|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 19:32:20 GMT -5
By: grajekk 07 Jan 2009, 06:47 PM EST Msg. 795153 of 795170 Jump to msg. #
Cramer is screaming for RICO charges and special prosecutors accross the board, and then more prisons to put the stock bad guys in! I'm starting to like him better now!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 20:08:21 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 07 Jan 2009, 06:40 PM EST Msg. 795151 of 795185 (This msg. is a reply to 795150 by thejetswithbrett.) Jump to msg. #
hiyah jetsw/brett'
no, i'm more concerned he harms himself. the kid shouldn't be here..enough already.
yes, let's get paid!
no longer expecting "more" answers, just expecting "$$"
hope it ends w/newbeginings in "short" order!
Enjoy The Night Friend,
klon'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 20:10:47 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 07 Jan 2009, 07:26 PM EST Msg. 795168 of 795186 (This msg. is a reply to 787065 by rodgranite.) Jump to msg. #
rodgranite- Your posts were a reminder of what is to come, but then I remembered that I listened to our faithful OLD TEAM and PULLED my certificates as asked, and so now either your posts are worthless or my certs remain worthless. Do I really need to think about this or read through the rest of your posts?
I know what is worthless here.
HAGN, and GLTU
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 20:13:24 GMT -5
Thanks....ShowMeTheMoney...
By: stockrich0 07 Jan 2009, 06:09 PM EST Msg. 795138 of 795161 Jump to msg. #
ENTOURAGE MUST WIN COURT CASE...
If Tyler represents unregistered shares which, by definition of Helen Bagley, are not certed shares, then, Tyler must not be awarded the 45 million shares of Entourage stock.
Bonafide shareholders are not necessarily CMKM shareholders, but a 'type' of shareholder, therefore, whether we receive our "Entourage stock and other assets" from CMKM or ABC corporation...doesn't matter, our justification to receive these assets in based on one thing only...We are certed...period.
Stockrich.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 21:11:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 22:07:25 GMT -5
Now where did this tommyferg come from.?? And why wouldn't Al come to the boards himself to dispute BH, if not true. Al is a member here on PB29 and the Millionaire board (that I know of) and has posted on both in the past. I'll continue to put my bets on Robert !By: tommyferg 07 Jan 2009, 09:19 PM EST Msg. 795208 of 795228 Jump to msg. # BHollenegg__ Why would you say something like this, I just spoke to Al. He Knows nothing about this so called meeting. Al is a very close friend of mine and I forwarded this to him. I tell you he is very upset and will most likely take action in this matter. Why would you do something like this, what do you get from it? If I were you I would call him and straiten this out ASAP. ___________________________________________________ "By BHollenegg Re: ALL Legal Shareholders…And so it begins…2009 « Reply #89 Today at 12:13pm »
Thank you for your patience. We are waiting to hear the outcome of the meetings this week from Attorney Al Hodges and Associates. I will provide an update as soon as I receive one. Every one agrees this has gone on too long. Please stand by...
Thank you All, BHollenegg"
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2009 22:11:06 GMT -5
By: rodgranite 07 Jan 2009, 09:45 PM EST Msg. 795222 of 795228 (This msg. is a reply to 795214 by freedom241.) Jump to msg. # I am careful.... that I do not create any false hope here. I do not commit to any specific timeline, just what I am hearing could happen. Even if the timeline is a bit skewed the end result will not change. Long and Strong!!!!! CMKX forever!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 9:57:06 GMT -5
evenup DIAMOND JEDI interesting cert info... « Thread Started Today at 9:03am »
My brother waited until the end of Dec. to order CIM cert from IRA from TDAmeritrade. First they emailed him the position was worthless. So he called and the lady said there were no certs for that position. He told here that he knew someone who had received a cert. for his position. She actually said "prove it" so we offered to fax her my cert and she said....ah...hold on. Then he talked to another lady for some time and she said she would call back. Yesterday she called back and said he had to change the ticker symbol on his request form from CIM to CMKM and fax the IRA paperwork again.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 10:11:04 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 08 Jan 2009, 09:21 AM EST Msg. 795289 of 795290 (This msg. is a reply to 795273 by shortinthesand.) Jump to msg. #
What I like is that Rod has the un-certed (non certified), electronic, phantom positions being paid out before any thought to damages for legal shareholders of record. Keeps on repeating it, and folks keep on giving him air time. Just amazing. How long we been here? Too long apparently..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 13:33:18 GMT -5
ty....: gusjarvis & Hawkeye 08 Jan 2009, 11:20 AM EST our bud C. Austin Burrell, who has provided litigation and research support to O'Quinn and Christian in their lawsuit hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner You Have to read this again « Thread Started Today at 12:37am » I know how people feel about Mark but... please read this and it will help everyone understand better why we are damaged shareholders going through all this pain and suffering due to our naked shorted stock CMKX. StockGate: Dateline Could Blow Lid Off Stockgate, Says Website June 14, 2004. to read the entire post..... click the link ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=795306XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBy: gusjarvis 08 Jan 2009, 11:24 AM EST Msg. 795310 of 795414 Jump to msg. # now you know our bud is connected to us and oquinn and that is why he knows all this: Subject: File No. S7-19-07 From: Bud Burrell Affiliation: 40 year veteran July 13, 2008 File No. S7-19-07 Amendment to Regulation SHO August 1973 I started on Wall Street in Block Trading for Bache. Worked in all Major firms through the years.Traveled all over the world. From $6 Billion per day Fails to deliver is now Over $13 1/2 billion per day. There is More Naked Short shares in the market than there is Outstanding Shares To read entire comment..... click the link...... ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=795310
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 13:41:58 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 08 Jan 2009, 11:40 AM EST Msg. 795317 of 795416 (This msg. is a reply to 795313 by ÿinvalid_sender.) Jump to msg. #
rod.. the amounts you are expressing sound about right to me.. according to the many past rumors.. as for cert holders not getting any of this.. I can assume that is because we cert holders have been taken care of long ago and it is sitting in a trust.. we have always been advised that cert holders will be taken care of and electronic types will get theirs separately.. makes sense to me.. bring it on..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 13:47:30 GMT -5
By: trixijude 08 Jan 2009, 11:44 AM EST Msg. 795322 of 795421 (This msg. is a reply to 795310 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
Gus, It's a great read, but, respectfully, what does it do for us? tia
By: gusjarvis 08 Jan 2009, 12:02 PM EST Msg. 795353 of 795421 (This msg. is a reply to 795322 by trixijude.) Jump to msg. #
trixi realize that bud works with oquinn and
mark and now take what he said about cmkx again, and dam it is good.
Take what he said about oquinn winning in april and know he is right because he is on the inside and that says they worked it out out of court or how would he know that. That means other things were worked out out of court, ie us imo
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 13:48:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 14:19:47 GMT -5
thanks.......portrush Mod Squad Re: Buzz Talk 1/1-1/9 2009 « Reply #76 Today at 1:29pm »
From the gusjarvis post in the Buzz thread...
"I did 9 interviews with the Christian traders radio station and with Mark Faulk. Faulks book describes the story of a Las vegas company CMKX. In CMKX $250 million was vaporized in a Las vegas pump and dump. 'No fewer than three federal criminal confidential informants involved in the deal before before the Stock even started trading'" --Bud Burrell
If this is accurate..."no fewer than three federal criminal confidential informants involved in the deal before the stock even started trading..."
Then do you suppose that those bonifide shareholders who unknowingly DID purchase stock after the fact, should be entitled to something because the government knowingly let them buy stock in an active, ahem--cough--cough, "sting?"
Just wondering.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 8, 2009 15:27:25 GMT -5
|
|