|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:10:03 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 08:04 AM EST Msg. 797076 of 797093 Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg, you wrote:
” I still stand by the information I provided “It was a sting, the DTCC has the funds, The SEC is through investigating CMKX, and Shareholders will be compensated“.
You have yet to provide a shred of proof to support these statements
*************
bhollenegg, You continue to site a "source" for this information, yet provide zero documentation or evidence that any correspondance ever took place. Many have done exactly the same thing only proven to be frauds. I am sure you can understand why many feel you are on this same road. \
************** bhollenegg, you continue to state "legal shareholders" as if you know who the illegal shareholders are. Care do discuss the difference between the two classes of shareholders?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:10:49 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Jan 2009, 08:39 AM EST Msg. 797084 of 797094 (This msg. is a reply to 797082 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
TYLER, you keep saving, "URBAN deserves to be in jail." fine. okay, no problem, if that is what the evidence indicates to you. you're the company. Mark, you're the CEO. you know best. however, if you truly believe what you say about urban then why in the world aren't you spending the time and energy to follow through with the original suit?
and if you say now, "well, urban doesn't have any money and he's not worth pursuing," my question becomes, "then why did you sue the basttardd in the first place?!!"
come on, guys. let's get the story straight. if he's the bad guy then go get him. if he's not the bad guy then tell us who is.
it appears to me like you are playing some game regarding urban, and it weakens your credibility with shareholders. it does with me. you can't play it both ways and expect to be honest brokers of the truth about what happened with CMKX.
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 08:43 AM EST Msg. 797085 of 797094 (This msg. is a reply to 797084 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
Tony, Tyler's work isn't about putting anyone in jail. It is about recovering whatever it can through default judgements.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:14:21 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 08:04 AM EST Msg. 797076 of 797093 Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, you wrote: ” I still stand by the information I provided “It was a sting, the DTCC has the funds, The SEC is through investigating CMKX, and Shareholders will be compensated“. You have yet to provide a shred of proof to support these statements ************* bhollenegg, You continue to site a "source" for this information, yet provide zero documentation or evidence that any correspondance ever took place. Many have done exactly the same thing only proven to be frauds. I am sure you can understand why many feel you are on this same road. \ ************** bhollenegg, you continue to state "legal shareholders" as if you know who the illegal shareholders are. Care do discuss the difference between the two classes of shareholders? By: rosencrantz2010 13 Jan 2009, 08:51 AM EST Msg. 797087 of 797094 (This msg. is a reply to 797077 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, i agree with goodolboy on this point. i don't know you from Adam but i assume you are an honest man. nonetheless, i have read posts from other supposedly honest men stating as fact that they have information that such-and-such is the TRUTH. And then we later learn that not only is it not the TRUTH but that the person intentionally lied to the board. it's the d*mnedest thing. i can't tell you how many liars there are on these boards. apparently people posting and talking on paltalk (for example, acca) lie as easily as they take a breath. in fact, i suspect some people find it easier to lie than tell the truth. lol so, reading your promise that you have such-and-such information from a very good source sort of loses its punch. you see what i mean? i understand why your source may not want you to reveal the source, but then, i've read that very point a hundred times as well. as in, "i'd really like to tell you but i can't reveal my inside source, etc., etc., etc." only to later learn it was all either a lie or the guy had been fooled by someone else that was lying to him. i worry sometimes that some of the best defenders of the "cmkx faith" have in fact been lied to by one or two people they truly trust. now, it's possible the people informing many of the faithful are themselves not lying but it does seem possible that the "inside source" has been lied to and in turn is passing it on as the gospel truth, when in fact it's a lie. geeeezzzz.. guys not even an educated guess??
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:19:15 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 08:04 AM EST Msg. 797076 of 797093 Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, you wrote: ” I still stand by the information I provided “It was a sting, the DTCC has the funds, The SEC is through investigating CMKX, and Shareholders will be compensated“. You have yet to provide a shred of proof to support these statements ************* bhollenegg, You continue to site a "source" for this information, yet provide zero documentation or evidence that any correspondance ever took place. Many have done exactly the same thing only proven to be frauds. I am sure you can understand why many feel you are on this same road. \ ************** bhollenegg, you continue to state "legal shareholders" as if you know who the illegal shareholders are. Care do discuss the difference between the two classes of shareholders? By: bhollenegg 13 Jan 2009, 09:12 AM EST Msg. 797095 of 797095 (This msg. is a reply to 797076 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy27...You will have the proof. In the meantime, do you believe Attorney Al Hodges, an Attorney at Law, who served as Judge Pro term, who has his own successful Law Firm, who is at the point in his career whereby he chooses which cases he will represent, would waste his time, his staff's time, the legal system's time, the firm's money and resources, his money, the shareholders' time, and at no fees; if it were the oppostie of '“It was a sting, the DTCC has the funds, The SEC is through investigating CMKX, and Shareholders will be compensated?“. Take care Goodolboy, BHollenegg By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 09:18 AM EST Msg. 797096 of 797098 (This msg. is a reply to 797095 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, I do believe Mr. Hodges would provide this service in an effort to seek closure, not because it was a sting.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jan 13, 2009 9:21:34 GMT -5
Does anyone really believe Tyler is trying to get $$$ from JE and UC after these YEARS of time that afforded any CROOKS plenty of time to arrange the money into untouchable instruments and places...I don't know what Tylers goals are but getting blood out of turnips is not one of them IMO...I still believe our CERTS were paid for by brokers and SHORTY...and I still believe THAT is the $$$$ everyone is after...but that money is well looked after IMO and will not be given to TYLER but to CERT HOLDERS...UC is out of the picture as well as JE I bet...only CERTHOLDERS , REGULATORS and TYLER remain...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:35:15 GMT -5
If only it were that easy!! wembley DIAMOND DIGGER If you work for a broker « Thread Started Today at 9:22am » I work for a broker, I am having my back office call the dtcc and inquire about a settlement and or compensation for the CMKM shareholders, if you also work for a broker, do the same. I will let you know what I hear.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:50:49 GMT -5
Key word.... "IF"
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Jan 2009, 09:28 AM EST Msg. 797100 of 797107 (This msg. is a reply to 797098 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
one thing that pop out of that conversation between hndtohnd and particlewaves is dennis smith (who works in al hodges' office and is the poster named particlewaves) saying that al hodges' has susan trimbath on retainer,,, and then he said something like, "if she can't find it then it's going to be pretty tough," and he was talking about evidence for a naked short!
what?!!!!
anyone else hear that? and if true, then why hasn't TYLER told us? why haven't they come out and said, susan trimbath found no evidence of a naked short.
if it's true that trimbath couldn't find evidence of a naked short then we are really getting shafted.
but before i go flying off the handle i'll wait and see what others think about this point. (maybe my hearing off and i didn't correctly hear what dennis said? maybe.)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 9:56:25 GMT -5
By: snoopstock5 13 Jan 2009, 09:46 AM EST Msg. 797109 of 797118 (This msg. is a reply to 797076 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Didn't the SEC investigate Cmkm in spring of 2004? Why yes they did. If it was a scam, why did the SEC allow Cmkm to not only trade, but to change their symbol to Cmkx? Also, thanks to Abad, isn't the DTCC and NCSS suppose to CLEAR all trades? Well they did a stand up job with 622 billion unregistered trades in Cmkx. By: snoopstock5 13 Jan 2009, 09:50 AM EST Msg. 797113 of 797119 (This msg. is a reply to 797098 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Don't forget the DTCC or NCSS job. CLEARING TRADES. That in itself shouts out to the world. I SCREWED UP AND ALLOWED 622 BILLION UNREGISTERED SHARES TO SIT THE MARKET. Click link to read the entire post... ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=797113
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 10:00:29 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Jan 2009, 09:50 AM EST Msg. 797114 of 797121 Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg and others. if all it takes is someone armed with a lawyer threatening to sue TYLER to get the truth, then why not have AL Hodges threaten TYLER with a suit? at least Al Hodges can get the TRUTH and it won't cost him a thing! lol
that way you'll get the evidence you've been looking for and I'm confident that a lawyer like Al Hodges will be able to sign the NDA and pass information on to his client (dennis) who in turn can pass it on to someone else who is not legally bound by the NDA. at this point, who cares?
frankly, i'm suspicious of the stories about people telling us they obtained the truth by threatening to sue TYLER. i think it's just more bullshiiitt.
now, who is feeding us those stories?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 10:02:24 GMT -5
By: snoopstock5 13 Jan 2009, 09:46 AM EST Msg. 797109 of 797118 (This msg. is a reply to 797076 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Didn't the SEC investigate Cmkm in spring of 2004? Why yes they did. If it was a scam, why did the SEC allow Cmkm to not only trade, but to change their symbol to Cmkx? Also, thanks to Abad, isn't the DTCC and NCSS suppose to CLEAR all trades? Well they did a stand up job with 622 billion unregistered trades in Cmkx. By: snoopstock5 13 Jan 2009, 09:50 AM EST Msg. 797113 of 797119 (This msg. is a reply to 797098 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Don't forget the DTCC or NCSS job. CLEARING TRADES. That in itself shouts out to the world. I SCREWED UP AND ALLOWED 622 BILLION UNREGISTERED SHARES TO SIT THE MARKET. Click link to read the entire post... ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=797113 By: rosencrantz2010 13 Jan 2009, 09:56 AM EST Msg. 797120 of 797121 (This msg. is a reply to 797118 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # has anyone that's talked with Hakala asked her why the SEC allowed this shiiitt to happen? how is it that the SEC allowed cmkx to trade a gazillion shares and never step in until they had apparently dumped their entire load? why did the SEC sit on its lazy assss and do so little to protect investors? anyone asked Hakala those kinds of questions? (minus the swearing, of course. lol)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 10:21:28 GMT -5
From the Conglomerate Board..... By: pleiadian 13 Jan 2009, 10:12 AM EST Msg. 36826 of 36826 Jump to msg. #
What if the Fed Bank has been cornered and the treasury has taken it over. As far as I am concerned all the Naked SHorting of equities profits ultimately go back into the Fed bank coffers through their surrogate the DTCC..Is the Fed Bank being forced to use all the cash they have stolen and that is why all the infusion of cash that is keeping the market floating. Covering all the naked short shares. Just a thought.....
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Jan 13, 2009 10:28:33 GMT -5
Why isn't Al getting paid instead of Tyler..At least he is communicating with us
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 10:29:38 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 08:24 AM EST Msg. 797081 of 797136 (This msg. is a reply to 797080 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg, you continue to state "legal shareholders" as if you know who the illegal shareholders are. Care do discuss the difference between the two classes of shareholders?
By: bhollenegg 13 Jan 2009, 10:09 AM EST Msg. 797127 of 797136 (This msg. is a reply to 797081 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
Goodolboy27...the difference between the two classes of shareholders, Legal Shareholders and illegal shareholders, are...
The Legal Shareholders are the ones who have paid for the stock and will receive a return on the stock. Legal Shareholders have Class and need to be paid.
The illegal shareholders are the ones who have not paid for the stock and 'deceived' a return on the stock. Illegal Shareholders have no Class and need to pay.
Take care, BHollenegg
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 10:11 AM EST Msg. 797129 of 797140 (This msg. is a reply to 797127 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg, agreed. eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 10:34:10 GMT -5
By: nufced 13 Jan 2009, 09:57 AM EST Msg. 797121 of 797141 Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg__SIX MOTNTHS AGO, you posted IMMINENT and HUGE ROI... ergo that phone call, Im guessing.
bhollenegg Barnacle Settlement is imminent « Thread Started Yesterday at 6:40pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recently I had the pleasure of speaking to someone directly to the settlement money for our ROI. As I wish I could elaborate more about this the settlement money is about to be released.
A good shareholder named Andy Hill will be in Mona's Room on Monday sometime and he will be able to elaborate on what has transpired. Remember read what is in the 14C the answers have been here from day one.
Thank you Bhollenegg
bhollenegg Barnacle Re: Settlement is imminent « Reply #10 Yesterday at 8:34pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you read the 14C it outlines the business plan of the company. As for my source I cannot and will not divulge that information. I have been involved with top secret programs while in the military and I understand secrecy at times.
The work that many shareholders have researched and spent hours of due dilligence on has uncovered a huge ROI.
Thank you Bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 13, 2009 11:11:15 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Jan 2009, 09:18 AM EST Msg. 797096 of 797182 (This msg. is a reply to 797095 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. #
bhollenegg, I do believe Mr. Hodges would provide this service in an effort to seek closure, not because it was a sting.
By: bhollenegg 13 Jan 2009, 11:05 AM EST Msg. 797180 of 797181 (This msg. is a reply to 797096 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. #
Goodolboy27...Whatever you believe is fine. Attorney Hodges is seeking Official Confirmation Of the Compensation, not closure.
|
|