|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 26, 2009 21:41:00 GMT -5
BookBiz Entourage holding at 75 cents per share « Thread Started Today at 7:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Since the reverse split on March 16th, Entourage stock has gone from .40 to .35 to .32 per share in one week but now is holding at .75 per share. The Entourage stock that CMKX holds, once 45 million shares, is now 4.5 million, worth about $3.3 million. Will Entourage pay off CMKX and go its merry way or is something different/better in store? Would love to know your thoughts on this chain of events...xoxox BookBiz geez... check out the bid.... ENTOURAGE MINING NEW(OTC BB: ENMGF.OB) Last Trade: 0.75 Trade Time: Mar 25 Change: 0.00 (0.00%) Prev Close: 0.75 Open: N/A Bid: 0.11 x 5000 Ask: 0.74 x 2500 1y Target Est: N/ by jdrombo [24-Mar-09 02:09 pm] 24-Mar-09 02:09 pm by jdrombo I suspect The listed BOD is just a ruse. This company is actually being run by Mario Pino! Who ever heard of a $.60 split between the ask and bid? They obviously don't want to sell shares, but are perfectly willing to take them off our hands...especially after a 10:1 RS! messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_E/threadview?m=tm&bn=93596&tid=3&mid=3&tof=2&frt=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 26, 2009 21:47:56 GMT -5
By: aladin99 26 Mar 2009, 09:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820009 of 820048
Jump to msg. # SEC/IRS/DTC/DOJ/FBI allowed UNREGISTERED SHARES to be transferred into physical certs...Why would all five do that??
SEC knew JE sold UNREGISTERED SHARES and did not stop the cert pull....This could be interesting if the NSS struck the deal and the system wanted to use JE as another FALL guy...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 26, 2009 21:50:19 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 26 Mar 2009, 10:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820030 of 820049
Jump to msg. # FINALLY the Rats are being chased out of their holes into the light. But then what, indictments, grand juries, arrests? This could still take awhile just to get the money back, could it not? Or are we insured by buying through brokers? All the greedy have insurance do they not? So many questions. I hope our 'good hands' are around some greedy dude's neck! eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 6:55:34 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 26 Mar 2009, 11:00 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820053 of 820073 (Reply to 820033 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...MY PALMS are itching so I am expecting the Trust money to be transferred SOON. Those darn houses, that 2% of the entire real estate market in the U.S. has been a real stinker....Lol. eom.
By: monetaryshift 26 Mar 2009, 11:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820055 of 820073 (Reply to 820053 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # ntp, i'm no financial expert, but do you have any idea how a 12 trillion dollar subprime mortgage market created a 700 trillion derivative mess?
little help
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 6:59:11 GMT -5
well hell.... nothing else is working........By: joesixpack333 27 Mar 2009, 12:36 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820063 of 820073 Seems the white hats and alphabets will get help.. on the local radio station today I listened to a lady who is an authority on Angels.. she has written books on the subject.. in her opening remarks.. she spoke in general about Angels then suddenly said.. "you have all heard of Michael the Archangel.. well he has been busy assembling an army of people on the earth..." ...that one kind of took me by surprise.. no mention of why.. just dropped that comment and continued on to take call about Angels from people and no one asked her about the army.. even the guy doing the interview never picked up on it.. hmmm.. now what ON EARTH would God need an army of people for, chosen by Michael the Archangel himself... weird.. ah.. probably nothing important..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 7:09:02 GMT -5
Yesterday at 6:27pm, ShowMeTheMoney wrote:T his Amendment to Rule 15c2-11, dated April 1991, is very interesting. Basically, it placed even greater responsibilities on Brokers and Market Makers to obtain and maintain information on OTC companies... Especially those OTC firms that were non-reporting or non-compliant. Bluntly, the SEC knew this was a problem... and they believed back then that the Market makers and Brokers had a responsibility to help prevent the fraud that was occurring in the OTC markets... and certainly not benefit from it. The proposed amendments to Rule 15c2-11 would place greater information review and recording requirements, and thus greater accountability, on broker-dealers publishing quotations for securities in a quotation medium other than a national securities exchange or Nasdaq ("covered OTC securities"). These proposed amendments also would provide greater investor access to information about these securities. In particular, the proposed amendments would: eliminate the Rule's "piggyback" provision, which currently permits broker-dealers (other than the initial broker-dealer) to quote the security without having current issuer information; require broker-dealers that publish priced quotations for a security to obtain and review updated information about the issuer at least annually; expand the information required about issuers that do not file periodic reports with the Commission; require documentation of the broker-dealer's compliance with Rule 15c2-11; and enhance investor access to the information required by Rule 15c2-11. These amendments were published... and complete details of the Rule can be found at the following URL: www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule15c2-11.htmlAlso, the Regulatory History of this Rule is noted below: 36 FR 18641, Sept. 18, 1971, as amended at 41 FR 22826, June 7, 1976; 49 FR 45123, Nov. 15, 1984; 56 FR 19156, Apr. 25, 1991; 70 FR 37496, 37618, June 29, 2005, Aug. 8, 2005; 73 FR 52752, 52768, Sept. 10, 2008 AIMO, - Show jfarn DIAMOND MINER Re: Shareholders Update March 25, 2009 « Reply #83 Today at 6:39am » Show, read below the quote from Antony Santos (owner of Nev West). I had a most interesting conversation with him regarding CMKM, Edwards, and the rule you highlight. I strongly encourage you to touch base with him. Tell him I encouraged you to call and that you are sharing info. with the OIG. He was a patsy Show. Call him. From Santos: "You don't know the half of it!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Please call me!!!!!!! 949-697-9819 Anthony Michael Santos, Esq. Infinite Software Corporation 28202 Cabot Road Suite 415 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 949-697-9819 asantos@infinitesoftware.com
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 7:12:06 GMT -5
Yesterday at 6:37pm, ShowMeTheMoney wrote: What I'm trying to say is that the SEC can't have it both ways. They wouldn't hear the arguments about NSS during the hearings that ultimately led to the company being delisted. Yet, years later, they bring forward a story that "all" the AS and OS is related to the illegal issue and sale of Unregistered Shares by insiders.
It doesn't really matter! It is even more illegal to sell "Unregistered" Securities... there are no arguments of liquidity in that case (like there have been in NSS)... and, most importantly, it is illegal for Market Makers and Brokers to participate in the sale of Unregistered Securities. Plus, Rule 15c2-11 clearly states that they (MM and Brokers) have a legal responsibility to perform enough due diligence to properly understand and represent the risks of an OTC firm to their clients.
Bottom line... We were delisted by the SEC precisely because the company had not posted the filings that were necessary for the Market Makers and Brokers to perform their proper DD. But, it didn't matter. The MM and Brokers didn't want to see that information, because they were too happy making commissions from the sales of these unregistered securities, plain and simple. And, that is illegal under Rule 15c2-11!
In my mind, it doesn't matter whether the SEC claims our huge OS is the result of a Pump and Dump scam, and not NSS. Regardless, the Market Makers and Brokers profited from selling shares that were not legal to sell.
All of us need to keep this in front of the OIG every day... and please copy your Senators and Congressional Representatives.
AIMO, - Show
john3339 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Shareholders Update March 25, 2009 « Reply #85 Today at 6:43am » BINGO Show. Precisely why I believe at the very least, we should see compensation coming from the SIPC for losses incurred by us, from the MM and borker fraud.
We should also see funds coming to make us whole, coming from our borkers' supplimentary insurances.
What we really need to see now, is some legitimate source showing valuation of what we had in claims and potential, the day before we were revoked.
We cannot be paid according to the pps, because the pps was artificially low because of the dilution of all these unregistered shares hitting the market. They'll HAVE to look at adjacent operations and extrapolate across the claims we had.
Dr. D did just that several years ago, when he "low-balled" our intrinsic value into the several trillion dollar range.
IMO, THAT is the value that the SIPC and supplimental insurances are going to have to cover to make us whole again.
And really, is there any way to definitively identify which shares were from the unregisterd batch, and which ones were a part of the 81 +- billion legitimate shares? I can't think of how anyone could possibly do that without generating major doubt in their results. This should mean, ALL certificate holders should take part in the reparation payments.
Now, how will the "un-shareholders" be treated in this? Hopefully the same. A certed share is simply proof of the fraud. Electronic markers, while not certed, should still be considered proof of the fraud.
imo, john
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 15:34:38 GMT -5
prisonguard DIAMOND JEDI Re: SEC didn't ask about unregistered shares? « Reply #5 Today at 11:54am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have said all along that I believe that the certs we hold were the nss. We had heard that the nss was around 1.3 Trillion if my memory is correct. Adding the registered and unregistered would give us the 1.3T. Could Roger Glenn have maxed out the O/S and Urban has been selling them to the brokers. Remember people telling about the long wait to get their certs, could this be because Urban setting the price. Now the unregistered would be the shares that the brokers still have on their books from people who did not pull certs and the bogus accounts that may be hiding the rest of the short. These shares need to become legit or covered before we get paid as this could effect the amount of payout.IMO
Remember "It's all being done for the shareholder" JMT
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 15:41:57 GMT -5
victorious Kimberlite Rookie Mahue meeting July 2008 « Thread Started Today at 2:03pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anybody have any information about an ALLEGED meeting between Mr. Mahue, brokers and market makers last July? If so let me know because I'm trying to confirm this meeting. Last I heard someone on the boards knows an agent ( an associate of IBM) who attended this very meeting. It's funny because at this time last year I was told that "it's over, it was a sting". Funny coincidence.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 15:47:39 GMT -5
By: jboydwv 27 Mar 2009, 10:33 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820096 of 820252 Jump to msg. # the author is a former SEC Commissioner By: AlanC 27 Mar 2009, 10:17 AM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 1182642 of 1182642 (Reply to 1182639 by AlanC) Jump to msg. # I should have mentioned that the author is a former SEC Commissioner who knows naked shorting is hurting all honest investors and the world economy! This is a must read: www.sec.gov/comments/s7-30-08/s73008-108.pdf
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 15:55:30 GMT -5
By: sharasilva 27 Mar 2009, 09:24 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820081 of 820254 (Reply to 820079 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # shifty, why did UC let the claims lapse?
By: rosencrantz2010 27 Mar 2009, 10:09 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820090 of 820253 (Reply to 820081 by sharasilva)
Jump to msg. # shara, that's a good question. IF the guy knew or suspected there was value somewhere, or at least in specific locations (afterall, they did a fly-over), why would he just walk away from it?
URBAN is either a) real stupid, b) lazy, c) determined that the potential value in those specific locations wasn't worth keeping, ooooooorrrrr d) he made a deal with SHORE GOLD.
for acquiring all of URBAN's former land holdings SHORE GOLD is either a) real stupid, b) wants to make sure there is no value in URBAN's old claims, oooooooorrrrr c) they made a deal with URBAN.
if SHORE GOLD had not picked up all of URBAN's old claims then the evidence right now would be overwhelmingly in favor of those claims being used as part of a pump and dump. the fact that they all went over to the big boy in the FALC should tell us there is value in URBAN's old claims. URBAN had to have known it and i'm guessing the guy had to have made a deal, otherwise he is the dumbest man on the planet.
By: sharasilva 27 Mar 2009, 10:34 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820097 of 820254 (Reply to 820090 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # rose, shore did not pick up UCs old claims, They applied for new claims. They hold these mineral rights 100% with no underlying obligations to anybody but the province/canada
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 16:20:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 16:32:38 GMT -5
By: aladin99 26 Mar 2009, 09:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820009 of 820261
Jump to msg. # SEC/IRS/DTC/DOJ/FBI allowed UNREGISTERED SHARES to be transferred into physical certs...Why would all five do that??
By: gusjarvis 27 Mar 2009, 10:40 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820102 of 820261 (Reply to 820009 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # aladin not only did they allow all the shares to
get sold while they watched, after they had the fraud records they allowed urban and bill frizzell to pump the chit out of this and continued to watch. They say as they watched our money got stolen and we didn't have enough cash to keep most of our valuable claims.
Now if this isn't a sting then wtf, they are liable for everything
but a monkey knows this was a sting operation
By: aladin99 27 Mar 2009, 11:34 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820125 of 820261 (Reply to 820102 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Gusjarvis - If this is not a STING then the SEC really enjoys seeing shareholders got raped, abused and manipulated by the NSS...622B must be from here...and the numbers are so accurate to a single share...thanks for the today's technology so the NSSellers could never deny or lie about what they have done...
Ameritrade - 180,519,376,324 Etrade - 165,192,304,923 Jeffery - 111,780,681,294 J.E - 259,000,000,000 - I don't have the exact number!
By: gusjarvis 27 Mar 2009, 11:50 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820131 of 820262 (Reply to 820125 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # aladin old leslie said our certs are part of the
issued and outstanding number of 703, so we know in bill's letters he knew exactly who else counterfeited us and the sec knew exactly. I mean of course they did, they had all the paper work.
So colluding to hide who else raped us has to be part of the operation or mark and bill will have to go to jail. And we know since bill says it in his letter, the sec was watching this very closely, that nobody would be stupid enough to commit fraud at that point, right bill.
They said nobody would be dumb enough to know the sec/fbi/doj/irs were watching every single share sold and every single wire transfer and every single move made by all in cmkx.
I can't wait for the og to say, sorry for being suck diks, it was just you know what we had to do. Now here is your check and shut up
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 16:35:40 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 27 Mar 2009, 11:54 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820136 of 820262 Jump to msg. # SHIFT...THERE are rumors of a possible .02 payment to shareholders that was possibly hijacked. Can't prove it either way. Our payout is potentially huge, what's to stop the Feds from grabbing it and paying us squat for interest while they pay for their 'new deal'? TIA. eom.
By: monetaryshift 27 Mar 2009, 11:58 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820142 of 820262 (Reply to 820136 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # ntp,
the 'master' covered all angles, that option is not available
'we are wrapped-up in good hands'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 16:37:05 GMT -5
By: kilroy.killbasher 27 Mar 2009, 11:56 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820139 of 820262
Jump to msg. # Sporky, So why would a struggling company take on the financial obligations of moose pasture claims already proven to be worthless? That makes about as much sense as financially disinterested parties frantically researching a long-revoked pinkie and investing their lives "tutoring" speculators on the CMKI board. When it doesn't make sense, you'd better look closer, and Rosen is doing just that. Why does that bother you?
BTW, if imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then I suppose SparkySantos should be flattered.
\\|// ( o o ) ~~~~oOOo~(_)~oOOo~~~~ KILROY WAS HERE
|
|