|
Post by JoeRockss on May 18, 2013 11:05:32 GMT -5
« Message list | Reply to msg. | Post new msg.
« Older | Newer »
By: rosencrantz2010 18 May 2013, 08:20 AM CDT Rating: Msg. 1175990 of 1176021 (Reply to 1175979 by king1000)
i agree with GUS. AL's job was to clear the government of most if not all possible future litigation problems by 1) filing suit against the people at the SEC over their failure to release funds that were supposedly collected for CMKX investors and 2) playing his part to help further the case that the cmkx investors group is largely made up of loons. AL did play his role well. he lost and took his sweet time in losing. (remember all those inevitable delays in his responses to the court and his allowing the other side as much time as needed in responding to the court?) and all the while adding the craziest, d*mn nonsense about the white hats and the world currencies and the pope and queen and good lord who knows what else?!! i'm surprised he didn't work in something about alien beings capturing the trust fund. in short, AL wasted all this time on purpose. it was his job. too bad it had to hurt all the people hoping AL was going to be a big winner. and why did others lie about AL having the goods. he didn't. it was all a stall, one more big stall that be necessary but it sure wrecked havoc on a lot of people's emotions and made most of those people look pretty dumb. and now we have SK getting ready to stick a knife in this whole scenario. he couldn't do it before, they had to let AL do his thing, but now that it's over CMKX is going to distance itself as far as possible from it by saying while AL may have been well intentioned he was wrong about the trust and it's time we put that silliness behind us and move on as a company. that's my prediction for the upcoming WEBINAR. ol' SK is going to push this AL craziness out the door forget about it because it accomplished what it was intended to accomplish. sorry AL supporters. you got snookered big time.
Geeeee, you think ol' BOB was in on it? LOL
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on May 18, 2013 11:25:57 GMT -5
« Message list | Reply to msg. | Post new msg. « Older | Newer » By: rosencrantz2010 18 May 2013, 08:20 AM CDT Rating: Msg. 1175990 of 1176021 (Reply to 1175979 by king1000) i agree with GUS. AL's job was to clear the government of most if not all possible future litigation problems by 1) filing suit against the people at the SEC over their failure to release funds that were supposedly collected for CMKX investors and 2) playing his part to help further the case that the cmkx investors group is largely made up of loons. AL did play his role well. he lost and took his sweet time in losing. (remember all those inevitable delays in his responses to the court and his allowing the other side as much time as needed in responding to the court?) and all the while adding the craziest, d*mn nonsense about the white hats and the world currencies and the pope and queen and good lord who knows what else?!! i'm surprised he didn't work in something about alien beings capturing the trust fund. in short, AL wasted all this time on purpose. it was his job. too bad it had to hurt all the people hoping AL was going to be a big winner. and why did others lie about AL having the goods. he didn't. it was all a stall, one more big stall that be necessary but it sure wrecked havoc on a lot of people's emotions and made most of those people look pretty dumb. and now we have SK getting ready to stick a knife in this whole scenario. he couldn't do it before, they had to let AL do his thing, but now that it's over CMKX is going to distance itself as far as possible from it by saying while AL may have been well intentioned he was wrong about the trust and it's time we put that silliness behind us and move on as a company. that's my prediction for the upcoming WEBINAR. ol' SK is going to push this AL craziness out the door forget about it because it accomplished what it was intended to accomplish. sorry AL supporters. you got snookered big time. Geeeee, you think ol' BOB was in on it? LOL I 100% disagree with the above post! I believe Al found a trust set aside for shareholders. I believe that Al has worked diligently to get the funds released. Furthermore, I appreciate that Al has used his own personal resources on this endeavor and has not asked the shareholders for a dime. I don't believe Al was intentionally stalling nor did he have any ulterior motive. But herein lies the problem, they are only my beliefs and I can't prove any of it. So am I right or is Rosencrantz??...I have no idea, thus the frustration! Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by crajaraman on May 18, 2013 14:16:43 GMT -5
I came across this post from Wyatt and had some questions..
Does AH have in his possession evidence of the trusts ? How did he obtain it ?
How can Wyatt say that AH has the discretion to use the information as he pleases ?
--
wyatt
So I did what I could do to get my ROI for myself and was unsuccessful as of today. However I do feel that it will have not been unsuccessful in the end. I believe that we played a a small part in bringing about a financial revolution never seen before in the history of mankind. With that being said what seems to be my and six others failures is your opportunity. Neither the Plaintiffs or Al Hodges ever discouraged anyone else from taking up the cause to fight for what was rightfully theirs.
As I recall there were a couple of attempts by some others that proved to be fruitless as well. So my failure is your gain. Now you can take up the financial burden and go get your ROI for yourself. Any evidence or information that Al Hodges has is his and his alone to disseminate share or burn. I personally will him advise him to start charging for consultations like Poof does.
I am sorry that Al was unable to announce to the Shareholders that there payment was coming on such and such date. He told you what he knows and it is still not good enough for everyone. I truly believe that we have won the war but as with any war we must clean things up and insure that chaos does not take hold. So there may be a pause in getting our ROI, however as Al stated it will come. So I am sorry if I have come of callous, it is not my intention. I am just aware of the personal sacrifice that was made by a few in hope to reward the many. Anyone wishing to take up the cause I wish you the sincerely the best of luck. Reece
|
|
|
Post by portrush on May 18, 2013 14:31:04 GMT -5
I believe its been said Pedro paid for the court transcripts. Is that correct? So...does that provide him certain rights of ownership to the copy he acquired?
pr
|
|
|
Post by crajaraman on May 18, 2013 14:37:12 GMT -5
Your analogy is accurate if the source of Pedro's information is public domain only...Is AH's source public domain ? If not, does SK have rights to this information ?
If not, listen all cmkxers! l
Line up with payment for trust information that AH obtained.
Tell me where, when and how to make payment ? Consider it done..
|
|
|
Post by portrush on May 18, 2013 14:56:32 GMT -5
I believe SK has made it clear, he doesn't subscribe to the theories or comments from H&A. Therefore, I doubt seriously he will spend any time in pursuit of that which he has already dismissed. It's been 18 months since he assumed leadership of the company. It is still stagnant for all intents and purposes. I suggest his hands are already full and his focus needs to be on developing something that will bring value to the shareholders.
pr
|
|
|
Post by crajaraman on May 18, 2013 15:00:28 GMT -5
from Wyatt Now you can take up the financial burden and go get your ROI for yourself. --
I would truly be interested in this possibility if the trust information is available to me.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on May 18, 2013 16:40:43 GMT -5
from Wyatt Now you can take up the financial burden and go get your ROI for yourself. -- I would truly be interested in this possibility if the trust information is available to me. We are strung along for 3 years by Al, Bob, Wyatt and the boys and this is how it ends? Go get it for yourself? I could respect them saying "sorry guys, we gave it our best shot and fell short" "Here is the information and evidence that has been gathered over the years, go see what you can accomplish." But after three years of this nonsense, we know absolutely nothing more than we did when it started. For all intent and purposes, it's over, but don't worry, because we have won?? Won what?? I don't feel like a winner as it pertains to this investment. Steve reaches out to Al and Al is not interested?? Could it because Al has nothing, nada, zero when it comes to proof of a trust? I think that may be the case. Al has stated that everything was verified by different sources before it was relayed to the shareholders. Did he have multiple sources that told him Peter Maheu was fined an enormous amount of money per day?? Because those sources were full of crap. So what else has his sources told him that was incorrect? But then again, we shouldn't be asking these tough questions, right? Just sit back, relax and know that you have won I guess our next update will be around January, 2014. If you guys would like to see the update earlier, then just let me know. I probably can throw something together that would be close. Frustrated Shareholder, Briwadd
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2013 20:28:14 GMT -5
from Wyatt Now you can take up the financial burden and go get your ROI for yourself. -- I would truly be interested in this possibility if the trust information is available to me. We are strung along for 3 years by Al, Bob, Wyatt and the boys and this is how it ends? Go get it for yourself? I could respect them saying "sorry guys, we gave it our best shot and fell short" "Here is the information and evidence that has been gathered over the years, go see what you can accomplish." But after three years of this nonsense, we know absolutely nothing more than we did when it started. For all intent and purposes, it's over, but don't worry, because we have won?? Won what?? I don't feel like a winner as it pertains to this investment. Steve reaches out to Al and Al is not interested?? Could it because Al has nothing, nada, zero when it comes to proof of a trust? I think that may be the case. Al has stated that everything was verified by different sources before it was relayed to the shareholders. Did he have multiple sources that told him Peter Maheu was fined an enormous amount of money per day?? Because those sources were full of crap. So what else has his sources told him that was incorrect? But then again, we shouldn't be asking these tough questions, right? Just sit back, relax and know that you have won I guess our next update will be around January, 2014. If you guys would like to see the update earlier, then just let me know. I probably can throw something together that would be close. Frustrated Shareholder, Briwadd Bri, Interesting position. Probably more the rule than the exception. Mike
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on May 18, 2013 22:07:49 GMT -5
I just love it, all the boards on Paltalk monitored any criticism and reddotted you for speaking out, and now certain guru's are saying it's your fault cuz you could of did more than sit at your computer chair lol. The boards were monitored by people who never wanted us to rally together. They led us like sheep to the slaughter mill. I hope they get what is coming to them, as I said in one of my previous post... you are lower than scum.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 19, 2013 9:37:23 GMT -5
dicek18 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Mr Hodges, Please Provide the Trust Information « Thread Started Today at 5:11am »
Mr. Hodges,
Now that the Bivens case is over, it would be of great benefit if you would release the name of the shareholder trust, the institution where the trust was initially established, and the names of the trustees who were assigned to manage the trust for the shareholders.
As has been said many times, that our trust was "swept up" into the WGS, one can sue those parties who did the "sweeping" as this is blatantly illegal and done without the permission of the entitled shareholders.
Calling the trustees into court and having them explain under oath the status of the trust, it's current dollar total, where the trust money is located, and which individuals ordered the management of the trust transferred into new hands, one can trace where the shareholder money is and who is responsible for withholding our payout from us.
Once you release all of the pertinent trust information regarding our trust money, a petition can be entered in court to freeze said trust account until the matter is legally settled under due process.
Thank you for your consideration and looking forward to seeing the shareholder trust information, which was established for the benefit of all 50,000 CMKX shareholders.
|
|
iboughtit2
Dr. Of Diamonds
4119 Days-still trusting the team but not the Banksters
Posts: 157
|
Post by iboughtit2 on May 19, 2013 10:04:48 GMT -5
dicek18 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Mr Hodges, Please Provide the Trust Information « Thread Started Today at 5:11am » Mr. Hodges, Now that the Bivens case is over, it would be of great benefit if you would release the name of the shareholder trust, the institution where the trust was initially established, and the names of the trustees who were assigned to manage the trust for the shareholders. As has been said many times, that our trust was "swept up" into the WGS, one can sue those parties who did the "sweeping" as this is blatantly illegal and done without the permission of the entitled shareholders. Calling the trustees into court and having them explain under oath the status of the trust, it's current dollar total, where the trust money is located, and which individuals ordered the management of the trust transferred into new hands, one can trace where the shareholder money is and who is responsible for withholding our payout from us. Once you release all of the pertinent trust information regarding our trust money, a petition can be entered in court to freeze said trust account until the matter is legally settled under due process. Thank you for your consideration and looking forward to seeing the shareholder trust information, which was established for the benefit of all 50,000 CMKX shareholders. Hey what a wonderful idea.....let's file more lawsuits and tie everything up in Court for another 4-5 years. Sounds like 'somebody' is working for the banksters who just do not want to let go of our money.
|
|
|
Post by vpd on May 19, 2013 11:01:31 GMT -5
Actjally it is a wonderful idea, to get Al to tell us what he knows if anything.
|
|
|
Post by crajaraman on May 19, 2013 15:43:41 GMT -5
Great post dicek18. This is what I have asked for as well, though my post was shorter..
|
|
|
Post by axis on May 20, 2013 8:39:36 GMT -5
Repost: Al responds to Briwadd [2/2/12]From: Brian #$%$#$%$ Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:51 PMTo: Al Subject: CMKX Mr. Hodges, I don't know how to go about this email, so I will just be brutally honest. I am pissed!! I am pissed at the entire CMKX saga and those that prolong the misery of the shareholder. Over the past 8 years, we have been introduced to many characters. We were told that Urban Casavant is a man of integrity, Roger Glenn was a sharp securities attorney that would never be involved in a scam, and that Bob Maheu never loses...Well, it would appear that all of that is false and that the shareholders were played for fools. Then out of nowhere, you appear on the scene bringing with you a resurgence of optimism. Early 2010, payment was imminent...the work to be done could be accomplished in a day. The end of 2010, early 2011 was the betting man comment and the beginning of 2012 was done, truly imminent, hours days comment. What will it be a year from now? How long can you continue to string this out without providing anything of substance? Mr. Hodges, everything that I have heard and everything that I have read leads me to believe that you are an intelligent individual. If that is the case, then surely you understand my frustration and don't hold any ill will towards me or others that have grown tired of this never ending nightmare known as CMKX. I ask/implore you to provide more information on your source of information. Are they government sources? You once told a shareholder that you had contacts within the Federal Reserve that stated 3.87 trillion was earmarked for CMKX shareholders, are you still communicating with the FED? Do you talk with anyone within the DOJ, SEC, FBI, etc? I am not asking for names, I would just like to know there is credible sources and that you are not relying on Bonnie and the white hats. Surely you can provide more information without divulging sensitive information. Please... Brian
From: Al <Al@hodgesandassociates.com>View Contact To: Brian #$%$#$%# Cc: particleswaves@yahoo.com; Gina <Gina@hodgesandassociates.com>; JAM <gioprism@gmail.com> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If it helps, I talk to all of those and more; everything is checked at least 3 or 4 ways before being discussed. Try just a little more patience -almost done. Two years ago.. Hello everyone! I email Al Hodges yesterday and he replied back to me below. Read my email at the bottom of the page then read Al’s email below. Hope you all enjoy this one liner from Al. Hope all is well with all of you! Have a Great Day everyone. Curtis this is what the email says..... RE: Hello AL Hodges, This is Curtis Pemberton and I need your Attention................. Monday, April 11, 2011 12:55 PM From: "Al" <Al@hodgesandassociates.com> To: "Curtis Pemberton" <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@yahoo.com> Cc: particleswaves@yahoo.com, "Gina " <Gina@hodgesandassociates.com> Take heart, we are almost finished. FYI, the IQD revaluation is waiting on us. dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/62176-fresh-from-cmkx-board-attorney-hodges-says-rv-waiting-on-cmkx-payout/Read more: dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/62176-fresh-from-cmkx-board-attorney-hodges-says-rv-waiting-on-cmkx-payout/#ixzz2Tq6qIzxo
|
|