|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 31, 2013 3:18:11 GMT -5
The Stand Update. My understanding is that the packets are ready...there was\is a processing issue and is being resolved. No expected date of delivery provided. Thank you All the best, BHollenegg That's good enough for me! Tomorrow, my employer gets a good swift kick in the Nads!!! =^ .". ^=………The days of cat servitude are OVER!!! FREEEEEEEEEEEDOM!
|
|
|
Post by timonesock on Jul 31, 2013 7:10:40 GMT -5
Thanks for the update!!!
Who gave you that information?
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Jul 31, 2013 7:23:19 GMT -5
marbearcat arrives at work to find two co-workers already at it with the boss...............marbearcat is not swayed in the least bit and immediately lets the boss know who's the real boss.........................boss wid da hot sauce~
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Jul 31, 2013 7:31:33 GMT -5
How many processing issues can there be over a 10 year span?
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Jul 31, 2013 7:53:56 GMT -5
The Stand Update. My understanding is that the packets are ready...there was\is a processing issue and is being resolved. No expected date of delivery provided. Thank you All the best, BHollenegg Thanks for sharing what you can. We are standing by.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 31, 2013 10:07:26 GMT -5
The Stand Update. My understanding is that the packets are ready...there was\is a processing issue and is being resolved. No expected date of delivery provided. Thank you All the best, BHollenegg Hi Bob....... Thanks for the Update.... For those interested in reading or re-reading, here is the link to "The Stand" !! cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=roe&action=display&thread=5220SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 31, 2013 13:18:07 GMT -5
marbearcat arrives at work to find two co-workers already at it with the boss...............marbearcat is not swayed in the least bit and immediately lets the boss know who's the real boss.........................boss wid da hot sauce~ The birds were definitely working for the evil black cat. =^ .". ^=
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 31, 2013 14:39:39 GMT -5
ChuckWheat *Diamond* Post by ChuckWheat on 2 hours ago The reality is that if Bob is wrong, we will know over time. If he's not, we should know sooner.
But if he isn't wrong, I wonder how many among us would have the integrity and wisdom to account for being wrong and spiteful toward Bob (and others, like Attorney Hodges), and offer sincere apologies to them?
Remember that the only things you were owed when you made your share purchases were the stock you received, and a level market playing field. If you do end up paid through Mr Hodges efforts, it won't be because Mr Hodges had a duty or obligation to do what he did for you...and while it certainly wasn't his responsibility to give you your shares, he may well have helped to level the market playing field for future investors.
I've been prepared for a long time to admit I was wrong if this ends with nothing...will other members stand with me in doing the same if this ends well for us?
C-Dub
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jul 31, 2013 14:41:52 GMT -5
And if it never ends???
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jul 31, 2013 20:35:19 GMT -5
4 hours ago puffs said: C-Dub Hodges has tried lawsuits and lost many times. Why would any of us, at this point in time, need to apologize to him? What amazes me is some shareholders are still posting as though he has accomplished something. In fact I believe the honourable thing for Hodges to do would be to apologize to us for not to showing enough proof to be acknowledged by the courts. As for Bob sadly I fear his reputation may have been damaged for the rest of his life.
ChuckWheat *Diamond*
Hey Puffs,
It's good to talk with you, it's been a while. If you will, imagine two likely scenarios (and I admit there may be more scenarios/sub-scenarios, but I'm not privy to anything you aren't so I wouldn't know authoritatively):
1) We will lose. Nothing done by former company management (in all it's various names) ever did anything to benefit shareholders, only themselves. Mr Maheu made a mistake by joining the company. All the efforts of Mr Hodges and anyone connected to the Bivens action knew it wouldn't work out but did all this just to toy with fragile shareholder emotions. Outcome: Hope that our evolving company will find a goal, mission, resources, and demand sufficient to return a fraction of what we invested so long ago.
If this is to be our reality, I agree that apologies would be inappropriate...and this adventure would come to an end.
2) We will win, but not on a timetable people will prefer. While former company management and others worked to take our investment dollars illegally/unethically, Mr Maheu brought in one of his teams that specializes in "tough assignments", probably partially because it would aid larger goals he had all along, couple with benefit for us shareholders suffering from the work of those discussed above. The team has had a significant fight, almost certainly far more tenacious and underhanded than could ever have been forseen at the outset of this effort. They are winning, but for reasons most shareholders seem unable or unwilling to understand, it doesn't appear we have any proof of anything and we keep having slippages in the anticipated completion of their work.
If this is to be our reality, on the day we find out about their successes the following would be true:
a) They would be vindicated in saying we won, and that we would be paid.
b) Regardless of the support (or lack thereof) from the general shareholding community, they will have completed the tasks they were commissioned to achieve...something they didn't have to do for us.
c) Those who focused their spite and ill will toward Mr Hodges, Bob, and others, will ironically find themselves receiving a mind-blowing gift from those they attacked so vigorously for telling them it was coming.
d) Only those who are so full of themselves as to be blinded to common courtesy and respect would take this gift without at least acknowledging what was done and expressing appreciation to those responsible for it...and at least acknowledging and atoning for their hateful ways displayed on these boards before they knew the truth.
As far as Bob, he is a shareholder like you and I. He has maintained integrity with his knowledge and beliefs throughout his journey, and he has shared what he could with other shareholders even to the point of taking backlash for doing so. I would argue that among shareholders he has given more to the cause of "justice" for us than his next 2-3 peers combined. I don't think he's been really damaged at all, except in the opinions of those who are looking for others to blame for their own choices.
All given with respect, and best wishes that scenario #2 will be delivered to all shareholders at the earliest possible opportunity, C-Dub
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2013 20:52:54 GMT -5
4 hours ago puffs said: C-Dub Hodges has tried lawsuits and lost many times. Why would any of us, at this point in time, need to apologize to him? What amazes me is some shareholders are still posting as though he has accomplished something. In fact I believe the honourable thing for Hodges to do would be to apologize to us for not to showing enough proof to be acknowledged by the courts. As for Bob sadly I fear his reputation may have been damaged for the rest of his life. ChuckWheat *Diamond* Hey Puffs, It's good to talk with you, it's been a while. If you will, imagine two likely scenarios (and I admit there may be more scenarios/sub-scenarios, but I'm not privy to anything you aren't so I wouldn't know authoritatively): 1) We will lose. Nothing done by former company management (in all it's various names) ever did anything to benefit shareholders, only themselves. Mr Maheu made a mistake by joining the company. All the efforts of Mr Hodges and anyone connected to the Bivens action knew it wouldn't work out but did all this just to toy with fragile shareholder emotions. Outcome: Hope that our evolving company will find a goal, mission, resources, and demand sufficient to return a fraction of what we invested so long ago. If this is to be our reality, I agree that apologies would be inappropriate...and this adventure would come to an end. 2) We will win, but not on a timetable people will prefer. While former company management and others worked to take our investment dollars illegally/unethically, Mr Maheu brought in one of his teams that specializes in "tough assignments", probably partially because it would aid larger goals he had all along, couple with benefit for us shareholders suffering from the work of those discussed above. The team has had a significant fight, almost certainly far more tenacious and underhanded than could ever have been forseen at the outset of this effort. They are winning, but for reasons most shareholders seem unable or unwilling to understand, it doesn't appear we have any proof of anything and we keep having slippages in the anticipated completion of their work. If this is to be our reality, on the day we find out about their successes the following would be true: a) They would be vindicated in saying we won, and that we would be paid. b) Regardless of the support (or lack thereof) from the general shareholding community, they will have completed the tasks they were commissioned to achieve...something they didn't have to do for us. c) Those who focused their spite and ill will toward Mr Hodges, Bob, and others, will ironically find themselves receiving a mind-blowing gift from those they attacked so vigorously for telling them it was coming. d) Only those who are so full of themselves as to be blinded to common courtesy and respect would take this gift without at least acknowledging what was done and expressing appreciation to those responsible for it...and at least acknowledging and atoning for their hateful ways displayed on these boards before they knew the truth. As far as Bob, he is a shareholder like you and I. He has maintained integrity with his knowledge and beliefs throughout his journey, and he has shared what he could with other shareholders even to the point of taking backlash for doing so. I would argue that among shareholders he has given more to the cause of "justice" for us than his next 2-3 peers combined. I don't think he's been really damaged at all, except in the opinions of those who are looking for others to blame for their own choices. All given with respect, and best wishes that scenario #2 will be delivered to all shareholders at the earliest possible opportunity, C-Dub Like Chevy Chase stated in Funny Farm, "as a novelist, I turned out to be a pretty good sports writer..." Mike
|
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Aug 1, 2013 1:04:44 GMT -5
4 hours ago puffs said: C-Dub Hodges has tried lawsuits and lost many times. Why would any of us, at this point in time, need to apologize to him? What amazes me is some shareholders are still posting as though he has accomplished something. In fact I believe the honourable thing for Hodges to do would be to apologize to us for not to showing enough proof to be acknowledged by the courts. As for Bob sadly I fear his reputation may have been damaged for the rest of his life. ChuckWheat *Diamond* Hey Puffs, It's good to talk with you, it's been a while. If you will, imagine two likely scenarios (and I admit there may be more scenarios/sub-scenarios, but I'm not privy to anything you aren't so I wouldn't know authoritatively): 1) We will lose. Nothing done by former company management (in all it's various names) ever did anything to benefit shareholders, only themselves. Mr Maheu made a mistake by joining the company. All the efforts of Mr Hodges and anyone connected to the Bivens action knew it wouldn't work out but did all this just to toy with fragile shareholder emotions. Outcome: Hope that our evolving company will find a goal, mission, resources, and demand sufficient to return a fraction of what we invested so long ago. If this is to be our reality, I agree that apologies would be inappropriate...and this adventure would come to an end. 2) We will win, but not on a timetable people will prefer. While former company management and others worked to take our investment dollars illegally/unethically, Mr Maheu brought in one of his teams that specializes in "tough assignments", probably partially because it would aid larger goals he had all along, couple with benefit for us shareholders suffering from the work of those discussed above. The team has had a significant fight, almost certainly far more tenacious and underhanded than could ever have been forseen at the outset of this effort. They are winning, but for reasons most shareholders seem unable or unwilling to understand, it doesn't appear we have any proof of anything and we keep having slippages in the anticipated completion of their work. If this is to be our reality, on the day we find out about their successes the following would be true: a) They would be vindicated in saying we won, and that we would be paid. b) Regardless of the support (or lack thereof) from the general shareholding community, they will have completed the tasks they were commissioned to achieve...something they didn't have to do for us. c) Those who focused their spite and ill will toward Mr Hodges, Bob, and others, will ironically find themselves receiving a mind-blowing gift from those they attacked so vigorously for telling them it was coming. d) Only those who are so full of themselves as to be blinded to common courtesy and respect would take this gift without at least acknowledging what was done and expressing appreciation to those responsible for it...and at least acknowledging and atoning for their hateful ways displayed on these boards before they knew the truth. As far as Bob, he is a shareholder like you and I. He has maintained integrity with his knowledge and beliefs throughout his journey, and he has shared what he could with other shareholders even to the point of taking backlash for doing so. I would argue that among shareholders he has given more to the cause of "justice" for us than his next 2-3 peers combined. I don't think he's been really damaged at all, except in the opinions of those who are looking for others to blame for their own choices. All given with respect, and best wishes that scenario #2 will be delivered to all shareholders at the earliest possible opportunity, C-Dub what exactly has bob maheu done for us, [shadow=red,left,300]except for the rumour [/shadow]of him making all the bankers pay for their shares... (and it is only a rumour BTW) I want conclusion to this debacle as well, but 10 years is approaching and the gurus aren't even trying anymore they are just repeating the same "cheque is in the mail" and the sheeple take it as fact..... and not rumour... 1/ probably is the answer... but hey ive waited this long ,so why not watch the ship sink..
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes3 on Aug 1, 2013 13:41:50 GMT -5
I agree chuck wheat...until something happens to the contrary...I will remain convinced that there is a definite reason/purpose for ten years of whatever the *&^% has been going on...I need a reason to believe that we have been duped..over the years I have listened to many individuals that I respect immensely....people who are allot smarter than I am....lawyers...doctors....finance people....etc...until that happens..I will continue with my addiction....]ps....don't include manny in that list of smart individuals.....thankyou very much......... ;D
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 1, 2013 16:53:59 GMT -5
WHERE'S THE LOOT?
=^ .". ^=
|
|
|
Post by Tommycmkx on Aug 1, 2013 18:14:18 GMT -5
I will repeat... WHERE'S THE LOOT?!
|
|