|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 1, 2008 19:40:26 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 01 Dec 2008, 04:34 PM EST Msg. 783726 of 783829 (This msg. is a reply to 783709 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. #
lilburrito0, Well, it was good seeing regardless. Be sure to stop by and say hello every once in a while. I have no doubt many will still be here. LOL!
By: lilburrito0 01 Dec 2008, 04:42 PM EST Msg. 783732 of 783829 (This msg. is a reply to 783726 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
goodolboy27
Here’s what I think you can do with Deli:
Go file a Lawsuit, Pro-Se, against Deli, his Wife and his business. You have Venue in your State because that’s where your contract with Deli happened. You have a case against Deli for Fraud!
Deli’s not going to pay some Attorney 20K to fight a lawsuit in another State. And even if he does do so, you’ll win!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 1, 2008 19:39:43 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 01 Dec 2008, 04:45 PM EST Msg. 783733 of 783831 (This msg. is a reply to 783716 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg'
"What I provided from my source is clear, straightforward, and verbatim.."
love ya brother! amen
By: bhollenegg 01 Dec 2008, 05:00 PM EST Msg. 783742 of 783831 (This msg. is a reply to 783733 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. #
Klonopi2mq..."What I provided from my source is clear, straightforward, and verbatim.."
...and that is a fact.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 1, 2008 19:43:18 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 01 Dec 2008, 05:50 PM EST Msg. 783751 of 783831 Jump to msg. #
Hey WUIT...
If our money is in trust, why do we need derivitrives settled for us to be paid?
What's the connection?
If CMKX helped force many of these lying and cheating companys out into the open...pur work is done.
Why do we still have 'a way to go'?
Stockrich.
By: wuitgameover 01 Dec 2008, 06:34 PM EST Msg. 783767 of 783831 (This msg. is a reply to 783751 by stockrich0.) Jump to msg. #
STOCK - NONE OF US KNOW ALL THE DETAILS
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 20:07:43 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 01 Dec 2008, 04:57 PM EST Msg. 783740 of 783842 (This msg. is a reply to 783732 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. #
lilburrito0, Fraud can only be proven successfully if those shares are proven to be fraudlent, forged or otherwise not bonafide. Tyler will not cooperate on that issue.
By: CHUNKY44 01 Dec 2008, 06:05 PM EST Msg. 783753 of 783842 (This msg. is a reply to 783740 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
goodolboy, fraudulent or forged would be determined by the stock registrar, I believe the T/A has been performing that service. The term "bonafide" is meaningless pertaining to a class of stock.
By: goodolboy27 01 Dec 2008, 06:09 PM EST Msg. 783755 of 783872 (This msg. is a reply to 783753 by CHUNKY44.) Jump to msg. #
CHUNKY44, in most cases you would be absolutely correct. In CMKXLAND things are a bit different unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:32:59 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 01 Dec 2008, 12:55 PM EST Msg. 783643 of 783875 Jump to msg. #
What are the advantages of not owning?
By: rosencrantz2010 01 Dec 2008, 05:45 PM EST Msg. 783750 of 783875 (This msg. is a reply to 783643 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. #
mquietstorm3,
well, the one really big advantage is that i wouldn't have had my money tied up in CMKX. if i had invested my money in apple (one of my favorites), for example, i would have bought AAPL at around 20 back in 2004. during that time i would have seen the stock run to $200. if i'd have taken profits i would have been very happy,,, but let's just say i had let it ride. well, in the past year AAPL has been cut in half, falling to around $90. OUCH!
nonetheless, that means, that if my money had been invested in apple back in 2004 rather than CMKX i would be seeing a portfolio worth considerable more than it looks like right now. in fact, that portion of my portfolio would be worth about 4 to 5 times more than it was beginning in 2004.
you asked what are the advantages of NOT owning CMKX, well, there you go, that's one, and it's a BIG one. i would have a lot more money now.
i think you've posed this question to the board a number of times in previous years. when you ask it again in 2009 and then again in 2010 and then again in 2011 i'll probably fish the same answer out for you,,, just in case you forget my answer. :-)
in short, most of us would have a lot more money in our pockets right now if we had not invested in cmkx. maybe that's what you mena when you say, "the pocket you in is not the pocket you think you is in."
a lot of us do indeed wish we were in another pocket, not the cmkx pocket.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:37:40 GMT -5
By: CHUNKY44 01 Dec 2008, 06:34 PM EST Msg. 783766 of 783878 (This msg. is a reply to 783755 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
GOB27, All I know is what you have previously stated; that you bought shares from Deli, and you believe (or have proof?) that they came from S. Brewer.
As an aside, I'm interested in the relationship between Brewer, and Urban, and TOGI. He seems to be a connection between the old management and the new management.
But concerning your potential action against Deli, if you have a cert from the T/A, then that is your official response from the company (Tyler). And seeing as how you bought the shares post revocation, any implied warranties offered by Deli, would be extremely hard to prove.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:43:00 GMT -5
By: nufced 01 Dec 2008, 06:11 PM EST Msg. 783757 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783716 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
bhollen..this tit for tat gets no one anywhere. thats why I have quit posting for the most part, the he said she said crap. I called NO ONE. and I have never spoken with your source, particlewaves, if thats who we are both talking about.
By: bhollenegg 01 Dec 2008, 07:28 PM EST Msg. 783812 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783757 by nufced.) Jump to msg. #
Nufced....no tic for tac...I am addressing fact. I said my source is someone with firsthand knowledge. I never spoke with particlewaves. I would like to know why he/she said they spoke to me and please post what they said. This is interesting.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:45:37 GMT -5
By: mt.men 01 Dec 2008, 06:55 PM EST Msg. 783783 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783779 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. #
klonopin2mgs Are we really there as suggested by Bhollenegg? I try to keep my feelings grounded but the continous bashing suggests the shorts are still fighting . And if they are fighting we have a Heart Beat that frightens them.
By: klonopin2mg 01 Dec 2008, 07:12 PM EST Msg. 783803 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783783 by mt.men.) Jump to msg. #
mt.men'
one thing is CERTAIN, he posted facts as given to him.....there's no doubt in my mind.
as for "are we there".....
i don't think it possible for anyone to have all the facts, no leaks unless intentional.....
so no, i don't expect a check or packet in my mailbox until whatever events still have to take place.....and if you really think about it, all the tradgedy taking place was no surprise.
looking like a great deal to come from these PIGS....
sure feeling good here though, better than ever!!!!
wish i had the answer your looking for, but certainly you can count on BHollenegg to be honest!
The Best To You & Yours...
klon'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:47:35 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 01 Dec 2008, 07:02 PM EST Msg. 783795 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783716 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
my source confirmed we were covered and not only that, others were covered as well, all on level three
but a monkey can see that
By: klonopin2mg 01 Dec 2008, 07:28 PM EST Msg. 783810 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783795 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
gusjarvis' excellent point..."all on level three ...... but a monkey can see that"
as some were told many years ago at the races in fact...."all hidden on level three / financial derivatives markets"
call me a monkey! we're getting closer.....
thank you for the great thought to leave on tonight!
Enjoy Yours!
klon'
By: gusjarvis 01 Dec 2008, 07:34 PM EST Msg. 783820 of 783879 (This msg. is a reply to 783810 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. #
ya klon and the gov't and federal reserve now took over printing the trillions it took to cover the iou's and bam
just hope they didn't buy out the best land ever for cheap and steal our land like bud said is possible, not likely with the bulldog on the case watching our backs lol
now back to the bananas, I mean beer!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:53:16 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 01 Dec 2008, 07:13 PM EST Msg. 783804 of 783879 Jump to msg. #
and my sources says that any poster who has to ignore the fact that brokers want to pay for shares per mark, that there were confidential informants in cmkx and it was a sting per bud mark's partner, that the task force subpoenaed the ssbank records 04 and everyone knew it, that per foia info every cert was tracked by the sec, that we had the greatest land on earth while the sec tracked our cert sales, that we had a shareholders lawyer already that was warned we were getting f'd by urban and who's sole job it was to make sure we didn't get f'd and then worked with urban and the sec and the team who supposedly f'd us
is full of chit, and probably plays some of the pumpers I talk to
By: rosencrantz2010 01 Dec 2008, 09:17 PM EST Msg. 783872 of 783880 (This msg. is a reply to 783804 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
gus, one problem with that idea is that if we had/have the greatest land on this earth then why is the market currently valuing that property at roughly $78 million?
shore now has almost all of the former cmkx claims and over the last six months shore's market cap has been steadily declining until today the company's value has dropped to well under $100 million.
just think if urban had stayed in the game and held all the cash he acquired from cmkx investors,,, wow! urban could have used half of it to acquire not only all of what he had but he could have also bought out shore gold,,,, lock, stock and barrel, and that includes the old de beers property as well.
what a shame if he let it all slip away. frankly, it's still too hard for me to believe that he could have been that dumb.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 21:57:10 GMT -5
By: yetihunter04 30 Nov 2008, 05:28 PM EST Msg. 783192 of 783384 (This msg. is a reply to 783172 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # bhollen, great. all you're doing is bringing more rumors to the boards (and displaying them like they're public knowedge fact). the shareholders are weary enough and have been lied to enough. when you first came out and said someone from the gov responded to you and said that yes, cmkx was a sting and shareholders would be compensated, i suggested you give your source to a trusted shareholder like granny2shoes to verify your information. you refused. then you posted about how all this is public knowledge and that all shareholders have to do is make some calls to find out the truth. that's what we tried to do when you said your gov source said cmkx was a sting. so in my opinion, you are either lying or you don't believe your source as much as you lead on. PLUS....if this is public knowledge as you claim, everyone should be able to share in the info you are supposedly receiving. By: jfarn 30 Nov 2008, 05:39 PM EST Msg. 783199 of 783383 (This msg. is a reply to 783192 by yetihunter04.) Jump to msg. # Yetihunter, Bhollen's integrity is beyond reproach. He has held the highest of security clearance that my country bestows on individuals. He is sharp individual and good man. He brings information to you, me, and others to provoke dialog and possibly uplift those that have lost a degree of hope. Granny is a nice lady. We will agree upon that.~ By: bhollenegg 30 Nov 2008, 06:52 PM EST Msg. 783255 of 783387 (This msg. is a reply to 783192 by yetihunter04.) Jump to msg. # Yetihunter...you are being dishonest. Please provide the link to where I refused the offer with Granny2shoes. If you are tired of being lied to, then set an example. Also, I did not say the my source was from the government. I said my source is a professional. I will communicate with Granny2shoes and provide my source so she can verify the information and report back to the shareholders. In return, Granny2shoes will provide me with all the information she received in which she signed a nondisclosure agreement so I can verify and provide the information to all of the shareholders instead of the select few. I am ready..let's do it. By: yetihunter04 01 Dec 2008, 07:17 PM EST Msg. 783807 of 783880 Jump to msg. # to bhollenegg, from granny2shoes: ******************* first of all to let those on the board know i will be out of town Dec.2-5, will leave tomorrow afternoon and will be back Fri. night, and another thing about the Bhollenegg, i welcome him to tell me anything but i have never said i have a nda with cmkm and i don't have. i do have one with another co. but not cmkm so will be glad to discuss anything with him, so who ever goes to the boards where he is please let him know i am open to his info, thanks, granny *******************
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 22:01:41 GMT -5
By: mt.men 01 Dec 2008, 07:14 PM EST Msg. 783805 of 783880 (This msg. is a reply to 783795 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
gusjarvis Is it really happening ? Do we have some finality here? Good see you and all the stalwart longs fighting . You have been one of the most vocal about the Sting. Hope we can go boat shopping thie Spring.
By: gusjarvis 01 Dec 2008, 07:29 PM EST Msg. 783813 of 783880 (This msg. is a reply to 783805 by mt.men.) Jump to msg. #
mt the sting is a given now with every cert tracked what is that worth
a f of lot buddy, sailing by next summer, but all dates are for suckers and told by liars
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 22:07:40 GMT -5
By: darlingdaphne 01 Dec 2008, 09:07 PM EST Msg. 783868 of 783881 Jump to msg. #
Entourage is the last event IMO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 22:13:14 GMT -5
144r DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: I called the DTCC today and..................« Reply #8 Today at 4:13pm » Anyone read this page recently? dtcc.com/leadership/issues/nss/
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 23:08:23 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 01 Dec 2008, 10:57 PM EST Msg. 783886 of 783890 (This msg. is a reply to 783872 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
ROSEN..I THINK we ARE Shore Gold, IMO. eom.
By: CHICPICK 01 Dec 2008, 11:03 PM EST Msg. 783889 of 783891 (This msg. is a reply to 783886 by newtopennies.) Jump to msg. #
newto, If we were Shore Gold, wouldn't you think that the Shore Gold shareholders would be aware of it.......Ask them.
|
|