Court Cases ......... UPDATED

[imSINGLEruRICH]

TY....... zanmia (from the Millionaire board)
DIAMOND MINER
Case 07-A-534087-B


Case 07-A-534087-B
Case 07-A-534087-B Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Carrano, Francisco Attorney Clary, Patrick C.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 10/08/2008 at 09:00 AM ALL PENDING MOTIONS 10/8/08 Heard By BULLA, BONNIE
Officers Jennifer Lott, Court Clerk

Parties 0001 - P1 Carrano, Francisco No
0002 - D1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No
0003 - P EMCO Corporation No
0004 - D IB2000.Com No
0005 - D Nevada Minerals Inc No
0006 - D Dhonau, John E No
0007 - D Casavant, Urban No
0008 - CO IB2000.Com No
0009 - CO Nevada Minerals Inc No
0010 - CO Dhonau, John No
0011 - DC Carrano, Francisco No
0012 - DC Emco Corp No
0013 - CR IB 2000.Com, No
0014 - CR Nevada Minerals Inc No
0015 - CR Dhonau, John E No
0016 - DX Urban Casavant No
0017 - DX CMKM Diamonds Inc No
0018 - TP IB2000.Com No
0019 - TP Nevada Minerals Inc No
0020 - TP Dhonau, John E No
0021 - TD Carrano, Vincent No
0022 - TD Edwards, John No
0023 - O Adams & Rocheleau LLC No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATUS CHECK: COMPLIANCE....DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

COMMISSIONER RECOMMENDED, matter CONTINUED 30 days as no one appeared;
FAILURE TO APPEAR on 11/14/08 WILL RESULT in SANCTIONS AGAINST COUNSEL.

CONTINUED TO:
11/14/08 9:00 A.M. STATUS CHECK: COMPLIANCE....DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this minute order to be placed in the attorney
folders of Mr. Clary, Mr. Koch, Mr. Spear/Mr. Flinders (Hutchinson &
Steffen).






Case 06-A-515435-C
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 06-A-515435-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Rutherford, Jay Attorney Keach, Eckley M.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Glass, Jackie Dept. 5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filed Date 01/06/2006 Closed Date
Last Hear 06/11/2008 For PLTF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT /13
Outcome GRANTED
Next Hear 10/20/2008 at 09:00 AM For PROVE UP OF DEFAULTPre-trial 03/31/2008 at 09:00 AM Trial
Disposed Disposition
Consolidated





Case 08-A-569762-C-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 08-A-569762-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G.
Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 10/06/2008 at 09:00 AM VIASHOW INC'S MTN TO DISMISS /01
Heard By Vega, Valorie J.
Officers Billie Jo Craig, Court Clerk
Lisa Lizotte, Reporter/Recorder

Parties 0001 - P1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No
008830 Koch, David R. Yes
0002 - D1 Viashow Inc No
009934 Lackland, Lisa W. Yes
0003 - D Durr, Nicole No
009934 Lackland, Lisa W. Yes
0004 - P Pecevich, Stephen No
008830 Koch, David R. Yes
0005 - P MDW And GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust No
008830 Koch, David R. Yes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms. Clark appearing with Ms. Lackland representing Viashow Inc. Arguments
by counsel. COURT ORDERED, Viashow Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mr. Koch to prepare the Order.


Case 08-A-569762-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G.
Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total of 2 entries, presently displaying 1 through 2.
Entries are typically displayed most recent first.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled Description
Continued Minutes Judge Room
Outcome Scheduled For
Filed By
10/07/2008 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MTN TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569615/02
Gates, Lee A
GRANTED All Parties
Viashow Inc
10/06/2008 at 09:00 AM VIASHOW INC'S MTN TO DISMISS /01
Yes Vega, Valorie J.
DENIED All Parties

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Today at 12:49pm, john3339 wrote:
ALL no shows including the plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney? Ya think they all expected everything to be wrapped up outside the courtroom before today???


smeagle
DIAMOND JEDI
Re: Case 07-A-534087-B
« Reply #3 Today at 1:01pm »
Ya, kinda makes you think it was all for show and real issues decided upon behind doors. Hopefully this is good for us. IMO

[imSINGLEruRICH]

tuscansun
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
Re: Case 07-A-534087-B
« Reply #4 Today at 1:04pm »

ALL of the Court cases are a tad suspect of being in a secret 'negotiated' HOLD between companies/people/Court for a coming moment in time where NS pay green light is pushed.

Its appears all planned, orchestrated and schemed to hold off the shareholders of all the other companies involved imo, to hold off the mergers coming... imo, to hold off the cmkm shareholders from figuring it out.........

holding off until the green light of NS money is released...

then all those court cases will be dropped on a dime and the whole kit and kaboodle will start flying in the sun like a new kite...!!

Life will be good and all the shareholders in many companies will be elated..

There, thats my story and I'm stickin to it !

Tuscan

[soonerlew]

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator

ViaShow 10/7/2008
« Thread Started Today at 1:12pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 08-A-569615-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Fuego Entertainment Inc Attorney Spear, Edwin R
Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G.
Judge Gates, Lee A Dept. 8

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 10/07/2008 at 09:00 AM ALL PENDING MOTIONS (10/07/08)
Heard By Gates, Lee A
Officers Katherine Streuber, Court Clerk

Parties 0001 - P1 Fuego Entertainment Inc No
008672 Spear, Edwin R Yes
0002 - D1 Viashow Inc No
009934 Lackland, Lisa W. Yes
0003 - D Durr, Nicole No
009934 Lackland, Lisa W. Yes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569762...DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

There being no opposition, COURT ORDERED, Motion to Consolidate GRANTED.
Counsel argued fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation should
be dismissed as they have not been plead properly. COURT ORDERED, Plaintiff
to amend causes of action with more particularity. Counsel further argued
regarding unjust enrichment claim advising of no disagreement about
contract. Mr. Spear advised willing to forgo it at this time. COURT SO
NOTED. Counsel inquired of conversion claim against Viashow. COURT
ORDERED, motion GRANTED.

« Last Edit: Today at 1:15pm by Goodolboy »

cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2223

[soonerlew]

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator

Re: ViaShow 10/7/2008
« Reply #1 Today at 1:13pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the CMKM side of the consolidated case:

Case 08-A-569762-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G.
Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 10/07/2008 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MTN TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569615/02
Heard By Gates, Lee A
Parties 0001 - P1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No
0002 - D1 Viashow Inc No
0003 - D Durr, Nicole No
0004 - P Pecevich, Stephen No
0005 - P MDW And GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569762...DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

There being no opposition, COURT ORDERED, Motion to Consolidate GRANTED.
Counsel argued fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation should
be dismissed as they have not been plead properly. COURT ORDERED, Plaintiff
to amend causes of action with more particularity. Counsel further argued
regarding unjust enrichment claim advising of no disagreement about
contract. Mr. Spear advised willing to forgo it at this time. COURT SO
NOTED. Counsel inquired of conversion claim against Viashow. COURT
ORDERED, motion GRANTED.

« Last Edit: Today at 1:15pm by Goodolboy »

cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/ind....lay&thread=2223

[soonerlew]

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator

Re: ViaShow 10/7/2008
« Reply #2 Today at 1:22pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me see if I got this right...
Fuego's attorney has to amend the suit because it was not properly plead.

Spears also will forgo the "unjust enrichment" claim of the pleading.

Can someone explain why the hell this case didn't get dismissed altogether with that kind of stupidity taking place? What exactly is left of this suit if the primary causes have been flushed down the toilet?

What am I missing?

cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/ind....lay&thread=2223

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Thanks....... zanmia
DIAMOND JEDI
Case 06-A-515435-C

courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us/Dis....edTime=09 %3A00+AM&Desc=PROVE+UP+OF+DEFAULT&HeardBy=Brennan%2C+James

Case 06-A-515435-C Status ACTIVE [/b]
Plaintiff Rutherford, Jay Attorney Keach, Eckley M.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Glass, Jackie Dept. 5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 10/20/2008 at 09:00 AM PROVE UP OF DEFAULT
Heard By Brennan, James
Officers Sandra Jeter, Court Clerk
Rachelle Hamilton, Reporter/Recorder

Parties 0001 - P1 Rutherford, Jay No
0002 - D1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No
0003 - P Speed Truck Challenge Inc No
0004 - D CMKXtreme Inc No
0005 - DB CMKXtreme.Com No
0006 - D Casavant, Urban No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There being no appearances, COURT ORDERED, matter OFF CALENDAR.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

OR ........the cases... just some more bouncing balls??... things to keep us busy??.... something just ain't right here, all these cases continue to reveal nothing?? WTH is behind the hidden doors??

swather
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
Re: Case 06-A-515435-C
« Reply #9 Today at 9:59pm »

Off Calendar adj. refers to an order of the court to take a lawsuit, petition or motion off the list of pending cases or motions which are scheduled to be heard. A case or motion will be ordered off calendar if the lawyers agree (stipulate) to drop it, if the moving party's lawyer fails to appear, if a suit is settled pending final documentation, or any number of procedural reasons for the judge to determine the case should not proceed at that time. A suit or motion can be put back "on calendar" by stipulation of the lawyers or upon motion of either party. (See: calendar


In other words, they have settled or, and most likely, Rutherford feels that since CMKX has no cash, there is no use in wasting money on lawyer's fees any further and they dropped the case......

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Case 06-A-515435-C

From The CMKX Clubhouse ....

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Two cases... Two no shows.



tenbeers
Honorary Member
Re: Rutherford Case Update 10/22/2008
« Reply #2 Today at 5:59am »
does that mean that they settled or just dropped the case because there is nothing to gain.



Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Re: Rutherford Case Update 10/22/2008
« Reply #3 Today at 8:09am »
If it were settled, someone would have either appeared and ordered a dismissal or at least filed the order with the court prior to the hearing. Neither appears to have happened. I don't see anyone asking for a continuance either, but maybe nufced or pedro or anyone else with a pacer account could check it out.

This seems to have gone the same was as the Carrano case, and as you saw by the notes in that case, the judge was pretty pissed off that no one showed. Of course there is no indication that the judged was bothered in this one. Strange to say the least.



Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Re: Rutherford Case Update 10/22/2008
« Reply #4 Today at 8:27am »

I sent a request to the new CEO to update us on the status of all current suits and explain why they chose not to show in either the Carrano or Rutherford case in his next Talking Head session.

Most likely, we will get another "legal strategy" disclaimer.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Thanks....zanmia
DIAMOND JEDI

Case 07-A-534087-B
Filed Date Description Performed
10/23/2008 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN'S MTN TO WITHDRAW ASCOUNSEL & ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT /19 11/24/2008
For All Parties


Case 07-A-534087-B Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Carrano, Francisco Attorney Clary, Patrick C.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total of 19 entries, presently displaying 1 through 10.
Entries are typically displayed most recent first.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled Description
Continued Minutes Judge Room
Outcome Scheduled For
Filed By
11/24/2008 at 09:00 AM HUTCHISON & STEFFEN'S MTN TO WITHDRAW ASCOUNSEL & ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT /19
Denton, Mark R.
All Parties

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Thanks.......goodolboy27
12 Nov 2008, 01:30 PM EST

Rutherford Judgement...

Case 06-A-515435-C
Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Rutherford, Jay Attorney Keach, Eckley M.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Glass, Jackie Dept. 5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event 11/10/2008 at 09:00 AM PROVE UP OF DEFAULT
Heard By Glass, Jackie
Officers Sandra Jeter, Court Clerk
Phyllis Irby/pi, Relief Clerk
Rachelle Hamilton, Reporter/Recorder

Parties 0001 - P1 Rutherford, Jay Yes
004013 Murdock, Robert E. Yes
0002 - D1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No
0003 - P Speed Truck Challenge Inc No
0004 - D CMKXtreme Inc No
0005 - DB CMKXtreme.Com No
0006 - D Casavant, Urban No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff sworn & testified. Default has been entered, there has been
attempted service. Mr. Murdock advised Pltf is seeking $2.5 Million,
$212,000 has been paid. Therefore the amount of the judgment should be for
$2,288,000 plus fees and interest. Fees we are requesting are 40%
contingent fee of $915,200 with interest. COURT NOTED, there was a
sponsorship agreement. COURT FURTHER ORDERED, Default entered in the amount
of $2,288,000, submit fee agreement, submit Order and amount of work done.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

From the Clubhouse.....

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Since CMKM Was the Primary Defendant
« Thread Started Today at 1:39pm »

in the Rutherford case, and now that the judge granted the default judgement, do you think Tyler will have the decency to give us an update as to how that impacts us?

How about someone give ol' Bill a call see what he has to say, cus if we have to depend on the info to be posted on the website, we might just as well wait for Acca to post something useful on his site.



Ric
Executive Administrator
Re: Since CMKM Was the Primary Defendant
« Reply #1 Today at 1:43pm »

I wish they would also give an update on the Entourage lawsuit but I know that will not happen. They tried to steal those shares and it came back to bite them. the only thing is , If Entourage wins we lose, If we win they will still keep the shares to pay the bills and we lose. So I doubt they will say anything about any talks going on in that matter.



Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Re: Since CMKM Was the Primary Defendant
« Reply #2 Today at 1:48pm »

At least with the Rutherford case they can't use the excuse that "due to ongoing litigation in the matter..." The case is over with the default granted. I agree with you about Entourage though. We are screwed either way there.

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Ric
Executive Administrator
Default against James Kinney and Ginger Gutierrez
« Thread Started Today at 6:51pm »

pickleman773

Not sure if anyone noticed, but a default judgment was entered against James Kinney and Ginger Gutierrez

viewer.zoho.com/docs/vIkVb

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Goodolboy
Chief Administrator
Carrano Case Update
« Thread Started Today at 3:39pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 07-A-534087-B Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Carrano, Francisco Attorney Clary, Patrick C.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Denton, Mark R. Dept. 13

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total of 89 entries, presently displaying 1 through 10.
Entries are displayed most recent first.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filed Date Description Performed
11/07/2008 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 11/07/2008
For Multiple FOR Parties
Filed By Multiple FILED BY Parties 2 pages
Multiple FILED BY Parties
IB2000.Com Defendant
Nevada Minerals Inc Defendant



10/23/2008 HUTCHISON & STEFFEN'S MTN TO WITHDRAW ASCOUNSEL & ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT /19 11/24/2008
Outcome GRANTED
For All Parties 11 pages

[imSINGLEruRICH]

Thanks Goodolboy... from the Clubhouse....

Rutherford Case Update 12/15/2008
« Thread Started Yesterday at 3:12pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 06-A-515435-C Status ACTIVE
Plaintiff Rutherford, Jay Attorney Keach, Eckley M.
Defendant CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R.
Judge Glass, Jackie Dept. 5

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total of 69 entries, presently displaying 1 through 10.
Entries are displayed most recent first.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filed Date Description Performed
11/10/2008 MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS
For CMKM Diamonds Inc
Filed By All Plaintiffs 2 pages


So, any ideas what this is? Although it was filed 11/10/2008 I hadn't seen it before