involvement of Jonathan Curshen and his Costa Rican Offshore asset protection company Red Sea Management in the demise of Eagletech. I was encouraged to write a criminal referral to the U.S. Secret Service who is charged with investigating counterfeiting of corporate securities under 18-USC-514. I authored 15 pages with 100 pages of evidence implicating the SEC and the DTCC as accessories to the crime. That referral was hand delivered to the Secret Service in Washington DC as a courtesy by the agent.
16 The NBC Dateline Debacle. Does anyone doubt the power of the wealthiest entity on earth the DTCC, the real owner of most all of the shares of every company in America, and held for your benefit. OK when they are benevolent, but what about when they manipulate the media, and threaten their detractors. The public doesn’t know it but at least half of the B-roll footage of me was shot after the cancellation of the April 10th scheduled airing. The story you saw on July 31st wasn’t the story ready for broadcast on April 10th. Producer Sharon Hoffman who should have resigned in protest was rewarded with a promotion to senior producer at NBC News a week later. Between 2:48 PM on July 6, 2005 and 7:22 PM on July 31, 2005 I received 11 threatening phone calls, the final one just about five minutes after the conclusion of the Dateline broadcast. You can be sure it wasn’t GE’s attorneys doing due diligence on the story.
17 Grandfathering! The SEC didn’t have the courage to make it a part of regulation SHO. Even they know how much it smells! They leaked it to the press in late December 2004 to an uproar of detractors, many of them still calling for a Constitutional test of their authority to suspend the settlement portion of their Congressional mandate to oversee the maintenance of an efficient clearing and settlement system. To the SEC and the DTCC efficient means de-materialization. De-materialization without transparency (access to short sale data) would be the final step in the perfect crime. I don’t know who to quote, reportedly somebody at NASAA said “Over my Dead Body.” Boo-Yaa!
18 Which brings us back to the subject of this appeal before the Commission; every shareholder of any Company in America who purchased shares and can not get delivery has a cause of action against the SEC as an agency of the U.S. Federal Government for violation of their 5th Amendment Constitutional property rights. An action brought as a Constitutional Tort under the ‘Federal Tort Claims Act’ in multiple Federal District Courts across the country is governed by the State eminent domain law where the shareholder’s property was taken (your home state). There is a multitude of case law in every state in the Union covering illegal inverse taking of property by Governments and their agencies. The governments successful defense using the discretionary exemption from Tort Claims in most cases since the 1947 case ‘Elizabeth Dalehite, et al. v. United States’ does not apply here. The SEC does not have discretion to suspend the settlement process (Grandfathering), even temporarily as they claim. The bottom line is they are vulnerable here. An agency with a strained budget, 1,500 mostly inexperienced attorneys, that brings 500 new enforcement actions per year would crack under the burden of 50 or 100 or 500 Constitutional Tort cases brought against it. The real benefit of such cases would be court ordered discovery of the short selling data that the SEC routinely denies shareholders, issuers and the media, under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act). The first survival of a motion to dismiss could alter the landscape.
In a perfect world: the Sec’s auditorium on February 13th would be filled with a silent lynch mob of aggrieved shareholders (CMKX shareholders welcome), the 13 State Securities Regulators who I would introduce as dignitaries one by one to the Commissioners, CEO’s of other victim companies, the media, congressional staff assistants, and our rock star advocates Byrne, Burell, Patch, Obrien (with or without the rabbit suit), Faulk, DeWayne, and Ferrara. My apologies if I missed somebody. My well rehearsed presentation would have had input from attorneys, State Regulators, and others and would have been released to the media ahead of time. I would have paper hand outs and a CD’s of evidence documents for media and congressional staffers to take away with them. The 13 State NASAA Consortium would be holding a press conference at a nearby hotel at Noon that day announcing their Joint Initiative and possibly the filing of a few cases against the miscreants in a few states. Finally the SEC would admit they are outgunned beg the Senate Banking Committee for help, we get our hearings, new clearing and settlement and Hedge Fund legislation, and a workout plan to settle the trades once and for all.
In the real world: I’ll take what I can get and I’ll soldier on! I encourage and welcome your comments and your help. This is our fight! The future for our children may depend on what we do here today!
Sincerely,
Rodney E. (Rod) Young
Eagletech Communications, Inc.
7241 NW 6 ST
Plantation, Fl 33317
Office: 954-584-9665 X101
Cell: 954-295-0136
Fax: 954-583-3309
ryoung@eagletech1.com
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:53:43 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 12:14 PM EST Msg. 623761 of 623789 (This msg. is a reply to 623751 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # prudential way, what does that mean to you my friends: "The SEC has recently been involved in a very proactive (some might even say prudential) exercise with respect to the issue of fails in the OTC derivatives markets."
oh what is coming out on thursday, isn't it otc derivatives holdings and the implications of them. If they are holding refco numbers and bigger do you think wallsteet would crumble, yes. Refco had if I remember right ten billion in naked shorts, and that is not including what it would actually cost to buy those securities back, it would be easily ten times that and would have caused a market run as traders are not dumb. They have exploited the naked shorting because it was easy and they just got away with it, it is that simple. I am talking about the piling on after they realized that the dtcc was doing why can't we, and boom a few years later it was rampant because wallstreet is greedy scum and don't care about retail investors at all they just do what makes money on our backs. So if refco and eagletech and others who bought their floats back started a wave of covering what would hav e happened. There is too much stock to cover and too many that know about it to cover on the market it is that simple. What would have happened say they had to buy back the shares of one company, we all would have known about it and the word would have spread like wildfire, that is the way the market works as the word gets out on the boards in hours not days.
The level three books come out, the auditors and accountants have to be accountable as many are watching, the short better be taken care of or the word will then be out, the loses will be huge as they had to borrow money to buy back naked shares imo to get out of this mess and there is so much more they did wrong that should come out as well.
We know john ol'quinn has a possible four trillion dollar classaction going with open and shut evidence, their own trading records, game set and match. Now is it time to see what they did or are they going to continue to hide the trillions in naked shares they had to do something about that the world knows about. I can't actually believe the dtc admitted they fail everyday day in and day out, it is like your bank going we screw up 1% of the time so good luck, oh and we just keep those assets as we never ever intend to fix it. Now bub said this was an open and shut case if we threw a lawsuit on everyone he didn't think they wanted it to go to court, that is if I remember right. The fact that eagletech and others filed lawsuits that look open and shut and we obviously have the same records for cmkx that is for dam sure, then since we didn't do that and are going the root we are going says deals were made and there is non-disclosure and john o'quinn's silence says his case must be going well, as does our silence of course.
We have all waited for years pretty much knowing something amazing was going to happen when it finally does come out and it does appear although I have said this years ago but it does appear that we are close to some conclusion to the whole mess. It seems like they could hide this forever but we all know they just can't, between now and dec 17th we should be out of the dark, maybe early next year. If we are not I really think more action is necessary for our sake!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:54:32 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 13 Nov 2007, 12:01 PM EST Msg. 623755 of 623789 (This msg. is a reply to 623740 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gus you are right on that statue of limitation. The Statue of Limitation does not start until discovery. Discovery has not been made to the victims as of yet. - - - - -
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 12:16 PM EST Msg. 623762 of 623789 (This msg. is a reply to 623755 by snoopstock613.) Jump to msg. # snoop and on top of that the sec grandfathered a felony, they knew they couldn't do that, and if it was serious someone on our side would have just fought it in court and won easily! the fact they didn't spells out that the clause was for a purpose and it was and it going would always coincide with us, the end of the whole ordeal, and the outing of how they fixed this. There is no covers they made deals imo, but if it is not shown in level three then that is bullchit - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:55:07 GMT -5
Thanks to mgl of millionaires..............................
By: snoopstock613 13 Nov 2007, 12:09 PM EST Msg. 623759 of 623790 Jump to msg. # Gus do you remember which poster stated awhile ago that either Etrade or TD Ameritrade were going to merge and one would no longer be around? - - - - -
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 12:20 PM EST Msg. 623766 of 623790 (This msg. is a reply to 623759 by snoopstock613.) Jump to msg. # snoop I have posted that myself and what I have heard, you know if you phone enough sometimes people know stuff lol. The information has been locked down tight but deals have been made imo to survive the biggest fraud ever, the counterfeiting of the stock market. Hard to believe they just admit they do it and on and on it goes, the senator's azzes are also on the line as although they pretend like everyone else that this is no big deal they know the truth that you and I know, it is in the trillions and involves all of wallstreet and organized crime, and the evidence is already in!
I was told etrade and ameritrade would merge and etrade would make it but man it doesn't look good and etrade must have way more than a billion in write offs coming, way way more imo. - - - - -
By: cpeel777 13 Nov 2007, 12:04 PM EST Msg. 623757 of 623790 Jump to msg. # Gus, then who is holding all of the money for the fails covered, including CMKX? - - - - -
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 12:24 PM EST Msg. 623768 of 623790 (This msg. is a reply to 623757 by cpeel777.) Jump to msg. # cpell777 you read the sec's own words they have taken care of the old fails, that means bought them. The money is obviously sealed with the other cases, john o'quinn has the quietest multi trillion dollar high profile case in history doesn't he. I just want to see the level three and see if they have to show what happened or if they are still hiding things, if they are still hiding what they have already admitted is a multi trillion dollar problem. Is it a coincidence that this comes out days before the 35 day cover period, where there is not one cover by the way. Funny nobody is saying anything about that on cnbc, not a word about just how weird that is!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:55:51 GMT -5
Thanks mgl............................
By: rosencrantz2010 12 Nov 2007, 07:41 PM EST Msg. 623558 of 623790 (This msg. is a reply to 623544 by oil.ipo.) Jump to msg. # oil,
the problem with all these song titles and lyrics is that in the end they really have come to mean,,,nothing.
for example, the lyrics of the song you just posted,,, do you really want us to take those lyrics literally? is this it? is this the end? is everything going to happen now?
or, instead, do you mean that the lyrics are referring to something that might mean what they say but not really exactly what they are saying?
are you trying to tell us the event is going to happen tonight? or is it going to happen tomorrow? or is it going to happen this month,,, or maybe next month,,, or maybe early next year?
is "the waiting" really over? i doubt it. and that is the whole problem with this song title and lyric thing that so many people seem to be hung up on. (it's as though people can't express themselves using their own words. that's sad.) these songs have all proven nothing. if you can show where any of them have been prophetic please show me.
for the last few years i've read all of the song titles and the lyrics and have been excited by many of them, but sad to say they have all turned out to be empty promises. with out a doubt, they have been truly empty,,, if not downright lies.
i hope this latest song lyric proves to be true,,, tomorrow? (or when were you saying this was going to be true? tonight? when does "the waiting is over" begin to take effect?) oil, i'm hoping for this month just like you, but i'm guessing we still have a ways to go.
unfortunately for all of us that have been here for the last four years, posting a song title and its lyrics doesn't mean a d**n thing and certainly hasn't meant a d**n thing over that entire time,,, and yet we've been led to believe that secret, important messages were being conveyed in the titles of songs. a lot of people have been played as saps with these song titles all that time.
- - - - - By: oil.ipo 13 Nov 2007, 01:14 PM EST Msg. 623785 of 623790 (This msg. is a reply to 623558 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Quite the opposite Rosencrantz. I am no fortuneteller. I am sick of much of the BS. My "this is it" has more to do with this better be it, because the team utilized the shareholders IMHO to extract maximum value for their intended purposes of what we all know to be true today (for the most part), and they more than received what they paid for in this massive down line of unprecedented support. Plus I feel that we have been used like in a SCIENCE EXPERIMENT. There is nothing more for the shareholders to do, and so... this is it.
I made my donation in the marketplace. My wife made her donation in the market place. My children also, and my dog. We all did it with full cognitive ability, just the same we played by the rules of fair conduct, while I believe "OTHERS" DIDN'T.
I also feel that we participated in a MARKET REFORM involving some reciprocity for my investments in the market, time, interest on my cash, compensation in the form of restitution, punitive damages for the participation in this science experiment most of all.
PLEASE PAY US
AIMHO2
Mega/Oil
« Last Edit: Today at 1:37pm by mgl »
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:56:22 GMT -5
From mgl of millionaires...............................
By: snoopstock613 13 Nov 2007, 12:25 PM EST Msg. 623770 of 623791 (This msg. is a reply to 623762 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # They are ALL guilty. They all KNEW what was going on and did nothing to stop it. - - - - -
By: gusjarvis 13 Nov 2007, 01:34 PM EST Msg. 623790 of 623791 (This msg. is a reply to 623770 by snoopstock613.) Jump to msg. # snoop also in eagletech rico case the sec is absent isn't it, or maybe I missed in in all those pages of evidence of the system fraud that happened. That should tell you deals were made and if you look at the time frame of when they handed their evidence into the secret service you will know that the sec purged itself after and in the end had to aid our side in stopping this. If they were still the enemy they would be in court right now as they were caught big time
« Last Edit: Today at 1:38pm by mgl »
"All I want is the truth... Just gimme some truth..." - John Lennon
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 13, 2007 16:56:57 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 13 Nov 2007, 02:14 PM EST Msg. 623795 of 623802 (This msg. is a reply to 623785 by oil.ipo.) Jump to msg. # GO JACBERT!~
I do credit ACCA with saying that "This is by far the Greatest Shareholder Base in the WORLD!"
Pleasure to be a part of something like this!~
Mega/Oil, and family.
THIS IS IT
|
|