|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 7:42:03 GMT -5
By: smartmoneyknows 12 Jan 2009, 12:18 AM EST Msg. 796791 of 796793 Jump to msg. # WHAT IS FAULK ENTERPRISES,INC? www.manta.com/coms2/dnbcompany_g1t65r FAULK ENTERPRISES,INC 6309 Connaught Ct Oklahoma City, OK 73132
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 7:51:01 GMT -5
john3339 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: CEO Chat: Friday, January 9th 10am EST « Reply #21 Today at 5:33am »
Quote:3. Question asked if CMKM certificate is only worth the amount of assets in the company? Per Mark, the only asset is a judgement against John Edwards. The company is moving forward on the Lis Pendens and searching for his assets. Mark believes the company will have value shortly and he would not be there if he didn't think it would. Will there be a payout to shareholders? NO evidence absolutely whatsoever.
At last, an answer that provides at least some semblance of credibility!
I have been so sick and tired of that idjut kw claiming the ETGMF cert as a CMKX asset, when it really belongs to US SHAREHOLDERS! Even when the deal is cancelled and the claims revert back to the company (which I believe they will), the time we held the cert, those shares belonged to us shareholders, not the company!
It was refreshing to read the answer where mf said our only asset was the JE judgement.
The rest? Too much history of bs, and so little time to wade through it to see if mf has really changed the tune of the corporate line.
imo john
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:12:37 GMT -5
ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD ok my convo with Mark Faulk today « Thread Started Today at 7:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I had some time today so i called: Stoecklein, got his secretary who confirmed that he has released the Entourage cert to Tyler. I have told her that we as shareholders would like to see for ourselves the judges orders for him to do so. She tried really hard to brush me off the phone.. and tell me that he and his office have nothing to do with Cmkx any more.. Upon which i reminded her that he was the "trustee" for our cert, and that we still did not see any document for the release of that document. I have also asked if they can tell us where we can get to see that document. She tried to brush me off into calling Frizzell and asking him for it.. but I still feel quite adamant that Stoecklein as the trustee has the obligation to show it to us.. ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: ok my convo with Mark Faulk today « Reply #1 Today at 7:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then i called Frizzell. I have no idea which number i have dialed any more since i have so many numbers from Task force to Frizzells office.. but however whichever one i have dialed i got Frizzell on the phone. I told him my first name and he said he knew who I am. He also said he did not want to talk to me, and he expressed his feelings as to not be hurt if i Never call again. I think i managed to say that shareholders dont have any other numbers to call and that i also would not mind if I actualy had other number to call..but so far up to recently we had none except for Frizzells office upon which Frizzells secretary would tell us she has no number for Mark faulk or for Kevin WEst. So, I did not get many words out .. because Frizzell was adamant to express his feelings of not wanting to talk to me.. in words: " i dont want to talk to you, and I will not talk to you" and couple of other versions. He also noted that .. he is a lawyers and that i should talk to other officials. I believe he also noted that i have not been kind on the boards toward the Tyler team. ( I thought of how kind he was to Abadgoodgirl in his first update and .. to me and other shareholders ) However.. that was it. « Last Edit: Today at 7:49pm by ines » ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: ok my convo with Mark Faulk today « Reply #2 Today at 7:42pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then I called the number that was suposedly added to the last update and I got Mark Faulk. And I did talk to him for about 2 hours.. and I dont know if this is interesting but i will post about the cmkx issues we have talked about. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=24154Will post that when she gets it on the boards.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 20:34:40 GMT -5
john3339 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: CEO Chat: Friday, January 9th 10am EST« Reply #21 Today at 5:33am » Quote:3. Question asked if CMKM certificate is only worth the amount of assets in the company? Per Mark, the only asset is a judgement against John Edwards. The company is moving forward on the Lis Pendens and searching for his assets. Mark believes the company will have value shortly and he would not be there if he didn't think it would. Will there be a payout to shareholders? NO evidence absolutely whatsoever. At last, an answer that provides at least some semblance of credibility! I have been so sick and tired of that idjut kw claiming the ETGMF cert as a CMKX asset, when it really belongs to US SHAREHOLDERS! Even when the deal is cancelled and the claims revert back to the company (which I believe they will), the time we held the cert, those shares belonged to us shareholders, not the company! It was refreshing to read the answer where mf said our only asset was the JE judgement. The rest? Too much history of bs, and so little time to wade through it to see if mf has really changed the tune of the corporate line. imo john scruffy2 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER John, aren't we talking about an "either/or" here? How would we get the ETGMF distribution AND get the claims back? Aren't we really talking about getting our benefits from the claims as either CMKX or ETGMF shareholders? If we get the distribution, what will our CMKX shares be worth without the claims, sort of thing... What has the Entourage deal been all about, anyway? Was it intended as a wind-up distribution of CMKX assets as portrayed, or was it yet another brilliant manoeuver to trap shorty and nail the NSS? I think we win either way. I'd just be a lot happier having someone other than Mark in control though, if the claims come back to CMKX. I can well believe that UC is still in the picture though as has been rumoured, so that is reassuring (to me) at least.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:37:02 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 12:16 PM EST Msg. 796865 of 797011 Jump to msg. #
From the Letsgettothetruth cubicle:
Mark Faulk said:
"the only (CMKM) asset is a judgement against John Edwards."
WTF happened with the Entourage shares?! And, why did Mark deliberately avoid addressing the satus of the cert?!
By: nufced 12 Jan 2009, 12:22 PM EST Msg. 796869 of 797011 (This msg. is a reply to 796865 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
good question. Maybe because its the only "asset" that has been named in a judgement? no clue.
By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 12:25 PM EST Msg. 796873 of 797011 (This msg. is a reply to 796869 by nufced.) Jump to msg. #
nufced, but why avoid the "posession" status of the cert?
By: aladin99 12 Jan 2009, 12:25 PM EST Msg. 796872 of 797011 (This msg. is a reply to 796865 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
No doubt he has been instructed to not say many things..
By: reality.bytes 12 Jan 2009, 12:31 PM EST Msg. 796876 of 797011 (This msg. is a reply to 796873 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
because it might have to be returned to issuer pending lawsuit?
By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 12:35 PM EST Msg. 796877 of 797011 (This msg. is a reply to 796876 by reality.bytes.) Jump to msg. #
That still makes no sense reality. Why expend $$$ and time to secure a court order to gaining posession of a cert that has a good chance of being returned to ETGMF?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:43:08 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 12 Jan 2009, 12:40 PM EST Msg. 796881 of 797012 Jump to msg. #
Well there are only so many places that "our" confirmation could possibly come from. If Mr. Stoecklein has no independent information relating to such a fund , also finds it highly unlikely today./ (With regards to confirmation thereof); Then such confirmation must come from another entity. Another entity would not likely release such information prior to written notification. I do not see an entity public or private discussing a market settlement/buy out prior to its release in specific terms.
As far as I am concerned if it isn't coming in written form inside of a couple of weeks then it is not looking so good for January.
JMHO
Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 20:43:18 GMT -5
ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: From D. Stoecklein« Reply #38 Today at 3:23pm »
I confirm the court order and turning over the certificate to Frizell. The investigations have been ongoing for over a year. I have no independent information relating to the fund;however find it highly unlikely. < Stoecklein to shareholder in an email
ok there is stoeckelin's email to shareholder. saying he released the cert to tyler. where is the document .. to be shown to shareholders?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:44:42 GMT -5
By: particleswaves 12 Jan 2009, 12:41 PM EST Msg. 796882 of 797012 (This msg. is a reply to 796825 by nufced.) Jump to msg. #
Hey Nuf, We may issue a statement of some kind or another in a few days; I have recommended to Al that we do so in light of all the recent brouhaha. In the mean time know that all we are looking for are some answers (much like everyone else) leading to the simple (or not so simple) truth of all matters concerning CMKX.
By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 12:44 PM EST Msg. 796883 of 797012 (This msg. is a reply to 796882 by particleswaves.) Jump to msg. #
Thanks particleswaves. Looking forward to seeing it.
By: nufced 12 Jan 2009, 12:44 PM EST Msg. 796884 of 797012 (This msg. is a reply to 796882 by particleswaves.) Jump to msg. #
Bless you particleswaves...many thanks to you and Mr Hodges. That is a wonderful idea!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:47:45 GMT -5
Talking about BHolleneggs post regarding tigerherb's
By: klonopin2mg 12 Jan 2009, 02:24 PM EST Msg. 796909 of 797012 (This msg. is a reply to 796895 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. #
gusjarvis' sounds pretty clear...loud & clear
just waiting to hear back....
so much i wish i had the answers too...
at this time, i'll gladly trade those answers for "$$" for all bonafide shareholders sake. i'll never stop seeking answers..that's just me....
meanwhile, the dominos keep falling all around us.....
just as we expected...
when does this end? i wish i knew...
Keep up the great work and keep the information that seems old...NEW!
peace.e
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:49:59 GMT -5
By: adrienne07 12 Jan 2009, 02:27 PM EST Msg. 796911 of 797012 Jump to msg. #
If CMKX is a scam show me missing pages of the Bill Jarvis Geological Report that was submitted to the SEC during our Administrative Hearing. It was several hundred pages long but was missing on upwards to 200 or so pages - right at the part that had the mineral finding breakdown and processing procedures. provide me a link to the ENTIRE Geological Survey and I will stand down.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 12, 2009 20:51:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 21:18:15 GMT -5
From the Clubhouse..... goldbarren Truth Seeker we need a fax in campaign« Thread Started Today at 5:49pm » or at least a good email spamming By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 04:44 PM EST Msg. 796937 of 796947 Jump to msg. # ENTOURAGE MINING LTD(OTC BB: ETGMF.OB) Last Trade: 0.02 Trade Time: 1:27PM ET Change: 0.02 (44.44%) Prev Close: 0.04 Open: 0.04 Bid: 0.02 x 5000 Ask: 0.03 x 5000 1y Target Est: N/A Day's Range: 0.02 - 0.04 52wk Range Volume: 377,902 Avg Vol (3m): 26,201.6 Market Cap: N/A P/E (ttm): N/A EPS (ttm): N/A Div & Yield: N/A (N/A) Suspicious volume since Dec 3. When did Frizzell take posession of the cert? Goodolboy Chief AdministratorLOL! Just a little fuel for the fire.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 21:29:15 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 02:47 PM EST Msg. 796918 of 797016 (This msg. is a reply to 796910 by particleswaves.) Jump to msg. # Thanks particleswaves, do you, by chance know what state this Patrick Lynch lives in or general location? By: particleswaves 12 Jan 2009, 05:45 PM EST Msg. 796945 of 797015 (This msg. is a reply to 796918 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodol...sorry, I hate to admit it but I have no notes or recollection of why I was looking for him in the first place. (The mind is the second thing to go.) Do you have any info indicating he may be a major player that we (or somebody) should talk to? By: goodolboy27 12 Jan 2009, 05:57 PM EST Msg. 796952 of 797015 (This msg. is a reply to 796945 by particleswaves.) Jump to msg. # particleswave, nothing to post on this board.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2009 21:43:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:01:38 GMT -5
By: sportsman93306 06 Jan 2009, 11:14 AM EST Msg. 36739 of 36823 Jump to msg. #
BHOLLENEGG. I APPRECIATE WHAT U R DOING AND I WOULD
LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE IN YOUR EFFORT. Somebody, posted a link on CMKI board about your post from a proboard message board. When I applied for memebership they declined it. However, that is not an issue with me.However,it does reflect the way that board is functioning. IS IT POSSIBLE FOR U TO POST THAT MESSAGE HERE. OK REF MY CONTRIBUTION TO YOUR EFFORT; I am willing to contribute 100 to 500 dollars a month for a year if we have reasonable degree of success in either(1) bringing culprit to justice or(2) get some restitution.OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH. By God's grace I can contribute above mentioned amount, however I can certainly afford much more, but I want a core team of say,100 shareholders making an effort in that direction. I understand that one should not throw good money after bad money, therefore one has to be careful in fixing the goal. If you are trying to get a core of dedicated sh ,please count me in. However,I won't be able to spend much time on this . THANKS SPORTSMAN
By: bhollenegg 13 Jan 2009, 06:33 AM EST Msg. 797069 of 797092 (This msg. is a reply to 797014 by sportsman93306.) Jump to msg. #
Thank you Sportsman93306. I appreciate your offer. Right now we are okay. Attorney Hodges is not charging the shareholders. He is helping the shareholders out because he knows the situation we are in. Attorney Hodges is a man of great honor and integrity, a caring person. Unfortunately there is a concertedd effort to discredit him and stop him from successfully obtaining an official confirmation. Right now Sportsman, all I ask from the Legal Shareholders please thank Attorney Hodges and His Firm, Mr. Dennis Smith for their much needed help and please let them do their work.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|