|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 20:58:36 GMT -5
omg.... a new poster on RB?? ... lol
By: pedro_f*g 18 Aug 2008, 08:08 PM EDT Msg. 752844 of 752979 Jump to msg. # whats new guys
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:01:15 GMT -5
By: tylerspy3 18 Aug 2008, 08:10 PM EDT Msg. 752851 of 752982 (This msg. is a reply to 752843 by tylerspy4.) Jump to msg. # The Entourage Cert is in the same place it has been from day 1. This is not about the Entourage Cert yet but in do time the cert will become a major player in the end run.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:05:24 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 18 Aug 2008, 04:08 PM EDT Msg. 752700 of 752977Jump to msg. # my69z, chris, had a chance to listen to both mp3s. as before, good stuff, and good food for thought. did i understand correctly in that first one that you suspect the OREO (500mt kimberlite) could really be SHORE's Star kimberlite (500mt also?)? agree with you about the BOD in the second mp3. why would kevin put posters on the BOD that were pumping fuego a day before the BOD announcement? now that is really on shaky grounds and i certainly wouldn't have advised kevin do anything like that, if that is what he did. these guys have to be as pure as the driven snow in order to avoid any appearance of imporpriety, and it doesn't look like they did that with these picks. too bad. they had a chance to step up the caliber of people and apparently missed the mark and got what in the end are defined as scam pumpers, like fuego could be. but that just a quick assessment since i'm not following that stock, but i've had so many suspicions about so many of the stocks the paltalkers have pumped over the years,,, apart from cmkx. By: my69z 18 Aug 2008, 07:56 PM EDT Msg. 752832 of 752976(This msg. is a reply to 752700 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosen,,,," did i understand correctly in that first one that you suspect the OREO (500mt kimberlite) could really be SHORE's Star kimberlite (500mt also?)? " Nope,,,didn't hear correct...."Star" is 500M +,,,,,so is the one main claim Carina and partner have......i was just point out the identical numbers. NOt pumping Fuego the day before,,,,,but for quiet a while.And what I was saying was......"Cancio" is tied all into Viashow,,,the company CMKX is now suin.....Cancio owns Fuego,,,,the company Phxgold ahs been allll over for the longest. My point was.......a BOD member should not be postin on a company that has a CEO tied to a company were now suin. And actually...NO,,,BOD person should be postin on ANY board....and if u IHUB the postin history,,,,you'll see he was just a postin away during that 5 week span of Kevin sayin he was lookin for a Chairman....to the hirin of these 3 guys. Hs he posted as of today???....if so,,it'll just continue to prove my point that no BOD should be able to find time to post on some dam msg brd......ever seen Mouseea Tremblay post on a brd??,,,,Mr.Challis??,,,R. Glenn???,,,,it's a simple matter of appearance and looking crediable. I say if ANY of'em can't stay off a brd now,,,then they get the boot asap Later By: nufced 18 Aug 2008, 08:20 PM EDT Msg. 752873 of 752983 Jump to msg. # my69z__you do know that Fuego sued Viashow first, correct?... Case 08-A-569615-C Status ACTIVE Plaintiff Fuego Entertainment Inc Attorney Spear, Edwin R Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Walsh, Jessie Dept. 10 Filed Date 08/14/2008 CMKM filed on the 15th By: my69z 18 Aug 2008, 09:59 PM EDT Msg. 752980 of 752983(This msg. is a reply to 752873 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # Nuf,,,yes,,,and that's not the point....still improper,,,,Cancio was all over Visa with all these other entities that were now suing,,,,,wasn't it also part of the "Columbos" group dd that said deals would be made and then they turn around a sue???...so why can't the same be said for what's goin on with that now?? No reputiable "BOD"'er would even touch this in anyway for a mulitple of reasons...I don't see any other BOD members postin away on a stock day in day out,,,,and especially when short little replies to people can easily be taken as little "insider" crap...and not to mention,,,these guys just pop up outta tha blue.....and even of there was a "committee",,,,,who were they ?? Either way,,,,,,Phx,,Ate and Cautious(?)......don't belong on this BOD. Dose this mean their gonna have a say in who the CEO is then??......bullschit,,,,
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:14:12 GMT -5
for some reason this statemnet makes me think of KW & BF..By: pedro_f*g 18 Aug 2008, 08:58 PM EDT Msg. 752938 of 752985Jump to msg. # now that im thinking - ive never seen a puppet write before
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:18:37 GMT -5
By: tylerspy4 18 Aug 2008, 08:56 PM EDT Msg. 752931 of 752985 Jump to msg. # Tylerspy3, what do you think about "wrapped up" and how it applies to our saga?
By: tylerspy4 18 Aug 2008, 08:58 PM EDT Msg. 752939 of 752985 (This msg. is a reply to 752936 by pedro_f*g.) Jump to msg. # PF, well if the 'old' was 'wrapped' that would make cents
By: pedro_f*g 18 Aug 2008, 08:57 PM EDT Msg. 752935 of 752985 (This msg. is a reply to 752931 by tylerspy4.) Jump to msg. # tyler4 - noticed how west never signed a cert
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 18, 2008 21:21:09 GMT -5
for some reason this statemnet makes me think of KW & BF..By: pedro_f*g 18 Aug 2008, 08:58 PM EDT Msg. 752938 of 752985Jump to msg. # now that im thinking - ive never seen a puppet write before
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:21:56 GMT -5
yeah were is Dr. D?? half expected to see him on the BOD.... or?? but I think I read a long time ago that he started his own company??By: sundance43210 18 Aug 2008, 09:06 PM EDT Msg. 752949 of 752985Jump to msg. # Paging Dr. D!!!! Hey where is Dr. D these days? Does anyone know?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:24:20 GMT -5
AKA MelvinBy: halfstep3 18 Aug 2008, 09:27 PM EDT Msg. 752953 of 752987Jump to msg. # just so you all know. that was ""NOT"" repeat ""NOT"" Urban on the tv shop iceroad truckers. By: tylerspy4 18 Aug 2008, 09:37 PM EDT Msg. 752957 of 752988(This msg. is a reply to 752953 by halfstep3.) Jump to msg. # halfstep, how do you know? You seem pretty sure of yourself
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:34:46 GMT -5
...... wth.... ?? here they go again Sooner.......they take turns.....me & you. Wish they would pick on the guys here once in awhile.....lol lol lol By: sundance43210 18 Aug 2008, 09:43 PM EDT Msg. 752963 of 752990Jump to msg. # Hey!! Watch me quite up this board like you was all Soonerlew on Board 29....Paging Dr. D!!!! Where is Dr. D!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 18, 2008 21:37:27 GMT -5
...... wth.... ?? here they go again Sooner.......they take turns.....me & you. Wish they would pick on the guys here once in awhile.....lol lol lol By: sundance43210 18 Aug 2008, 09:43 PM EDT Msg. 752963 of 752990 Jump to msg. # Hey!! Watch me quite up this board like you was all Soonerlew on Board 29....Paging Dr. D!!!! Where is Dr. D!!!!! I thought I had been forgotten by all. Guess not, huh?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:50:15 GMT -5
ty pennypauly...... By: capten4711 18 Aug 2008, 01:53 PM EDT Msg. 4062 of 4062Jump to msg. # SGGM 101 day of the SHO March 31, 2008 Mark-to-Market Value of FTDs on March 31, 2008 ST GEORGE METALS INC Y 101 3/31/2008 37,578 1/4/2006 www.sec.gov/comments/s7-20-08/s72008-179.pdfJuly 23, 2008 Subject: Follow-up on July 22 Meeting Dr. Sirri et al.: www.sec.gov/comments/s7-20-08/s72008-179.pdfI thank you for meeting with Ken Salomon, John Welborn and me yesterday afternoon to discuss Reg SHO, naked short selling and the SEC's recent emergency order. As a follow-up, I want to emphasize the following points: 1. OSTK continues to believe that it is critical that the SEC extend the pre-borrow requirement of the emergency order to the entire market, not just the 19 select companies. OSTK requests that the SEC promptly undertake swift rulemaking so that this protection applies fairly across the market. Capten
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:53:09 GMT -5
ty Seagull..... hawkeye posted this gusjarvis post... with The Listener www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussi....e-news-bei-cmkmBy: gusjarvis 09 Aug 2008, 08:34 PM EDT Msg. 749909 of 750023Jump to msg. # NOW WEARY, PEDRO, SPORTSMAN, OTHERS I would love for you to tell me that given mark faulk's silver state bank evidence was gained before any og update and they let cmkx run the fraud and sell hundreds of billions of shares, i need you to explain this to me, given that it was all said in late 2006/early 2007 after the cmkx fraud had long been discovered and exposed 100% for sure, thanks for you valuable imput I am sure and all your answers you will have , the listener: I have to agree that it is time for the company to pay shareholders a dividend even if it’s token to acknowledge that the company is viable and willing to apply pressure on the short. I look back when Kevin West was on the CMKM Taskforce and he told me that the company would be putting out a PR on a day when I was talking with him. The attorney’s told Urban that the PR would be out that day and it never happened. I asked Kevin what happened and he told me that Urban was even surprised it didn’t come out. He explained his frustration with the lack of communication from the company to shareholders. He told me that the attorney’s are running the show and not even Urban can decide when a PR is issued. Basically the attorneys have a task at hand and they could care less what the shareholders think because they have a job to do and that is all that matters, their success ultimately is our success. They refuse to show any part of their hand for whatever it is they are working on. The shareholders are locked in and basically everyone must trust the team whether they like it or not. I find it rather ironic that Kevin who is a shareholder is now the interim CEO and by position must have a better insight as to what is going on. Kevin believes in communication, he really does. Interestingly enough now that he is on the inside, he is not allowed to communicate because of the attorneys. He might not like it, but he understands why. Kevin is a shareholder and believe me, if he is okay with it, so am I. Kevin stated to me while on the CMKM Taskforce that CMKM had substantial assets. He confirmed to me that there was no way he would be spending all of his time and effort if the only asset was Entourage. The SEC basically warned the CMKM Taskforce that if they tried to tell everyone to pull their stock certificates that the SEC would try to charge them with market manipulation. The attorney’s in turn created a transaction which was clever enough to force a stock certificate pull and that is really the only reason why the Entourage deal was done. Not because it was the “only” asset, there are other assets but because it was the only way to get a stock certificate pull underway. Key point here, I asked Kevin if interpleader was something that was thought of after the stock certificate pull was pretty much near completion. Kevin made it very clear to me that interpleader was the goal from day 1. Basically Robert Maheu told everyone in a meeting that the goal of the CMKM Taskforce was to identify and cert as many CMKM shareholders as much and accurately as possible. The goal was to provide him with a list that he could take to interpleader. Basically different attorneys would be used for different tasks depending on where we were in the overall plan. It was my understanding that despite the PR that Stocklein and Maheu were no longer part of the CMKM Taskforce that they were still consulting with the company. Kevin made it very clear to me that he was extremely confident in what the company was doing because as far as they were concerned they were successful in certing enough shareholders to move forward with interpleader. We knew of the holdouts and that would be addressed through interpleader if they wouldn’t cooperate. The fact that interpleader is not filed could be an indication that we are getting some cooperation. Kevin and I, identified the issue of broker/dealers hiding stock certificates from the CMKM Taskforce. It was obvious to me that the company had some sort of open ended settlement. The reason being that why would the attorneys need to keep their own set of data on shareholders when the transfer agent had the data. Faxing in our stock certificates to the law firm for verification made no sense to me if we are already verified by the mere issuance of our stock certificates with the transfer agent. Also why would the brokerage firms who did order stock certificates and had the shares hide them from the CMKM Taskforce. What would be the purpose of hiding them in their vaults unless by giving them to shareholders and in turn the shareholders faxing them into the law firm created a liability for them. The fact that the DTCC cleared out all of their CMKM was also very interesting. Basically CMKM in the process of distributing Entourage and any other assets would not be using the DTCC. Why would that be? I understand that CMKM is revoked and is a private company and should not use the DTCC, so then brokerage intermediaries have no reason to be holding electronic shares and should have issued certs to their clients. I suspect that if CMKM has settled with the DTCC it could not give the Entourage and any other assets, including settlements, back to the DTCC to distribute. That is why everyone had to fax in to the law firm because ultimately distribution would have to be done through them and not the DTCC. My purpose here is to try and give a better insight as to where we were and where this is going. It’s obviously going forward. I myself get very impatient at times, however when I put it in perspective, there is progress. The cert pull has identified what brokerage firms are naked short, which is critical if this has to be taken into the courts. Nevwest has been busted along with Edwards for their part in all of this. The fact that Nevwest sold 259 billion shares of stock clearly explains why CMKM issues more and more shares to make sure the company retained control with all these additional shares in the market. Shareholders should be intrigued with the fact that these restricted shares were recommended by Frizzell to Stocklein to be null and void for violating the company’s restricted stock rules and therefore if done would not only lower the number of shares issued and outstanding, but also create a naked short. If these shares are counted currently in the Taskforce count and now are to become null and void, what is the true count. Also if the company had shares in the treasury that were sitting there to offset a hostile takeover, how many of those shares can be retired now that the threat has been addressed. If 259 billion shares were wrongfully issued, and the company issued the same amount to the CMKM treasury to offest it, what if 518 billion shares are eliminated or retired. Then if there is hardly any float and the naked electronic shares is very high, this could skyrocket the book value of our shares. The naked short, if held by the company, could give us a multiple of our current value. Understand that if the company issues a dividend it means outright “war” and there is no more room for negotiations for those who are short. A dividend is a punch made directly in their face. It is the last resort option, we would like a “settlement” and a peaceful interpleader that pays us nicely. A settlement is better than a dividend, but I must agree with shareholders as to they have had a enough time. It’s time to inflict some serious pain if they can’t make good on what they sold to the public. Where the line is drawn, only the attorney’s know. I am confident in what I know, and therefore I am more intrigued with how this will play out rather than when am I getting paid. I’m more in the mode of how much will I be paid rather than when will I get paid. Very key points that need to be known this late in the game. 1. do we have assets? 2. is there a naked short? 3. does the company own the naked short? Well according to the recent conference call Kevin addressed my questions. 1. He said the Emerson Koch he recently met with and felt comfortable with what is has done. Basically Emerson in my opinion verifies the assets and well as my previous conversation with Kevin that CMKM has substantial assets. 2. Kevin outright said there is a naked short and he identified them with me who they were. Etrade, Ameritrade and TD Waterhouse. I also verified through a phone call to the transfer agent that these firms were playing games with their clients that they ordered certs and they were quote “lost” when in fact they never placed an order with the TA for a cert. 3. Most importantly Kevin said on the conference call that the naked short could give huge valuation to shareholders. The only way that could give bonafide shareholders valuation is if electronic shares are owned by CMKM. I have been silent for a long time because I am confident in where this is going. I’m not happy with the constant delays, but understand it is not the company creating the delays, it is the non cooperation of the brokerage firms. The attorneys are running the show, I am glad they are running the show. We are obviously close to getting a conclusion on this saga. I could care less if the whole market place gets cleaned up, all I care about is us getting paid. I bought CMKM to make money not clean up the marketplace. It is not CMKM’s responsibility to clean up the marketplace. It is the government that is responsible. If they have to pay us to shut up, I’ll take it. Other companies and their shareholders need to step up and determine their own destiny. It is the sad reality of the situation, but let’s be serious, if CMKM locked in the shorts and it get’s us paid that is all that matters to me. Call it selfish, I don’t care, I’ve been in this long enough and all I want is the payoff. The Listener ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&rea…
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 21:58:57 GMT -5
sandi66 Global Moderator Re: procmkm posts 8-16 & 8/17 & MP3 8/17« Reply #5 Today at 2:34am » MP3 evening of 8/17/08 in International Room AccaIntRoom8-17-08 www.zshare.net/audio/17216348a7e42316/ Re: procmkm posts 8-16 & 8/17 & MP3 8/17 « Reply #6 Today at 11:31am » Acca recap, short n sweet: (1:58 AM) Desperado2100: fol... he indicated that he believed that funds would be released within the next 2 weeks (or less) and there would be a posting on the SEC website, also... it may or may not be taxable... he "thought" it "probably" wouldn't be taxed but NO Guarantees! he stated that the release is in the hands of the SEC... but, he thought they wanted it over and done (now) too. he didn't say (however) that the funds were in their hands... just the "release" (2:01 AM) dck004: acca also said that ds had met with etg... and that the cert was critical He also made statement, "there's a reason I know about Fortress Financial" and another recap.... ty Seagullrecap of Acca's mp3 8/17/08 www.zshare.net/audio/17216348a7e42316/Acca : There is a trust that is absolutely earmarked for us. FACT! Question: You said we should watch the SEC 2 weeks max. Could it be a lot sooner? Acca: yes it could be a lot sooner Question: How do we look for this month? Are we still on que? Is it still going to happen this month? Acca: I think they look great! I am not going into what Little Burrito and Pedro are saying. To go into that, It would be detrimental to what we are trying to do here. I am so glad you haven't asked me about that. I will address that in my own way. It is hilarious that individuals like KW and BF continue to go on...and they are not part of this. It upsets him that a lot of people don't understand that. You don't understand what is going on here... And you say well maybe the Tyler group is right. It's total BS!! I am done with that! Question: ? Acca: It wasn't and event... The SEC is the event... They are the ones calling the frickn' shots here. Ines: How can we get paid on NSS when we have a lot of things not finished yet? Acca: ........ Actually, Ines, the SEC can release it at any time. It was given control of it by a certain entity. Gosh: asked about IOUSA ?? Acca: No on that. Ines: When is it most likely that the SEC going to do this? When are they going to do it? How can they do this with all the lawsuits going on... Is there a reason they are going to do it now? You are saying within 2 weeks... Acca: Do you think Citi Group is involved in this? Ines: Yes, but I don't think that is what we are waiting for. You are trying to tell me that Citi is involved. Acca: You can say what you want about the SEC but they are not that corrupt. The SEC has to adhere to the terms of this. They have to. Mr. Maheu made them to adhere to what they have to do. I wanted you to answer it yes. Knight derivatives ... What is this about... When it was trading and prior to it being halted from trading, I was very vocal. ...understand that Knight and also Jefferies and that is not the only ones... .......It was illegally done... the trades were illegally done... that is it! When you go on the boards you listen to little Burrito and KW... BS I don't care who is in charge in Tyler Frickin' Texas. It is BS.. (Acca is raging) I don't care what they are doing. This is how it transpired. That is the truth! Gosh: You mentioned that we should check on the SEC because they have the right to pay us. ... and that there are trusts set up for us. You mentioned that that payment be on the NSS. Will the trust be dispersed at a different time be or combined? Acca: sorry for the tyrade... just check the SEC website ... I am just at my wits end. Ines: I am OK with the tirade. I just want to know what is going on. If ranting gets it, then rant. Acca: smoke break Ines: Acca says we are suppose to get paid this month.... but the SEC can pay us at any time. Wodan: Is he saying the old team took care of us? Ines: I don't know. I couldn't hear everything. Wodan: ..... What we talked about a few hours ago...tells me a lot.... tells me we need some more time to see what the next step is going to be... Ines: How is the SEC going to release anything when all these lawsuits are involved? Ines: Transfer Agent wants to depose a lot of people... If it could be done at anytime... why wasn't it? Acca: There is a reason it wasn't done. You are making your statements and they are wrong. Ines: Acca: Don Stocklein ... people from STG ... cert is very key... and we know who owns that cert... Ines: Can SEC release the funds before the lawsuits are done? Acca: Yes... absolutely yes Ines: Are you saying something is coming on the SEC website that says CM? How will we know? Acca: Yes it will be on the SEC website Question: Is it correct to say if this was a sting...is it possible that everything can just go away? Acca: Why do you think it is still here? If you want to think it is a sting... then think that. Urban could have split it into oblivion? Do you understand why he didn't do that? There is a reason why. It is very obvious he didn't do that? There is a reason we are still here ... that I am still employed... Ines: Where is the end to this? ............. Acca: You are very wrong on that? There is no criminal action involved... there is a reason... why? answer why do you think he didn't do it? Ines: .......... that is what I am asking you... Why are we still here? Acca: We are still here because of Urban Cassavant. Tyler, Texas ....... BS... you don't have to understand the reason behind it... that is the way it is suppose to be... Why is UC still here? Gosh: We are at the end... Acca: Look at ____ Financial... How would Acca know about Fortress Financial ? Starts with Cit... Ends with Citi.. JackBert: ... ..... a long time ago... It was a plan that was put into motion to deal with naked short.... It took the amount of time it took to get it done ... UC was not the exact person who came up with the idea...I think that he was just a tool ... That is why he is still here. It might be like a just a wisp of smoke that disappears but I do think that it will have a good ending... I hope the shareholders can see it through Acca: I appreciate what you said. You are so right on.(paraphrased) I have said things that were true ...which weren't ... difficult task. God bless. I love you people. Question: 2 weeks we get money from the SEC? after the .54 ...when is the rest of it coming? What about CIM? Acca: Can't speak about CIM ..... but the ____?____ man .. ??fall ... you will be fine... that's it. ~seagull
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 22:06:15 GMT -5
trillionaire1 DIAMOND DIGGER Global Mining Company profits- Wall Street Falls« Thread Started Today at 9:15pm » This was an interesting video. BHP Biliton (A Global mining company) profited 15.4 billion this year while Wall Street falls. Big buyout fight from BHP Biliton with Rio Tinto another big mining company A tale of two businesses is the name of this video. These videos change so hope it's there if you go to listen... money.cnn.com/?cnn=yesHopefully we have a connection with those mining companies
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 18, 2008 22:10:59 GMT -5
drillbit DIAMOND JEDI PROOF is in PAYMENT! PROOF of anything that has been said by anyone, including me, about CMKX being a good investment. PROOF that Urban is a good man as well as some other folks.!
scruffy2 DIAMOND JEDI Well Drill, I hear ya, but it sure looks like we are all just going to have to "carry, on carrying on", without any substantial information on our investment, until the PTB decide to let us in on their solution.
Can you believe we have been 4 YEARS now without hearing ANYTHING of substance, apart from a cert pull and revocation to form our opinions on? Can such a clampdown of information be instituted by other than the highest of authorities? To me the accusations against UC are simply laughable, and the real concern here is probably how might the authorities choose to handle this hot potato, indeed?
But then, as you say there is always the question of WHEN? What events have to occur before the resolution is presented? Is the timing of UC's Court case (possibly positively) significant? 40,000+ highly inquisitive minds need to know... LOL!
|
|