|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 30, 2009 12:02:40 GMT -5
chrisl Crossfire Administrator Re: I spoke to a Security Lawyer « Reply #4 Yesterday at 8:49pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mar 28, 2009, 6:23pm, Ric wrote: Then based on this post Ric 89% of the shares today are not registered with the SEC as being able to trade on the market? So Helen will tell me they are registered but the SEC will say they are not. In your opinion Ric who is the culpable party with regards to this issue? And the company is oblivious to this and will not even really address it? How much did Bill make during Phase I and II? And what the f**k did they really do with the money? cmkxclubhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2484
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Mar 30, 2009 12:14:34 GMT -5
DUPLICITY CATCHES UP WITH CRIMINAL INSTITUTIONS
'SNIPPED' PORTION OF 26TH MARCH REPORT PROVES WE ARE CORRECTMonday 30 March 2009 00:00• THE NSA'S 'SNIPPING' OF OUR POINTED REPORT DATED 26TH MARCH PROVES THAT THE 'SNIPPED' TEXT WAS ACCURATE AND SO MUCH TO THE POINT THAT THEY HAPPILY RISKED CONFIRMING ITS ACCURACY BY 'SNIPPING' IT. IF IT HAD BEEN INACCURATE, THEY WOULD HAVE LEFT IT UNTOUCHED SINCE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONTRIBUTING TO THE FOG OF CONFUSION THEY CULTIVATE. THESE FOOLS ARE IN URGENT NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY.
THE FOLLOWING TEXT WAS CRIMINALLY 'SNIPPED' BY THE NSA NERDS FROM OUR REPORT DATED 26TH MARCH 2009. THEREFORE, WHAT IS INDICATED BELOW IS CLEARLY CORRECT.
Given the importance of all this text, we reappend the entire portion that was snipped, and have also restored the 'snipped' text on the original report dated 26th March. If it is illegally 'snipped' again, we will retore it again. Interfering with a 'foreign' website is illegal.
This latest aberration shows with CRYSTAL CLARITY that what we are saying is ACCURATE: witness the fact, which is alluded to below the restored 'snipped' text, that current pre-G-20 coverage in the 'mainstream' media in both London and New York is discussing every nuance under the solar system with the single exception of the ONLY ISSUE THAT MATTERS: namely, the perverse intention to restore the Fraudulent Finance Ponzi fraudulent trading operations so that the greedy US 'State within the State' Intelligence Power that controls the Federal Government can continue its secret offshore financing operations so as to retain its power contrary to the interests of the American people and the Rest of the World.
• The text 'snipped' from the 26th March 2009 report is given immediately below. When our text is 'snipped', we have IMMEDIATE confirmation that it's accurate (which we don't need to be told, or we wouldn't have posted it in the first place). If the text had been inaccurate, the CIA/NSA would be delighted because we would be contributing to the fog of confusion that they sponsor in order to be able to continue with their corrupt and fraudulent activities unexposed. So these people are in serious need of brain surgery: when they 'snip', they reconfirm the accuracy of what they 'snipped'.
• We were advised of the criminal 'snipping' by phone and a number of emails. Sample comment from one US correspondent advising us of the 'snipping':
'As always, we in the United States appreciate and rely on your reports, for we can get nothing from our brainwashed and controlled media'.
'All intelligent persons in the United States are outraged at the actions of this criminal clique of hardened criminals who have taken over our democracy. This is NOT what we voted for in November of last year'. Email received from a US address: 29th March 2009: 14:01:05.• CMKM UPDATE:The previously reported theft of the $12.8 billion was orchestrated to achieve three objectives at the same time: • To dissolve the multi-billion dollar claims and Court Order related to CMKM et al, and to make it clear that the CMKM Attorney(s) have signed the appropriate documentation to secure the funds held at the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation under Court Order, and STEAL THE MONEY. • To satisfy the ‘Payee’ et al, by authorising and signing a Presidential Executive Order (15th January 2009) – thereby circumventing public disclosure (and possible physical threat when George W. Bush was no longer President of the United States) and STEAL THE MONEY. • To STEAL the $12.8 billion via Presidential Order/Court Claim – and funds sitting under the control of the DTCC – with the intent to send the money to Carlyle et al., without any repercussions – via Bank of America, Tyler, Texas, and then to Canada. The rest of the report is in the OT under Library Card or on the World Reports site~ www.worldreports.org/news/205_duplicity_catches_up_with_criminal_institutions
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 30, 2009 19:45:32 GMT -5
By: silverbulletny1 30 Mar 2009, 06:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823151 of 823202
Jump to msg. # We have a New Transfer Agent CMKX and SRCI and others.....
same # 702-656-4919
Helen is gone and had to sell the business so......
Pacific Stock Transfer is the new Agent
just sharing.......... they are very nice fwiw
Helen made sure she left us in good hands.
they said they will PR but don't know when.
By: aladin99 30 Mar 2009, 06:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823166 of 823202 (Reply to 823151 by silverbulletny1)
Jump to msg. # Silver - CMKX/SRCI = 2 of a kind... Revoked stocks that have TA....is that interesting!
Thanks for the info....
|
|
|
Post by Tommycmkx on Mar 30, 2009 19:51:25 GMT -5
interesting. WE ARE ALIVE! GO CMKX!!!
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Mar 30, 2009 21:45:26 GMT -5
From Paltalk scroll: Interesting...
what is everyone thinking about the new transfer agent for cmkx? ah halani cha: hi ranup ranupbill: ranupbill: hi puffer subtlerise: where the heck have ya been sheilayea1: yeah puffer where have you been sheilayea1: puffer i can tell you first hand that i have spoken with the sec too sheilayea1: molly white said this would be over in march sheilayea1: i spoke with leslie hakala last week and she said they were still in litigation sheilayea1: soon to be over sheilayea1: and more settlements coming our way sheilayea1: i will bet news is coming our way ranupbill: hoppe so puffer sheilayea1: entourage has to release something sheilayea1: my gosh sheilayea1: no way sheilayea1: i will call craig dr again tomorrow sheilayea1: yes sheilayea1: first hand sheilayea1: yes sheilayea1: no sheilayea1: it was what leslie said sheilayea1: yes, there would be more than just john edwards sheilayea1: it is posted on the sec site sheilayea1: dec. 12 sheilayea1: yes sheilayea1: it is for public consumption sheilayea1: you can be sure puffer_8: bb in a bit ranupbill: yes it is dck sheilayea1: i was very encouraged and also frustrated when i called her and molly white sheilayea1: c you all tomorrow nite
|
|
|
Post by speedomodel on Mar 31, 2009 0:11:09 GMT -5
Rambo they better hurry because march is ending in a few days. hope you are doing great.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 6:32:37 GMT -5
thanks.....ming
By: stockrich0 30 Mar 2009, 07:41 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 823187 of 823342 (Reply to 823185 by factanonverba13) Jump to msg. # Well, how about this...
Back in June 2004, just before Roger Glenn came on the scene, Pacific
Transfer was getting ready to become our transfer agent. Roger Glenn
came on the scene, they backed off the change [as if something major
happened with the plan].
My belief is this, the end of 1st Global is another sighn of the end.
Helen's job is finished. Just like Entourage. Just like Tyler.
...we're there.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 6:35:47 GMT -5
By: silverbulletny1 30 Mar 2009, 06:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823151 of 823202 Jump to msg. # We have a New Transfer Agent CMKX and SRCI and others..... same # 702-656-4919 Helen is gone and had to sell the business so...... Pacific Stock Transfer is the new Agent just sharing.......... they are very nice fwiw Helen made sure she left us in good hands. they said they will PR but don't know when. By: aladin99 30 Mar 2009, 06:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823166 of 823202 (Reply to 823151 by silverbulletny1) Jump to msg. # Silver - CMKX/SRCI = 2 of a kind... Revoked stocks that have TA....is that interesting! Thanks for the info.... from the Nevada SOS site... PACIFIC STOCK TRANSFER COMPANY Secretary, Treasurer, Director, President.... JOSEPH J MEUSEOh what a tangled web...... ST GEORGE METALS INC - Current report filing (8-K) Item 1. Change ...Oct 4, 2002 ... Joseph J. Meuse (31) From August 2001 to present, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance, Network Resources International. ... Single
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:21:02 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 30 Mar 2009, 06:25 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823160 of 823350 (Reply to 823141 by nufced)
Jump to msg. # nufced, we have the proof of who shorted us
and given the fact the sec was implicated in eagletech's case as aiding and abeiting the fraud with the dtc, and now we have the sec covering up who really sold cmkx's shares and making it look like john edwards and urban sold them all, there should be more than enough proof to sue them. And since we know who sold hundreds of billions of shares they will be sued too. Ameritrade, etrade, td, and others. We can subpoena the records from bill frizzell, he has all the numbers and the names.
And nuf, since the sec watched all this happen they are responsible letting it happen, so we will also sue them for the value of our land plus our money back, times three of course. They should have to fund out lawyer given the evidence we can start pro se, what do you say.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX a nuf you know ameritrade sold 180 billion
etrade over 100 billion, jeff over 100 billion, td under 100 billion, and many others.
You have seen the nobo lists bill got and the letters he sent, so we know who sold over 300 billion shares.
Since we know that, we know the sec has covered up massive counterfeiting, so they need to be sued, right.
And since we know these brokers sold fake shares they are just as guilty as john edwards, right, so they should be made to pay, right.
And since we know they screwed us and stole the money as well as john edwards stealing the money from his sales, we can easily prove that we should have had enough money to explore our claims, right.
So they are all liable for our claims, including the sec, right
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:24:51 GMT -5
By: chrisl_cmkmbk 30 Mar 2009, 08:29 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823199 of 823350
Jump to msg. # Lets see. If this is true that CMKM will be getting $85,000.00 for this cert and no claims to go with it what was the cert pull for? That money should be earmarked for shareholders regardless of how little it is? Who is there to make sure it goes to the shareholders? Oh wait they have no clue who the registered shareholders are and it will take considerable time, effort and money to figure this out?
How much did Frizzell make on Phase I and II again? I forgot?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:31:32 GMT -5
By: jfarn 30 Mar 2009, 09:20 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823266 of 823350 (Reply to 823255 by nufced)
Jump to msg. # Nufced,
Try not to be blinded by being right and acknowledge that the civil complaints filed by the SEC and CMKM were grossly narrow in scope. Your boy Bill uses the excuse that they didn't have deep enough pockets to go after big fish.
The SEC doesn't appear to have such excuse and quite a few of us will continue to highlight such. The SEC wants to go after only Dvorak and NevWest and leave those responsible for brokering/selling/signing off on the other 360 billion unregistered un-named.
You're a smart cookie. Give me your thoughts as to why Leslie's and Molly's work was so exclusive.
I won't even begin to badger you how poorly Tyler has carried and/or represented themselves after taking over the reigns.
Hope all is well,
By: nufced 30 Mar 2009, 09:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823282 of 823350 (Reply to 823266 by jfarn)
Jump to msg. # Lets wait and see who owes whom a drink.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:32:28 GMT -5
By: chrisl_cmkmbk 30 Mar 2009, 08:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823202 of 823350
Jump to msg. # Think about what just happened:
The company states for them to determine who registered shareholders are this would take considerable time, effort and money.
Rumor is they got $85,000.00 for the Entourage Cert.
Helen sold off her business.
Can you smell you have just been punk'd by Tyler.
And people were pizzed about me considering putting CMKM into receivership. Who is watching them?
By: joesixpack333 30 Mar 2009, 09:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823289 of 823350 (Reply to 823202 by chrisl_cmkmbk)
Jump to msg. # chrisl.. no one is pulling anything off on anyone.. this is the most watched stock on the planet.. we are in good hands..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:36:48 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 30 Mar 2009, 10:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823312 of 823350 (Reply to 823310 by mkaykay0)
Jump to msg. # and why would ENTOURAGE be paying us? i thought the deal was they had the claims and we had the certs?
so, TYLER (CMKX) is controlling 45 million shares that were reversed into 4.5 million shares. right?
and those shares are currently worth 20 cents/30 cents at the bid. right? okay, so if CMKX sold those 4.5 million shares into the market that would provide TYLER (CMKX) with how much cash? let's see, 4,500,000 x .20 = $900,000.
so, if my math is right, why would TYLER take $85,000 for the ENT shares?
furthermore, what about the claims? the claims are what matter. frankly, who gives a rat's assss about the ENT shares?
if they weren't going to give me back the claims why would i give back their shares for 10 cents on the dollar at the current bid price?
something doesn't add up here.
By: CHICPICK 30 Mar 2009, 10:47 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823313 of 823350 (Reply to 823312 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # rosen, Your calculations are correct. Entourage is giving 85K to Tyler to get rid of future court expenses that would cost them much more, and Tyler is taking about 10 cents on the dollar because they need the money for expenses. Shows you that there is nothing here. Just some wrap up, and the few bucks they might collect from the Urbcrooks.
PS. None of the claims belong to us anymore.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 7:39:49 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 30 Mar 2009, 10:57 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823321 of 823350 (Reply to 823313 by CHICPICK)
Jump to msg. # chic, why not sell the cert into the market? if they have the authority to sell it outright to entourage i would think they'd have the authority to sell it piecemeal in order to make more money.
why take $85,000 now when you could have dumped the lot into the market,,, even taking only have the price,,, even at half the current bid price they would have cleared $450,000.
nah, something is just too stupid about this deal. isn't anyone thinking in TYLER? if TYLER was desperate for money why wouldn't they sell off 200,000 shares a week? that way they might not crush the share price and would have made $80,000 in two weeks.
in fact, if they were smart they would have pumped ENTOURAGE prior to their sell. "DIAMONDS! GOLD! OIL! ENTOURAGE HAS IT ALL! THEY DISCOVERED THE MOTHER LOAD!"
they could have hired sterling with 10,000 shares and he would have juiced the boards for them. LOL
good lord, you'd think the TYLER group would have learned how the pennies worked by now! LOL
By: CHICPICK 30 Mar 2009, 11:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 823325 of 823350 (Reply to 823321 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # rosen, Because when the cert was first issued, it was supposed to be distributed to the CMKX shareholders. If it was (and it wasn't) it probably would have come with a time restriction. I wouldn't think that Tyler has a right to sell on the open market.....It concerns me that Tyler was able to sell it back to Entourage without shareholder support, unless the shareholders that put up money for legal said OK.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2009 10:01:31 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 31 Mar 2009, 12:20 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823338 of 823392 (Reply to 823197 by nufced)
Jump to msg. # ya nuf but you forgot the brokers sales
and they have pretended they didn't even happen, as if it was only je's sales, you and I know it was others as well.
Why do they hide their identities when you and I even know them
ie ameritrade, 180 billion fake shares
By: snoopstock5 31 Mar 2009, 09:37 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823358 of 823392 (Reply to 823338 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Gus, Jefferies 111.7 bill clich, TD Canada 80 bill, and Etrade god knows how many. So for a stock that has 703 O/S, 622 billion are unregistered. IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE? OF COURSE, WE HAVE NOT ARREST. The only thing we have is Nevwest out of business, but their DID DD. Yes they are trying to cover it up, but thousands of us WILL NOT LET THEM. Their are also THOUSANDS that still have not received certs. Unless, the thousands that never received their certs already sold Cmkx and profited from it then bought back. We also know from Judge Brenda at the hearing, she said the the people that bought shares after revocation ALREADY KNEW their risks. In other words, would not be counted as injuried shareholders. The taskforce stated at their site that only shareholders who NEVER SOLD CMKX were getting certs. That is not saying that you could not have sold a part of you position and kept that rest. It is talking about shareholders that sold THEIR ENTIRE POSITIONS and then bought back at .0001 levels.
By: aladin99 31 Mar 2009, 10:11 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 823362 of 823393 (Reply to 823358 by snoopstock5)
Jump to msg. # snoopstock5 - J.E never could have 259B shares on his own...I believe our NS is so huge and the SEC used J.E to help the shorts cover their naked positions while we got paid...
|
|