|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:02:51 GMT -5
By: restripe2007 31 Dec 2008, 11:45 PM EST Msg. 792284 of 792295 Jump to msg. #
CMKX is the one and only, LET'S GET PAID
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:03:21 GMT -5
By: bobbyhull1 01 Jan 2009, 12:38 AM EST Msg. 792287 of 792295 Jump to msg. #
This is the year! The beginning of 2009 and we get paid! Now!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:03:56 GMT -5
By: jlecks 01 Jan 2009, 01:11 AM EST Msg. 792289 of 792295 Jump to msg. #
A Night at the Opera:
By: jay_adobe 19 Jan 2006, 01:58 PM EST
Msg. 97802 of 792287
nigel, It is not 'date' specific, but 'event' specific. I believe you will know for sure that the NSS has been cleaned up and handled satisfactorily when word is released (by whatever means deemed necessary) that the physical exchange of Entourage certificates is completed. Entourage shares will not be distributed until the NSS is cleaned up totally, however, the threat of the distribution remains a powerful leverage tool to ensure the NSS problem is fixed. The shorters were caught in a bind with the other dividends, but they are forced to clean it up this time. Of course, IMO.
Happy New Year, All.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:04:39 GMT -5
By: tbo452 01 Jan 2009, 01:49 AM EST Msg. 792292 of 792295 Jump to msg. # 'Fistful Of Dollars' Clint Eastwood Marathon on AMC... 'Fistful Of Dollars' Baxter woman, putting a curse on her enemies, just before she is killed... "I hope you all die spitting up blood...!!" My sentiments exactly, for ANYONE responsible for causing CMKX shareholders to ENDURE the TORTURE of this 6 YEAR ORDEAL...!! You all know who you are...!! Oh, yeah... HAPPY NEW YEAR...!! cmkxtrek.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:06:04 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 31 Dec 2008, 08:07 PM EST Msg. 792244 of 792295 Jump to msg. #
if the shares go back some posters are going to look like fools.
Bellingus 01 Jan 2009, 08:01 AM EST Msg. 792295 of 792295 (This msg. is a reply to 792244 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
If the shares go back maybe the majority will... ...do the instinctive thing rather than the smart thing, get it?
Why is it that you consistently act as though you just heard about the CMKX story yesterday?
By: rosencrantz2010 01 Jan 2009, 09:10 AM EST Msg. 792302 of 792498 (This msg. is a reply to 792295 by Bellingus.) Jump to msg. #
bellingus, no, i don't get it. what is the "majority" (who is the majority in your reference, cmkx shareholders?) suppose to do after the entourage shares go back to that company and the claims are returned to cmkx?
what is the instinctive thing to do versus the smart thing? instinctive thing = sell our cmkx shares following a return to trading?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:06:44 GMT -5
By: dennissullenger 01 Jan 2009, 09:27 AM EST Msg. 792308 of 792498 Jump to msg. # Hmmmm...Where's all the hairballs?? Contracts expire... Bwhahahah go cmkx dennis
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:07:18 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 01 Jan 2009, 10:33 AM EST Msg. 792320 of 792498 Jump to msg. #
DISTRIBUTION will go forward, no matter what the sissy bashers say lol
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:08:06 GMT -5
chris Dr. Of Diamonds Re: RUMORS.... UPDATED DAILY !!..... « Reply #123 on Jan 2, 2009, 5:30pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- monetaryshift is thingyydoo; why bother bringing his gargabe here? I guess the only reason is that we've run out of rumours. It's good and about time imo.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:09:39 GMT -5
snifferpup God of Diamonds Re: RUMORS.... UPDATED DAILY !!.....« Reply #124 on Jan 2, 2009, 5:36pm » This just in from SYGY1... Stockleins address402 West Broadway, Suite 400 San Diego, California 92101 www.stoeckleinlaw.com/ContactUs.jspAnd Gary Aguirre's office with the same address 402 W. Broadway, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92101 www.aguirrelawfirm.com/Waiting on confirmation of this
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:12:31 GMT -5
snifferpup God of Diamonds Re: RUMORS.... UPDATED DAILY !!..... Joan Lunden Interviews Attorney Steve Oshins on Dynasty TrustsNationally known dynasty trust expert Steve Oshins was recently interviewed by former Good Morning America Co-Host Joan Lunden on dynasty trusts.Publish Date: 2008-11-23Former Good Morning America co-host Joan Lunden recently interviewed nationally known estate planning attorney Steve Oshins on dynasty trusts. The interview will be made into a DVD to be distributed nationally by financial planners as a means of catering to their wealthy clients and prospective clients. The video is currently in pre-production and is targeted for national distribution on January 1, 2009. A dynasty trust can be drafted under Nevada’s special law written by Mr. Oshins to protect the family assets from estate taxes, creditors and divorce for as many as 365 years. For this reason, it is the most valuable piece of an estate plan. Mr. Oshins wrote the law and was able to get it passed in Nevada’s 2005 legislative session. It became effective as of October 1, 2005. Prior to that date, Nevada had a law similar to most other jurisdictions which allowed dynasty trusts to last for only approximately 100 to 120 years. Mr. Oshins has provided a number of free articles about dynasty trusts at his law firm’s web site, www.oshins.com. No password is required to access the articles. About Steve Oshins: Attorney Steve Oshins is a nationally known estate planning and asset protection attorney based in Las Vegas, Nevada with clients all over the United States. He is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in both the Estate Planning & Probate category and the Tax Law category and was named one of the Top 100 Attorneys by Worth magazine. www.bignews.biz/?id=789825&keys=trust-dynasty-dynastytrust-estateplanning
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:14:56 GMT -5
3bid Dr. Of Diamonds Re: RUMORS.... UPDATED DAILY !!.....« Reply #126 on Jan 2, 2009, 7:38pm » monetaryshift is thingyydoo; why bother bringing his gargabe here? I guess the only reason is that we've run out of rumours. It's good and about time imo. An opined rumor of an end to rumors is the mother of all rumors.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:16:04 GMT -5
By: aladin99 02 Jan 2009, 09:08 PM EST Msg. 793042 of 793055 (This msg. is a reply to 793025 by ravenpeach1.) Jump to msg. #
Raven...I think Tyler is hiding the truth... until we get paid...no ones would be that dumb to lend them the money but UC and UC is genius...I believe 2009 is our best year ever!
Have a great Nite!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:17:42 GMT -5
johnjrambothe2nd Dr. Of Diamonds Re: RUMORS.... UPDATED DAILY !!.....« Reply #129 Yesterday at 12:49pm » By: sportsman93306 31 Dec 2008, 05:57 PM EST Msg. 792191 of 793158(This msg. is a reply to 791903 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # BHOLLENEGG COULD U PLEASE DISCLOSE WHAT DID COMPANY'S attorney tell you vs what did company's attorney tell to shareholder's attorney. THANKS SPORTSMAN� By: bhollenegg 03 Jan 2009, 06:50 AM EST Msg. 793091 of 793158(This msg. is a reply to 792191 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. # Sportsman93306,...The opposite. Shareholders are told one thing, while shareholder's attorneys are told the opposite in regards to compensation. There are a select few shareholders who were told the same information as the shareholder's attorneys ...shareholders will be receiving compensation/payments. Thank you, BHollenegg ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=793091
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:18:52 GMT -5
By: jfarn 02 Jan 2009, 09:58 PM EST Msg. 793061 of 793062 (This msg. is a reply to 793043 by jlecks.) Jump to msg. # jlecks,
I have said it time and time again:
Bill Frizzell has been less than completely forthcoming in our ordeal.
He has been completely dishonest with our short situation. He has blasted Roger Glenn and has done nothing. He has blasted the SEC and the SEC Inspector General does not know of him. He has blasted Urban and..............we all know the result there. He has decried the communication we all received from the "old team" and how has the communication improved under Billy's watch? He has dedicated years of his practice in collecting data regarding a historic short that was "handed to us on a silver platter" and he has done Nothing with it except collect money per head from CMKM shareholders. Bill Frizzell is either nothing more than a money grubbing, ambulance chasing, hack or up for the 2010 Academy Award winning actor for his role as of late.
The inconsistencies and hypocrisy of Bill et.al has been nothing short of AMAZING.
I have met many a folk in my career; Bill ranks up there in the most surprising disappointments I have come across.
This IMO will ALL come out in the wash.
jf~
By: jlecks 03 Jan 2009, 12:55 AM EST Msg. 793082 of 793178 (This msg. is a reply to 793061 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. #
JFarn,
Agreed.
Just to recapitulate a previous post regarding "A Day at the Races:"
Where I noted my bets for Win, Place, and Show.
You, being "Show."
Not that I think you aren't worthy of First Place (quite the opposite, really); but quite frankly, I know that if my first two fillies fail, you will bring up a ferocious and unexpected WIN up from the rear.
A smart man knows how to parlay for a guaranteed WIN.
Always bet on the underestimated.
I'm no dummy.
On another topic: I found it a bit strange that Pedro agreed with my one post which was basically a rehash of what you've been saying for the last two years... Yet, he chooses to demean and argue with you; yet, as I stated above, agree with me. Certainly I have no charismatic-board qualities, so I find his reactions a bit bizarre and unconventional.
Happy New Year.
MVBR
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 4, 2009 1:20:28 GMT -5
ty luci..................................
By: bhollenegg 30 Dec 2008, 09:28 PM EST Msg. 791903 of 793097 (This msg. is a reply to 791833 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosencrantz2010...Thank you for reading my posts. I do not mind you quoting what I actually posted.
Going after bad people will cost more than shareholders can presently handle and afford financially and time wise. Obtaining an "official confirmation" of the compensation funds is feasible financially and time wise.
I spoke with the company's attorney. The shareholder's attorneys spoke with the company's attorney. The company's attorney told me, a shareholder, a different answer than what he told the shareholder's attorneys about the compensation. If the company's attorney is not willing to share the correct information with the shareholders, then he can share the correct information with the attorneys representing the legal shareholders. The attorneys are for getting official answers about the compensation using the legal big stick.
Thank you, BHollenegg
By: sportsman93306 31 Dec 2008, 05:57 PM EST Msg. 792191 of 793097 (This msg. is a reply to 791903 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # BHOLLENEGG COULD U PLEASE DISCLOSE WHAT DID COMPANY'S attorney tell you vs what did company's attorney tell to shareholder's attorney. THANKS
SPORTSMAN
By: bhollenegg 03 Jan 2009, 06:50 AM EST Msg. 793091 of 793097 (This msg. is a reply to 792191 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. # Sportsman93306,...The opposite. Shareholders are told one thing, while shareholder's attorneys are told the opposite in regards to compensation. There are a select few shareholders who were told the same information as the shareholder's attorneys ...shareholders will be receiving compensation/payments.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|