|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Dec 19, 2008 16:12:02 GMT -5
CARQUEST AND NCMALE PLEASE READ MY RESPONSE. SORRY FOR BEING LATE IN RESPONSE AS I WAS BUSY. Please refer POST NO #787569 ,787570,787571 AND 787572. I clearly mentioned that iI may not play fair game. This was to elicit response from CARQUEST, whom I respect a lot. He has credibility. I remember ,few years back his prediction came trur over 90% of time. Recently, he stated that the 'CLAIMS HAVE VALUES'. After that there was complete silent. BHOLLENEGG is very optimistic lately, and believes distribution will be made 'soon'. Since, CARQUEST had reliable source, I wanted to know if he still has RELIABLE SOURCE?AND, IF HE HAS... then what is his take on CMKM scenario. CARQUEST, NEED NOT BE SPECIFIC, AS I KNOW, HE HAS TO PROTECT HIS SOURCE.But few basic questions he can answer if he still believes that outcome will be good. ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU(CARQUEST), CHOOSE TO KEEP QUIET, THEN IT MEANS, THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE GOOD OUTCOME. CARQUEST, I APOLOGIZE FOR MY POSTS BUT, I POSTED TO GET A RESPONSE FROM U, AS U R THE FEW SHAREHOLDERS, WHO HAVE CREDIBILITY. THANKS SPORTSMAN PS NCMALE.I HOPE U UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE SCENARIO� - - - - - View Replies » ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/viewreplies.cgi?board=CMKI&reply=787942
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:48:38 GMT -5
By: jlecks 19 Dec 2008, 12:02 AM EST Msg. 787920 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787788 by carquest44.) Jump to msg. # Carquest, Thanks for your note of positivity. Honestly, such simple gestures are most welcome, these days, in this sea of despair. With regards to your snake: I hope you mean that proverb in the sense that we are "close" instead of that we are too daft to realize that the reading-glasses we are looking for are on our head! I got the Goldak Survey from Saskatchewan E/R site. I just don't have the time to follow the aberrant signals. I'm sure that would be interesting to see where some of this signals are located. It might make up for the missing Table. I also (finally) received Vrynov's book on Ash-Flow Tuffs and Variegate-Ash Flows in Russian. Just wondering if your Uncle thinks I should bother reading it re: CMKX. Honestly, I just don't have the time to spend on it, now, unless he thinks it's worthwhile for us. Best of luck to you and thanks for the Holiday greetings. For me, it's Merry Christmas, and I wish you the best. BR
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:50:04 GMT -5
By: jfarn 19 Dec 2008, 06:25 AM EST Msg. 787925 of 788014 Jump to msg. #
In several conversations with Bill Frizzell, he recalled that Leslie Hakala had voiced her true feeling towards the more than 50,000 CMKX shareholders who had lost hundreds of millions of dollars:
“‘I am not concerned about the present shareholders. I’m concerned about future investors in this company.’ Those were her exact words! And I said, ‘Leslie, that’s 50 or 60 thousand people who have put their money in there. Your action is going to delist this security. All their investments go down the tube if this company goes under, and that’s not a concern?’ I remember having that conversation. She said, ‘I’m just worried about future investors. I don’t want anybody else investing their lives in this.’ It was then that I realized that the SEC didn’t want to do anything to help the shareholders of CMKX. They just wanted us to just go away.”
Still, Frizzell hoped to get Hakala and the SEC to consider the evidence he and John had put together with the help of the CMKX shareholders. Even though they had only a few days to solicit brokerage statements and put their case together, Frizzell was certain the information was enough to raise the question of naked short selling:
“It started off with Leslie asking ‘What proof do you have of naked shorting?’ ‘Well, I have a CD and these are 5,050 brokerage statements that represent 350 billion shares. This has just come within the last five days. We also have a December 2004 report from the transfer agent saying that 2,033 people hold certificates representing 326 billion shares. That’s 676 billion shares owned by only 7,083 shareholders. Since there over 50,000 total shareholders total, it’s obvious that the ones that haven’t been counted yet will far surpass the 703 billion shares issued.’ So, Hakala said, ‘well, how do I know that those brokerage statements haven’t been altered?’ ‘Well…that can be verified through the brokerage house and we can get affidavits if we need to. But we’re here to tell you that this is our investigation.’ ‘And she said, ‘Well if you prove the naked short, we will investigate it.’ The end result of all of this was that as I was walking out, we were all getting up, and Mr. Petillion, said, ‘By the way, if this is an orchestrated short squeeze against the brokerage houses to make the stock price go up, we will come after those who are responsible.’ And then he said, ‘We would not look kindly on a cert pull because it would cause market manipulation.’ And this was the regional chief. I mean…it was a clear threat in my opinion from the SEC that if we did anything…well, I said something to the effect that if there are brokers out there with shares in their accounts that they haven’t delivered, then…it is what it is.”
BY: Mark Faulk---CMKM CEO
By: leowanta 19 Dec 2008, 12:36 PM EST Msg. 787952 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787925 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. #
jfarn>
"“‘I am not concerned about the present shareholders. I’m concerned about future investors in this company.’ Those were her exact words! And I said, ‘Leslie, that’s 50 or 60 thousand people who have put their money in there. Your action is going to delist this security. All their investments go down the tube if this company goes under, and that’s not a concern?’ I remember having that conversation. She said, ‘I’m just worried about future investors. I don’t want anybody else investing their lives in this.’ It was then that I realized that the SEC didn’t want to do anything to help the shareholders of CMKX. They just wanted us to just go away.” " QUOTE BY FRIZZEL...
NOW LOOK AT WHAT HE PREFACED THIS PARAGRAPH WITH:
"In several conversations with Bill Frizzell, he recalled that Leslie Hakala had voiced her true feeling..."
SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE LAWYER WHO "KNOWS HER TRUE FEELING"....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
GIVE ME A BREAK! DO YOU REALLY THINK I BELIEVE THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH LESLIE SUPPOSEDLY SAID IS HER "TRUE FEELINGS"......
LET ME SELL YOU THE BROOKLYN BRIDGE....!!
bill frizzell was not EVEN in CMKX until the May 2005 hearing...he knows NOTHING. Let me ASSURE you Leslie Hakala is NOT going to give Bill Frizzel one iota of info for him to use against the SEC. GET IT?
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:52:53 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 19 Dec 2008, 12:25 PM EST Msg. 787947 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787942 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. #
huh?..."ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU(CARQUEST), CHOOSE TO KEEP QUIET, THEN IT MEANS, THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE GOOD OUTCOME."
how do you come up with this type of reasoning..it's just not logical.
think...
"compartmental". as it should be...
still, looking hard for the rest of the answers myself....but i do not expect to find them on this mb....EVER!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:53:23 GMT -5
By: lazsusan60 19 Dec 2008, 12:35 PM EST Msg. 787950 of 788014 Jump to msg. # Wow, look at this one - it makes sense... www.thelion.com/bin/forum.cgi?sf=CMKX&msg=208&cmd=read I guess those guys saying that there is a penny stock mafia out there manipulating a lot of these stocks and using the WIzard to do it were right.... Does anyone know more about the players? HOw are they connected? WHo is their head guy?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:55:22 GMT -5
By: leowanta 19 Dec 2008, 12:57 PM EST Msg. 787957 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787788 by carquest44.) Jump to msg. #
"IF IT WAS A SNAKE; IT WOULD HAVE BIT YOU"
right on!....CMKX was not a "scam" we are alive and well; UC is not the SNAKE....in fact, is the saving grace of cmkxers' claims/money held in our "wrapped" up company trust...
thanks for the riddle....very re-assuring for all
Let's get paid now! please, Merry Christmas!
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:57:22 GMT -5
CARQUEST AND NCMALE PLEASE READ MY RESPONSE. SORRY FOR BEING LATE IN RESPONSE AS I WAS BUSY. Please refer POST NO #787569 ,787570,787571 AND 787572. I clearly mentioned that iI may not play fair game. This was to elicit response from CARQUEST, whom I respect a lot. He has credibility. I remember ,few years back his prediction came trur over 90% of time. Recently, he stated that the 'CLAIMS HAVE VALUES'. After that there was complete silent. BHOLLENEGG is very optimistic lately, and believes distribution will be made 'soon'. Since, CARQUEST had reliable source, I wanted to know if he still has RELIABLE SOURCE?AND, IF HE HAS... then what is his take on CMKM scenario. CARQUEST, NEED NOT BE SPECIFIC, AS I KNOW, HE HAS TO PROTECT HIS SOURCE.But few basic questions he can answer if he still believes that outcome will be good. ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU(CARQUEST), CHOOSE TO KEEP QUIET, THEN IT MEANS, THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE GOOD OUTCOME. CARQUEST, I APOLOGIZE FOR MY POSTS BUT, I POSTED TO GET A RESPONSE FROM U, AS U R THE FEW SHAREHOLDERS, WHO HAVE CREDIBILITY. THANKS SPORTSMAN PS NCMALE.I HOPE U UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE SCENARIO� - - - - - View Replies » ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/viewreplies.cgi?board=CMKI&reply=787942By: ncmale28409 19 Dec 2008, 01:29 PM EST Msg. 787963 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787941 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. # sportsman93306, please accept my apology....now that I know the reason why you did what you did I can understand. Your ploy did work and brought carquest to the board. His immediate reply to your post means he is still positive and with us or he would not have bothered replying. JMHO.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 19:59:19 GMT -5
By: leowanta 19 Dec 2008, 02:49 PM EST Msg. 787975 of 788016 (This msg. is a reply to 787974 by brushmouth.) Jump to msg. #
thanks brushmouth, i just send an e-mail to Mr. Kennedy to verify also asked if the CMKM v Entourage suit was settled.
thanks for your information, so no merger is part of the vote...
yes, i have a friend that bought shares but i don't think she got a proxy....she may not have been a shareholder of record to get one...don't know.
thanks again BM
leowanta
By: leowanta 19 Dec 2008, 05:00 PM EST Msg. 787981 of 788016 (This msg. is a reply to 787975 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. #
ok, i got a response from entourage>>
Craig Doctor to me 3:22 (37 minutes ago)
Dear
Entourage meeting is on the 23rd of December. There has been no settlement in place as of yet.
Regards,
Craig Doctor
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 20:00:37 GMT -5
By: brushmouth 19 Dec 2008, 02:44 PM EST Msg. 787974 of 788017 (This msg. is a reply to 787970 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. #
20:1 Reverse split is on the agenda. U can buy more at .02 a share right now LOL Later,BM
By: darlingdaphne 19 Dec 2008, 05:04 PM EST Msg. 787984 of 788017 (This msg. is a reply to 787974 by brushmouth.) Jump to msg. #
brushmouth I spoke with someone who spoke with Dr Kennedy yesterday and they were leaning towards a 10 for 1 Reverse Split the vote is for up to a 20 for 1 reverse Split I would imagine that there has to be something in the works for CMKI/CMKX shareholders or the proxy vote on the R/S is meaningless
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 20:02:50 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 19 Dec 2008, 07:28 PM EST Msg. 788001 of 788017 Jump to msg. #
Hey Monetary, didn't you say...
...like, .83 cents? It was about 3 or 4 months.
I know it's just a personal guess, but I like the range...and that would be a "big snake".
Stockrich.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 20:03:51 GMT -5
By: pontiyak 19 Dec 2008, 07:37 PM EST Msg. 788006 of 788017 Jump to msg. #
I will be voting NO ! on any R/S by ETGMF on their stock....
they are trying to R/S CMKX shareholders out of existance....
Many people may not care about ETGMF, as they have yet to recieve their shares, but ETGMF is one of only 2 companies we have or are entitled to, that is still trading ,and fully compliant.
I DON'T CARE IF I GET ONLY 1 FRIGGIN SHARE...NO R/S !!!!
yak
By: newtopennies 19 Dec 2008, 07:37 PM EST Msg. 788007 of 788017 (This msg. is a reply to 787984 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. #
IT was FOR or AGAINST...I voted against. eom.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 19, 2008 20:04:33 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 19 Dec 2008, 07:46 PM EST Msg. 788014 of 788017 Jump to msg. #
if etgmf has nothing to do with the wrapped up cmkm <---(notice the correct company is being used in this post), why is there a cert being held for.........
oh never mind
By: newtopennies 19 Dec 2008, 07:56 PM EST Msg. 788015 of 788017 (This msg. is a reply to 788014 by monetaryshift.) Jump to msg. #
SHIFT..I HOPE everything is 'wrapped up' on both sides of the border SOON so we can see where the future lies with CMKM. eom.
By: stockrich0 19 Dec 2008, 07:57 PM EST Msg. 788016 of 788017 (This msg. is a reply to 788014 by monetaryshift.) Jump to msg. #
The distribution triggers the payment...
...or, "other assetts".
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Dec 19, 2008 21:18:34 GMT -5
Can someone bring me up to speed on what anything involving Entourage whether it be a settlement, a split, land, a certificate, or anything else to do with that company would mean anything of value to a person who holds shares of CMKX? Unless I've forgotten my 4th grade math, it looks to me like Entourage is a company that doesn't have two nickles to rub together (they closed at .01 today)?
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Dec 19, 2008 21:34:09 GMT -5
Wait a minute...what positive post?By: jlecks 19 Dec 2008, 12:02 AM EST Msg. 787920 of 788014 (This msg. is a reply to 787788 by carquest44.) Jump to msg. # Carquest, Thanks for your note of positivity. Honestly, such simple gestures are most welcome, these days, in this sea of despair. With regards to your snake: I hope you mean that proverb in the sense that we are "close" instead of that we are too daft to realize that the reading-glasses we are looking for are on our head! I got the Goldak Survey from Saskatchewan E/R site. I just don't have the time to follow the aberrant signals. I'm sure that would be interesting to see where some of this signals are located. It might make up for the missing Table. I also (finally) received Vrynov's book on Ash-Flow Tuffs and Variegate-Ash Flows in Russian. Just wondering if your Uncle thinks I should bother reading it re: CMKX. Honestly, I just don't have the time to spend on it, now, unless he thinks it's worthwhile for us. Best of luck to you and thanks for the Holiday greetings. For me, it's Merry Christmas, and I wish you the best. BR
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 19, 2008 22:50:19 GMT -5
Today at 8:20am, luci wrote: could it be the money is already there for us - collected via the cert pull, if it is indeed a fact that all of our certed shares are nss? but there needs to be a "fall guy" to be able to explain where the cash to pay the shareholders came from?
kibert79 DIAMOND JEDI Re: SEC Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al « Reply #72 Today at 11:57am » You may be on to something, luci. I've believed for a few years now that there will be AT LEAST one "fall guy"........although I thought that it would be UC. I suppose that could still be coming, but the SEC, US government, Tyler, etc. doesn't seem to want to go after him.
|
|