|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 2, 2009 21:10:12 GMT -5
By: mquietstorm3 02 Apr 2009, 09:32 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823967 of 823971
Jump to msg. # " IN LIFE I BARGAINED FOR A PENNY AND FOUND THAT LIFE WOULD GLADY PAY MORE " eom
By: rosencrantz2010 02 Apr 2009, 09:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823969 of 823971 (Reply to 823967 by mquietstorm3)
Jump to msg. # mquietstorm3, that's great. if only it applied to THIS lifetime.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 17:50:30 GMT -5
By: planter82 03 Apr 2009, 01:07 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823979 of 824133 Jump to msg. # Kevin West phone report, Hart Senate Bldg? Post by Jo on Today at 1:24pm This phone records report shows Kevin West attached to the following phone number : (903) 262-8397 , which is the same phone number that Mark Faulk used at the bottom of his letter to the FBI in Vegas regarding the Victim Notification correspondence. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/victims_letter_to_fbi.pdf He (Mark) placed the number under the Tyler TX office address but this record check came out as you see it below, with Kevin Wests name associated with the number and the Hart Senate Bldg as the address. The phone number is a cell phone. There are also 56 email addresses and names and some varying phone numbers attached to the 56 names. I will post that if possible. But here is the report on Kevin West for starters. Name Address Other Info 1 KEVIN WEST Hart Senate Office Building Washington Dc, DC Phone Type: Cellular Carrier: New Cingular Wireless Pcs Llc - Il Time Zone: 1:05 PM CST County: Smith Average Income: $35,544 Average Home Value: $75,800
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 17:58:34 GMT -5
actually it was Annette Nazareth who said it, but just the same the message could apply for either!
By: hanssolong 03 Apr 2009, 05:38 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823984 of 824133 (Reply to 823983 by adrienne07) Jump to msg. # I thought naked shorting was a fantasy created by those who just want their stock to go up?Lol Hakala said that and she is either really, really stupid or she is involved in it deep.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:00:43 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 03 Apr 2009, 09:37 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823996 of 824134 (Reply to 823962 by rosencrantz2010) Rosencrantz2010; Shareholders have been played off way too long, and missed that grand window of opportunity (for much larger news items) to "GO LIVE", FIGHT, LITIGATE, MEDIATE, SUE, NEGOTIATE, EXPLODE, TAKE OFF, and for heavens sakes AIR their story by informing, and EXPOSING the NAKED TRUTH. Those words are with pellucid meaning , and not easily confused. Whether or not we wait on "bigger things" to transpire globally remains to be seen for years. My feeling is that many shareholders should have been informed SOMETHING of their position/situation relative to "pending events", discovery of "huge potential value", "something really worthy of the wait", but most importantly to be one of many who never knew of their fateful outcome is sickening within its own merit. To never have (had) any definitive notification one way or the other after all that "we" have been through.... AND it aint over yet. That's a pretty sad situation for many families in the CMKX community that certainly could have been dealt with , and more importantly legally avoided. Is all that I ever heard about were the needs of Urban and the "OLD TEAM". What about the shareholders that made this thing happen? Everything can be dealt with, and anything can be negotiated.
This I posted a couple of days ago, and it somewhat failed to post;
Those of you that are reporting that the SEC is "no longer, NOT finished with the CMKX investigation", "still under investigation, pending , etc.", can go back to them and let them know that they already reported that things " were finished " to some of the shareholders apparently. Get their act together, act professionally, put it down on that computer screen one way, or the other. If these statements are in fact being made by this agency; These false and misleading statements that are handed to shareholders (by individuals) are of a duplicitous nature, affecting thousands of lives potentially, and are about as trustworthy, honest, and above board as those that run our health care system in this Country. IOW, not WORTHY at ALL! These agencies should be sued into the ground that they stand on for keeping this charade going..
Time to stop with the games, and pay the shareholders.
________________________________________
Then we had some more updates with the standard conflicting "positive" message that matched what many have previously posted about SEC statements where "investigations were well completed", which regressed apparently from history to now -"almost completed" based on discussions with individuals of knowledge, and authority. How history goes back in time, and not forward is somewhat amazing to see/to me. SEC time warping.
This should not be ongoing. What needs to be happening are the games to end abruptly. For shareholders of record to be managing damages collected in adequate/commensurate restitution payments (by themselves as received) as interest builds, their trust is repaired, as well as their financial security.
I have nothing against the SEC, nor any other FEDERAL AGENCY. Just pay the shareholders what is due them.
AIMHO2~
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 3, 2009 18:03:50 GMT -5
snoopstock5 Diamond Finder and Miner I called the Transfer Agent to ask about my certs. « Thread Started Today at 2:59pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Very nice people and helpful. I spoke to Beth and she stated stated that if I received a stock certificate that was counter signed by 1st Global, then the stock certificate was REGISTERED. I told her about the SEC litigation release of 622 billion shares that are unregistered. She knew nothing about it. She also stated that if the SEC unregistered 622 billion shares, they have the names and stock certificate numbers. The SEC has not given the transfer agent any info on shares that are not registered of Cmkm. I have written to the SEC asking if my shares are part of the 622 billion that are unregistered. snoopstock5 Diamond Finder and Miner Re: I called the Transfer Agent to ask about my ce « Reply #1 Today at 3:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear , Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, the SEC’s policy is not to give legal advice regarding specific legal situations. Accordingly, I cannot advise you on the status of your shares. I encourage you to contact your lawyer with any questions you might have. Regards, Leslie Hakala snoopstock5 Diamond Finder and Miner Re: I called the Transfer Agent to ask about my ce « Reply #2 Today at 3:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The SEC is SUPPOSE to be their for the investors protection. Guess not. wodan Junior Miner Re: I called the Transfer Agent to ask about my ce « Reply #3 Today at 3:53pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC is not giving out any info. However, the transfer agent stated that IF THE CERTIFICATE IS COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT THEN IT IS REGISTERED. She checked my cert number on her computer and told me that my shares WERE REGISTERED. She stated that the SEC would have a list of names and/or companies that certs were considered unregistered. She was very adamant that any certs countersigned by the transfer agent were indeed registered. snoopstock5 millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=25296 tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8200
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 3, 2009 18:06:16 GMT -5
seagull Administrator CMKX Gossip Column Re: gossip 4/3/09 « Reply #8 Today at 2:40pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: swather CMKX..........now a private company in Texas « Thread Started Today at 1:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are many opinions on this board about whether CMKX is a private company or a public company whose trading privileges have been canceled.............. when CMKX moved from Nevada to Texas, Kevin didn't actually move the company. He folded the Nevada CMKX. He surrendered the company's Nevada charter which means that the company that we all hold shares in no longer exists.......... anyone who so desires can now go to the Nevada SS and set up a company called CMKM Diamonds Inc. Also, before surrendering the company's NV's charter, Kevin transferred all legal rights to any future monies, claims, or any other assets the company might acquire to a new CMKX of TX. What Kevin then did was set-up a new company registered in Texas called CMKM diamonds. The share structure of the new CMKX is unknown at this point. However, in a statement when the new company was set up, Kevin stated that shares in the old company would be exchangeable for shares in the new company on a one-for-one basis. However, in setting up this new CMKX, one can reasonably expect that the Tyler Group has made sure that they have complete control, either through possessing at least 50.1% of the O/S or having a convertible preferred share giving them control. So, at this point, I doubt anyone on this board has converted their old, Nevada based CMKX shares to new CMKX shares or whether Kevin even has new certificates printed up. While Kevin has stated that our shares are convertible, it would be an interesting legal question as to whether our current Nevada CMKX shares have any value in the new CMKX...............I don't think so....... Therefore, as it stands now, CMKX is a private TX company with, I would assume with few share conversions, less than 300 shareholders. The Tyler group is in full control because the rest of us don't own shares in the new company unless we took up Kevin's offer and converted our shares. Kevin and MF can do whatever they want because, at this point, it is their company ---------------- By: Chris Are you a corporate lawyer, are you sure 100% or is this your own opinion? Link to Post - Back to Top Logged -------------------- By: swather -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris.......its called research........... fact.......CMKX Nevada is gone fact......a new CMKX was set up in TX fact........our shares are convertible into the new company on a 1 for 1 basis according to Kevin opinion........based on statements from people on this board, very few have converted their shares.....including me. opinion........while our shares are convertible, it would be an interesting legal question as to the legal status of our old shares with respect to the new CMKX opinion........The Tyler group would be absolutely stupid if they didn't give themselves absolute control of the new CMKX, either through a convertible preferred share or 50.1% of O/S common shares ---------- By: sptrader Companies can change locations, whenever they desire, there is only one CMKM Diamonds and only one company with stock symbol CMKX. Verify this with Kevin or Mark, if you don't believe me. (or a corporate attorney or Transfer Agent) Our certs are still valid. Do you think that when Hershey recently moved from Pennsylvania to Mexico, that their stockholders shares became worthless? Nonsense. jmho --------- By: gumboman My opinion is that CMKX is a private company, and it was private before it was revoked. I have no idea if this is fact, but I do know that before we were revoked CMKX had some mysterious things going on. When you typed i the symbol "CMKX," the company staus on the chart said "CMKX (not public)" I think someone slipped up and this information was showing up on a couple of different ticker sites....And not "Big-Hearted Eddie's Ticker Site" type of website. To me, "Not public" means that we are a private company. This was also never refuted. As far as Tyler goes, I really could care less what they have to say right now. I tend not to listen to people who constantly lie, whether it is for my benefit or not. Are private companies listed on the SOS website? tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8188
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:06:25 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 03 Apr 2009, 01:01 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824020 of 824136 (Reply to 824018 by aloha_joe2)
Jump to msg. # aloha, two things: a) i wonder why it is taking the courts so long and b) what does she mean when she says, "The litigation has nothing to do with NSS funds"? what are nss funds?
is HAKALA verifying nss funds or did she mean to say, "that other person has her head up her assss because there is no such thing as nss funds."
By: jfarn 03 Apr 2009, 01:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824031 of 824136 (Reply to 824020 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # It is taking so long because it is obvious that their complaint was exclusionary, arbitrary, and capricious.
They are taking on serious water.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:11:19 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 03 Apr 2009, 02:24 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824063 of 824136
Jump to msg. # LEOWANTA...PLEASE...No more dates. No one in charge of this 'play' is required to do anything on shareholder's schedules. It's a numbers game to these people, the higher the numbers, the more leverage they can use. You are a number, I am a number. Our shares are all numbered and accounted for. They know where each of us live. The shareholders that have died and will die before any justice is found here are 'collateral damage'. It's a military term and this is probably run by spooks with military or quasi-military experience and backgrounds. It's business and Politics, and has nothing to do with people's feelings, although we all feel things. The trouble with many posters on the boards, including myself, is that we have fallen in love with the inventory, and forget this is a high-stakes game to see who can gain the higher ground with the least amount of casualties. If CMKM leases are as valuable as we think, entire 'old power' governments are holding the resources hostage for their future 'balance of power' against the 'new powers' who are after the same resources. That's why they call 'rare earth metals' rare. If and when we get anything out of this, we will undoubtedly owe a great deal to people that have done their jobs to the best of their abilities, for the sake of everyone involved, including shareholders. All in my opinion, eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:14:22 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 03 Apr 2009, 02:55 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824074 of 824138 Whatever is done for us, it will not be done...
...in the name of CMKM Diamonds.
I believe that company is 'effectively dead'.
When you listen to Mark Faulk's description of the company
and Kevin's statements of "no money" for ANYTHING.
And Hakala, and her 'endless investigation' that leads nowhere,
for nothing...(no wonder the country is broke). You have to
think that we're being set up to believe the worst (whatever
that is) because nobody is being arrested and nobody is being charged.
...and consider this,
Even if Hakala did finally finish this farce of an investigation, if you
add up the money that would be potentially paid back to shareholders,
it's laughable.
I simply can't believe that anything she is doing is the action we are
waiting for.
I will stick with MONETARY-SHIFT, that we are a 'wrapped up' component
separate from tyler, linkedf to Entourage, and derivatives, and the world
stage...and not to some 'rinky-dink' two-bit law firm in Texas, that hasn't
got a clue.
And if that's their smokescreen [or cover] , then, their brilliant! Because they
sold me.
Stockrich.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 3, 2009 18:15:21 GMT -5
chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #2 Today at 11:23am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spoke to another attorney the other day. This is definitely a tangled web and Tyler seems to be causing more confusion just like Urban did. Seems they are very very similar in their way of hiding the pea. The attorney feels there are serious issues with this company but you have to weigh the risk to reward. Based on our conversation he said the reward is not worth the risk. The company admits it has no money, tied up in lawsuits and not sure if there is a ongoing business into the future. He stated means nothing that they have judgments awarded to them collecting is a different story. He did mention that based on the conversations they company is skirting shareholders rights in decisions being made since the shareholders own majority rights. The company did not have the legal right to implement a board of directors without a shareholder vote. So the beat goes on. I will try another but at some point this becomes fruitless and Tyler knows this. Risk to reward. High risk no reward. « Last Edit: Today at 11:30am by chrisl » goldbarren Executive Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #4 Today at 11:32am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- they didnt implement a board the board added to a board already in existance which is legal under anyone's rules up to the limit of the articles until the next election which in nevada can mean never - dunno bout tx chrisl Crossfire Administrator gold, I understand but the company never released the articles to the shareholders and never updated them from my research. chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #8 Today at 11:45am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 11:38am, goldbarren wrote: The fact is the company refused to release the articles so I am not making that up. Since the company refused to release the articles we have no clue if there ever was a board of directors. Next since the current management does not release information on if there truly was a board and if that board was voted on by the majority then under "speculation" we can assume that board was put in place without a shareholder vote. If the company were to release the original articles stating something different then I would agree with do not speculate. My toy plastic gun with a plastic tip that shoots caps is loaded. « Last Edit: Today at 12:14pm by chrisl » chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #10 Today at 12:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 12:18pm, goldbarren wrote: Ok again since the company past or present never have provided the articles with regards to this information how do we know it is legal? That is a fact? Based on when Urban passed this scam off to Kevin what was the share structure and who had majority voting rights? Who was left on the board? Once Kevin took over as CEO were the shareholders the majority of this company and did Kevin skirt the rights of shareholders without a vote to implement these individuals? Now if you recall gold the company actually addressed this issue and stated to do a shareholder vote would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars potentially so they obviously are aware that what they did was questionable. So with that typed the company should release the articles on past and present for shareholders to view and read. goldbarren Executive Administrator ] Re: Update from me « Reply #12 Today at 1:07pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- this is all articles look like pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15533 chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #14 Today at 2:20pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:09pm, goldbarren wrote: Cool. Also they are based on a certain share structure and with the information provided recently I guess we can assume that the company has no majority rights within its own articles. This would mean that by not requesting shareholders to vote on certain issues the minority shareholders are truly running this company which would lead one to believe if the majority ever got together they could vote these knuckleheads out of office. What do I know I am a basher on a inernet chat board. cmkxclubhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2487&page=1chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #16 Today at 3:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 2:50pm, goldbarren wrote: Now that is where the company is skirting the law. They refuse to disclose the shareholder structure which actually would determine the company should not be making decisions on behalf of the majority. chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #18 Today at 3:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hell with CMKM if I succeed in putting them into bankruptcy then I will be happy. goldbarren Executive Administrator Re: Update from me « Reply #19 Today at 4:13pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- that is a noble endeavor but make it receivership BK is too expensive to file for cmkxclubhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2487&page=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:16:14 GMT -5
By: easternbreezes1 03 Apr 2009, 03:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824082 of 824138 (Reply to 824027 by leowanta)
Jump to msg. # LeoWanta, That may or may not be true. I hope there is a followup question, asking Ms. hakala to explain more fully what her reference to "NSS Funds" entails. Are there NSS funds that have been collected? That would be a fine place to start!
By: sportsman93306 03 Apr 2009, 03:33 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824083 of 824138
Jump to msg. # WHY DID'NT HALKAL SAY THAT THERE WAS
NO NSS FUNDS. THAT WOULD HAVE CLARIFIED EVERY THING,IMO. THANKS SPORTSMAN
By: nufced 03 Apr 2009, 03:51 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824090 of 824138 (Reply to 824082 by easternbreezes1)
Jump to msg. # easternbreezes, I thought Leslie was trying to clarify, what SBG quoted Sheila as saying, which was....Actually SBG quoting Sheila who was quoting Ms Hakala
"this letter will explain the distribution of the NSS funds in addition to the disgorgement funds and how to access those funds"
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:20:43 GMT -5
By: snoopstock5 03 Apr 2009, 04:22 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824099 of 824139
Jump to msg. # I spoke to Beth and she stated stated that of I received a stock certificate that was counter signed by 1st Global, then the stock certificate was REGISTERED. I told her about the SEC litigation release of 622 billion shares that are unregistered. She know nothing about it. She also stated that if the SEC unregistered 622 billion shares, they have the names and stock certificate numbers. The SEC has not given the transfer agent any info on shares that are not registered of Cmkm.
I have written to the SEC asking if my shares are part of the 622 billion that are unregistered.
She works for the Transfer Agent Monetary.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:23:02 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 03 Apr 2009, 05:02 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824108 of 824140
Jump to msg. # I think some very BIG CERTS are floatin' around
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:24:30 GMT -5
By: snoopstock5 03 Apr 2009, 04:22 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824099 of 824139 Jump to msg. # I spoke to Beth and she stated stated that of I received a stock certificate that was counter signed by 1st Global, then the stock certificate was REGISTERED. I told her about the SEC litigation release of 622 billion shares that are unregistered. She know nothing about it. She also stated that if the SEC unregistered 622 billion shares, they have the names and stock certificate numbers. The SEC has not given the transfer agent any info on shares that are not registered of Cmkm. I have written to the SEC asking if my shares are part of the 622 billion that are unregistered. She works for the Transfer Agent Monetary. By: snoopstock5 03 Apr 2009, 05:03 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824109 of 824140 Jump to msg. # SEC not helpful. They will not let us know if our shares are part of the 622 billion shares. However, Mark states that he can't get the info from the SEC either. Dear , Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, the SEC’s policy is not to give legal advice regarding specific legal situations. Accordingly, I cannot advise you on the status of your shares. I encourage you to contact your lawyer with any questions you might have. Regards, Leslie Hakala By: monetaryshift 03 Apr 2009, 05:53 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824117 of 824140 Jump to msg. # REMEMBER THIS: ITS VERY IMPORTANT: IT WAS THE SEC THAT ASKED HELEN TO MARK THE CERTS "FOR THIS DISTRIBUTION ONLY" DONT THINK FOR A SECOND THAT U HAVE UNREGISTERED SHARES THE SHIFT
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 3, 2009 18:29:03 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 03 Apr 2009, 05:59 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 824119 of 824140 (Reply to 824117 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # ms; as long as "they" start distributing something that "we" can finally use $$$ everything will be fine. Otherwise, these (our)bona fide certificates are useless, and well you know what we can do with them.
Regards,
AIMHO Oil
|
|