|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:46:49 GMT -5
rileyraegen DIAMOND DIGGER Re: OT: Where's psychicballs? « Reply #14 Yesterday at 11:18pm »
My husband and I just met Psychicballs. Nice guy and very intelligent. Had a beer at Sherlocks. He said to let everyone know his computer is being worked on, and will be back on in a week or so. Also went to Tyler today. Interesting to say the least. Met and talked to the supposed owner of the building where CMKX rents an office space where they only pick up the mail. He seemed very nice and sympathetic to the plight of the CMKX shareholders. He was nicely dressed, asked our names, shook our hands, and was very professional. He said he has had 1000 + people there looking at the building and taking pictures. He was under the impression Frizzell and Kevin were nice guys working for the good of CMKX, but when I asked him where Frizzell's office was he stated basically that he did not know, and that we would have to get a phone book to get the address. Talked awhile and we left. Got the address and lo and behold it was across the street from the CMKX office. Strange!!!!! We went into Frizzells office and he was the only one in there. He said he was busy but we did manage to talk awhile. Did feel as though he was talking down to us though. Didn't get a good feeling. Frizzell did not ask our names, and did not shake our hands. I did tell him my name. Did find out the two properties they received from the lawsuits are for sale, and that one looks like it will be sold. Frizzell talked like the money would be used for wages, secretary and possible office space. They must have controlling interest because we sure didn't have any say. Makes me wonder if this money will all be eaten up for nothing. Frizzell said Kevin is working for nothing. He must have another job, because I couldn't last that many years with no income. CRAZY!!!! Frizzell did say the big lawsuit hadn't been filed yet, but acted like he didn't acknowledge the naked short at all. Wanted to know what I expected from owning stock. I was nice, and didn't say. BUT I will say I DO NOT WANT TO BE LIED TO, I do not want to be SOLD stock that is NAKED SHORTED, and yes I expect closure and a good product. Again I will say alot of things do not add up.
A concerned shareholder on vacation. Maybe next year I'll go to Canada. RileyRaegen
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:47:22 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 06 Jun 2009, 11:41 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839524 of 839526 (Reply to 839506 by e362) Jump to msg. # e362.. CMKX is unlike any other stock in many ways.. if memory serves me correctly.. CMKX applied to revoke itself and the SEC allowed it.. and what about the Entourage PR with mention of CMKM.. are we dead in the water or what.. then there is our team.. the best in their fields.. which takes us to the financial meltdown shortly after we did our cert pull.. concrete proof of the existence of the NSS.. so how did we get our certs if they didn't pay the company for them.. Maheu was our trustee.. trustee of what.. hmmm
ever read up on Chuck Fipke and what he went through with his diamond claims.. total secrecy..
CMKX is like the Kennedy assassination.. we saw the movie.. we know what happened but nothing else.. and that is what will happen with CMKX.. we know the market imploded we will get paid and no one will know what really happened..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:47:58 GMT -5
Well here's one RUMOR I would like to see come true!! Won't believe it til I see it !! For every one crook they get.... there are 10 more still hiding behind the curtain...... A fair trading market is still a long way off !!seagull Mini Mod Re: Other Gossip, etc..6/1/09-> « Reply #94 Yesterday at 8:30pm » There are so many arrests ... The Daily PERP Walk Thread is 23 pages long so far ... on millionaires board ... Yea!! They are cleaning up the markets!!! millionaires.proboards.com/index.....d=24781&page=23
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:49:13 GMT -5
twobits10 Diamond Finderrileyraegen DIAMOND DIGGER Re: OT: Where's psychicballs? « Reply #14 Yesterday at 11:18pm »My husband and I just met Psychicballs. Nice guy and very intelligent. Had a beer at Sherlocks. He said to let everyone know his computer is being worked on, and will be back on in a week or so. Also went to Tyler today. Interesting to say the least. Met and talked to the supposed owner of the building where CMKX rents an office space where they only pick up the mail. He seemed very nice and sympathetic to the plight of the CMKX shareholders. He was nicely dressed, asked our names, shook our hands, and was very professional. He said he has had 1000 + people there looking at the building and taking pictures. He was under the impression Frizzell and Kevin were nice guys working for the good of CMKX, but when I asked him where Frizzell's office was he stated basically that he did not know, and that we would have to get a phone book to get the address. Talked awhile and we left. Got the address and lo and behold it was across the street from the CMKX office. Strange!!!!! We went into Frizzells office and he was the only one in there. He said he was busy but we did manage to talk awhile. Did feel as though he was talking down to us though. Didn't get a good feeling. Frizzell did not ask our names, and did not shake our hands. I did tell him my name. Did find out the two properties they received from the lawsuits are for sale, and that one looks like it will be sold. Frizzell talked like the money would be used for wages, secretary and possible office space. They must have controlling interest because we sure didn't have any say. Makes me wonder if this money will all be eaten up for nothing. Frizzell said Kevin is working for nothing. He must have another job, because I couldn't last that many years with no income. CRAZY!!!! Frizzell did say the big lawsuit hadn't been filed yet, but acted like he didn't acknowledge the naked short at all. Wanted to know what I expected from owning stock. I was nice, and didn't say. BUT I will say I DO NOT WANT TO BE LIED TO, I do not want to be SOLD stock that is NAKED SHORTED, and yes I expect closure and a good product. Again I will say alot of things do not add up. A concerned shareholder on vacation. Maybe next year I'll go to Canada. RileyRaegen Frizzel will be very fortunate if CMKXERs don't sue him...the eton property does not belong to tyler texas.....that property belongs to CMKXERS...tyler texas is a scam....tyler texas has nothing to do with cmkx nevada holdings, they are two completely separate companies.... Frizzell should be disbarred, he holds himself out to be a lawyer, but he does not know the law. All the work he did for cmkxers on the taskforce, WAS VOLUNTEERED by frizzell, he wanted to gather information for his own lawsuit, not for the benefit of all cmkxers, but for the benefit of him and john martin.....the charade tyler played in this whole diversion was/is illegal, and it just might cost frizzell everything he has....the pain and suffering he caused putting out information we were not getting paid....he was hoping we'd all leave so he could collect our restitution....things didn't pan out so well for frizzell....i don't think it's over for him....the costs he incurred was his burden...the eton settlement is not his to keep....period. stay tuned....i don't think UC is done with tyler yet. 2bits
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:49:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:50:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:50:51 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 06 Jun 2009, 11:41 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839524 of 839526 (Reply to 839506 by e362) Jump to msg. # e362.. CMKX is unlike any other stock in many ways.. if memory serves me correctly.. CMKX applied to revoke itself and the SEC allowed it.. and what about the Entourage PR with mention of CMKM.. are we dead in the water or what.. then there is our team.. the best in their fields.. which takes us to the financial meltdown shortly after we did our cert pull.. concrete proof of the existence of the NSS.. so how did we get our certs if they didn't pay the company for them.. Maheu was our trustee.. trustee of what.. hmmm ever read up on Chuck Fipke and what he went through with his diamond claims.. total secrecy.. CMKX is like the Kennedy assassination.. we saw the movie.. we know what happened but nothing else.. and that is what will happen with CMKX.. we know the market imploded we will get paid and no one will know what really happened.. By: jonathonanders 06 Jun 2009, 12:04 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 839527 of 839569 (Reply to 839524 by joesixpack333) Jump to msg. # Joe, We were already revoked and in appeal. We just dropped the appeal. Was no question of the sec allowing it, they had already had done it. As to the Entourage mention of cmkx. In any financial filing you must show all pending actions, all lawsuits etc. That information has been in the filings since the lawsuit was filed. But youre right, cmkx is different. Quite a saga.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:51:25 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jun 2009, 03:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 839555 of 839570 Jump to msg. # Sell Platinum, Buy Palladium on $1,000 Spread: Chart of Day By Halia Pavliva and Nicholas Larkin ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=839555By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jun 2009, 03:42 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 839556 of 839570 Jump to msg. # which of those "ums" are we suppose to have? either one? hopefully it's the one we're suppose to buy, not sell.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:52:08 GMT -5
sweettime Diamond Hunter Re: Bud Burrell -- "Good News Coming"... « Reply #4 Today at 7:15pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I asked Bud: "Are you speaking about specifically CMKX related news or are you just speaking about NSS news in general which may possibly include CMKX?"
He stated: "CMKX, re: ongoing litigation, no specifics I know of."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:52:42 GMT -5
bobbybdb DIAMOND JEDI MASTEr We The People Stimylus Package « Thread Started Today at 2:21pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From tramps boad. Thanks bigreader You gotta hear this guy.We had all better wake up. www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 14:56:32 GMT -5
ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Weekly Buzz Talk June 1 « Reply #170 Today at 9:44am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SHAREHOLDERS VISIT WITH PSYCHICBALLS AND WITH FRIZZELL IN TYLER.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My husband and I just met Psychicballs. Nice guy and very intelligent. Had a beer at Sherlocks. He said to let everyone know his computer is being worked on, and will be back on in a week or so. Also went to Tyler today. Interesting to say the least. Met and talked to the supposed owner of the building where CMKX rents an office space where they only pick up the mail. He seemed very nice and sympathetic to the plight of the CMKX shareholders. He was nicely dressed, asked our names, shook our hands, and was very professional. He said he has had 1000 + people there looking at the building and taking pictures. He was under the impression Frizzell and Kevin were nice guys working for the good of CMKX, but when I asked him where Frizzell's office was he stated basically that he did not know, and that we would have to get a phone book to get the address. Talked awhile and we left. Got the address and lo and behold it was across the street from the CMKX office. Strange!!!!! We went into Frizzells office and he was the only one in there. He said he was busy but we did manage to talk awhile. Did feel as though he was talking down to us though. Didn't get a good feeling. Frizzell did not ask our names, and did not shake our hands. I did tell him my name. Did find out the two properties they received from the lawsuits are for sale, and that one looks like it will be sold. Frizzell talked like the money would be used for wages, secretary and possible office space. They must have controlling interest because we sure didn't have any say. Makes me wonder if this money will all be eaten up for nothing. Frizzell said Kevin is working for nothing. He must have another job, because I couldn't last that many years with no income. CRAZY!!!! Frizzell did say the big lawsuit hadn't been filed yet, but acted like he didn't acknowledge the naked short at all. Wanted to know what I expected from owning stock. I was nice, and didn't say. BUT I will say I DO NOT WANT TO BE LIED TO, I do not want to be SOLD stock that is NAKED SHORTED, and yes I expect closure and a good product. Again I will say alot of things do not add up.
A concerned shareholder on vacation. Maybe next year I'll go to Canada. RileyRaegen
*** Did find out the two properties they received from the lawsuits are for sale, and that one looks like it will be sold. Frizzell talked like the money would be used for wages, secretary and possible office space.
Frizzell did say the big lawsuit hadn't been filed yet, but acted like he didn't acknowledge the naked short at all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~ And this is exactly what jo has said.. that Cody found out. Tyler gang did not file the derivative suite. And its almost been a year and if its not filed it will be kicked out of courts.
SO WHAT DID TYLER GANG REALLY DO FOR US AT ALL?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 15:14:29 GMT -5
By: kilroy.killbasher 07 Jun 2009, 01:01 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839610 of 839730
Jump to msg. # Mkay, IF Delidog got in trouble (I don't know anything for certain, so I'm not saying one way or the other), he got in trouble (from what I understand) from "making a market" for CMKX shares.
As I mentioned to you some time ago, I talked to my attorney with securities background, and he assures me that, just because a stock is de-registered, revoked, whatever, it's still legally an asset until proven otherwise such as a declaration of bankruptcy, etc.
Unless there is a court order stating that security is counterfeit or there is some injunction against it (I'm paraphrasing here for sure), it's still considered to be an asset (regardless of value or not) in your possession. No one can be denied the right to sell their legally-acknowledged asset.
He was aware of no law that prevented two sane and willing individuals to make a deal between them for the transfer of title of of those assets. Perhaps he's wrong, perhaps not. If he's wrong, somebody show me the link. Point is, unless anyone can prove otherwise, there's nothing illegal about two individuals completely knowledgeable of the facts, to strike a deal to transfer ownership of that asset between the two for consideration of some cash received.
Can anyone prove me wrong on this? I'm asking?
If not, what do you want for your shares? Quote me a price you'll accept for those worthless pieces of paper (which BTW, I doubt you can even produce). But, if you can, I'm serious about purchasing them for much more than you expect in return (judging from your posts). Just quote me a price.
But, I'm telling you in the front end. You have to tell me publicly on this board how many shares you have to sell and what you are willing to take for them.
If you do that, I will provide you with the contact information for an attorney that will take it from there. I promise. This is for real. But, it ONLY pertains to you. Sorry, no other shareholders.
Deal? C'mon! What do you have to lose? According to your own testimony... NOTHING!
\\|// ( o o ) ~~~~oOOo~(_)~oOOo~~~~ KILROY WAS HERE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 15:31:58 GMT -5
Deli denied the RUMOR of criminal charges had any substance....
By: baby-bunny 07 Jun 2009, 10:19 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839633 of 839732 (Reply to 839632 by mkaykay0)
Jump to msg. # Could be a grand jury thing; secret until they announcement the indictment.
Glisson really pissed them off when they told him to quit, he said he would, and then started up again.
They should go after baglady too, since she was facilitating him.
By: mkaykay0 07 Jun 2009, 10:28 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839634 of 839732 (Reply to 839633 by baby-bunny)
Jump to msg. # Then was bragging about it in the PT rooms. Calling them "cookies"
By: chrisl_isright 07 Jun 2009, 10:42 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839638 of 839732 (Reply to 839634 by mkaykay0) Jump to msg. # Mona came up with the name "cookies". Deli will turn on people so fast when the time comes.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 15:36:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 07 Jun 2009, 10:43 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839639 of 839732 (Reply to 839635 by lion3047)
Jump to msg. # i'm disappointed i didn't buy shares from Deli. I didn't/don't need more but it would have been interesting to see how it worked.
i'm confident the shares bought from Deli are good to go. no problems there. the only question surrounds Deli and whether or not he'll face charges. however, like URBAN, given the length of time the SEC has allowed to pass i suspect Deli is just fine. the SEC scolded him and that will be the extent of his punishment. in a word, Deli is SAFE.
the real question for me is who were the big sellers? and when we find out who they are, the next question is why were they selling?
if it was URBAN, as many have stated, i can imagine reasons for the sale beyond the idea of "more dumping of worthless shares." in fact, i can see where urban might be pushing those shares out the door all the while laughing his assss off at shorty. as far as urban was concerned, the more shares out the more that will eventually have to be paid out to shareholders. why not just keep pulling shares out of treasury and putting them back into the "market?" lol
if there are only X number of real shares, then you only hurt shorty if you keep adding X+1 to what has to be paid. the more you manage to sell through Deli the larger the bill.
and,,, the more i think about it, if it was URBAN that was feeding Deli the shares then it may also suggest that URBAN knew there wouldn't be anything the SEC could do about it since in the end he knew that the SEC would have to take DELI to court and that would mean a lot of information could come out that the SEC didn't want out. in other words, why would URBAN be worried about the legal niceties of Deli's actions when he and the SEC were butting heads already and one more stick in the eye to the SEC wasn't going to mean a thing. in a sense, it was like URBAN telling the SEC to go jump in the lake because he was going to just keep dumping all the treasury shares he wanted to through Deli and there wasn't a d*mn thing the SEC could do to stop it, other than to warn Deli and issue warnings - much like the limpthingy warnings and charges the SEC issues more than TWO YEARS AGO about EDWARDS and URBAN,,,, and what has that produced?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
i hear the SEC is thinking of changing its acronym to LDC,,,
limpthingy commission.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 7, 2009 15:40:50 GMT -5
By: aladin99 07 Jun 2009, 10:58 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 839645 of 839732
Jump to msg. # There so many bashing fools are on USXP board including taco.... that's also interesting!!!!!!I know taco & nuff never traded usxp....
|
|