|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2009 15:44:12 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 18 Feb 2009, 12:14 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811535 of 811569 (Reply to 811531 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # 99...DO you think the efforts of Bob and Al led to the flurry of activity at Tyler, or do you think something else is happening? eom.
By: aladin99 18 Feb 2009, 01:29 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811541 of 811569 (Reply to 811535 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # N2P - What Bob & Al have been doing is the good work but I never thought they could get the confirmation from Morris Richard or Tyler because if Morris Richard knew he wouldn't say it 100% which is expected and forget about Tyler....One thing good about Tyler is when Koolmoney talked to BF and BF said something like we don't need to worry about 1.4M acres... that a few thousand would make us rich!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2009 15:46:46 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 18 Feb 2009, 01:57 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811549 of 811569 (Reply to 811545 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # aladin, what type of positive news are you expecting out of tyler? what will the nature of that news be? the arrest of someone? tyler getting their hands on the edwards money? a summary judgement on urban? urban agreeing to pay $200m to tyler?
how does the SEC expect to get money from anyone when they allowed everyone a year or more to spend, hide and do whatever they wanted with the $250m?
in the STANFORD and MADOFF cases the feds came in like blood hounds and went after the assets in days to prevent it from being moved and hidden. in the CMKX case the feds didn;t lift a finger to do anything for years.
how then can any of us expect any of the $250m coming back to us? and if it doesn't come back to us then where will any settlement funds come from?
but,,, back to the original question, what kind of positive news are you expecting out of tyler?
By: aladin99 18 Feb 2009, 02:06 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811552 of 811569 (Reply to 811549 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # Rose - Tyler is basically getting paid to write BS and BS nothing but BS so when we get paid...there will be no big impact on bankers/dealers and government agencies a whole...Tyler requested to cancel 13.3B shares from UC's family members...whyTH they would do that...what's the status of that??? They don't seem to go after UC at all...I don't see the system would hand any our restitution money to Tyler...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2009 15:52:20 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 17 Feb 2009, 07:34 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811371 of 811570
Jump to msg. # Hey jfarn _ are you still upset because I did not call you up? Get over it!
By: jfarn 17 Feb 2009, 07:43 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811378 of 811570 (Reply to 811371 by lilburrito0)
Jump to msg. # Jose, You did not call me because you were afraid about me getting your coordinates. You are a little man, a sarcastic accountant pusssy; and surely your Madre is/would not be proud of what you have become and/or represent.
Win and/or lose with CMKM: you will never be welcome in my company Jose.
Watch your step. We have mutual friends and you should be mindful of such.
Comprende?
By: lilburrito0 17 Feb 2009, 07:46 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811381 of 811570 (Reply to 811378 by jfarn)
Jump to msg. # LOL _ You'd be surprised as to who the Feds are interested in! And right now it's not Urban and Edwards!
Looking forward to meeting you Jfarn. So please, hurry up and don't waste anymore time with your words!
Adios
By: oldepro 18 Feb 2009, 02:22 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811556 of 811569 (Reply to 811381 by lilburrito0)
Jump to msg. # lilburrito, rosencrantz
By: oldepro 07 Feb 2009, 12:09 PM EST Rating: post rating 0 Msg. 806972 of 811554 (Reply to 806892 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # rosencrantz,
"where are the authorities? why isn't TYLER going after RB and other posting boards in an effort to obtain the records of those people that helped in the scam, or claimed to have insider information about what was going on? the evidence is out there and TYLER needs to be going after it, especially if TYLER has deep pocket investors that are funding all aspects of their work."
Did you just mention why we have seen no indictments yet? Is this why Ms. Allred from the IRS wants to talk to those who attended the races and the party. Is this what is taking so long? I wonder if she is tracking the free shares from the races? It would not be Tyler's job, it would be up to the DOJ, FBI and the IRS. Are they tracking paid pumpers? I pumped, but for free. I was caught up in the fervor. No one has contacted me.
Where did $250 million come from?
The Commission alleges that as Casavant generated demand for CMKM stock through fraudulent promotion of the company, Edwards, Casavant, and their nominees sold their shares into the public markets for at least $64.2 million in profit, much of which was paid to Casavant to support his extravagant lifestyle. Allegedly, Edwards profited by about $26.4 million from sales through a single broker-dealer, Casavant profited by about $31.5 million, and Casavant's nominees profited by about $6.3 million.
"at least $64.2 million in profit", not $250 million.
There is $186 million unaccounted for. Who got it? Is that why is taking so long? Where did the $250 million figure come from? Not the SEC. I know, does anyone else?
Now, personally, I pray your "what if" scenario is correct. The truth will come out. Question is, will any of us be alive? Rosen, I do appreciate the time you spend here and the questions you ask. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2009 15:57:09 GMT -5
By: aladin99 18 Feb 2009, 02:40 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811561 of 811571 Jump to msg. # don't read if you don't own... camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=3176 By: rosencrantz2010 18 Feb 2009, 03:02 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811565 of 811571 (Reply to 811561 by aladin99) Jump to msg. # aladin, one of the first links in that document is to Great Western Diamonds, which is one of the few other large holdings in the FALC. (SHORE#1, SHANE#2, STAR/UNITED#3, FORESTGATE#4, ENTOURAGE#5, and GREATWESTER#6.) Great Western has a decent sized set of claims in the north of the FALC and they have held those claims going all the way back to the early cmkx maps. so, you have linkage (however strong or weak you want to make it) between urban (the dumbest crook in mining history!) and shane resources, united uranium, star uranium, cmkx, and entourage. Those companies now control roughly 25% to 30% of the FALC claims. then the remaining portion of the FALC is under the control of SHORE GOLD. the interesting thing about that is that just about ALL of those claims were once owned by CMKX. can you imagine urban was so dumb he let all those claims slip through his fingers? wow! he has to be the dumbest guy in the world! and now SHORE GOLD is getting ready to do open pit mining and telling people that they will eventually have the largest diamond mining works in the world. you'd have to be pretty dumb to be a part of all of that and then just let it slip through your fingers for a quick score. but, there are a lot of dumb people in the world and urban must surely be the dumbest to have done that. right? By: aladin99 18 Feb 2009, 03:16 PM EST Rating: Msg. 811568 of 811571 (Reply to 811565 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # Rose - lol...That's UC... UC was born to be the dumbest miner on earth or to be the creator of a million millionaire...Believe it or not! ...Bob and Al should work on the confirmation of 1.9M acres which I believe they could achieve a better result than working on the confirmation of compensation settlement...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2009 16:07:04 GMT -5
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:47:04 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 268113 Post # of 268136 Here is a really good watch!!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovllHgvUJpQ
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 18, 2009 19:17:41 GMT -5
snifferpup Mod Squad Re: The Buzz 2/16/09 « Reply #23 Today at 10:31am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- richy_63: toronto peoples contact was a lawyer that gave them info ~he was the one who said no more info i gave you enough to make your own decission ~all i can say is t do your own calcultion and then you will see how posative it is ~i was tol d that you will not hear any real confirmation on this . it will just be bang your paid millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=24670&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 18, 2009 19:18:49 GMT -5
pennypauly Mini Mod Re: The Buzz 2/16/09 « Reply #25 Today at 6:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ty jacbert Re: The Buzz Talk 2/16/09 « Reply #68 Today at 3:10pm » Hello ... all After a discussion in the International Room in Paltalk today, INES was wondering why it was taking so long for the judge to make a decision in the John Edwards case. viewer.zoho.com/docs/scaxEI made a call to the SEC number in that document and... After making an inquiry about the judges decision in the case that the SEC is persuing against John Edwards I was given over to the enforcement Div. of the SEC. The agent said he would look into the case and let me know what he could find out and call me back. Mz. Molly White called me back and said that no decision had been reached and that it was normal for a judge to take this long or longer... for a judge to make a decision in this type of case. She continued that when the decision is reached she doubted that a press release would be put out on it. She said that it could be accessed through normal means and that it would be put out as soon as the judge released his decision. All were very helpful.. and Ms. White wanted spring to hurry up. Thanks, jac millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=24670&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 18, 2009 19:22:24 GMT -5
sokr61 DIAMOND DIGGER OT: On Mad Money Now « Thread Started Today at 6:08pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyone watching Cramer right now? Did you see his street signs in the background? 3 words: THE NAKED TRUTH What's up with that??? millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=24695jmalone7us DIAMOND DIGGER Re: OT: On Mad Money Now « Reply #1 Today at 6:34pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are no coincidences! Or so its been said. curtisrp DIAMOND MINER Re: OT: On Mad Money Now « Reply #2 Today at 6:50pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sokr61, Why are you lying like that? I do not appreciate the games you are playing with us shareholders!!!! I was watching Cramer and I never saw the signs that say “The Naked Truth”. Prove it to me and if you can not prove it then you need to be banned from this board due to the fact you are playing baby games!!!! Only losers play GAMES!!!! If you prove it to me then I take that back. Curtis sokr61 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: OT: On Mad Money Now « Reply #3 Today at 7:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Curtis, Watch the first 15 minutes when it replays..... The first 15 minutes were THE NAKED TRUTH. Then the signs switched to GOLDEN PARACHUTE(S?). Then I believe they were changed to OFF THE CHARTS, although I lost interest by then.... Hope this helps...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 18, 2009 19:39:02 GMT -5
drillbit Diamond Finder and Miner I guess I am a simple minded sort BUT « Thread Started Yesterday at 8:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHY hasn't CMKX gone the way of many other scam stocks in the past? Why are we still here discussing all things CMKX, Tyler, Acca and even Robert/Mr. Hodges? JMHO, but someone set up something many years ago to facilitate something. Our stock should have gone the way of so many real scam stocks LONG AGO. Robert Maheu was a master of the covert and overt....know same with the former usually being 85% below the water and the other % being seen. haney Diamond Finder and Miner Re: I guess I am a simple minded sort BUT « Reply #1 Yesterday at 9:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Drillbit: You are so right. Over the years I have come to believe that it is so big and that our grand kids will read about this stock in the future. we are changing the world for the better. KK ocd Diamond Finder and Miner Re: I guess I am a simple minded sort BUT « Reply #2 Today at 3:30am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree but I'll never invest in anything like this ever again...ever! With options you get penny stock pricing but get treated by the companies like a human. What a concept. hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: I guess I am a simple minded sort BUT « Reply #3 Today at 6:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I more than agree with you Drillbit....thanks very much. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=7705
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 18, 2009 21:17:19 GMT -5
twobits... I do, how about you? LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 28, 2003 CMKI Casavant Mining Kimberlite International ) announced today that effective on the opening of the markets on Wednesday, January 29, 2003 it's new trading symbol Trading symbol See: Ticker symbol will be "CMKM". The new symbol was issued by the National Association of Securities DealersNational Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) www.thefreelibrary.com/Casavant+Mining+Kimberlite+International+Gets+New+Trading+Symbol...-a096931474Thank you, BHollenegg i do, i used info from the Amendments filed at the NSOS...which are incomplete as to "ticker symbol" changes....therefore, i stand corrected, after verification from my written copies of Press Releases...t/y for informing me....i bought in June 2004, therefore never traded under symbol "cmkm" now, about your "other" research, request you stand corrected and admit there is no factual connection between CMKM China Marketing Company and CMKM Diamonds, Inc. trying to tie these two companies together is just "fantasy".
that was my point about your original post by my first response to you2bits Twobits ...Thank you for acknowledging that CMKM was once the trading symbol for CMKM Diamonds. You came up with the "factual connection". Please read what is written… "Something does not seem right with CMKM China Marketing". I compared the similarities of CMKM China Transactions vs CMKM Diamonds Events. If you look at the transactions of CMKM China from 2007 to 2009, it looks more like a reference for prices, not transactions. I stand by my observation...hopefully you will stand corrected on your "factual" accusation. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by chris on Feb 18, 2009 21:36:54 GMT -5
If I were hawkeye1 I would shut up for good.
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Feb 18, 2009 21:53:53 GMT -5
sokr61 DIAMOND DIGGER Member Info Status: offline Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 179
|
|
|
Post by twobits10 on Feb 19, 2009 13:12:53 GMT -5
i do, i used info from the Amendments filed at the NSOS...which are incomplete as to "ticker symbol" changes....therefore, i stand corrected, after verification from my written copies of Press Releases...t/y for informing me....i bought in June 2004, therefore never traded under symbol "cmkm" now, about your "other" research, request you stand corrected and admit there is no factual connection between CMKM China Marketing Company and CMKM Diamonds, Inc. trying to tie these two companies together is just "fantasy".
that was my point about your original post by my first response to you2bits Twobits ...Thank you for acknowledging that CMKM was once the trading symbol for CMKM Diamonds. You came up with the "factual connection". Please read what is written… "Something does not seem right with CMKM China Marketing". I compared the similarities of CMKM China Transactions vs CMKM Diamonds Events. If you look at the transactions of CMKM China from 2007 to 2009, it looks more like a reference for prices, not transactions. I stand by my observation...hopefully you will stand corrected on your "factual" accusation. Thank you, BHollenegg sorry bhollenegg, i disagree with your "research"....in "law" it's called too much of a stretch in logic.... just because Urban flew to China...isn't enough of a nexus to put these two companies together for any reason...CMKM...China Marketing Company...simply put..C=China MK=marketing M=Management seems like a logical ticker symbol...there is no connection, even about the trading....again you try to SPIN cmkx into it...i don't buy it...but hey, whatever floats your boat.... 2bits
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Feb 19, 2009 13:28:09 GMT -5
Moderator: No Moderator Assistants: Boardmarks: 3 Created: 2/22/2006 8:59:14 PM Board type: Free China Marketing Media Holdings Inc Address: 6993 Gentle Breeze Dr. Willis, TX 77318 USA Phone: 281-615-7166 Business Description: Not Available State of Incorporation: TX Year of Incorporation 1999 Officers: Lois Newman, Pres. & Sec't. Fiscal Year End: December 31 Outstanding Shares: 4,778,000 as of 2006-02-10 Estimated Market Cap: 4.778M as of 2006-02-17 (based on Outstanding Shares as of 2006-02-10) Authorized Shares: 100,000,000 as of 2005-02-09 investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=5267Funny CMKM(China Marketing Media Holdings Inc ) is a TEXAS corporation...HA HA...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 19, 2009 15:27:21 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 19 Feb 2009, 09:12 AM EST Rating: Msg. 811723 of 811920 (Reply to 811722 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # i wonder if TYLER has thought to ask the SEC where the money is and exactly how much urban and edwards each pulled out of the country. there would be records carefully documenting the amounts and when and where those funds were routed.
for example, the IRS should have a record of a bank wire between urban's las vegas account and the bank of montreal, for example.
TYLER should be able to obtain the copy of a record showing something like: $97,529,781.45 transfered to bank of montreal 08/21/2004. right?
you can argue over the amount, the bans involved and the date but you can't argue over whether or not the US government knows. following 9/11 and the passage of the patriot act, no money is allowed to slip out of the country undetected,,, unless. of course, you want to argue urban put it into cash and slipped it across the boarder on dog sled. and of you want to argue he simply used a check, well, that little electronic transaction would have been recorded by the feds as well, and for the very same reasons, to prevent money laundering and the prevention of people trying to skip out on paying their taxes.
in other words, the FEDS have to know where the funds are and exactly what amount was moved.
TYLER, you should demand the FEDS give you that information! that's our money! right?
|
|