|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 3, 2009 9:09:12 GMT -5
By: radioguts 03 Oct 2009, 08:24 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 874553 of 874587 Jump to msg. # New DOCS posted at CMKM DIAMONDS website: www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/index.html LATESTTransfer Agent Notice Documents: App. for Edwards TRO TRO and hearing order Aff. in support of TRO app. Government Actions
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 3, 2009 9:43:36 GMT -5
ty snifferpup
grnfrst: JUST A GUESS - KEVIN'S TRO MAY HAVE TO DO WITH FREEZING ANY MOVEMENT (SELLING) OF CMKX STOCK/CERTS BY EDWARDS - WHICH MAY TIE INTO OLD TA ENDING IT'S ASSOCIAITON WITH CMKX, EFFECTIVE OCT IST ! THIS COULD BE GOOD REINFORCEMENT THAT ALL CMKX TRANSACTIONS ARE BEING FROZEN IN PLACE ! AIMO !
grnfrst: URBAN AND THE OTHERS (INCLUDING URBAN) ARE ALREADY COVERED IN THE ORIGINAL TRO FROM APRIL 17, 2007 !
grnfrst: SO, ALL LOOSE STRINGS ARE BEING TIDIED UP (NO MOVEMENT BY ALL RELATED PARTYS INCLUDING US (NO MORE TA TO MOVE SHARE/CERTS AROUND)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2009 20:23:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Oct 28, 2009 21:36:21 GMT -5
2011 - what the F is going on?
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Oct 28, 2009 22:15:57 GMT -5
2011 - what the F is going on? Man, you got that right. This nightmare needs to END. And END now. I don't think any of us deserved this.
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Oct 29, 2009 6:49:33 GMT -5
This is the criminal case trial, IMHO, it has no bearing on current events or attempts geared towards the bona-fide share holders, but I would sure like to see all the scumbags(if guilty), in jail by yesterday......
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 29, 2009 13:48:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 4, 2009 12:40:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 5, 2009 13:09:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by steeladybug on Nov 5, 2009 23:21:18 GMT -5
2011 - what the F is going on? Man, you got that right. This nightmare needs to END. And END now. I don't think any of us deserved this. *sigh*
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 10, 2009 12:45:32 GMT -5
Posted by: nufced Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:17:11 AM In reply to: None Post # of 283159
11/03/2009 9:00 AM This was interesting because the Kummer Lawfirm is present. Sherwood Cook is with a different lawfirm at present.
Tamara Peterson, Esq., present on behalf of witnesses Sherwood Cook and Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw. Mr. Koch advised matter has partially resolved. Arguments by counsel regarding moneys held in attorney trust account on behalf of Deft. Edwards and possible necessity of a show cause hearing. Mr. Frizzell advised Deft. Edwards is incarcerated in London, England. COURT ORDERED, motion GRANTED; funds MUST be turned over within FIVE (5) DAYS; matter SET for Show Cause Hearing. Order SIGNED IN OPEN COURT. Mr. Koch to prepare Order including funds. 11/30/09 9:00 AM HEARING RE: SHOW CAUSE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 17, 2009 23:22:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 17, 2009 23:26:14 GMT -5
Posted by: jarta Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:59:48 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 283915 Post # of 283936 Janice, ... More disturbing than Glisson's declaration (I did all those transactions, but I wasn't acting like a broker) is the one signed by his attorney, Terry Nelson. It was obviously drafted by Glisson or Bretz - both nuts - and says the right things (I don't remember the discussion Hakala said occurred) to have a shot at getting past the SEC's motion for summary judgment. But, the 4-page declaration is filled with colloquialisms and mis-spellings (for example, Hakala is spelled 3 different ways). It could not have been drafted by Nelson. He's a partner at Foley & Lardner in Madison. Foley's one of the biggest and most prestigious firms in Wisconsin. It has offices all over the world. www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=14768 To see a partner from that firm's signature on such a poorly prepared declaration is shocking to me. Partners at such prestigious firms are sticklers about the look and accuracy and completeness of documents they sign. I hope someone checks to see that the signature is really Nelson's. ... eom
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2009 10:10:26 GMT -5
application fro default against Gutierrez & Kinney Posted by: IQ1 Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:58:19 PM In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 283981 Post # of 284012 Enjoy! courtesy of IQ viewer.zoho.com/docs/tcUddb
|
|
|
Post by sweettime on Nov 19, 2009 12:45:20 GMT -5
viewer.zoho.com/docs/tcUddbFrom 2003 through 2005, Gutierrez sold almost 18 billion shares of purportedly unrestricted CMKM stock in her own name. (Compl. ¶ 63.) From 2003 through 2005, Kinney sold about 61.4 billion shares of purportedly unrestricted CMKM stock. "Purportedly"? since was it just an allegation that the shares were unregistered? I thought that was a Fact.... ?
|
|