|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 14:12:18 GMT -5
Mona Lisa Smiles DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Mona MP3 11/18 « Reply #16 Today at 11:23am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the issue of Tyler being truthful and upfront is not true..they are deliberately misleading us...and being funded by Urban to do so..I believe it's all for a good cause..to benefit shareholders..If you go under any other assumoption..well all I can say is that any other assumption has been disproven by my contact thru law enforcement avenues. So if you are going by the reasoning that Tyler is being given a check or Tyler is telling the truth..then you miss the point. Many people are being funded..imo...each is getting their part of the 4 million...Tyler knows that UC is not guilty and Tyler knows things that they are not willing to say...and guess what Urban is PAYING them to act this way....according to this legal contact. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23393&page=1
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 14:14:24 GMT -5
nada999999 DIAMOND MINER Re: Mona MP3 11/18 « Reply #24 Today at 1:27pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And to think that Bill was gonna leave his professional practise and they ran Tyler on a couple of hundred bukaroos lol Wake up and smell the coffee, they all work for Urban and I love it. Has the DNA of Mr Maheu all over. LOLOL AIMHO millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23393&page=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 16:44:39 GMT -5
Mona Lisa Smiles DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Mona MP3 11/18 « Reply #16 Today at 11:23am » I think the issue of Tyler being truthful and upfront is not true..they are deliberately misleading us...and being funded by Urban to do so..I believe it's all for a good cause..to benefit shareholders..If you go under any other assumoption..well all I can say is that any other assumption has been disproven by my contact thru law enforcement avenues. So if you are going by the reasoning that Tyler is being given a check or Tyler is telling the truth..then you miss the point. Many people are being funded..imo...each is getting their part of the 4 million...Tyler knows that UC is not guilty and Tyler knows things that they are not willing to say...and guess what Urban is PAYING them to act this way....according to this legal contact. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23393&page=1 As I have expressed many many times in posts, of hoping that the Tyler clan have wooden heads and strings.. let's see... any resemblance?? Single
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 17:37:32 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 19 Nov 2008, 12:26 PM EST Msg. 779783 of 779875 Jump to msg. # AN OLDIE but a goodie? www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2006/dtc/reo/reo_9516-06.pdf By: klonopin2mg 19 Nov 2008, 12:46 PM EST Msg. 779789 of 779875 (This msg. is a reply to 779783 by newtopennies.) Jump to msg. # newtopennies' i have that one memorized! it came as a birthday present to me. ;-) it's in the attic with the rest... we wait.. Enjoy The Week!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 17:39:59 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 19 Nov 2008, 12:31 PM EST Msg. 779785 of 779875 Jump to msg. #
CMKX Longs:Who's on first, appears to no longer be accurate. Our circumstance cannot any long offer a pictorial display as simple as a baseball diamond. We have no ball, no park, no players and a management team who speak to us as if we're still in a 8 year old quiet period. At least for those willing to listen.
We have more invisible "knowitall's" supported by "DEEP THROAT" who always knows when, what never comes, will be here.
We thought we had land, diamonds, later oil, and the largest naked short in a certifiable format.
Now we have to endure posters who say:the money is positioned and the amounts of our check are $.x,$.y and that's non-taxable, then management say's that's not true, it doesn't exist.. Yet they are gonna make our business fly one day. Oh' less not forget the 33M awarded yet appears not collectible, but I ask you why would the court give criminals like us a dime.
Oh I asked who's on first, but really I just want the truth.... cal
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 17:41:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 17:44:38 GMT -5
chrisl Cannoneer Texas Meeting - Select Few « Thread Started Today at 1:23pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maybe most of you forgot about the "Texas Meeting" where a "Select Few" were present. The "Select Few" had a meeting at the office of the attorney this was before he became corporate counsel. The "Select Few" was shown the damaging information against the company and the insiders. The "Select Few" were privaledged to see what 99% of us were not allowed to view. Now the "Select Few" will tell you anyone could of gone to that meeting but most of the "Select Few" were from Texas as I recall. Most of the "Select Few" sold their shares and got out on this information. Some of those "Select Few" are still on the boards today laughing at the people now saying I knew when to get out. One of those "Select Few" is a member of this board today. It must of been nice to be invited to the "Texas Meeting" and be one of the "Select Few". This by the way was well before Mark Faulk. Ric Cannoneer Re: Texas Meeting - Select Few « Reply #6 Today at 3:22pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually Leslie warned him about this. The information he gave out to a select few and the Brewer case just proved he didn't care. When he was sending out secret e-mails to those that paid him $25, the SEC told him about dissemination of information and how it was against the SEC rules on insider information. Of course proof would be hard to get without the ones that got such information turning on him and likely the SEC wouldn't have the time to go after such low level disreguards of the rules. friscotrader™ Matey Re: Texas Meeting - Select Few « Reply #7 Today at 4:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I didn't get invited, but know a few who did. Many still own the same shares they had when the information was shown to them. I know a few got out or thinned their positions substantialy. I think a few of the tea party guests are on the board or whatever the hell they want to call it. friscotrader™ Matey Re: Texas Meeting - Select Few « Reply #8 Today at 4:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just to clarify, I was told the info they saw was available to anyone who asked to see it. cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=57858
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 17:45:18 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 19 Nov 2008, 02:22 PM EST Msg. 779823 of 779877 (This msg. is a reply to 779773 by cbaughan.) Jump to msg. #
Mona Jay said it great: Think c-o-m-p-a-r-t-m-e-n-t-a-l-i-z-a-t-i-o-n.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 17:54:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 18:08:06 GMT -5
chrisl Cannoneer Texas Meeting - Select Few « Thread Started Today at 1:23pm » Maybe most of you forgot about the "Texas Meeting" where a "Select Few" were present. The "Select Few" had a meeting at the office of the attorney this was before he became corporate counsel. The "Select Few" was shown the damaging information against the company and the insiders. The "Select Few" were privaledged to see what 99% of us were not allowed to view. Now the "Select Few" will tell you anyone could of gone to that meeting but most of the "Select Few" were from Texas as I recall. Most of the "Select Few" sold their shares and got out on this information. Some of those "Select Few" are still on the boards today laughing at the people now saying I knew when to get out. One of those "Select Few" is a member of this board today. It must of been nice to be invited to the "Texas Meeting" and be one of the "Select Few". This by the way was well before Mark Faulk. Here's a post I posted awhile ago.... I never forgot the circumstances & the events that followed that underhanded meeting!!SEC hearing in 2005??... Kevin, Bill & John knew about Urban since 2005.?? ..and then.... the infamous "secret meeting" with the "select few"... pretty sneaky imo.... Word around the boards was that some of these "select few" sold/dumped/ unloaded ( call it what you want) their shares on this info which most shareholders were not privy to?? and now we are asked for trust & allegiance ?? With underhanded shenanigans as this, is it any wonder why so many shareholders are reluctant ??
The Task Force, Maheu, Stoecklein & Frizzell ?? 2005, 2006 ... thank you, thank you, thank you very much Urban ??
Kevin became Interim in September of 2006.... thank you, thank you, thank you very much Urban ??
Right into March 2007 when Kevin accepted the CEO position..... thank you, thank you, thank you very much Urban ??
April of 2007...... they now tell us ...this is when they discovered the damaging information about Urban?? The delivery of the mysterious boxes?? .....errrrrrrrrrrrrr....... did they know in 2005 or not ?? seems they got that suit filed in record time?? Was Urban forced out If they did have evidence since 2005 ?? Were the new players , playing the old?? or are the old players , playing the new??Did we not receive updates (during this time line 05 to 07) from all of them?? the Task Force, Frizzell, Kevin , others and emails from John Martin that painted Urban in a different light ?? Painted CMKX as having the world by the balls?? Ya know silver platters, protected claims ,other assets... etc etc ?? Did any of them have a clue??Sorry...... I still believe there is more here than meets the eye!! Just like that.... it all changes?? I ain't buying it !! Single
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 18:11:15 GMT -5
Brigantine DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: URBANS EMAIL ADDRESS « Reply #22 Today at 5:28pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DiceK, I don't know what UC's status is, for sure. But, regardless of what that role is, I am betting that his being painted the bad guy in this, is part of the plan. There was a rumor in the summer of 2004, already. "UC will take a fall for us." I would bet money, he has as part of his role, been told to or agreed not to communicate with us since the cert pull, began. Since all but a few Tylerites seem to agree Tyler is playing a role, surely it's not too far a reach to agree that UC is playing a role, as well. Personally, through DD, Friends and stuff I see on this board, I have seen at least 3 crucial pay dates come and go where I was certain we were about to be paid. I believe those days came and went, because something major changed the outcome in some way. Bottom line, we are doing battle with the most powerful people on this planet. The owners of the Federal Reserve. The ultimate guarantor. The thieving corksuckers who would enslave us all. Will we still win? I can no longer say with certainty that we will. But, I hope we do, because if we don't win, the FED will own us all, if they don't already. The hijynx we are seeing with the Treasury and its nonsense regarding the bailout is just the tip of the iceberg. So, I go back to the conversation I had with Golden in January of 2006. We will get paid when the Fed goes down. Until then, we wait. Some say, enjoy the show. Well, it is hard to enjoy the show while your world collapses around you. I've got about five weeks left. If something doesn't happen by then, (either a fantastic job offer or payday) the house of cards collapses, again. I'm not having any fun here, watching the show, anymore. Pay us. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=23402&page=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 19, 2008 18:25:34 GMT -5
By: chrissyll 19 Nov 2008, 06:06 PM EST Msg. 779878 of 779878 Jump to msg. #
Mona and momike are liars and here is why: I have a copy of the general ledger from Jan 2006 thru June 2008. If $4 million dollars would of been loaned to CMKM from Urban Casavant it would of been on the general ledger.
So to clarify Mona and momike are taking information and twisting it to their own needs.
How much is Urban paying these 2 hillbillies?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 20:36:13 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 19 Nov 2008, 08:01 PM EST Msg. 779908 of 779919 Jump to msg. #
WHAT EXACTLY is the "FREEDOM FUND" or "PROGRAM" and how would that relate to settlement money for CMKXR'S??? Or does it? eom.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 20:37:33 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 19 Nov 2008, 08:07 PM EST Msg. 779911 of 779919 Jump to msg. #
WHO ARE the 'white hat guys' that hire a guy like Mr. Maheu anyway? Why can't they come out to play and tell us what the facts are? eom.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 19, 2008 20:38:27 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 19 Nov 2008, 08:09 PM EST Msg. 779912 of 779919 Jump to msg. #
LONGS aren't being paid to be here, having lives and all, but I see the basher boys are hanging in there like stink on ####. What does that mean? eom.
|
|