Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 5, 2016 7:37:49 GMT -5
dizardos
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
23 hours ago Treadstone, gmbudwrench and 6 more like this.
Post by dizardos on 23 hours ago
I think we all have to keep in mind that each of us has and operates on different levels of information and their corresponding quality. In spite of that difference much still offers no certainty unless the highest of highest standards of due diligence are applied as a result of the initiation of the largest intelligence operation in history (besides what took place during WWII) which means disinformation is everywhere. We have all observed that on numerous occasions with all kinds of parties claiming to be owed trillions of dollars. Some stories stand scrutiny, many do not.
I know one source from which Harvscorvette can get information from and I personally consider that individual the most credible of everyone involved. We have to keep in mind though that most people do not know the background stories and for them any statement will come across as just another opinion. There is nothing wrong with that perspective on that level of information. Nevertheless we have Al Hodges who went much further than all others and lead by example without making any demands on anyone else. That could (or should depending on perspective) qualify as an indicator of credibility, especially when taking into account the spending of most significant personal funds. All in all I think Desperado honestly wants to help the shareholder base, but that is not always as easy as it seems. For example in my own case one influential contact part of CMKX and much more told certain things before they were even on the radar. It was from that angle that the Knights Templar entered the picture, but after having observed numerous inconsistencies and anomalies at One World of Nations, it would appear that there are divisions in that group and it is the same in regards to the Jesuits, the Knights of Malta and many other organisations. It is not a simple black and white matter. So just because a scenario appears to be credible it does not mean it is correct. I have made that mistake numerous times. Of course it is much easier to discard all the information, but that does not mean one actually receives the correct information. If there are ten hostile intelligence operatives and one benevolent one, one's track record might look a lot better by considering it all nonsense, but that certainly leads nowhere.
As far as I am concerned Acca has done numerous things that are disrespectful to shareholders which I would never allocate to 'orders from above'. What are those 'higher powers' going to do if one does show up on Paltalk to say that one is not allowed to speak and offer apologies instead of numerous no shows? What about stimulating credit card debt? What about the statement of becoming a whistleblower and it never happening? I do not know the source behind Acca and I do not care either. It could very well be a Global Intelligence plan for maximum internal and external confusion, so that the job gets done behind the scenes without interference, but I am not favourably inclined towards that if that is the case. I know some of the networks Hodges and Harvscorvette are involved in and that will always be far more credible than Acca's information as far as I am concerned.
The conflict between shareholders results mostly from not operating on the same level of information. Some receive weekly information updates, but many do not. It is therefore not illogical to realise that those who practically never receive any insider information do not have the same trust level. Why should they when they would appear to be in the dark? It was for this very reason that I supported Operation Truth with Thomas Gates in order to help those shareholders who never receive any information as long as Operation Truth would not expose or endanger the benevolent operatives involved with CMKX or harm the odds of success for CMKX. I also made that clear to Dave van Gunten and Steve Walker. I know that Harvscorvette was very much against that as unnecessary and in that sense I moved against his interests. All in all there are different needs upon the level of information people are part of. I am one of the few people who has seen puzzle pieces of the highest levels of that information, but I was never part of it for this chapter of the book. In that sense I can relate to those who do have insider information and those who do not. CMKX is and remains a rollercoaster ride until we get paid. Almost everyone has made mistakes along the journey and has had his or her emotional outbursts and often those outbursts hit other shareholders without meaning to do so as the real culprits of the numerous delays are hidden in the shadows.
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
23 hours ago Treadstone, gmbudwrench and 6 more like this.
Post by dizardos on 23 hours ago
I think we all have to keep in mind that each of us has and operates on different levels of information and their corresponding quality. In spite of that difference much still offers no certainty unless the highest of highest standards of due diligence are applied as a result of the initiation of the largest intelligence operation in history (besides what took place during WWII) which means disinformation is everywhere. We have all observed that on numerous occasions with all kinds of parties claiming to be owed trillions of dollars. Some stories stand scrutiny, many do not.
I know one source from which Harvscorvette can get information from and I personally consider that individual the most credible of everyone involved. We have to keep in mind though that most people do not know the background stories and for them any statement will come across as just another opinion. There is nothing wrong with that perspective on that level of information. Nevertheless we have Al Hodges who went much further than all others and lead by example without making any demands on anyone else. That could (or should depending on perspective) qualify as an indicator of credibility, especially when taking into account the spending of most significant personal funds. All in all I think Desperado honestly wants to help the shareholder base, but that is not always as easy as it seems. For example in my own case one influential contact part of CMKX and much more told certain things before they were even on the radar. It was from that angle that the Knights Templar entered the picture, but after having observed numerous inconsistencies and anomalies at One World of Nations, it would appear that there are divisions in that group and it is the same in regards to the Jesuits, the Knights of Malta and many other organisations. It is not a simple black and white matter. So just because a scenario appears to be credible it does not mean it is correct. I have made that mistake numerous times. Of course it is much easier to discard all the information, but that does not mean one actually receives the correct information. If there are ten hostile intelligence operatives and one benevolent one, one's track record might look a lot better by considering it all nonsense, but that certainly leads nowhere.
As far as I am concerned Acca has done numerous things that are disrespectful to shareholders which I would never allocate to 'orders from above'. What are those 'higher powers' going to do if one does show up on Paltalk to say that one is not allowed to speak and offer apologies instead of numerous no shows? What about stimulating credit card debt? What about the statement of becoming a whistleblower and it never happening? I do not know the source behind Acca and I do not care either. It could very well be a Global Intelligence plan for maximum internal and external confusion, so that the job gets done behind the scenes without interference, but I am not favourably inclined towards that if that is the case. I know some of the networks Hodges and Harvscorvette are involved in and that will always be far more credible than Acca's information as far as I am concerned.
The conflict between shareholders results mostly from not operating on the same level of information. Some receive weekly information updates, but many do not. It is therefore not illogical to realise that those who practically never receive any insider information do not have the same trust level. Why should they when they would appear to be in the dark? It was for this very reason that I supported Operation Truth with Thomas Gates in order to help those shareholders who never receive any information as long as Operation Truth would not expose or endanger the benevolent operatives involved with CMKX or harm the odds of success for CMKX. I also made that clear to Dave van Gunten and Steve Walker. I know that Harvscorvette was very much against that as unnecessary and in that sense I moved against his interests. All in all there are different needs upon the level of information people are part of. I am one of the few people who has seen puzzle pieces of the highest levels of that information, but I was never part of it for this chapter of the book. In that sense I can relate to those who do have insider information and those who do not. CMKX is and remains a rollercoaster ride until we get paid. Almost everyone has made mistakes along the journey and has had his or her emotional outbursts and often those outbursts hit other shareholders without meaning to do so as the real culprits of the numerous delays are hidden in the shadows.