|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 5, 2008 21:37:42 GMT -5
seagull Administrator Gossip Queen of CMKX Re: gossip 9/5/08 « Reply #5 Today at 5:40pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- cmkxaholic Re: It's Been A Pleasure (Acca related posts) « Reply #5570 Today at 12:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I also heard Kevin told a shareholder we where getting .54 pps. I heard it from Mona in her paltalk room. _________________ When did this happen? ~dicek __________________ I think it originaly happened sometime in the beggining of the year. Mona brought it up again last night in her room. ~cmkxaholic « Last Edit: Today at 5:50pm by seagull » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6059 |
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 6, 2008 8:59:01 GMT -5
By: msdonnaharrison
06 Sep 2008, 06:08 AM EDT
Msg. 761406 of 761417
Jump to msg. #
It's so nice to see all the anti-cmkx'rs enjoying the latest news. They have worked so hard to convince bona fides this was a MASSIVE HUGE GLOBAL FINANCIAL ENERGY MARKETING SCAM and they deserve to celebrate at this time. Clearly the latest lawsuit is just more proof that BONA FIDE shareholders holding the only REAL certificates have been scammed and lost everything. It's obvious the timing of Fannie/Freddie moving under the government control, Basel II, the Auction Rate Security Subpoenas, and the drop in oil has nothing to do with cmkx or this MASSIVE HUGE GLOBAL FINANCIAL ENERGY MARKETING SCAM. Baloney, Chic, Oldno, Nuffy, Jumbo and others should celebrate this victory forever. They have done a fine job and worked very hard day in and day out on a stock they do not even own. Now that is true dedication!
Bless you all!!! and again, CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!
- - - - -
View Replies »
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 6, 2008 9:00:00 GMT -5
By: aladin99 06 Sep 2008, 09:27 AM EDT Msg. 761417 of 761417 Jump to msg. # Most interesting about the TX-lawsuit is... Urban Casavant is not in it...WHY?  ? |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 10:48:09 GMT -5
ocd Diamond Finder and Miner Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #1 Today at 12:39am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interesting points... 1. Urban was not named 2. "Attorney fees incurred by Plaintiff" 3. #40. "While a Nevada corporation, over 700 billion shares of company common stock were issued. A majority of the stock was issued illegally to friends and relatives of Urban Casavant, the CEO of CMKM." 4. Common stock issued (from page 12) equals 171,666,596,165 which is approx 24%...not a majority. If some clown like me living in a trailer can spot a very basic math problem, how much credibility will Frizzell have with a Judge? IMO, #4 should nullify #2. And fwiw, I gave up reading on page 8. Now another thought I've had. If this is real and not a scripted ending, Tyler really going after Urban, then I look for a counter suit from Urban. It will be pretty easy for Urban to prove that the Tyler gang had obtained Urban's confidence and the company with malicious intent...think motive. It will be easy for Urban's attorney to show how fast Tyler put everything in motion just as soon as Kevin took over officially. They're screwed. These guys will never collect $10 bucks from the Casavants. « Last Edit: Today at 12:42am by ocd » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6061 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 10:49:32 GMT -5
hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #2 Today at 6:52am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also this... These illegal distributions and damages to CMKM were not discovered until April of 2007 when new management assumed
control of the company.--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The bank records obtained through these subpoenas and a thorough examination of records in the possession of the transfer agent revealed the massive fraud that had occurred. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above described CMKM investigation has identified certain individuals, trusts and companies who maintain ownership of shares in CMKM based on the curent list of the official company tansfer agent. CMKM hereby brings this action to cancel such illegally obtained shares. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. Defendants should be made to disgorge all benefits derived from unjustly owning, holding or disposing of CMKM stock or assets. Defendants should be made to returnall funds they received directly from CMKM or as proceeds from the sale of CMKM stock or other assets.tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6061 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 10:52:25 GMT -5
gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #3 Today at 7:06am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- everyone of us knows this is a lie for sure These illegal distributions and damages to CMKM were not discovered until April of 2007 when new management assumed control of the company. gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #4 Today at 7:36am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- this is from ric or some other goof on 66 in dec 06, the og board "Before the hearing * John Edwards opened 32 accounts at NevWest and sold more than 250 billion shares of a sub-penny stock, which generated total sales proceeds of over $53 million. NASD alleged that NevWest earned commission revenue on the sales totaling $2.5 million -- 36 percent of the firm's total revenues during the relevant period. * CMKM opened 100 bank accounts of which 64 million dollars passed through at Silver State Bank" scorpion Senior Diamond Miner Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #5 Today at 7:36am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 703,000,000,000 A/S -259,000,000,000 Daryl Anderson ____________________ 444,000,000,000 ___________________ -171,000,000,000 CMKM suit against Casavant relatives, et al. _________________ 273,000,000,000 -111,000,000,000 Jefferies _________________ 162,000,000,000 (OR) 633,000,000,000 A/S -259,000,000,000 Daryl Anderson 374,000,000,000 -171,000,000,000 CMKM suit against Casavant relatives, et al. 203,000,000,000 -111,000,000,000 Jefferies 92,000,000,000 getting closer to that 80 billion figure that was rumored years ago « Last Edit: Today at 7:49am by scorpion » gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: CMKM (Tyler) Sues Casavant family « Reply #6 Today at 8:43am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- scropion good at math hey thanks, and what about bill and kevin having to forget they did the cert pull, another good sign actually that this is sealed tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6061 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 10:56:07 GMT -5
timewilltell Ace of Diamonds Re: New CMKM Lawsuit out today..Sep 5th « Reply #3 Today at 8:04am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- this law suit . that has been filed buy the texas group dosent read to favor the share holders . and it certainly looks like we share holders have been hung out to dry . i would like to think that i am wrong ....havent read it to closely yet ,... but i think that the suggestion that we may need our own attorney might be correct . i am not an attorney ,... but it sure looks like we bonafides are out on a limb,. ... i remember an interview couple years back , frankie. and casavant .... i assume it was an interview , and urban said .. in that quote , i will take care of my friends ,and family ,... and ,.... i wont use the descriptive word he used of the bonafide , s.h. that statement has always been in the back of my mind ,... if some one can do some d.d. back from 04 up . and read the frankie fly on the wall . it was all there .. maybe we should have taken heed ...,as to his intentions . i am not saying it was a plan , . i am just informing all who maybe didnt read that particular statement , ...according to the tyler and court reports , s.h. get no mention of retribuition . , and a trial buy jury , , we all know where thats going ,.. it will take years ,..if ever to finalize .,..i hope i am wrong . it will be a devastating blow to all of us legitt s.h. imo. ... ,..i consisdered , uc.to be an honorable person .... but this does leave"s some doubts . . i hope my firsts thoughts were correct of him. god bless all of the bonafide s.h.'s . we sure need him now .,....boy do we miss mr. mahue ,.... twt. timewilltell Ace of Diamonds Re: New CMKM Lawsuit out today..Sep 5th « Reply #4 Today at 9:14am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO ALL ,.. AND UC. IN PARTICULAR . TO DOUBT HIS HONESTY .. I JUST MISSREAD TYLERS COURT CASE AGAINST CMKM. .. . YES I AGREE WITH SEAGULL GO GET THEM CASAVANT , , WHY DOSENT THE SEC. PUT A CLAMP ON THIS GROUP . AND SHUT THEM DOWN ,. THEY ACCOMPLISH NOTHING,... EXCEPT TO CONFUSE S.H"S . AND FRUSTRATE US WITH THERE NONSENCECAL PRS,.... WHICH HAVE NO SUBSTANCE ,.. GOD BLESS ALL BONAFIDES ,..AND OUR MGNT TEAM , ... TWT. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=20453 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:02:37 GMT -5
stormgrey43 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: While on my vacation... « Reply #4 Today at 9:54am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:32am, pennypauly wrote: Without getting into too much detail, I will only say that I have been told that this was in fact a sting from the very start, moneys have been collected, and a distribution plan was being worked on for the shareholders. I was not made privy to amounts or dates, nor was my source. This was relayed to me over one month ago. I imagine that the task of organizing a distribution of this magitude is daunting to say the least. IMO, from what I have been told, this is the only thing we are waiting on. I do not have an opinion on where the company is heading or if it will ever trade again, though if I had my druthers - I would rather be offered a cash payment, so that I could run away from this company as fast as I can, and never look back. I think statements made from one or more attornies who have/had ties to the company are extremely interesting as is the nonshareholder website. I think banks collapsing all around us is also quite telling. I think Urban being a free man tells the biggest tale of all. Storm millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21892 |
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 6, 2008 11:03:40 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 06 Sep 2008, 11:40 AM EDT Msg. 761431 of 761435 Jump to msg. # So, at some point the good Judge will jump in and see that the OLD CMKM shareholders were the lawful lien holders to whatever claims, royalties, "TRUSTS," current state of assets, DAMAGES collected that ALL along "THEY" have been denied since day 1 forward depending on when you came into this sinful mess. Not The Play Write anachronistic style of BILL FRIZZELL/KEVIN WEST & "THE NEW CMKM". It's just a matter of timing, + a legal matter of chronological order of the shareholders entry into a STOCK PLAY, and their legal entitlement to what they purchased rights to. It is a real shame that we have to wait all of this time for either the play to finish or the Judge to rule. Which ever way the legal rule goes it should be fair for some 40,000 Bona Fide recipients of legal record. They thought that they purchased "good/real" shares in a real mining play as advertised, and promoted by some really, really Big names as billed out. I do not think that it would be a great idea to let them down. In essence the media is saying if you sinned you win today in the press's eyes- the way that so many are interpreting this plot, and that simply cannot be the case. AIMHO2~ Oil ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=761431Yeah promoted by some GREAT PUMPERS too like NUFFY and ELO...now they are the biggest BASHERS and TYLER GROUPIES...go figure...PUMP DUMP SHORT BASH KILL...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:09:35 GMT -5
xxdiamondchildxx DIAMOND MINER What is reality? It's sure not what... « Thread Started Yesterday at 10:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- big business/big political "Good Ole' Boys" portray to the LAY population IMO. Let's face it "Lay" & "Bona Fide" CMKX Shareholders (for which I am one), things are by far NOT what they appear when it comes to almost every topic that involves BIG MONEY/POWER as well as SAVING FACE for that matter. Are there good people high up...sure there are...but for the most part, corruption/blood money/phony behavior/extreme egos dominate those that sit in positions where monetary wealth/power occupations reign supreme. That being said, the saga that is "CMKM Diamonds, Inc." is no different IMO...for it involves some big time individuals that made deals with other individuals (some big, perhaps some not) because they were caught with their pants down (again, IMHO). The moral of the above story is all is not as it appears to those devoid of milk/honey choreographed by those that live in The Land of "Milk and Honey". It continues to blow me away that many in the "lay" population think that those "Good Ole' Boys" above them will really tell them as things are. In fact, the "Good Ole' Boys" rely on this deceptional information/herd population mentality to rise to higher levels of monetary gain and power. Cut emotion from the equation...and I can CLEARLY stay FOCUSED/PATIENT and view things "OUTSIDE THE BOX" as it pertains to this CMKM Diamonds, Inc. saga. ALL OF THE ABOVE IS IMHO...SO PLEASE TAKE IT AS SUCH. God Bless those with "Righteous" intent! Peter (Dxild) millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21888 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:12:02 GMT -5
Ric Executive Administrator Re: Texas Suit Filed « Reply #1 Today at 12:34am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted by: jarta Date: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:26:41 PM In reply to: nufced who wrote msg# 258401 Post # of 258424 nuffie, ... "Thats a seperate suit, filed in 07..ie:Urban" The question is not why Urban is not part of the Texas suit. The question is why the Texas suit was filed at all since there is room for many Roes and Does to be added to the Nevada suit. In other words, there already was a vehicle to sue these people that existed in Nevada. Why, then, Texas? I see Frizzell himself is the attorney for the plaintiffs in the Texas suit. That raises the possibility that the Nevada lawyer, Koch, wouldn't do it and there is no money to pay a Texas lawyer. In any event, the Texas defendants are all Canucks and they will surely ignore this filing - just as Edwards and Urban have done with the Nevada filing. I'm sorry for the stuckholders, but it sure looks like, as they say in Texas, another dry hole. ... eom cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2173Ric Executive Administrator Re: Texas Suit Filed « Reply #2 Today at 12:35am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way, Jarta is an attorney |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:18:14 GMT -5
Posted by: dragon52 Date: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:38:50 PM
In reply to: nufced who wrote msg# 258396 Post # of 258446
What kind of deal did Frizzle and Urban come to?
since Urban was not cited in the suit as a defendent though at the time he was CEO and issued those shares to his relatives, it shows that only Corrine Ward, Eric Reid, Margaret Reid, Carolyn Casavant, Ron Casavant, Victor Casavant and Max Casavant were named and Urban was left out. IMO he should have been included since he was the culprit in releasing those shares to his relatives. Though the filed records do not show him as being a recipient of any monies, one still has to question, how the fck did he buy that mansion in Las Vegas and other properties? Does drag racing pay that much? or was he compensated for his services under the contract that no one could find?
"16. Beginning tn 2002, various individuals including the Defendants were issued
large blocks of CMKM common stock as a result of fraudulent and illegal activities by insiders
of the company. Urban Casavant was the sole officer and director of the company at all relevant
times. The Casavant Defendants are immediate family members or relatives of Urban
Casavant"
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:25:44 GMT -5
Posted by: pontalba Date: Saturday, September 06, 2008 12:04:35 PM
In reply to: dirtbal3 who wrote msg# 258441 Post # of 258446
With one exception, all those amounts are well over the federal criminal prosecution standards. I don't know if they will bother, but they could easily argue this one under RICO statutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:27:22 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Friday, September 05, 2008 6:35:42 AM
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 258343 Post # of 258446
Don't be Silly Janice hooohaaaaaahaaaaa
If you think for 1 second that CMKX is now over...
If they get their management and CEO in order, get some financing in order and go public again IPO ...
it is very possible the stock may have a chance ...
Only problem I see is that there are thousands of investors but perhaps this is not a problem... they may become future investors if CMKX does things right this time...
We now realize CMKX is not going to declare itself bankrupt
So there is only one direction to go...
Posted by: rics1997 Date: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:53:03 AM
In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 258361 Post # of 258446
IPO - initial public offering.......
It's hard to initially offer shares when there are already 703 billion out there, lol. The process to IPO is extensive but it it's simplest form it is where a private company decides it is going to offer shares to the public to raise capital. Usually, the company will find a financial institution that will get the shares and pay you for it and they will actually sell the initial shares to the public. You are already paid. Of course there is much more to this process but basically CMKM doesn't even qualify for an IPO. All they would do is file paperwork to reinstate it's registration. But seeing how they have to file for a least three years and they haven't filed one piece of paper yet that doesn't look good either. Not to mention they need to be an actual business.
This can not happen with CMKM. More reasons then one. Not to mention a IPO requires so many quarters of profit depending on what exchange you will go on not withstanding finding the financial and market backers to IPO your company. If CMKM was to IPO that means they are getting rid of the current shareholders and somehow make a profit without actually having a business. Not sure how that suppose to happen unless they found some Jeanie in a bottle somewhere.
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:11:30 AM
In reply to: rics1997 who wrote msg# 258365 Post # of 258446
I see your point, but if CMKX gets its finances they will most likely challange the claims that have been taken from the company. I'm not a lawyer but they may have a legal chance considering the fact that so many organizations have authorized the sale of the shares hence alowing an illegal act against the shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 6, 2008 11:30:14 GMT -5
By: restripe2007
06 Sep 2008, 02:09 AM EDT
Msg. 761405 of 761460
Jump to msg. #
what ever team is working for me/ shareholder GET IT DONE thank you
|
|
