|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 1, 2008 23:13:17 GMT -5
errrrr.... Has the Company told us there was an out of court settlement with Entourage?? oh well... this is the rumor thread anyway!!Ty: newtopennies By: darlingdaphne 01 Dec 2008, 09:15 PM EST Msg. 37299 of 37299 Jump to msg. # UCROCKS: Rumor of a R/M with Entourage been floating around~~ puffer_8: hey gang I spoke with Craig at ETGMF timolin_1: hey puffer puffer_8: i am a etgmf shareholder & i asked if the pakets went out 2 etgmf shareholders his answer...yes puffer_8: shareholdes meeting 12/23 puffer_8: I asked if there was going to b r/s puffer_8: he basically responded that... yes a r/s is mentioned in the shareholder packet puffer_8: but that could only happen puffer_8: if puffer_8: there was an out of court settlement with cmkx & etgmf [/b] UCROCKS: ffgo said... On October 3, 2008 the Company announced that it was in advanced discussions to acquire a Uranium Mining & Exploration Company which if successful, would constitute a Reverse Merger. UCROCKS: GEE I Wonder WHO on earth THAT COULD BE?..lol.. UCROCKS: doesn't Enourage have lots o URANIUM??...hmmmm?....doin a R/S merger with WHO??...ffgo said... On October 3, 2008 the Company announced that it was in advanced discussions to acquire a Uranium Mining & Exploration Company which if successful, would constitute a Reverse Merger. (,i believe Craig let that slip out..."there was an out of court settlement with cmkx & etgmf'.....he didn't HAVE to volunteer that information...either it slipped out...OR he was giving puffer a HINT!) that tells me bobhollen source is correct .cmkx investigation is OVER~ ........getting CLOSER!!!...wooooo hooooo....
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Dec 2, 2008 8:23:58 GMT -5
errrrr.... Has the Company told us there was an out of court settlement with Entourage?? oh well... this is the rumor thread anyway!!Ty: newtopennies By: darlingdaphne 01 Dec 2008, 09:15 PM EST Msg. 37299 of 37299 Jump to msg. # UCROCKS: Rumor of a R/M with Entourage been floating around~~ puffer_8: hey gang I spoke with Craig at ETGMF timolin_1: hey puffer puffer_8: i am a etgmf shareholder & i asked if the pakets went out 2 etgmf shareholders his answer...yes puffer_8: shareholdes meeting 12/23 puffer_8: I asked if there was going to b r/s puffer_8: he basically responded that... yes a r/s is mentioned in the shareholder packet puffer_8: but that could only happen puffer_8: if puffer_8: there was an out of court settlement with cmkx & etgmf [/b] UCROCKS: ffgo said... On October 3, 2008 the Company announced that it was in advanced discussions to acquire a Uranium Mining & Exploration Company which if successful, would constitute a Reverse Merger. UCROCKS: GEE I Wonder WHO on earth THAT COULD BE?..lol.. UCROCKS: doesn't Enourage have lots o URANIUM??...hmmmm?....doin a R/S merger with WHO??...ffgo said... On October 3, 2008 the Company announced that it was in advanced discussions to acquire a Uranium Mining & Exploration Company which if successful, would constitute a Reverse Merger. (,i believe Craig let that slip out..."there was an out of court settlement with cmkx & etgmf'.....he didn't HAVE to volunteer that information...either it slipped out...OR he was giving puffer a HINT!) that tells me bobhollen source is correct .cmkx investigation is OVER~ ........getting CLOSER!!!...wooooo hooooo.... [/quote] puffer_8:[/b] but that could only happen puffer_8: if puffer_8: there was an out of court settlement with cmkx & etgmf
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:19:30 GMT -5
Thanks newposter, good catch...... nice to know someone actually READS and not just SCANS as I do...... thanks again !! Single
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:21:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:27:40 GMT -5
Time for some HUMOR instaed of RUMOR... By: rosencrantz2010 02 Dec 2008, 08:51 AM EST Msg. 783929 of 783958 Jump to msg. # which driver was the CMKX cert holder and works in TYLER? Texas man says God told him to ram other driver at 100 mph Texan Michael E. Schwab said that the woman driving the sedan on U.S Route 281 near San Antonio "was not driving like a Christian" and that "God said ... she needed to be taken off the road,” according to the Bexar County Sheriff's Office. So, Schwab, 52, of Blooming Grove, Texas, rear-ended the car with his pickup truck — at more than 100 mph, the San Antonio Express-News reports. Both both drivers suffered only minor injuries in the Friday morning accident. Though Schwab told deputies "God said she wasn't driving right" and "it was Jesus' will for him to punish the car,” he did not describe the other driver's alleged transgressions of the holy rules of the road. Deputies determined the unidentified 35-year-old woman “had done nothing wrong,” according to a news release. Schwab was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and his bond was set at $50,000. He also will undergo a psychiatric evaluation.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:34:17 GMT -5
By: Profiler317 02 Dec 2008, 09:08 AM EST Msg. 783935 of 783961 Jump to msg. # Entourage New Filing>>>>>>>>>> www.pinksheets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6277204 By: jlecks 02 Dec 2008, 11:02 AM EST Msg. 783956 of 783961 (This msg. is a reply to 783935 by Profiler317.) Jump to msg. # "...that 20 priority diamond targets existed on the parcel" Now, that sounds promising! "Hatchet" and "Nevada" properties have been abandoned but Smeaton and Doran are still viable (diamonds and uranium). Chit. If this ain't the Last Event, folks, I don't think we'll ever see one. Good luck to all of us. This is JMO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:42:37 GMT -5
By: factanonverba13 02 Dec 2008, 10:35 AM EST Msg. 783950 of 783966 (This msg. is a reply to 783928 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # CMKX owns nothing. Besides, there is a good chance that the FALC will never be mined because of the immense costs and nearly insolvable problems with the over burden. By: darlingdaphne 02 Dec 2008, 11:36 AM EST Msg. 783964 of 783964 (This msg. is a reply to 783950 by factanonverba13.) Jump to msg. # well factanonverba13 this press release from Shore Gold would dispute that www.shoregold.com/newsrelease/2008_Nov_24.pdf another 12.5 mill into the FALC
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 11:48:22 GMT -5
seems NO ONE can keep their stories/info straight!! Not the SEC, the DTCC, not even CMKM Diamonds' CEO or BOD...... silverbulletgirl DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: UPDATE!!!! UPDATE!!!! I called the DTCC today « Reply #65 Today at 10:53am » MAIL IS IN........... lol omg Mary Anne xxxxxx, Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, we do not have any information indicating that a payment would be due to you for the shares of CMKM DIAMONDS INC CASAVANT INTL MINING and CASAVANT INTL MINING CORP that you held in your account. Unfortunately, there is no indication of a cash payment pending and I am uncertain where the previous representative received this information. The security delisted on 11/01/2005 and is considered worthless. Sincerely, Adam R. Apex Reorganization and Safekeeping, TD AMERITRADE Division of TD AMERITRADE, Inc.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 12:36:26 GMT -5
BHollenegg DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: UPDATE!!!! UPDATE!!!! I called the DTCC today « Reply #78 Today at 11:40am »
The funds are at the DTC. As mentioned by one of the brokers, they don't have information on a revoked stock (updated info)...they wouldn't... unless the DTCC wanted the brokers to know. Insist on your broker to call the DTC....tell the broker you are expecting a large sum and would like to park a large percentage in your brokerage account.
Take care, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 12:45:21 GMT -5
By: jlecks 02 Dec 2008, 11:34 AM EST Msg. 783963 of 783992 (This msg. is a reply to 783959 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. #
Darling,
This is the best part! Who wouldn't want to explore, lose, or #### away 20 PRIORITY Diamond Targets? LOL!
1.2.1(c) Smeaton/Forte a la Corne Property
On October 20, 2005, the Company announced a series of property option (earn-in interest) agreements (the “Saskatchewan Property transactions”) with CMKM Diamonds Inc. (“CMKM”), United Carina Resources Corp. (now known as United Uranium Corp.) and 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. (a private company)(“1010”), whereby the Company assumed the earn-in rights to properties optioned to CMKM. CMKM was about to default on its option agreements and the Company realized an opportunity to acquire prospective diamond and uranium prospects in Saskatchewan. One such property is termed the Smeaton/Forte a la Corne/Green Lake Diamond prospect (the “Smeaton Property”).
Upon signing the Smeaton Property consisted of a 1.5 million acre parcel of claims. Previous to the Entourage-CMKM agreements, CMKM and 1010 had flown an airborne geophysical survey of the Smeaton Properties. The Company’s geologist, James Turner, P. Geo., reviewed the results of the survey and reported to the Company that 20 priority diamond targets existed on the parcel, but in light of the $12 hectare maintenance fees payable, certain of the claims should be allowed to lapse for lack of potential. The present parcel remains at approximately 22 claims.
In December 2005, the Operator, without prior consent of the Company, commenced drilling on a priority target on the property. This drilling encountered kimberlitic rock at approximately 530 feet and continued in kimberlite for over 300 feet eventually ending in dolomites at about 900 feet. An independent kimberlite expert, Harrison Cookenboo, (PhD, P. Geo.), a qualified person, reviewed initial samples and concluded:
“both pieces of core are in most respects closely similar to macro-crystic serpentine calcite kimberlite, but with some atypical features for kimberlite “sensu-stricto”, and suggests that the examined samples are best referred to as kimberlite or a closely related “kimberlitic” rock type with the potential for carrying diamonds”.
On January 10, 2006, the Operator informed the Company that the first drill target (Target: C-Gpp) on the Smeaton Property had been completed after encountering difficult drilling 1000 feet into the target. The hole finished in dolomites and the Operator decided to drill the second hole 30 meters to the northwest where geo-physical data implied that the center of the kimberlite may be situated.
The kimberlitic rock from the first drill hole was sent to Saskatchewan Research Council for caustic fusion and micro-diamond analysis. The kimberltic rock did not yield any micro-diamonds however chromites were found in the drill core. In 2005, the Company expended $200,630.00 on the Smeaton prospect; the Smeaton project has 20 priority targets to be investigated and as of the date of this report has examined four of these targets.
There has been no additional work done on the Smeaton claims subsequent to the Company’s drilling of January 2006. The Company has requested of 1010, all information on the Smeaton claims so that a compliant NI 43-101 Technical Report could be commissioned for the Smeaton claims however 1010 has not responded to these requests. The Company considers these claims as non-operational until such a report can be completed. Furthermore 1010 has never consulted the Company before commencing drilling on the Smeaton properties and no budgets or plans were discussed before exploration work was carried out.
In early 2006, the Company advised 1010, which acts as the Operator of the property, that it would not participate in any further exploration by 1010 unless the exploration was conducted in accordance with NI 43-101 recommendations and mining best practices which to date have not been met. 1010 nevertheless proceeded to perform work on the property and, on March 26, 2006, sent invoices to the Company totaling approximately $280,122.53.
The Company believes that it is not liable, under the terms of the Agreement or in any other way, for these invoices and has so advised 1010, most recently in its letter to 1010 dated April 27, 2007. To date, no collections or other proceedings have been commenced by 1010.
There is, however, the risk that 1010 might commence collections or other proceedings. In that event, while the Company would vigorously defend its position that it is not liable in any way for funds claimed pursuant to the invoices, there is the risk that a proceeding by 1010 could be successful. The Company cannot assess the probability of that risk and accordingly, the likelihood of loss, if any, is presently not determinable.
The Company issued 33,888,888 shares of the Company stock as consideration for the purchase of the Smeaton claims. 30,000,000 (thirty million) of these shares were to be distributed to the CMKM shareholders but these shares have not been distributed at this time and there is no indication when, or if, these shares will be distributed.
Since CMKM failed to distribute the 45,000,000 (15,000,000 for Hatchet property and 30,000,000 for Smeaton property) consideration shares and because 1010, in the opinion of the Company, failed to operate the property in an operator like fashion and failed to comply with the Company’s various requests to have all previous claim materials sent to the Company, on August 27, 2007, the Company filed, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against 1010 and CMKM seeking to have the court set aside the October 25, 2005 Mineral Property Option and Assignment Agreements between the Company and the Defendants (collectively, the “Contracts”) and requesting that the defendants return the 45,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) paid to CMKM and the 3,888,888 shares paid to 1010 to consummate these agreements. This matter has yet to be resolved in the Courts; however, all parties are working toward a negotiated settlement."
eom
By: darlingdaphne 02 Dec 2008, 11:46 AM EST Msg. 783970 of 783992 (This msg. is a reply to 783963 by jlecks.) Jump to msg. #
jlecks its the perfect storm nothing can be done with those claims untill the suit is settled. you will notice the disclosure on the top of the PR from Shore Gold not for release to the US. The money claims are locked up untill its time to proceed. Dr Craig mentioned to a Entourage share holder that they may be voting on a Reverse Merger at the shareholder meeting on the 23rd of Dec. If this is the case then I would bet that the CMKM vs Entourage suit has come to a end so its full speed ahead
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 12:50:18 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 02 Dec 2008, 11:41 AM EST Msg. 783965 of 783997 (This msg. is a reply to 783964 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. #
Boy that darlingdaphne is laying down irrefutable facts!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 13:42:33 GMT -5
Ty: darlingdaphne 02 Dec 2008, 11:57 AM EST By: AlanC 02 Dec 2008, 11:24 AM EST Msg. 1181907 of 1181907 (This msg. is a reply to 1181906 by AlanC.) Jump to msg. # Hostility grows against tiny states and islands around the world that harbour an estimated $6,000bn (£3,895bn, €4,725bn) of offshore assets. Hedge Fund states and islands : "Harbours of resentment" investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/node/500
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 13:51:04 GMT -5
By: darlingdaphne 02 Dec 2008, 12:37 PM EST Msg. 783991 of 784029 Jump to msg. # so as you follow the companies that are involved here there is a monster growing just on the Uranium side www.wise-uranium.org/uccog.html I can't wait till the Diamond play shows all the players Sask mining website www.saskmining.ca/photoLib.php?SEC=DiamondsBy: mquietstorm3 02 Dec 2008, 12:39 PM EST Msg. 783992 of 784029 (This msg. is a reply to 783991 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. # darlingdaphne, How do you spell C.O.N.G.L.O.M.E.R.A.T.E for starters? By: wuitgameover 02 Dec 2008, 12:45 PM EST Msg. 783996 of 784030 (This msg. is a reply to 783992 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # MQ3 - THATS EASY - CMKM CERTS
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Dec 2, 2008 14:03:39 GMT -5
Thanks newposter, good catch...... nice to know someone actually READS and not just SCANS as I do...... thanks again !! Single I do hope entourage said "IF" sort of in jest as if they expect that it happen.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2008 14:15:46 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 02 Dec 2008, 01:44 PM EST Msg. 784023 of 784037 (This msg. is a reply to 784019 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # who is Entourage reverse merging into? and what is the thinking about where our cmkx shares would stand in all of this? will we get our proportionate shares of Entourage and then those shares get reverse merged into some other company? but we still hold on to our cmkx shares? and with those shares we do,,,, what? if we are to believe the word that cmkx shares would NEVER be reverse split or reverse merged down into another company then how are we going to use those shares? will they trade again? will they be bought out? By: jlecks 02 Dec 2008, 02:08 PM EST Msg. 784036 of 784037 (This msg. is a reply to 784023 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # OT: Rosen, Time to re-visit some of Bellingus's CMKX posts.
|
|