|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:50:35 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Mar 2009, 08:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820603 of 820607 (Reply to 820595 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # monetary, okay. fine. but man-o-man, what are you really hearing? this is gone on forever and the small guy is taking it in the gut. in many respects there are just as many, maybe more, that were hurt by this SEC scam as are being hurt in the bernie madoff scandal.
a lot of people are losing homes, marriages, cars, businesses, health and so on. the madoff case if bigger money but the number of people being hurt is greater in the CMKX case.
the SEC has to appreciate that and pay dearly for their mistake.
HAKALA and TYLER should both be pressured since neither one wants to answer questions. one or both of them are lying.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:51:06 GMT -5
jfarn DIAMOND MINER Re: Conversation with Anthony Michael Santos, Esq. « Reply #38 Today at 1:31pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dvorak, JE, Nevwest et.al were not responsible for the majority of the 622 billion unregistered shares. Why has the SEC treated RG and other large self-clearing brokers like spotted owls? Our pitiful management tries to spin it as they don't have the resources to go after the big boys hence their narrow plan of attack. What's the SEC's excuse? They haven't one and are now caught looking stupid and are currently trying to explain such to the OIG.
It all don't add up because it can't. Look at Phx. Golds letter from way back re: our plight and his tabulation of the numbers. The SEC took portions of that letter and used it as their script for an exit plan. But as we can now see, there are gaps. Thoughts welcome
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:51:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:53:12 GMT -5
from IHub Posted by: tiger760 Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009 4:49:59 PM In reply to: pantherj who wrote msg# 269722 Post # of 269825 All shares held now, are shares in the PRIVATE COMPANY of CMKM DIAMONDS INC. ..... Posted by: pantherj Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009 6:48:02 PM In reply to: tiger760 who wrote msg# 269812 Post # of 269825 Yes indeed, and that is unfortunate. it is possible, unlikely ... but possible, that liability for this private company's debts could extend to the individuals that are its owners. Ummm, that would be you, sir. time to put your assets in a a fail safe trust, i'd say.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:53:48 GMT -5
By: chrisl_fukpb66 28 Mar 2009, 05:51 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820501 of 820660
Jump to msg. # However, as the Company has stated many times, we will do everything within our power to assure that anyone who purchased shares in good faith is bonafide. If you have bought shares in good faith from your broker, and have received a certificate for those shares from our transfer agent, then most likely your shares are bonafide.
ivory maybe you can explain what "most likely" means?
Cause to me it means we are not sure.
By: chrisl_fukpb66 28 Mar 2009, 05:53 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820506 of 820660
Jump to msg. # There has been a lot of speculation and concern about whether certain shareholders are bonafide. With over 50,000 shareholders, it is impossible to say at this time with any degree of certainty whether or not individual certs are bonafide. Determining who are our actual shareholders are and who holds bonafide shares is a process that unfortunately will take considerable time, and could ultimately involve regulators and/or a legal process.
ivory did you read this part too? This part says we do not have the money to find out. But we will guess at it and most likely you are bonafide but we are not sure.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:54:37 GMT -5
By: chrisl_fukpb66 28 Mar 2009, 05:39 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820487 of 820661
Why did Tyler tell PB66 to dump me and pedro?
By: chrisl_fukpb66 28 Mar 2009, 05:58 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820512 of 820661
Tyler is nervous how come?
By: chrisl_fukpb66 28 Mar 2009, 06:43 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820538 of 820661
Jump to msg. # 89% of the O/S is unregistered. Odds are Bill and Kevin have unregistered securities. Any bets on that?
Nobody voted for the CEO cause we all are unregistered which would mean the current management is in there illegally? Just a thought.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 11:55:41 GMT -5
hundredtoone Diamond Wiz (Moderator) Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT! « Reply #229 Today at 11:47am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Welcome to… the Awakening Prophecies for a New Century from Dr. Robert Ghost Wolf first published and broadcast live on the Original Art Bell Show DAYS of DESTINY THE EIGHTH THUNDER … and the War of Valued Life Are you prepared for the NEW Realities for the coming Century? from Dr. Robert Ghost Wolf www.wolflodge.org/visibiliti/prophecy/welcome.htm...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficia
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 12:10:04 GMT -5
ShowMeTheMoney Mod Squad Re: Conversation with Anthony Michael Santos, Esq. « Reply #50 Today at 1:12am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've been thinking about my conversation with Anthony Santos... a lot. It's pretty clear he feels he was used... and it's equally plausible to me that he probably doesn't know all the details of how he was used.
In my mind, I'm beginning to pull together a scenario that makes sense to me... but, I need help from others who have more details and information from the John Edwards era to validate, or not, my thoughts.
We are currently left to believe there are two possible scenarios as to why Roger Glenn authorized the issue of 300 Billion new shares. In one scenario, Urban was in on the Pump and Dump from the beginning, and would have been the ring leader. In that scenario, Roger Glenn was just another corrupt lawyer who he could use. (Along with Sherwood Cook and Brian Dvorak.)
However, in the second scenario, Roger Glenn was brought in by UC to help fix a problem. In my mind, that problem was the need to offset the securities John Edwards issued into the market.
Recall that Santos claims that the Unregistered CMKX Securities were sell-able because of the exemption under Section F of Rule 15c2-11, which says that Brokers and Markets Makers do not have to conduct due diligence on the initial Prospectus and past filings if they are simply responding to Buy order.
The question that immediately comes to mind is where did all those Buy Orders come from? This is where I need our DD experts to help me out... Specifically, I need to know when the "Got CMKX" advertising campaign and race cars promotions got into full swing. More to the point, did they start during the time that John Edwards was selling his unregistered shares? Or, did those activities not begin until after Roger Glenn came on board?
The answers to these questions, imo, are critical. If the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions were in full swing during John Edwards' time, then he was likely using those activities to bring in buyers to avoid the requirements of Rule 15c2-11, via the exceptions allowed under Section F... that allowed selling Unregistered Securities directly to prospective buyers... and this was nothing but a massive Pump and dump from the beginning... Roger Glenn included.
If, however, the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions didn't start up until Roger Glenn and Robert Maheu came on board, then we have to ask ourselves two other very important questions:
[1] Where did John Edwards get his buyers?
[2]Why did UC, Glenn and Maheu then feel the need to create the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions?
In scenario 2, I think the answers to these two questions would be obvious. John Edwards was selling his shares to someone who was conducting an Asset Raid on the company. And, UC, Glenn and Maheu would have used the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions to create new buyers to offset JE's buyers.
If, however, the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions were always in place, then everything looks like a massive "Pump and Dump" operation with Roger Glenn being the next lawyer in line who was willing to risk all for a piece of the pie.
Personally, I'm still betting on scenario 2... if for no other reason than how many times have we heard how most Bona Fide shareholders claim they bought shares because of Roger Glenn and Maheu... which would have been after John Edwards time.
Can anyone provide proof on when the Got CMKX Advertising Campaign and Race Car promotions were started in contrast to the time John Edwards is accused of selling his Unregistered Shares, and the time when Roger Glenn and Robert Maheu came on board?
AIMO, and thanks in advance to anyone and everyone who can help provide information on the timing of these events.
- Show
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 12:20:38 GMT -5
ShowMeTheMoney Mod Squad (SEE THE ENTIRE POST IN THE covo THREAD)
Mr. Anthony Santos says he saw Opinion Letters from three attorneys that allowed NevWest to sell CMKX Securities. These three individuals were:
[1] Sherwood Cook
[2] Brian Dvorak
[3] Roger Glenn.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 12:32:40 GMT -5
jersey DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Promissory note due today-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i448.photobucket.com/albums/qq209/TruthAdministrator/Picture621.jpgi448.photobucket.com/albums/qq209/TruthAdministrator/Picture622.jpgi448.photobucket.com/albums/qq209/TruthAdministrator/Picture623.jpgthe CMKM Diamonds address in the note is attached to a company called "A Following of the Heart" 32037800250, "A FOLLOWING OF THE HEART ","313 MOUNT SYLVAN ST ","LINDALE 9 clicks down www.window.state.tx.us/filelib/fran0915.csvthanks Pedro other info, thanks again to Pedro s448.photobucket.com/albums/qq209/TruthAdministrator/?mediafilter=images jersey DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Promissory note due today « Reply #2 Today at 7:45am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the note was dated march 29, 2007 but there wasn't a cmkm tyler until approx. a week later in tyler not lindale tx... hmmm CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Provides Information Update to Shareholders April 5, 2007 CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has obtained office space at 615 South Broadway (2nd floor) in Tyler, Texas. Phones, a fax line and internet service will be operational next week....... and the day after the note.... CMKM Diamonds, Inc Announces a Change in Directors March 30, 2007 www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/news_index.html portrush Mod Squad Re: Promissory note due today « Reply #4 Today at 11:45am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is this the same $4million that Kevin said Urban "never delivered"? Also note that it says UC provided this on behalf of Emerson Koch.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 12:54:18 GMT -5
snifferpup Mod Squad Re: BIG SHORE GOLD PR « Reply #5 Today at 8:18am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- starbase7: interesting note on Shore Gold. They said they got all those claims in the Canada lottery~!!!! Tell me how one company ends up with all the claims we had in the lottery system without some of the other companys getting at least (1) one of them?? See Shore Gold PR herecmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=3370
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 13:55:09 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 29 Mar 2009, 07:38 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820687 of 822199 (Reply to 820686 by factanonverba13)
Jump to msg. # factnonsense,
you posted "CMKX is, was and ever shall be worthless"
cmkx is a revoked trading symbol, cmkm diamonds inc the nevada corp was wrapped up just prior to the convert out. please refer to the pr's.
wishing you the very very best in your bright bright future
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 13:56:14 GMT -5
By: aladin99 29 Mar 2009, 08:24 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820690 of 822199
Jump to msg. # Where is Chrisl??? If UC was a bad guy...then
1. The SEC did not even bother getting involved with this 2. The SEC wouldn't feel UNCOMFORTABLE answering our questions 3. FBI/DOJ/IRS should never get involved and waste their time & efforts 4. Tyler did not even exist 5. Maheu would never join 6. UC could 100% walk away from 622B so call Unregistered shares without a scratch...
Jefferies sold 111B long sales and this is one of the 27 mm'm that sold CMKX so do your math & you will see NS in trillions easily but the SEC can't tell you that, can they?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2009 14:00:06 GMT -5
By: aladin99 29 Mar 2009, 08:30 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820692 of 822199
Jump to msg. # O/S is less than 100B and NS = trillions and everyone got certs...if they requested them...
By: rosencrantz2010 29 Mar 2009, 08:41 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820694 of 822199 (Reply to 820692 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # aladin, so who, in your opinion, owns all the remaining unrequested shares? (you're estimating there are an additional 500b to 1,000B shares in electronic form still out there)
a. individual investors too lazy or misinformed to order their certs, or
b. the company?
By: aladin99 29 Mar 2009, 09:14 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820697 of 822199 (Reply to 820694 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # Rose - unrequested shares could be only 32-35B from lazy investors the rest are fine since the counter was designed to show that many...
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Mar 29, 2009 14:07:05 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 28 Mar 2009, 07:08 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820547 of 820604 Jump to msg. # friendly reminder... 'nothing posted here matters' 'wrapped up' 'DISTRIBUTION will go forward' 'shift is here' 'expect the un-expected' 'deriv says ouch' By: Gooddolphin 28 Mar 2009, 07:27 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820561 of 820604 (Reply to 820547 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # monetaryshift... When?.. Where?.. How much?.. (I don't expect a relpy). Good luck. By: monetaryshift 28 Mar 2009, 07:30 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820563 of 820606 (Reply to 820561 by Gooddolphin) Jump to msg. # i like 09,falc,>5 By: stockrich0 28 Mar 2009, 08:36 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820598 of 820606 (Reply to 820563 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # Hook me up, homey.... 09/falc/5 If $1.65 is thinking small? $5.00 would be thinking a little bigger. Stockrich. If this above thread is to have any kind of credibility, if monterayshift means $5.00 / sh, the people who believe or interpret it as such need to be put in straight jackets and join him wherever he is being treated (if he means $5.00 / share). When I read this, my interpretation was 5 cents, and even this is a loooooooooooooooooooong shot...
|
|