|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 14, 2008 21:36:15 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI Who controlled John Edwards??... « Thread Started Today at 6:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If Edwards ran the CMKX show behind the scenes and told First Global what to do and given that First Global remains the TA for CMKX despite the SEC actions, then we need to know WHO controlled/controls our Mr. Edwards. Obviously the SEC, DOJ, NASD, etc. etc. are after BIGGER FISH than Edwards because in the scheme of CMKX things a $33 million judgement is PEANUTS. If we the shareholders are about to be provided VINDICATION by way of financial compensation, then it would stand to reason that the BIGGER FISH have been caught and dealt with? Who is/are the BIGGER FISH? Will it ever be DISCLOSED? There is an old Vegas saying: There is lots of money in Vegas, but don't ask where it came from because you probably don't want to know. Oaks (aimho) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20993tuscansun DIAMOND JEDI Re: Who controlled John Edwards??... « Reply #5 Today at 7:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Edwards is a Herring... yup, there are Big Fish he was dangled in front of for some long time, imo... is that the answer you were looking for... and Yup... no doubt in this womans mind that we are gonna see the Fall Guys the SEC dangled doofus in front of .... its called Triple STING....... common Oaks, you're a tad late to the party or in the caboose of the STING TRAIN where Hindsight is available... Whatcha gettin' at...? Spit it out...! When did you SEE the Light ? ain't it GRAND? aimho Tuscan millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20993
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 14, 2008 21:40:52 GMT -5
IceCrush Mod Squad Make a backup copy: portfolio « Thread Started Today at 9:04pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's just a thought, but based on the post made by Silverbullet, perhaps there might be mix ups in the system. Just to be on the safe side..............make a back up copy of your portfolio. Who knows, stranger things have happened. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ay&thread=20989silverbulletgirl Midnite to 2am tonight TDAmeritade OUTAGE « Thread Started Today at 3:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scheduled Outage to Positions, Balances, and Order Status Information Access to positions, balances, and order status on the website and IVR phone system will be unavailable from midnight to 2 am ET on July 15, 2008, as we implement system enhancements. just a heads up just printed out my portfolio just to be SAFE. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20996
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 14, 2008 21:42:31 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI Why is the SHADOW BANKING SYSTEM relevant to CMKX? « Thread Started Today at 7:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let's pick a number and folks it is JUST A NUMBER purely for illustrative purposes. The number is .54 per share only because it is so outrageous and has been tossed around numerous times before. Using the 700 or so billion outstanding that translates to approx. $375 billion buckaroos. IMO, the ONLY way this type of money could be EXTRACTED from the financial system without reaking complete havoc would be from the SHADOW BANKING SYSTEM of derivatives and other HIGHLY LEVERAGED financial instruments. What if we have been able to STING the SYSTEM somehow? To see CMKX rise like a phoenix from the financial ashes of destruction would sure be a thing to behold. Oaks (aimho) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20995
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 14, 2008 21:43:55 GMT -5
tuscansun DIAMOND JEDI Re: Why is the SHADOW BANKING SYSTEM relevant to C « Reply #3 Today at 7:16pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What if ....?? Those two words are silly words to use at this point in the game.... oaks DIAMOND JEDI Re: Why is the SHADOW BANKING SYSTEM relevant to C « Reply #4 Today at 7:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well Tuscan I only use "what if" because as yet, despite how we feel, want, and perhaps expect etc., none of us have been financially rewarded as CMKX shareholders. Oaks (aimho) millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ay&thread=20995
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:08:05 GMT -5
from the RB conglomerate board.....
By: my69z 13 Jul 2008, 06:28 PM EDT Msg. 32845 of 32876 (This msg. is a reply to 32832 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # Klon,,,,
thanks...and don't even have a clue what your talking about with Tyler
lol
By: klonopin2mg 14 Jul 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 32851 of 32876 (This msg. is a reply to 32845 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # hey chris',
let's just say i just thought you had a better feeling than i do concerning the "happenings" in tyler...
while i reserve judgement on tyler only because i know BF to be a competent attorney, i've not been pleased at all with any of the work done in tyler from day one.......
i just hope the inconsistencies, frequent incompetency and say nothing FAQs are done with an honorable purpose for "ALL" bonafide shareholders in the end/new beginings. we'll know more soon enough and i'm always open minded (benefit of doubt). let's see what happens next! Entourage?
i always enjoy reading your posts. have listened to many of your MP3 takes and appreciate all your positive efforts.
Enjoy Your Week!
klon, and i'd love a "$$" divy.e
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:20:41 GMT -5
By: chrisl666 14 Jul 2008, 06:01 PM EDT Msg. 741893 of 742004 (This msg. is a reply to 741892 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # gusjarvis Bud Burrell is a blabbering idiot for God's sake I would not think you would fall for his stupidity?
By: gusjarvis 14 Jul 2008, 06:16 PM EDT Msg. 741896 of 742002 (This msg. is a reply to 741893 by chrisl666.) Jump to msg. # chrisl sean hackman, flannigan, walters john edwards, at least all turned. Without bud we know this already just through the og and noahltl's dd, they roled before the share raises, so yes we do know that before cmkx the shell even traded that these informants were already in the stock. And yes that proves like mark faulk and bud said, this was a major sting operation. And like our current attorney hodges said we trapped the largest short ever. Pretty fing easy to see, pretty easy to see we are fine, pretty easy to see the pr's were used for the sting and have to be good, pretty easy to see the og updates were right and we have the goods and oil, pretty nice to be in cmkx right now.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:34:34 GMT -5
I really don't see what Reality Bytes finds so d*mn funny about this post concerning Alan C or for that matter ANYONE being blackballed from voicing their opinion. This still is America right?
By: reality.bytes 14 Jul 2008, 01:54 PM EDT Msg. 741802 of 742015 Jump to msg. # ROFLMAO....
By: AlanC 10 Jul 2008, 12:58 PM EDT Msg. 104736 of 104779 (This msg. is a reply to 104733 by sharonb.) Jump to msg. #
sharonb: A couple of weeks ago I sent Chariman Cox an email suggesting that some SEC officials should have RICO charges brought against them since they have known of the naked shorting/counterfeiting/FTD problem for years and have failed to stop it. Two days ago I sent him another email which was returned with this message: "The Securities and Exchange Commission's e-mail system has blocked direct transmission of your message. If you believe it is important that your message reach the intended recipient, please call that individual to make other arrangements. Please do not reply to this message by e-mail.
We regret any inconvenience.
**SEC E-mail Administrator**"
In addition when the comment period on SHO was extended I posted my thoughts along with the Sanity Check Commentary directly on their website and my comments were never published. Who would have thought our SEC would resort to this? Sad commentary imho! - - - - -
By: mdnj_38 14 Jul 2008, 07:44 PM EDT Msg. 741926 of 742029 (This msg. is a reply to 741802 by reality.bytes.) Jump to msg. # I would like to now why you find this so funny ? You may be ignorant to this' but these people work for us ! Yes US' AlanC, You, Me. and every other American. Where the BOSS they are the Workers!! Get it now ? Time we remind these people with our vote.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:38:09 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 14 Jul 2008, 08:12 PM EDT Msg. 741933 of 742033 Jump to msg. # those promoting that bud burrell interview need to listen to bud a little closer. he doesn't talk about cmkx all that much. and what he does say, which amounts to about 10 seconds at the very end of a 20-30 minute interview is less than supportive of what we've been through. you could almost take what he says about us several ways. i have to admit to being a bit disappointed in the interview. for goodness sake, we heard him go on about 5-10 minutes about all of his accomplishments. when a guy can rattle off every single thing he has done over the past 30-40 years that easily you know he is use to saying it and loves to hear himself talk. good god, does that guy love to hear himself talk, especially about himself.
he's smart and experienced, there is no doubt about that. but i'm afraid that guy has given this talk about 100 times before and he loves giving it. he's got more cliches "then you can shake a stick at." (cliche). LOL
he really didn't say anything about cmkx. he talked a lot about market corruption. if you want to hear about all the ways we are getting shafted then you will enjoy the interview. if you are hoping to hear something of substance about cmkx or our future, good luck.
this guy likes to talk. he is clearly angling for his own talk radio show. and he could easily do it because he is a non-stop motor mouth.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:43:41 GMT -5
C'mon People....... there should be thousands .... but there are only hundreds !!
By: gotoil1870 14 Jul 2008, 09:10 PM EDT Msg. 741957 of 742041 Jump to msg. # I HOPE EVERYONE IS SENDING THEIR COMMENTS INTO THE SEC...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 22:53:40 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 14 Jul 2008, 10:20 PM EDT Msg. 741965 of 742053 Jump to msg. # What if Urby was made to look like he was gambling and throwing all the company money away? Remember nothing is ever as it seems. Do you remember me stating a few times about the power of how magic works?
One must learn the difference between Illusions and Disillusions!
Great job by the whole operation!
By: amos8111 14 Jul 2008, 11:24 PM EDT Msg. 742011 of 742055 (This msg. is a reply to 741965 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # mq, right nothing is ever as it seems.. so you seem like a positive long shareholder but in reality you are a cassavant shield posting all this BS to make things appear better than they actually are, right?
amos
By: mquietstorm3 14 Jul 2008, 11:42 PM EDT Msg. 742040 of 742055 (This msg. is a reply to 742038 by amos8111.) Jump to msg. # amos
Are you implying that you have lost total confidence in what you own and that the system as been right all along? No? - - - - -
By: amos8111 14 Jul 2008, 11:50 PM EDT Msg. 742054 of 742057 (This msg. is a reply to 742040 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # mq,
Nothing is ever as it seems.
amos
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 23:00:59 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 14 Jul 2008, 11:53 PM EDT Msg. 742058 of 742070 (This msg. is a reply to 548867 by amos8111.) Jump to msg. # amos
Do you remember this: read reply
By: amos8111 19 May 2007, 11:08 AM EDT Msg. 548867 of 742071 (This msg. is a reply to 548857 by carquest44.) Jump to msg. # Carquest44,
Thanks for your response, but I am sure you know that many here would like to know more of the specifics of uncle’s involvement, details, details, and more details..
You did say that he had signed off on whatever he was doing and made inferences that it was positive for shareholders.
My only request is that you or uncle carquest contact Kevin or Bill if you already haven’t do so. After all, they are the company now and your uncle worked for CMKM so it is not out of line that new company officials would want to speak to him about past work.
Again thanks for your response,
amos
By: amos8111 15 Jul 2008, 12:01 AM EDT Msg. 742077 of 742086 (This msg. is a reply to 742058 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # mq,
Again, nothing is ever as it seems. So carquest44's information wasn't what it seemed to be.
amos
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 23:02:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jul 14, 2008 23:23:19 GMT -5
C'mon People....... there should be thousands .... but there are only hundreds !!By: gotoil1870 14 Jul 2008, 09:10 PM EDT Msg. 741957 of 742041Jump to msg. # I HOPE EVERYONE IS SENDING THEIR COMMENTS INTO THE SEC... I tried to send one to senator@shelby.senate.gov and it wouldn,t go. whats up?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 23:36:23 GMT -5
Hellllppppp.......errrr.. duh... I go to the link page.... but what do I click to listen ?? must I register to listen?? TIAMona Lisa Smiles DIAMOND DIGGER I got a call« Thread Started Today at 10:18pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- media.putfile.com/Money-will-be-released-anytime
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 14, 2008 23:47:36 GMT -5
C'mon People....... there should be thousands .... but there are only hundreds !!By: gotoil1870 14 Jul 2008, 09:10 PM EDT Msg. 741957 of 742041Jump to msg. # I HOPE EVERYONE IS SENDING THEIR COMMENTS INTO THE SEC... I tried to send one to senator@shelby.senate.gov and it wouldn,t go. whats up? dunno know what's up with Shelby's link.. but........ Why don;t you post one to SEC comments..... here's the link (thanx to 100-1.) Here is the link to make a comment... www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/ruling-commen....egulation%20SHOand here is the link where your comment will post.... (may take a day or 2 before it hits ) Here is the comment page itself... www.sec.gov/comments/s7-19-07/s71907.shtmlSingle
|
|