|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 22, 2008 22:58:09 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 22 Jul 2008, 10:17 PM EDT Msg. 744680 of 744693 (This msg. is a reply to 744678 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # no sir, not incompetent analylzing.....
we were discussing the past, not the present in my analogy...
if you'd like my present analogy, feel free to ask, o.k.?
yours:
"But I doubt theere's gonna be a 5 cent payout....possible??,,,sure...anything is.....but doubt it"
is that an analogy ...i wouldn't call that Incompetent!
but then, i try my best to be polite!
Good Night Chris!
chuck
By: klonopin2mg 22 Jul 2008, 10:23 PM EDT Msg. 744681 of 744693 (This msg. is a reply to 744678 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # not appreciating the unecessary criticism....just want to make it clear that my analogy was in reference to #2, not #1 and i clearly stated in my opening sentence that it was only in "fun".
Enjoy The Night!
chuck
By: my69z 22 Jul 2008, 10:29 PM EDT Msg. 744682 of 744693 (This msg. is a reply to 744681 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # LOL,,,no no no....not criticism,,,,LOL
By: klonopin2mg 22 Jul 2008, 10:49 PM EDT Msg. 744685 of 744693 (This msg. is a reply to 744683 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # cool chris' thanks, this is what i don't like about mb posts....so easy to misinterpret what another is thinking......
i took this as the 'criticism', "Incompetent analyzing....."
hope you see where i was coming from....i told you i was beat and my post was "just for fun"...and i thought you were being harsh in your response.....thanks for reply...i was hoping i hadn't offended you with my post....we don't have to agree on everything..that we both understand.
oh well, we'll get over this too.lol
Have A Great Night Chris!
past my bedtime tonight..later bud.... but i'm in favor of more than a nickle, remember "anythings possible" ;-)chuck
By: my69z 22 Jul 2008, 10:31 PM EDT Msg. 744683 of 744701 Jump to msg. # all i was doin was typin......lol,,,but wouldn' tturned down a nickel either,,,,,just for the record lol
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:00:26 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 23 Jul 2008, 12:23 AM EDT Msg. 744695 of 744702 (This msg. is a reply to 744658 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jfarn combine that with andy's post, which is first hand info for once, that roger worked with leslie on this. It is more obvious than anyone can imagine, plus bud has said now that there were no less than three federal gov't informants in cmkx before it traded. They caught hackman and others in 2003 or earlier, as kevin did say that oh just maybe some of the players got caught in operation uptick in eagletech days. Didn't andy also say maheu was at the party. Sad we still have to have faq's of bullchit, when it is so easy to see what we have, I mean the new cmkx doesn't even have access to their own work they did for the old cmkx and the team after roger.
Just because they can end this like this, they did
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:01:05 GMT -5
By: aladin99 23 Jul 2008, 01:38 AM EDT Msg. 744696 of 744702 Jump to msg. # Whoever could not pay us must file BK and go to jail....
By: dblwmtolle 23 Jul 2008, 02:01 AM EDT Msg. 744697 of 744702 (This msg. is a reply to 744696 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Bull, aladin, the money has already been collected! Yeah, right. Guess you finally got over that one and now you believe me when I told you there was no money collected. Man you are slow.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:02:40 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 23 Jul 2008, 02:10 AM EDT Msg. 744698 of 744702 (This msg. is a reply to 744678 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # chris why would you doubt five cents, that is small compared to the pps they could have easily put this at. Andy said a four billion dollar deal, and the real o/s minus the unregistered is what under ten billion, hmmmmmm, that equals just about about? before the squeeze and while at least three federal gov't informants where working the stock before the share raises with roger glenn! It is all in the prs, while if it isn't there is a huge fing problem right, as they used them for the sting, along with the boards
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:03:08 GMT -5
By: bobhwang 23 Jul 2008, 06:45 AM EDT Msg. 744699 of 744702 Jump to msg. # .07
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:21:34 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI The question of how big the WIN could be... « Thread Started Today at 1:39am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A bit of a rambling post here which responds to some of the questions posed to me on other threads. I find when these threads get too long it is simpler to start a new one...... I never signed any non-disclosure documents because I was never an insider. As for any large payout amounts it can only be answered by how deep we may be into the Shadow Banking System and whether there was considerable leverage used to enhance the return. Take $100 million and leverage it 100 times in the derivative game and you come out with a whack of moola if it works. Do that a couple of times and holy greenbacks batman!! Is that what happened? Don't know but it is the only way it could derive what would be IMO an outrageous return for shareholders to happen with 700 billion shares outstanding. We have all heard the chatter of trusts, revocable rights, etc. etc. It is all possible and plausible, but as yet unproven and verified. Question is HOW LONG are shareholders prepared to wait this out before it simply becomes TOO LONG? Many people who are bona fide shareholders by the cert pull and registration with the TF as requested, have simply put CMKX on the shelf and moved on with their lives. They realize if something does happen they will find out soon enough. Some of the forums, etc. are really not about CMKX that much now. Just the way it is and that is OK too because many of you have met some other great people along the way, who share other common interests, ie there is way more to life than just CMKX. So keep the faith and keep believing, but don't let holding out for CMKX run your life. I know most of you don't but I do worry for those who do? Oaks (aimho) « Last Edit: Today at 1:40am by oaks » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21197
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:29:33 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI The question of how big the WIN could be... « Thread Started Today at 1:39am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A bit of a rambling post here which responds to some of the questions posed to me on other threads. I find when these threads get too long it is simpler to start a new one...... I never signed any non-disclosure documents because I was never an insider. As for any large payout amounts it can only be answered by how deep we may be into the Shadow Banking System and whether there was considerable leverage used to enhance the return. Take $100 million and leverage it 100 times in the derivative game and you come out with a whack of moola if it works. Do that a couple of times and holy greenbacks batman!! Is that what happened? Don't know but it is the only way it could derive what would be IMO an outrageous return for shareholders to happen with 700 billion shares outstanding. We have all heard the chatter of trusts, revocable rights, etc. etc. It is all possible and plausible, but as yet unproven and verified. Question is HOW LONG are shareholders prepared to wait this out before it simply becomes TOO LONG? Many people who are bona fide shareholders by the cert pull and registration with the TF as requested, have simply put CMKX on the shelf and moved on with their lives. They realize if something does happen they will find out soon enough. Some of the forums, etc. are really not about CMKX that much now. Just the way it is and that is OK too because many of you have met some other great people along the way, who share other common interests, ie there is way more to life than just CMKX. So keep the faith and keep believing, but don't let holding out for CMKX run your life. I know most of you don't but I do worry for those who do? Oaks (aimho) « Last Edit: Today at 1:40am by oaks » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21197toproc25 DIAMOND DIGGER Status: offline Re: The question of how big the WIN could be... « Reply #2 Today at 1:58am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY!!! why do you like to tease us??? if you cared for your fellow shareholders you would get us an absolute no longer then and not before then date!!!!! that would make everyone happy!!! it would be easy for company to give us a date!! but imo they are still playing with shorty....and imo they are using you to bluff shorty....!!!!!!! they went through the rest of the wanna be gurus'...so now imo they might be using you.....when will the games end?? when will the company have the gonads to end it .....and quit bluffing shorty?? they have the evidence....!! don't play the game if you are affraid to end it....!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 6:32:13 GMT -5
stockrich DIAMOND MINER Re: The question of how big the WIN could be... « Reply #4 Today at 2:41am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think what Andy is trying to say is, it would take something like a "shadow banking system" to achieve some of the crazy numbers that have been talked about for years, like: $1.54, $2.00, $3.00 and so forth. Andy himself, was always a proponent of the ".005 cent payout" however, when he would make that statement was often booed right off the board, no one wanted to hear that. So even if he doubled or quadrupled his half cent payout...Where are we?...1 cent...2 cent? A lot of people here would still be woefully upset. I believe a 'conservative' upbeat, positive projection for a stock purchased at an average selling price of .0001 would be 10 cents, that's a 100,000% return for each share. However, there would probably be a riot and a call to burn down America if that was the announced payout per share. So (and I am only theorizing) Andy may be stating one potential way that he can see a 'amazing return' paying those highly touted dream figures...that makes sense to him. Stockrich. ming DIAMOND MINER Re: The question of how big the WIN could be... « Reply #5 Today at 2:47am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- basically what andy is saying is that the ROI could be astronomical, IF...etc, but he has no idea when it will possibly eventually come... so basically he knows as much as we do. lets repeat, all together, "WE ARE IN GOOD HANDS" if you do that often enough, it starts to act like a mantra : it gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling... self-hypnosis... while we wait. and wait. and wait. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21197
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 19:30:48 GMT -5
oaks DIAMOND JEDI Re: The question of how big the WIN could be... « Reply #65 Today at 7:21pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well if nothing else I can sure generate discussion...LOL I just felt it important to clarify and to a degree detract a bit from my recent high optimism. I simply have no desire to mislead anyone if I can help it. Like I said, I remain firm in my belief that CMKX is a sting that started long ago and I continue to believe shareholders will come out on top. And YES, I truly wish I could come to this forum and state I know how much we are getting and when it will happen. Oaks (aimho) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21197&page=4That he does. The thread is four pages long!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 19:33:18 GMT -5
drillbit Diamond Finder and Miner JMO as to Mr. Maheu « Thread Started Today at 1:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMO Bush SR. contacted IBM. SR. was the head of the CIA and knows Mr. Maheu well going back years. MY POINT? I think that the two Bush's want a legacy and I don't mean this Fall. All won't come out until the Freedom of Information Act timeframe allows. A legacy for Bush and a last huge hurrah for Iron Bob. Actually, it MAY be IBM's biggest job. NO way UC has access to anyone that has the clout of E&A, Stocklien, Maheu etal. WITHOUT a big power initiating same. Again, this goes back before 2000 and before Jarvis sold the shell to Edwards etal. It was after Mr. Maheu was contacted/contracted, that he picked CMKI/x to use as his vehicle. cmkxaholic Diamond Finder Re: JMO as to Mr. Maheu « Reply #1 Today at 3:04pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If we're waiting on the freedom of information act, won't that take a good two or more years? I don't know when the FOIA is supposedly taking effect. Let us know. Thanks. drillbit Diamond Finder and Miner Re: JMO as to Mr. Maheu « Reply #2 Today at 3:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What I posted has NOTHING to do with any payout! My premise is, ALWAYS has been, that CMKX will NEVER be seen IN THE PRESENT as a vehicle to stop NSING*. IF we are to be made whole+, it can not/won't be made public. *JMO, but you may want to read more or change an agenda. GLTU « Last Edit: Today at 4:14pm by drillbit » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=5645
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 19:41:42 GMT -5
twistcapper Administrator Re: Andy clarifies his source.....FYI - updated + « Reply #7 Today at 8:48am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: The source still thinks something is going to happen fairly soon. But the source IMO has no absolute definitive dates nor amounts or that is my take at least. Some feel differently but it is the same when as yet..nothing has happened in an official manner to confirm and verify. As for shareholder pain and suffering....I agree completely it seems very unjustified if behind the scenes things are settled but for some reason they won't pull the trigger. Oaks (aimho) cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=20287
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 19:56:58 GMT -5
By: jfarn 23 Jul 2008, 10:29 AM EDT Msg. 744751 of 745007 (This msg. is a reply to 744658 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # Koch's work: Signed off by Kevin... "In fact, Mr. Glenn did nothing to help the company resolve its SEC problems. It has been discovered in the last few weeks (which was the spring of 07) that Mr. Glenn actually wrote legal opinions authorizing billions of free trading stock and assisting the company to increase its authorized shares from 500 billion to 800 billion shares. The only information released to the public about Mr. Glenn was his hiring to help with SEC reporting problems.
Koch, Kevin, Bill, Leslie: +/- 50% of unregistered shares to hit the market and Dvorak is it?
By: klonopin2mg 23 Jul 2008, 11:23 AM EDT Msg. 744770 of 745008 (This msg. is a reply to 744751 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jf' "Dvorak is it?"LOL
making those "unregistered" more valuable perhaps in the sense of expediting a certain "mutual interest" payment. Don't think we'll ever see Roger on an action from the SEC or DOJ, no?
you listed four, and i'd think there to be quite few more that could be added to that list...even a couple more in TX due to increased volume in the stock solicited by remarks/purportedly facts.
thanks for coming out last night and today, don't be a stranger...
you have important information to share...
i'd like to see the word "imminent".... just maybe that word will be released rather than...the "proverbial" "SooN" from a source other than tyler!
Bobhwang's .07 = happy shareholder, but i was told "shareholders would be very happy" so my expectations are a bit higher, but not unrealistic....perhaps the "$$" is just part of the final outcome. for as long as this is dragging out...i would suggest a better outcome.
any thoughts on that subject? that you might post, obviously it would just be an opinion, no? ;-) (i don't expect a response to speculatory questions.lol)
Have A Great CMKX Day!
chuck
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 20:03:31 GMT -5
By: aladin99 23 Jul 2008, 03:09 PM EDT Msg. 744801 of 745011 Jump to msg. # UC and us knew NSS 5 years before the system could...We could predict that the NSS disease the worst disease ever in the history of the earth. Every company should call for the worldwide cert pull like we did which is impossible but the SEC should mention about cert pull and investors must obtain physical certificates for every stock that they own.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jul 23, 2008 20:05:54 GMT -5
I sure wonder why Stoecklein and Roger Glen were not named in any of the LITIGATION??...seems FUNNY if they were KEY in authorizing the BILLIONS of ILLEGAL shares doesn't it?...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 23, 2008 20:06:43 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 23 Jul 2008, 02:10 AM EDT Msg. 744698 of 745016 (This msg. is a reply to 744678 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # chris why would you doubt five cents, that is small compared to the pps they could have easily put this at. Andy said a four billion dollar deal, and the real o/s minus the unregistered is what under ten billion, hmmmmmm, that equals just about about? before the squeeze and while at least three federal gov't informants where working the stock before the share raises with roger glenn! It is all in the prs, while if it isn't there is a huge fing problem right, as they used them for the sting, along with the boards
By: my69z 23 Jul 2008, 04:40 PM EDT Msg. 744880 of 745017 (This msg. is a reply to 744698 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gus,,,i don't make pps predictions.
|
|