|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 18:55:54 GMT -5
iq Administrator What is Bill going to do next ?« Thread Started Today at 1:31pm » I would imagine that once Bill is ready he will be assisted by someone like Mason Alan Dinehart III, RFC FEND - A Securities Expert Witness in Arbitration Telephone: (310) 641-0377; Outside CA (800) 484-6930 (7428) Email: fendmase@ca.rr.com www.fend.comAs we all know Kevin is giving up the CEO role to get things moving. The only possible scenario is that Bill will be joining forces with someone as well who can aid him use the data he has aquired in the court of law, does anyone know someone really good to aid Bill and take this to the next level ? What are your thoughs can Bill handle this on his own ? CMKX To DA MOON.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 18, 2008 18:57:32 GMT -5
Here I lightened it up a bit...looks like UC alright...HAPPY too...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) 100-1 on another board someone said they had enlarged it and could tell this guy had front teeth missing. Does it look that way to you? TIA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 19:00:05 GMT -5
IceCrush
ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD *****
Re: weekend (and beyond) Buzz Talk 8/16 « Reply #26 Today at 1:32pm »
Today at 10:14am, atb wrote: Acording to lilburrito Stoecklein handed over the Entourage Cert. Is this true, or can anyone verify that this is true?
By: lilburrito0 16 Aug 2008, 04:59 PM EDT Msg. 751938 of 752028 Jump to msg. #
Yeah! _ Right! _ Then why did Stoecklein hand over the ETGMF certificate to the new committee?
Lilburrito is mostly playing with some correct info and some incorrect info.
Ok what i have already heard.. and i believe to be correct :
Yes entourage wanted their cert back. For that they have to leg go of the claims.
But Stoecklien is the one holding the cert and Emmerson has rigths to the claims.
So all of these people have to be in agreement for this to happen.
Now Pedro is playing with some as you see correct info.. and the rest he makes up is just his games.
Kevin .. anounced only partial positions for a reason. Kevin is realy stepping down. he will only stay as a Chariman of the board.
Which opens positions for new CEO and New president and other board members.
I believe this will be the old team, and the choice of old team, Stoecklien and Emmerson decisions.
Emmerson even may have a position.
pedro is not getting a position.. he is just playing.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Now i believe what we have seen so far is the rest of the tyler positions.. and all others will not be people from tyler choosing.
So the fact that Stoecklien is giving the entourage cert back .. is not like Pedro is tryhing to describe it giving into the powers of tyler .. but just the oposite.
Tyler is really stepping down .
I have also heard that Tyler demanded some moneys.. for all this to happen.. moneys for what? i dont know .. expenses or something else? maybe frizz needs a new tupee?
So now after that is settled . new positions are supposed to be anounced. yes I have info that it is the truth these negotiations have happened.. and cert to go back to entourage.. and other new figures coming into cmkx.
but its nothing like pedro is trying to describe. stinky burrito.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Aug 18, 2008 19:06:02 GMT -5
I blew it up but as far as I can determine he has his lips shut...can't see any teeth in it...but maybe they can produce a better blow up than I...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 19:08:35 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 8:35:43 AM In reply to: puppydotcom who wrote msg# 256407 Post # of 256713 You can be certain we have NSS and you don't want to provide any of the facts till you're ready to make it hurt. The best form of attack is to surprise them ! Posted by: IQ1 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:04:53 AM In reply to: NSDM-forever who wrote msg# 256451 Post # of 256714 This is exactly why you can see Bill is taking his time in documenting the evidence. Seem like people's main objective is to discredit others as sheep even on this board. Having done his research...to prove this while the world will watching under a microscope... LOL Trust me there are a lot of individuals watching this stock even the White house ...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 19:13:32 GMT -5
Posted by: h24ever Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:14:32 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 256615 Post # of 256715 DD from nufced'..... Liability of Stock Brokers and their Supervisors Stock brokers are usually held liable for investor losses under five legal theories: Misrepresentation in connection with the purchase or sale of a security; Selling an unregistered security; Churning the investor's account; Advising the investor to buy stocks that are not suitable for the investor; and Breaching the fiduciary duty owed to the investor. Since stock brokers often do not have the resources to reimburse the investor, it is usually important to find the broker's employer or supervisor also liable to the investor. This is called "secondary liability" and is predicated primarily on the failure of the broker-dealer to supervise the stock broker. fraudlaw.org.bcentralhost.com/Definitions%20and%20concepts/Law%20by%20Topic/Securities/Fraud%20on%20Investors/Stock%20Brokers/broker_liability.htm
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 19:15:48 GMT -5
Posted by: h24ever Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:36:06 AM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 256638 Post # of 256716 136.00 dollar stock and a .0001 stock twist it how ever you want, but when one lil .0001 stock is trading more shares then all the exchanges but together. and brokers don't think anything is wrong lolol Posted by: rics1997 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:25:40 AM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 256630 Post # of 256718 Actually it's not weak. Most brokers agreement in which you personally sign clearly states that you as the buyer are responsible for knowing if the shares are registered or not. Heres an example from a brokers agreement. From E-Trades agreement that you agreed to when you signed up for their service. (s) "Control" or "Restricted" Securities I am responsible for knowing when a security is deemed a Restricted Security. It is my obligation to notify E*TRADE Securities of any and all restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the issuer, the issuer's counsel or any other third party. Prior to placing an order in connection with the sale or transfer of Restricted Securities, I must advise E*TRADE Securities of the status of the securities. I agree to furnish E*TRADE Securities with the necessary documents (including opinions of legal counsel, if requested) to clear legal transfer. I am responsible for all costs associated with processing the security, including the cost to repurchase stock, if I sell stock that is later found to be nontransferable. As such, E*TRADE Securities, at its sole discretion, may require that such securities not be sold or transferred until they first clear legal transfer. I also acknowledge and agree that I am responsible for all reporting obligations with regard to the sale of control or restricted securities, including the filing of Forms 144, 3, 4 and 5. Restricted Securities may not be purchased on margin. I also understand that proceeds from the sale of control of restricted securities may not be made available to me for withdrawal or reinvestment purposes until E*TRADE Securities receives the non-restricted shares back from the Transfer Agent. Even if the necessary documents are furnished in a timely manner, there may be delays with the processing of such securities. I further agree that E*TRADE Securities will not be held liable for delays in the sale or settlement of such securities or the release of proceeds from such sale resulting from the failure of issuer's counsel to provide or to approve any necessary legal opinion, or any delays from the Transfer Agent.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 19:22:19 GMT -5
Posted by: h24ever Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:36:06 AM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 256638 Post # of 256716 136.00 dollar stock and a .0001 stock twist it how ever you want, but when one lil .0001 stock is trading more shares then all the exchanges but together. and brokers don't think anything is wrong lolol Posted by: rics1997 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:25:40 AM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 256630 Post # of 256718 Actually it's not weak. Most brokers agreement in which you personally sign clearly states that you as the buyer are responsible for knowing if the shares are registered or not. Heres an example from a brokers agreement. From E-Trades agreement that you agreed to when you signed up for their service. (s) "Control" or "Restricted" Securities I am responsible for knowing when a security is deemed a Restricted Security. It is my obligation to notify E*TRADE Securities of any and all restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the issuer, the issuer's counsel or any other third party. Prior to placing an order in connection with the sale or transfer of Restricted Securities, I must advise E*TRADE Securities of the status of the securities. I agree to furnish E*TRADE Securities with the necessary documents (including opinions of legal counsel, if requested) to clear legal transfer. I am responsible for all costs associated with processing the security, including the cost to repurchase stock, if I sell stock that is later found to be nontransferable. As such, E*TRADE Securities, at its sole discretion, may require that such securities not be sold or transferred until they first clear legal transfer. I also acknowledge and agree that I am responsible for all reporting obligations with regard to the sale of control or restricted securities, including the filing of Forms 144, 3, 4 and 5. Restricted Securities may not be purchased on margin. I also understand that proceeds from the sale of control of restricted securities may not be made available to me for withdrawal or reinvestment purposes until E*TRADE Securities receives the non-restricted shares back from the Transfer Agent. Even if the necessary documents are furnished in a timely manner, there may be delays with the processing of such securities. I further agree that E*TRADE Securities will not be held liable for delays in the sale or settlement of such securities or the release of proceeds from such sale resulting from the failure of issuer's counsel to provide or to approve any necessary legal opinion, or any delays from the Transfer Agent. Posted by: h24ever Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:48:26 AM In reply to: rics1997 who wrote msg# 256656 Post # of 256718 rickie boy, you just pay attention. A broker CAN NOT sell unreg shares. As a broker that i believe you are, should you not know this call e*trd ask them if you can buy or sell some unreg shares. tia lmaooooo Posted by: rics1997 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 12:23:28 PM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 256660 Post # of 256721 No, I'm not a broker but I did stay at a Holiday Inn express A broker can't knowingly sell a unregistered stock. But if they don't know then they are not responsible and as stated in the legally binding contract you signed with them when you opened your account, they clearly state that you are responsible for knowing if a stock is registered or not. That they are not responsible to find that information out for you. Again if they knowingly sell unregistered stock then that would hold them responsible but how are you going to prove they knew anything. If the TA is saying that they have a valid opinion letter to sell the stock then how would they know.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:23:33 GMT -5
and I agree with ..... more here than meets the eye...Posted by: h24ever Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:58:32 PM In reply to: rics1997 who wrote msg# 256678 Post # of 256721 Thats good then, Bill can call on the boyz to do the 1 2, knock out, I still say theres something more here then ANYONE on this board or any other knows. lets wait and see the end game ??
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:26:34 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:27:15 PM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 256689 Post # of 256723 It should not surprise you once Bill is ready he will be assisted by someone like Mason Alan Dinehart III, RFC FEND - A Securities Expert Witness in Arbitration Telephone: (310) 641-0377; Outside CA (800) 484-6930 (7428) Email: fendmase@ca.rr.com www.fend.com
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:31:00 GMT -5
Posted by: pantherj Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:32:40 PM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 256672 Post # of 256723
It's obvious that Bill "lapdog" Frizell holds nothing. If he did he would have gone to court about it by now. No attorney would sit on a law suit worth a gazillion dollars IF he had the goods. he has nothing. Even that "i don't have to tell the truth on my resume" chic doesn't work for you now.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:34:49 GMT -5
Posted by: rics1997 Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:54:56 PM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 256708 Post # of 256724
I never got these bankruptcy statements. It sort of shows how little Kevin knows about corporations. Why would you file bankruptcy to go under? There is no reason for a corporation to file bankruptcy unless it was trying to reorganize. If you are just going out of business there is absolutely no reason to file BK because incorporating itself protect it's officers and shareholders from civil suits for debt. There is no need to file bankruptcy because of this.
And lets be realistic about this new board. Every one of these people are message board posters that have done nothing but make up theories used to protect Urban in the past and Kevin clones with Phx being on one end of the Kevin spectrum and Cautious being on the nut case side of Kevin. Phxgold up until a year ago was still touting Urban's innocence and giving the def 14 theory that trapped so many and Cautious was still on Pal-talk as of yesterday. They claimed they were going to hire real business people to begin a new company and we ending up with TOGI supporters.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:36:41 GMT -5
Posted by: janice shell Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 8:08:33 PM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 256611 Post # of 256724 Trust me there are a lot of individuals watching this stock even the White house ...Bushy's certainly dumb enough to be a CMKX bagholder, but probably the folks who run his blind trust aren't.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:51:50 GMT -5
By: tylerspy3 18 Aug 2008, 04:56 PM EDT Msg. 752715 of 752973 (This msg. is a reply to 752707 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. # The new CEO should surprise every shareholder
Hmmmmmm.... wonder what Perrymason knows or thinks he knows??
By: perrymason99 18 Aug 2008, 07:48 PM EDT Msg. 752823 of 752972 (This msg. is a reply to 752715 by tylerspy3.) Jump to msg. # I guarantee I won't be surprised.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:54:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 18 Aug 2008, 04:08 PM EDT Msg. 752700 of 752977 Jump to msg. # my69z,
chris,
had a chance to listen to both mp3s. as before, good stuff, and good food for thought.
did i understand correctly in that first one that you suspect the OREO (500mt kimberlite) could really be SHORE's Star kimberlite (500mt also?)?
agree with you about the BOD in the second mp3. why would kevin put posters on the BOD that were pumping fuego a day before the BOD announcement? now that is really on shaky grounds and i certainly wouldn't have advised kevin do anything like that, if that is what he did. these guys have to be as pure as the driven snow in order to avoid any appearance of imporpriety, and it doesn't look like they did that with these picks. too bad. they had a chance to step up the caliber of people and apparently missed the mark and got what in the end are defined as scam pumpers, like fuego could be. but that just a quick assessment since i'm not following that stock, but i've had so many suspicions about so many of the stocks the paltalkers have pumped over the years,,, apart from cmkx.
By: my69z 18 Aug 2008, 07:56 PM EDT Msg. 752832 of 752976 (This msg. is a reply to 752700 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosen,,,," did i understand correctly in that first one that you suspect the OREO (500mt kimberlite) could really be SHORE's Star kimberlite (500mt also?)? "
Nope,,,didn't hear correct...."Star" is 500M +,,,,,so is the one main claim Carina and partner have......i was just point out the identical numbers.
NOt pumping Fuego the day before,,,,,but for quiet a while.And what I was saying was......"Cancio" is tied all into Viashow,,,the company CMKX is now suin.....Cancio owns Fuego,,,,the company Phxgold ahs been allll over for the longest.
My point was.......a BOD member should not be postin on a company that has a CEO tied to a company were now suin.
And actually...NO,,,BOD person should be postin on ANY board....and if u IHUB the postin history,,,,you'll see he was just a postin away during that 5 week span of Kevin sayin he was lookin for a Chairman....to the hirin of these 3 guys.
Hs he posted as of today???....if so,,it'll just continue to prove my point that no BOD should be able to find time to post on some dam msg brd......ever seen Mouseea Tremblay post on a brd??,,,,Mr.Challis??,,,R. Glenn???,,,,it's a simple matter of appearance and looking crediable.
I say if ANY of'em can't stay off a brd now,,,then they get the boot asap
Later
|
|