Post by oldepro on Jun 25, 2012 17:48:03 GMT -5
Honorable Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Congresswoman Capps and Most Honorable Fellow Citizens of America,
I am Steve Walker from Oxnard Ca. I have been involved in stock market reform, with particular attention to Abusive Naked Short Selling (Phantom Shares), for over ten years. On June 7, I filed two separate Whistleblower Complaints with the SEC. On June 11, from a previous Freedom of Information Act request, the SEC sent me a copy of Exhibit 17 from the SEC Administrative Hearing in Los Angeles involving CMKM Diamonds May 10. 2005. File No. 3-11858.
The contents in this document are startling. I ask for a complete investigation.
CMKM Diamonds is the largest case of abusive naked shorting in history. Proof can be obtained by comparing two Documents. Exhibit 17 from File No. 3-11858 and Exhibit A from the Koch Declaration, filed 04/27/2007 by David Koch on behalf of CMKM Diamonds. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
Please read my SEC-OIG Complaint filed June 7, before I received Exhibit 17 under the FOIA,
The SEC and the DOJ are using false volume numbers in two major cases involving CMKM Diamonds.
During an SEC Administrative Hearing involving CMKM Diamonds, Christopher Wall presented testimony regarding volume in CMKX stock. The numbers he relied on are FALSE. It was a result of a computer "glitch":
"One of the problems with this exponential rise in popularity occurs in tracking share volumes. The Pink Sheets and OTCBB are limited by binary reporting systems that 'max out' at 4.295 billion shares, and the largest number a binary system can display is 32 digits. If it reports volumes larger than that, the data gets distorted. Counters either revert back to zero or provide incorrect volume data. Only a new reporting system could rectify this problem."
Read more: www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/04/072804.asp#ixzz1x1rLg1EX
Note: I contacted the author Matt Blackman yesterday by email. Look at his charts and imagine what the total could be (Naked short shares), if he is correct.
From Steve Walker to Matt Blackman: "Thank you so much for responding.
I assume the numbers in the charts came from the exchanges. If the OTCBB and Pinks had faulty reporting systems, these chart numbers would be suspect. Actually all OTCBB and PInks data would be. Correct? Am I missing something?
Thanks so much for your help.
Matt Blackman mattblackmancmt@gmail.com
4:04 PM (17 hours ago)
to me
Suspect only on issues that have maxed out at 4.295 billion shares (more than 32 digits) which is a very small subset of all PS and OTCBB stocks. But the growth bars since they are relative accurately depict growth rates which is what I was trying to show."
If he is correct and I agree with him 100%, if the "very small subset" is 5 stocks (we have documents for 3), you are then looking at 700 Billion X 5= 3.5 Trillion phantom shares. At .0001 = 1 billion shares is $100,000.
*Not in Original filing (Added for clarity) "from Lee Webb Stockwatch,'
"As Judge Murray wrote, 'the investing public has received only self-serving statements from persons promoting CMKM Diamonds.'"
Ms. Hakala goes on to remark that despite the lack of reliable information, "CMKM Diamonds' stock trades at exceptionally high volumes."
In fact, CMKM has traded at even higher volumes than perhaps realized by the SEC, which relied on flawed data provided by Bloomberg.
As previously reported by Stockwatch, CMKM has traded such massive volumes that many quote services, evidently including Bloomberg, have not been able to accurately report the daily totals.
In simple terms, the volume counters used by many quote services "turn over" much like a vehicle odometer once they hit a certain point.
In more technical terms, most software uses a 32-bit signed integer to represent volumes, therefore the maximum possible value is 2,147,483,647.
CMKM regularly traded more than 2.15 billion shares per day, topped 10 billion shares on many occasions and once notched an astounding 39.6 billion shares. Those whopping volumes were not accurately reported in the Bloomberg data relied upon by the SEC.
www.stockwatch.com/swnet/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=B-471798-U:CMKX&symbol=CMKX&ne..
It's a bit confusing at first, but what happens is when the total reaches 2,147,483,647; it then resets and counts backward to zero. Then it restarts at zero and goes up. At the end of the day, it ends in either a positive or negative number below 2,147,483,647, and it may have reset 5-10 times (if 10 times, real volume was roughly 20 billion).
If you look at Exhibits 17 and 61 from the SEC Hearing, you will see many NA. Approximately 50% of the time. Every NA would be a negative number.
I have documented proof and I alerted Agent Vasquez two years ago. www.capwiz.com/politicsol/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=4046781356
Both the SEC and the DOJ are prosecuting major cases relying on FALSE NUMBERS.
I make no accusations about the character of those involved. I think it is a case of a computer "Glitch". No matter what, it must be resolved.
Here are the volume figures from CMKM, www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf See exhibit A.
Take special note, until June of 2004 the company records show negative numbers. I believe they switched systems at this time.
Mr. Wall testified the volume went over 2 billion shares "six or seven times". This is ludicrous. It is much higher. In February of 2004 it averaged 3 billion per day from Knight Trading ALONE, per Carol Remond Dow Jones.
Which begs the question, are these naked shorted shares? In my opinion, yes. I believe the phantom shares are held by Major Brokerages, in individual Roth/Ira Accounts. Please take swift and decisive action. I will provide documents upon request.
My Canadian counterpart has evidence this was done to other pink sheet stocks as well. He has documents on QBID and FFGO specifically. He will provide upon request.
If applicable, ask for whistleblower protection under Dodd Frank.
I am filing with the SEC Office of the Whistleblower today.
Finally, I petition for a Congressional Investigation.
Sincerely,
Steven Walker
filed 6-7-2012
IWF_CD064A5BB3
Here's the smoking gun, Mr. Wall testified the period was between January 2003 to April 2005. Confirmed by Ms. Hakala. The first 2 pages of the exhibit show the price volume chart for this period. Next were daily time and sales. Shockingly the time and sales charts stop 3/19/04. The CMKM reports are showing every other day (average), a negative number. So are Bloomberg from exhibit 17, but they are left blank. Question is who blanked them out and why? If they had shown a negative, pages 1 and 2 would look like CMKM"S Exhibit pages 7 and 9. It would show negative volume. If the SEC had shown Judge Brenda Murray 14 months of negative volume, in BILLIONS of shares, I doubt she would make this ruling, www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2005/3-11858-1.pdf
CMKM stopped showing negative numbers after changing Tranfer Agents in June of 2004. These numbers are the best reference to true trading, available to the pubic. In his deposition with the SEC Donald Stoecklein testified an analysis by Dr. Jim DeCosta, showed the naked short could be 14-1.
A meeting was held between the SEC and CMKM Attorneys and management.
Among others, this meeting consisted of Andrew Petillion (AP), Branch Chief of Enforcement at the Pacific Regional Office, Leslie Hakala (LH), SEC Enforcement Attorney, , Gregory Glenn, SEC Chief Litigation Counselobert Maheu (RM), Donald Stoecklein (DS), and Bill Frizzell (BF), Owners Group (OG) representive for CMKM shareholders. Donald Stoeckein states Jim DeCosta presented evidence of 14-1.
During the Hearing, no one objects to or disputes the false numbers of the SEC, who play 'hide in plain sight' with Judge Brenda Murray. What is needed is to look at the original Bloomberg Reports.
With my whole heart and hopes for those in the future, I beg you to investigate. A naked short pays no income tax.
From CMKMDiamonds June 20, 2012:
There is apparently a new controversy among shareholders about the actual CMKX share counts, so here are the numbers as of today, 6/20/12 per the records at Transfer Online:
Shareholder Count: 50,407
Issued Shares: 695,969,515,522
Outstanding Shares: 695,933,015,522
Non-Restricted Shares: 672,250,114,879
Restricted Shares: 23,682,900,643
Authorized Shares: 800,000,000,000
www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/
There are 633 Billion certed by the TaskForce
There needs to be an immediate ,audit through the DTCC, of all brokers still holding shares , including ROTH/ IRA Accounts.
CMKM still exist today and has a preliminary agreement with the holder of what may possibly be valuable claims. We deserve to know the TRUE number of shares.
There are claims by Attorney Al Hodges that CMKM was involved in "support foreign terrorist organizations."
"The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations. To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security" cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4385.
Oh, where's the sex? While this was all going on,
"One senior attorney at SEC headquarters in Washington spent up to eight hours a day accessing Internet porn, according to the report, which has yet to be released. When he filled all the space on his government computer with pornographic images, he downloaded more to CDs and DVDs that accumulated in boxes in his offices." abcnews.go.com/GMA/sec-pornography-employees-spent-hours-surfing-porn-sites/story?id=10452544#.T-euxfW3FNg
In October 2009, I contacted SEC Chairwoman Mary Shapiro, SEC Director of Enforcement Division Robert Khuzami, David Kotz at the time, Inspector General of the SEC, about this very subject, and nothing was done. This was before I had possession of Exhibit 17. Exhibit 17 screams for a full Congressional Investigation.
I have no doubt many insiders of CMKM were corrupt and should pay for their crimes. But I believe the SEC came into this case with tunnel vision. Naked short selling in CMKX was not addressed at the May 2005, when it should have been. Why did the SEC fight so hard to exclude evidence of naked shorting BEFORE the Hearing? Why was Judge Brenda Murray not shown the REAL trading in CMKX? How many other companies were victims? Someone was gaming the system and so far, they have gotten away with it. Why? It's time for all these and other questions to be answered.
I leave you with the words of the late Robert Maheu, former aide to Howard Hughes and one time Chairman of the Board of CMKM Diamonds.
Conversation with Mark Faulk March 2007,
"FAULK: I agree with that completely. I think in the end that will be the only way that the truth comes out is for them to push it into the courts and the judge to step up and say enough is enough now let’s get it all out there. What about the SEC? What was your involvement with them? What are your feelings on how they’ve dealt with this?
MAHEU: Well, I don’t quite get this question.
FAULK: I’ve covered the issue of stock market fraud and naked short selling and stock counterfeiting over the last three years quite a bit and I’ve always had the impression that many times the SEC would just as soon kinda bury the companies and make it go away and I very much had that feeling in this particular issue but again from your viewpoint, do you feel like they were operating in the best interest of the shareholders?
MAHEU: I kept saying at that same hearing that I felt that they and we, and by we I mean those that were at the so-called management level at the time, had an obligation to protect the stockholders, and I was inferring that sometimes I get the impression that that was not what they were doing. I hope that answers your question.
FAULK: Yeah, it does. Sometimes it’s hard to tell if they are doing it maliciously or are they just kind of following the letter of the law. That’s a gray area where I obviously have my own opinions about how, not just in this case but how they’ve dealt with…
MAHEU: Why was the SEC put in place in the first place? I thought the first obligation they had was to protect the stockholders.
FAULK: Exactly. And theoretically that is true. I haven’t always seen it play out way and not just in this instance but in hundreds of companies. Very many times I’ve had them just say the easiest approach is to just make it go away.
MAHEU: I don’t know if you have the same feeling as I do, but my youngest son is the number 2 man on the police force in San Diego. He and I and Peter, who of course runs the Global Intelligence Network, we talk about certain things, about how things were handled in the past and how we feel that there is a tendency today to handle it differently. We feel that there are too many people in law enforcement or regulatory bodies today who begin with a conclusion. They do not logically arrive at one.
FAULK: So in other words you think they have a conclusion and then they try to find the facts to back up their preconceived…
MAHEU: They’ve got to rationalize their fallacious conclusion, and when you do that, Mark, and I don’t give a d*mn, you may be the smartest thing since 7-up, but you’re on a collision course.
FAULK: You’ve already clouded your objectivity, basically.
MAHEU: Exactly."
www.thefaulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1089.html
Fellow Honorable Citizens of America and the World,
In my life, I have never 'taken a shot'. My wife raised our boys with Wayne Gretsky's quote "you miss every shot you don't take.". Please help me with my shot, spread this to anyone you know and urge them to take action, by emailing and calling the offices of the Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Congresswoman Capps . And then, contact your Representatives and ask them to become involved. Alert the Senate Banking Committee. If a member is from your State, it makes a big difference. Working together we can create a reverse Ponzi scheme, and hold someone responsible. Please help me make this go viral, email and post it everywhere on the web. If you have invested in the stock market in the last ten years, you have been a victim of abusive naked short selling. Let's see some justice for a change.
Thank you,
Steve Walker
docs.google.com/file/d/1uMBzM9NB5NsAlSPwdlWmfG4c22zBUXDcZf3CeKVc7MF7RflV6Otauo6zfUMQ/edit
www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
I am Steve Walker from Oxnard Ca. I have been involved in stock market reform, with particular attention to Abusive Naked Short Selling (Phantom Shares), for over ten years. On June 7, I filed two separate Whistleblower Complaints with the SEC. On June 11, from a previous Freedom of Information Act request, the SEC sent me a copy of Exhibit 17 from the SEC Administrative Hearing in Los Angeles involving CMKM Diamonds May 10. 2005. File No. 3-11858.
The contents in this document are startling. I ask for a complete investigation.
CMKM Diamonds is the largest case of abusive naked shorting in history. Proof can be obtained by comparing two Documents. Exhibit 17 from File No. 3-11858 and Exhibit A from the Koch Declaration, filed 04/27/2007 by David Koch on behalf of CMKM Diamonds. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
Please read my SEC-OIG Complaint filed June 7, before I received Exhibit 17 under the FOIA,
The SEC and the DOJ are using false volume numbers in two major cases involving CMKM Diamonds.
During an SEC Administrative Hearing involving CMKM Diamonds, Christopher Wall presented testimony regarding volume in CMKX stock. The numbers he relied on are FALSE. It was a result of a computer "glitch":
"One of the problems with this exponential rise in popularity occurs in tracking share volumes. The Pink Sheets and OTCBB are limited by binary reporting systems that 'max out' at 4.295 billion shares, and the largest number a binary system can display is 32 digits. If it reports volumes larger than that, the data gets distorted. Counters either revert back to zero or provide incorrect volume data. Only a new reporting system could rectify this problem."
Read more: www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/04/072804.asp#ixzz1x1rLg1EX
Note: I contacted the author Matt Blackman yesterday by email. Look at his charts and imagine what the total could be (Naked short shares), if he is correct.
From Steve Walker to Matt Blackman: "Thank you so much for responding.
I assume the numbers in the charts came from the exchanges. If the OTCBB and Pinks had faulty reporting systems, these chart numbers would be suspect. Actually all OTCBB and PInks data would be. Correct? Am I missing something?
Thanks so much for your help.
Matt Blackman mattblackmancmt@gmail.com
4:04 PM (17 hours ago)
to me
Suspect only on issues that have maxed out at 4.295 billion shares (more than 32 digits) which is a very small subset of all PS and OTCBB stocks. But the growth bars since they are relative accurately depict growth rates which is what I was trying to show."
If he is correct and I agree with him 100%, if the "very small subset" is 5 stocks (we have documents for 3), you are then looking at 700 Billion X 5= 3.5 Trillion phantom shares. At .0001 = 1 billion shares is $100,000.
*Not in Original filing (Added for clarity) "from Lee Webb Stockwatch,'
"As Judge Murray wrote, 'the investing public has received only self-serving statements from persons promoting CMKM Diamonds.'"
Ms. Hakala goes on to remark that despite the lack of reliable information, "CMKM Diamonds' stock trades at exceptionally high volumes."
In fact, CMKM has traded at even higher volumes than perhaps realized by the SEC, which relied on flawed data provided by Bloomberg.
As previously reported by Stockwatch, CMKM has traded such massive volumes that many quote services, evidently including Bloomberg, have not been able to accurately report the daily totals.
In simple terms, the volume counters used by many quote services "turn over" much like a vehicle odometer once they hit a certain point.
In more technical terms, most software uses a 32-bit signed integer to represent volumes, therefore the maximum possible value is 2,147,483,647.
CMKM regularly traded more than 2.15 billion shares per day, topped 10 billion shares on many occasions and once notched an astounding 39.6 billion shares. Those whopping volumes were not accurately reported in the Bloomberg data relied upon by the SEC.
www.stockwatch.com/swnet/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=B-471798-U:CMKX&symbol=CMKX&ne..
It's a bit confusing at first, but what happens is when the total reaches 2,147,483,647; it then resets and counts backward to zero. Then it restarts at zero and goes up. At the end of the day, it ends in either a positive or negative number below 2,147,483,647, and it may have reset 5-10 times (if 10 times, real volume was roughly 20 billion).
If you look at Exhibits 17 and 61 from the SEC Hearing, you will see many NA. Approximately 50% of the time. Every NA would be a negative number.
I have documented proof and I alerted Agent Vasquez two years ago. www.capwiz.com/politicsol/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=4046781356
Both the SEC and the DOJ are prosecuting major cases relying on FALSE NUMBERS.
I make no accusations about the character of those involved. I think it is a case of a computer "Glitch". No matter what, it must be resolved.
Here are the volume figures from CMKM, www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf See exhibit A.
Take special note, until June of 2004 the company records show negative numbers. I believe they switched systems at this time.
Mr. Wall testified the volume went over 2 billion shares "six or seven times". This is ludicrous. It is much higher. In February of 2004 it averaged 3 billion per day from Knight Trading ALONE, per Carol Remond Dow Jones.
Which begs the question, are these naked shorted shares? In my opinion, yes. I believe the phantom shares are held by Major Brokerages, in individual Roth/Ira Accounts. Please take swift and decisive action. I will provide documents upon request.
My Canadian counterpart has evidence this was done to other pink sheet stocks as well. He has documents on QBID and FFGO specifically. He will provide upon request.
If applicable, ask for whistleblower protection under Dodd Frank.
I am filing with the SEC Office of the Whistleblower today.
Finally, I petition for a Congressional Investigation.
Sincerely,
Steven Walker
filed 6-7-2012
IWF_CD064A5BB3
Here's the smoking gun, Mr. Wall testified the period was between January 2003 to April 2005. Confirmed by Ms. Hakala. The first 2 pages of the exhibit show the price volume chart for this period. Next were daily time and sales. Shockingly the time and sales charts stop 3/19/04. The CMKM reports are showing every other day (average), a negative number. So are Bloomberg from exhibit 17, but they are left blank. Question is who blanked them out and why? If they had shown a negative, pages 1 and 2 would look like CMKM"S Exhibit pages 7 and 9. It would show negative volume. If the SEC had shown Judge Brenda Murray 14 months of negative volume, in BILLIONS of shares, I doubt she would make this ruling, www.sec.gov/alj/aljorders/2005/3-11858-1.pdf
CMKM stopped showing negative numbers after changing Tranfer Agents in June of 2004. These numbers are the best reference to true trading, available to the pubic. In his deposition with the SEC Donald Stoecklein testified an analysis by Dr. Jim DeCosta, showed the naked short could be 14-1.
A meeting was held between the SEC and CMKM Attorneys and management.
Among others, this meeting consisted of Andrew Petillion (AP), Branch Chief of Enforcement at the Pacific Regional Office, Leslie Hakala (LH), SEC Enforcement Attorney, , Gregory Glenn, SEC Chief Litigation Counselobert Maheu (RM), Donald Stoecklein (DS), and Bill Frizzell (BF), Owners Group (OG) representive for CMKM shareholders. Donald Stoeckein states Jim DeCosta presented evidence of 14-1.
During the Hearing, no one objects to or disputes the false numbers of the SEC, who play 'hide in plain sight' with Judge Brenda Murray. What is needed is to look at the original Bloomberg Reports.
With my whole heart and hopes for those in the future, I beg you to investigate. A naked short pays no income tax.
From CMKMDiamonds June 20, 2012:
There is apparently a new controversy among shareholders about the actual CMKX share counts, so here are the numbers as of today, 6/20/12 per the records at Transfer Online:
Shareholder Count: 50,407
Issued Shares: 695,969,515,522
Outstanding Shares: 695,933,015,522
Non-Restricted Shares: 672,250,114,879
Restricted Shares: 23,682,900,643
Authorized Shares: 800,000,000,000
www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/
There are 633 Billion certed by the TaskForce
There needs to be an immediate ,audit through the DTCC, of all brokers still holding shares , including ROTH/ IRA Accounts.
CMKM still exist today and has a preliminary agreement with the holder of what may possibly be valuable claims. We deserve to know the TRUE number of shares.
There are claims by Attorney Al Hodges that CMKM was involved in "support foreign terrorist organizations."
"The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations. To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security" cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4385.
Oh, where's the sex? While this was all going on,
"One senior attorney at SEC headquarters in Washington spent up to eight hours a day accessing Internet porn, according to the report, which has yet to be released. When he filled all the space on his government computer with pornographic images, he downloaded more to CDs and DVDs that accumulated in boxes in his offices." abcnews.go.com/GMA/sec-pornography-employees-spent-hours-surfing-porn-sites/story?id=10452544#.T-euxfW3FNg
In October 2009, I contacted SEC Chairwoman Mary Shapiro, SEC Director of Enforcement Division Robert Khuzami, David Kotz at the time, Inspector General of the SEC, about this very subject, and nothing was done. This was before I had possession of Exhibit 17. Exhibit 17 screams for a full Congressional Investigation.
I have no doubt many insiders of CMKM were corrupt and should pay for their crimes. But I believe the SEC came into this case with tunnel vision. Naked short selling in CMKX was not addressed at the May 2005, when it should have been. Why did the SEC fight so hard to exclude evidence of naked shorting BEFORE the Hearing? Why was Judge Brenda Murray not shown the REAL trading in CMKX? How many other companies were victims? Someone was gaming the system and so far, they have gotten away with it. Why? It's time for all these and other questions to be answered.
I leave you with the words of the late Robert Maheu, former aide to Howard Hughes and one time Chairman of the Board of CMKM Diamonds.
Conversation with Mark Faulk March 2007,
"FAULK: I agree with that completely. I think in the end that will be the only way that the truth comes out is for them to push it into the courts and the judge to step up and say enough is enough now let’s get it all out there. What about the SEC? What was your involvement with them? What are your feelings on how they’ve dealt with this?
MAHEU: Well, I don’t quite get this question.
FAULK: I’ve covered the issue of stock market fraud and naked short selling and stock counterfeiting over the last three years quite a bit and I’ve always had the impression that many times the SEC would just as soon kinda bury the companies and make it go away and I very much had that feeling in this particular issue but again from your viewpoint, do you feel like they were operating in the best interest of the shareholders?
MAHEU: I kept saying at that same hearing that I felt that they and we, and by we I mean those that were at the so-called management level at the time, had an obligation to protect the stockholders, and I was inferring that sometimes I get the impression that that was not what they were doing. I hope that answers your question.
FAULK: Yeah, it does. Sometimes it’s hard to tell if they are doing it maliciously or are they just kind of following the letter of the law. That’s a gray area where I obviously have my own opinions about how, not just in this case but how they’ve dealt with…
MAHEU: Why was the SEC put in place in the first place? I thought the first obligation they had was to protect the stockholders.
FAULK: Exactly. And theoretically that is true. I haven’t always seen it play out way and not just in this instance but in hundreds of companies. Very many times I’ve had them just say the easiest approach is to just make it go away.
MAHEU: I don’t know if you have the same feeling as I do, but my youngest son is the number 2 man on the police force in San Diego. He and I and Peter, who of course runs the Global Intelligence Network, we talk about certain things, about how things were handled in the past and how we feel that there is a tendency today to handle it differently. We feel that there are too many people in law enforcement or regulatory bodies today who begin with a conclusion. They do not logically arrive at one.
FAULK: So in other words you think they have a conclusion and then they try to find the facts to back up their preconceived…
MAHEU: They’ve got to rationalize their fallacious conclusion, and when you do that, Mark, and I don’t give a d*mn, you may be the smartest thing since 7-up, but you’re on a collision course.
FAULK: You’ve already clouded your objectivity, basically.
MAHEU: Exactly."
www.thefaulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1089.html
Fellow Honorable Citizens of America and the World,
In my life, I have never 'taken a shot'. My wife raised our boys with Wayne Gretsky's quote "you miss every shot you don't take.". Please help me with my shot, spread this to anyone you know and urge them to take action, by emailing and calling the offices of the Senators Boxer and Feinstein and Congresswoman Capps . And then, contact your Representatives and ask them to become involved. Alert the Senate Banking Committee. If a member is from your State, it makes a big difference. Working together we can create a reverse Ponzi scheme, and hold someone responsible. Please help me make this go viral, email and post it everywhere on the web. If you have invested in the stock market in the last ten years, you have been a victim of abusive naked short selling. Let's see some justice for a change.
Thank you,
Steve Walker
docs.google.com/file/d/1uMBzM9NB5NsAlSPwdlWmfG4c22zBUXDcZf3CeKVc7MF7RflV6Otauo6zfUMQ/edit
www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/Koch%20Declaration.pdf
