|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 28, 2014 7:03:28 GMT -5
hitman DIAMOND MINER Post by hitman on Apr 26, 2014 at 9:09pm
Fact remains that the markets are rigged and the dollar is going to collapse. So what good would going back to trading under these conditions do for us? Get us a far less return in a dying currency is how I see it. No I'd rather be patient and let transfer into New Corp. happen that's when we will see real life changing gains. Cause the New Corp. will be dealing in what ever currency is most valued I bet. Cause what would you really rather have? Dollars or a much higher valued currency whatever that might be and get much more dollars when exchanged? I'd rather the second myself. All in my opinion and the way things look to be headed to me of course.
Hitman
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Apr 28, 2014 7:19:07 GMT -5
hitman DIAMOND MINER Post by hitman on Apr 26, 2014 at 9:09pmFact remains that the markets are rigged and the dollar is going to collapse. So what good would going back to trading under these conditions do for us? Get us a far less return in a dying currency is how I see it. No I'd rather be patient and let transfer into New Corp. happen that's when we will see real life changing gains. Cause the New Corp. will be dealing in what ever currency is most valued I bet. Cause what would you really rather have? Dollars or a much higher valued currency whatever that might be and get much more dollars when exchanged? I'd rather the second myself. All in my opinion and the way things look to be headed to me of course. Hitman At my age, I just want something now before I die.. I don't care what the value is.. Time is running out..
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 28, 2014 9:20:39 GMT -5
hitman DIAMOND MINER Post by hitman on Apr 26, 2014 at 9:09pmFact remains that the markets are rigged and the dollar is going to collapse. So what good would going back to trading under these conditions do for us? Get us a far less return in a dying currency is how I see it. No I'd rather be patient and let transfer into New Corp. happen that's when we will see real life changing gains. Cause the New Corp. will be dealing in what ever currency is most valued I bet. Cause what would you really rather have? Dollars or a much higher valued currency whatever that might be and get much more dollars when exchanged? I'd rather the second myself. All in my opinion and the way things look to be headed to me of course. Hitman At my age, I just want something now before I die.. I don't care what the value is.. Time is running out..Dogs and Cats can agree on things. Meow woof!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 30, 2014 16:09:22 GMT -5
habs2014 DIAMOND DIGGER Exhibit 17 22 hours ago moneykat1208 and medicalpete like this. QuotelikePost Options Post by habs2014 on 22 hours ago After sending my information off to Debra Waite for my VIN i started to think about Steve Walker's past work on the false data entered into our case:(see below) So because she is listed as our liaison i thought it would be prudent to send her excerpts from Steve's filing and ask her as a "Victim" to investigate his findings and clarify the Rico case that Timothy Vasquez allowed the false data to be entered in. I implore all shareholders to send Debra an email asking the same question
"I am Steve Walker from Oxnard Ca. I have been involved in stock market reform, with particular attention to Abusive Naked Short Selling (Phantom Shares), for over ten years. On June 7, I filed two separate Whistleblower Complaints with the SEC. On June 11, from a previous Freedom of Information Act request, the SEC sent me a copy of Exhibit 17 from the SEC Administrative Hearing in Los Angeles involving CMKM Diamonds May 10. 2005. File No. 3-11858.
The contents in this document are startling. I ask for a complete investigation.
CMKM Diamonds is the largest case of abusive naked shorting in history. Proof can be obtained by comparing two Documents. Exhibit 17 from File No. 3-11858 and Exhibit A from the Koch Declaration, filed 04/27/2007 by David Koch on behalf of CMKM Diamonds. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
Please read my SEC-OIG Complaint filed June 7, before I received Exhibit 17 under the FOIA,
The SEC and the DOJ are using false volume numbers in two major cases involving CMKM Diamonds.
During an SEC Administrative Hearing involving CMKM Diamonds, Christopher Wall presented testimony regarding volume in CMKX stock. The numbers he relied on are FALSE. It was a result of a computer "glitch":
"One of the problems with this exponential rise in popularity occurs in tracking share volumes. The Pink Sheets and OTCBB are limited by binary reporting systems that 'max out' at 4.295 billion shares, and the largest number a binary system can display is 32 digits. If it reports volumes larger than that, the data gets distorted. Counters either revert back to zero or provide incorrect volume data. Only a new reporting system could rectify this problem." 3 hours ago habs2014 said: I have sent this question to SK also, I find it strange that he has no interest in pursuing the naked short proof that lies right in front of him. The comment "don't care about old business" is far to loose at this stage. swordfish168 DIAMOND MINER given the FACT that Frizzell is legal council for CMKX and he knows most everything that went on before SK took the reigns of the company I find SK lack of interest and knowledge totally bizarre. All he has to do is ask Frizzell as far as I can see. I cannot imagine him saying "I cannot tell you". I think there is alot we are NOT being told. best, mike
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Apr 30, 2014 16:36:38 GMT -5
I talked to SK on the phone many times and yes he has a very big interest in the Naked Shorts. Don't know what these guys are talking about.. One of the reasons we are listed in Transfer on line..
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on May 1, 2014 0:59:44 GMT -5
I talked to SK on the phone many times and yes he has a very big interest in the Naked Shorts. Don't know what these guys are talking about.. One of the reasons we are listed in Transfer on line.. Transfer Online made a good buck off of shareholders selling shares. Doesn't really matter who was buying, what does matter is WHO THE HECK WAS SELLING?!!!!!!!! =^.".^=
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on May 1, 2014 6:03:19 GMT -5
I talked to SK on the phone many times and yes he has a very big interest in the Naked Shorts. Don't know what these guys are talking about.. One of the reasons we are listed in Transfer on line.. Transfer Online made a good buck off of shareholders selling shares. Doesn't really matter who was buying, what does matter is WHO THE HECK WAS SELLING?!!!!!!!! =^.".^= Who cares.. A share is a share no matter how you count it.. No matter who's name it's in...
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on May 1, 2014 6:18:16 GMT -5
Transfer Online made a good buck off of shareholders selling shares. Doesn't really matter who was buying, what does matter is WHO THE HECK WAS SELLING?!!!!!!!! =^.".^= Who cares.. A share is a share no matter how you count it.. No matter who's name it's in... Oh yes it does matter. If Hodges plaintiffs were selling, it surely does matter.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on May 1, 2014 6:34:12 GMT -5
Who cares.. A share is a share no matter how you count it.. No matter who's name it's in... Oh yes it does matter. If Hodges plaintiffs were selling, it surely does matter. Stop it already with that.. You and a bunch think these guys were still pumping and dumping the de-listed stock of a lifetime. What proof is there in all these years of looking into the cracks and finding nothing.. Stop it with the garbage talk already.. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by e362 on May 1, 2014 7:56:48 GMT -5
Oh yes it does matter. If Hodges plaintiffs were selling, it surely does matter. Stop it already with that.. You and a bunch think these guys were still pumping and dumping the de-listed stock of a lifetime. What proof is there in all these years of looking into the cracks and finding nothing.. Stop it with the garbage talk already.. View AttachmentDo you know it as fact that it is "garbage talk" and none of the plaintiffs sold during the "we have won or payment is imminent" phase of updates during the years? b agree with cat,Because if they did, they sure were reacting to different news than we were lead to believe by the esteemed atty. imo
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 1, 2014 8:05:32 GMT -5
Oh yes it does matter. If Hodges plaintiffs were selling, it surely does matter. Well Cat,There were actually many posts and much discussion regarding Hodges and the plaintiffs in regards to their shares during the Bivens suit. I can't remember exactly , but I believe it was somewhere around 2- 2 1/2% of their total combined shares that were actually sold?? transferred?? moved?? or Put in a trust?? Some plaintiffs shares remained unchanged (for instance BH that I can remember, along with a few others). This seems to be my memory of discussion and data presented, I could be wrong BUT those posts are still around on the boards. A search may help find them. Also I believe it was CW who provided the data... maybe he can help. As always anyone who can confirm or correct .... please feel free to do so. SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 1, 2014 8:24:32 GMT -5
what keeps SK going?
#2011886 EricGreenField 1 hours ago SK is down in the mouth. he sees and reports little hope. then why continue? why go on? he's not getting paid. there doesn't appear to be any bid payday just ahead. if anything, any payday at all is dubious and if one does come along it's going to come from the WELLS FARGO case, which as we all know doesn't stand much more than a snowball's chance in hell.
so, why does he persist?
and if he is hopeful and sees something at the end of the rainbow, why doesn't he tell us? why keep reminding us we no money and few if any chances of success? why beat us up?
|
|
|
Post by portrush on May 1, 2014 8:32:20 GMT -5
Stop it already with that.. You and a bunch think these guys were still pumping and dumping the de-listed stock of a lifetime. What proof is there in all these years of looking into the cracks and finding nothing.. Stop it with the garbage talk already.. View AttachmentDo you know it as fact that it is "garbage talk" and none of the plaintiffs sold during the "we have won or payment is imminent" phase of updates during the years? b agree with cat,Because if they did, they sure were reacting to different news than we were lead to believe by the esteemed atty. imo So what's your point? pr
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on May 1, 2014 8:43:49 GMT -5
Stop it already with that.. You and a bunch think these guys were still pumping and dumping the de-listed stock of a lifetime. What proof is there in all these years of looking into the cracks and finding nothing.. Stop it with the garbage talk already.. View AttachmentDo you know it as fact that it is "garbage talk" and none of the plaintiffs sold during the "we have won or payment is imminent" phase of updates during the years? b agree with cat,Because if they did, they sure were reacting to different news than we were lead to believe by the esteemed atty. imo I would like to address you as my friend. Pedro was the only one who post a shareholders count with names that I seen back in the days before the Hodges court hearings. We have no updated list in our hands from TOL. Steve said there was a lot of movement going on with the shares. Didn't say who or why they were moving. I'm thinking many were removed from the shareholders list to have that list come to light. I still think we are still trying to locate where all the shares are that are not listed with TOL. That can be a lot of digging over-seas in foreign counties and Canada. JMHO
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on May 1, 2014 9:04:09 GMT -5
Stop it already with that.. You and a bunch think these guys were still pumping and dumping the de-listed stock of a lifetime. What proof is there in all these years of looking into the cracks and finding nothing.. Stop it with the garbage talk already.. View AttachmentDo you know it as fact that it is "garbage talk" and none of the plaintiffs sold during the "we have won or payment is imminent" phase of updates during the years? b agree with cat,Because if they did, they sure were reacting to different news than we were lead to believe by the esteemed atty. imo There are a few things that have come out that people don't want to talk about: 1) Hodges did a lot of talking during the bivens suit but now, long after the suit he must not? 2) If the plaintiffs sold during the bivins, what gives? Looks shady if true. 3) And let's not forget this doozie: 'Very Tird' aka.....Treffy, one of the plaintiffs said Al said to him......"You worry too much about the shareholders" What the -you know what- is up with THAT?!!!! I want some truth to come out, not fantasy! I was told I was killing hope here? Is this a fantasy board or are we here for the truth? I don't want fantasy. Can't deposit fantasies in my bank!!!! >"<
|
|