|
Post by cheechman on Dec 28, 2010 9:12:07 GMT -5
If we are NOT paid this week and there is a SC order then WHY would Al not walk into the appeals court and lay down EVERY piece of evidence he has and shove it up there A$$ IF WE are not paid and he does not do this makes no sense UNLESS HE does not have the goods and I think he does. cheechman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2010 9:30:30 GMT -5
cheechman.... does AL have the evidence? wouldnt you think after a year of threats with tthe BIG evidence we would have been paid if they were worried about it at all???.... im getting that sinking feeling in my gut again!
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Dec 28, 2010 9:41:49 GMT -5
Read the following very closely; then rethink what your saying. Al Hodges can appeal the suit with the most d*mning evidence that would pale the evidence of the JFK shooting......AND IT WOULD DO NOTHING........ The ruling as it stands (IMW) Says that the courts can not order the individuals of the SEC to release funds from a private company. Now Ask your self why we were put thru a whole effing year of this crap and Hodges never saw that coming. This should have been clearly obvious to a seasoned attorney. We have been played.
|
|
|
Post by cheechman on Dec 28, 2010 9:44:50 GMT -5
cheechman.... does AL have the evidence? wouldnt you think after a year of threats with tthe BIG evidence we would have been paid if they were worried about it at all???.... im getting that sinking feeling in my gut again! I still believe he has the EVIDENCE but remember ALOT of the evidence is on the people that paid up for there crimes so thats why I hope he has held back.
|
|
|
Post by cheechman on Dec 28, 2010 21:20:03 GMT -5
If Judy/Dennis is correct and this goes to next week and Al needs to refile IT IS NOW TIME TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND SHOW THE EVIDENCE TO THOSE MF'S.
CHEECHMAN
|
|
|
Post by woutcome on Dec 28, 2010 21:27:28 GMT -5
If what is said by Judy is true, then I can see appeal is written all over...IMO I hope I am wrong.....
|
|
|
Post by raidermike99 on Dec 29, 2010 6:54:47 GMT -5
Read the following very closely; then rethink what your saying. Al Hodges can appeal the suit with the most d*mning evidence that would pale the evidence of the JFK shooting......AND IT WOULD DO NOTHING........ The ruling as it stands (IMW) Says that the courts can not order the individuals of the SEC to release funds from a private company. Now Ask your self why we were put thru a whole effing year of this crap and Hodges never saw that coming. This should have been clearly obvious to a seasoned attorney. We have been played. Played for what reason?
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Dec 29, 2010 7:13:01 GMT -5
If we are NOT paid this week and there is a SC order then WHY would Al not walk into the appeals court and lay down EVERY piece of evidence he has and shove it up there A$$ IF WE are not paid and he does not do this makes no sense UNLESS HE does not have the goods and I think he does. cheechman The last update I received from Attorney Hodges was the 12/23 Update. The last time Attorney Hodges did not answer my emails he was on silence mode. I understand the shareholders want to know all the details. I have provided what I can without compromising the progress made, as well as, the safety of the individuals involved in releasing the funds. Attorney Hodges has a considerable amount of responsibility on his shoulders. Attorney Hodges is determined to see this to the end and to the optimum results for the shareholders. Attorney Hodges is in this to win. Informing the opponents of what you are going to accomplish is fine, but informing the opponents how by providing information which will give the opponents strategic advantage is not the way to win. The final win is when the shareholders are in possession of all their CMKX Funds. At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds? Does it make sense to contact the opponents and provide details of information acquired by Attorney Hodges, file a report with the police against Attorney Hodges because he will not make public strategic-confidential information, to harass and threatened the ones who are working to release the funds, and then demand results by a certain date? When the XXX is involved, this is serious stuff..he does not play games when it comes to security issues. The XXX's priority is national security. We are part of a huge settlement. Other governments are involved. The XXX feels there are security issues, then he will do his job and will not give permission until he takes care of it. The XXX will not be forced by shareholders to make a decision. I will continue to support those who are actually making progress and focused on releasing the funds to the shareholders. I will wait until Attorney Hodges is allowed or ready to communicate with the shareholders. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Dec 29, 2010 7:42:18 GMT -5
Bhollenegg, I respect your call for level headed thinking, but I think it is human nature to be at wits end at this point. When Christmas came and went without money in hand and AH didn't even give a reassuring message through one of the plaintiffs I think it turned up the we've been played emotion to the breaking point. His SC court directive for the end of this year is 2 business days away and if that passes it will be pretty cut and dry we have been lied to. The fact that he has not updated you in 5 days of which included the infamous Christmas prediction should be very alarming to you as you are a plaintiff in his suit. "Silent mode" as you called it from an atty to his plaintiff is unacceptable and unprofessional, silent mode from you to us is understandable should the situation require. As for "At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds?" Here is something I think all stuckholders could accept and benefit from that wouldn't risk a thing. Obviously AH or transfer online etc has the name and cert #'s of all the bonafides. Have transfer online set up a copy of the trust agreement on there site only accessable by entering the correct name and cert number for bonafides to view. They can remove any names they feel would jeopardize a person or this suits safety. Obviously the opposition is well aware of the trust so they would gather nothing new and it would calm alot of stuckholders fears that they have been played all along. GLTUA and thank you.
|
|
|
Post by beavis on Dec 29, 2010 7:57:57 GMT -5
Bhollenegg, I respect your call for level headed thinking, but I think it is human nature to be at wits end at this point. When Christmas came and went without money in hand and AH didn't even give a reassuring message through one of the plaintiffs I think it turned up the we've been played emotion to the breaking point. His SC court directive for the end of this year is 2 business days away and if that passes it will be pretty cut and dry we have been lied to. The fact that he has not updated you in 5 days of which included the infamous Christmas prediction should be very alarming to you as you are a plaintiff in his suit. "Silent mode" as you called it from an atty to his plaintiff is unacceptable and unprofessional, silent mode from you to us is understandable should the situation require. As for "At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds?" Here is something I think all stuckholders could accept and benefit from that wouldn't risk a thing. Obviously AH or transfer online etc has the name and cert #'s of all the bonafides. Have transfer online set up a copy of the trust agreement on there site only accessable by entering the correct name and cert number for bonafides to view. They can remove any names they feel would jeopardize a person or this suits safety. Obviously the opposition is well aware of the trust so they would gather nothing new and it would calm alot of stuckholders fears that they have been played all along. GLTUA and thank you. I like the way you are thinking
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes1 on Dec 29, 2010 7:58:03 GMT -5
Bob...there comes a point when you have to admit defeat...this has been eight years of pointless confusion and deceit...the govt will never give up 3.7 tr to us when the govt is bankrupt...it AINT GONNA HAPPEN.....so lets just go gently into that great night..what an effin waste of time.....
|
|
|
Post by playthosedrums on Dec 29, 2010 8:01:39 GMT -5
Bob H, I truly thank you for coming on the boards day after day, giving us your opinion on what's going on with AH and the release of our funds.
You take alot of abuse from certain people, and honestly don't know how you do it. I hope you had a great Christmas and hope the new year provides health and wealth for you and all the shareholders involved in this.
With that being said, I have to tell you, come Jan. 1, 2011, I am getting of this roller coaster. Too many emotions from day to day. If we ever get our money, I'm sure I will find out someway.
Wolfbela promised to wait until the first of the year with his campaign, but I see he is contacting officials looking for answers. You really can't blame him as this saga is truly getting old.
I must tell you that I'm not feeling warm and fuzzy about hearing about ER or any kind of payment by friday. Please prove me wrong.
Take care and Happy New Year
|
|
|
Post by beavis on Dec 29, 2010 8:05:19 GMT -5
I thought there weren't any opponents or obstacles left.
|
|
dude
Diamond Finder
Posts: 51
|
Post by dude on Dec 29, 2010 9:17:30 GMT -5
There will always be Security Threats, Terrorist, Corrupt Politicians,Crazy Dictators, Evil Doers .......TO them I say " " That's why we have The Constitution and The Second Amendment to the above mentioned I say " Come Get Some "
|
|
|
Post by cheechman on Dec 29, 2010 9:34:36 GMT -5
I thought there weren't any opponents or obstacles left. Thats what I thought ALL THE WARS HAD BEEN WON
|
|