Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2013 20:25:43 GMT -5
OMG.........And all this time I have been spelling it wrong.I was actually named after the 17th letter of the Greek alphabet...... I can't believe you knew that.... Well I guess when ya have a connection..... ya have a connection !! Bad guys, Good guys...It doesn't matter what ANYONE thin,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. OK , OK sorry Mrs. ZO6Mike ... ouch. Could you please control your better half...... I thought she knew Manny was involved?? And is Manny paying you?? <shaking my head> RHO P-paying me? Was he supposed to pay? MMMMaaaannyyyy! (Knuckle biting like Santino in the God a Father when Carlo beat'er up) I knew it! All this time he's been collecting Brazillians (Brazillians. Ha!) and he gives me bupkiss. Or was that bupkis? Bumpkisses es eszzzz? Story of my life... Mike
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 4, 2013 6:45:12 GMT -5
portrush Administrator .Post by portrush on Nov 2, 2013 at 12:43pm
I am all for accountability and transparency. The Sunshine Law is great where applicable, as is integrity to provide explicit details where it may not be.
Folks need to research RECEIVERSHIP and understand what happens when this occurs. Who gets paid from the assets, who loses out, and what happens to any future "claims/assets" if the court controls or shuts down a company.
Some will tell you this is a strategic advantage for shareholders. Others will say its their worst nightmare and the quickest route to nothing...except for the attorneys and the few shareholders named in the suit.
I don't understand it all, but it doesn't strike me as "good." More open discussion and education is warranted, IMO. I know one attorney who said the shareholders typically do not win in these situations.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 5, 2013 14:26:05 GMT -5
RoughCut DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by RoughCut on 44 minutes ago
Why do we have to pick one or the other to support? Rather than campaign for your pick by talking about why you think the others are not the one to support, support them all. After all these years of delay it looks like we should get behind anyone who is trying to help.
I support Oldepro and Mr. Gates. Just take the time to read about all the things over his career he has had firsthand experience with -- he has been at the forefront of some very high level investigations. And Oldepro has been a leader for years in verifiable DD about CMKX. Just take the time to read about both of them before you make judgments. And if the money is bothering you just send in 10 or 20 bucks -- good grief folks.
I certainly support Bob H.(and always have) in his latest efforts to get info from Wells Fargo about any trust for us under their keeping. Rather than point out reasons why that wouldn't be possible like you are an expert in this situation, just let him try. At least he is trying for goodness sakes.
I support SK in trying to get us back to trading. What else has anyone else done on our behalf who have run CMKM Diamonds all these years?
And of course I support Al Hodges. I have been a supporter since he first published his intentions on Dec 16, 2009 to pursue all legal means if necessary to get what is rightfully ours. Seems I read Mr. Mahue's comment along those lines in 2005.
In real life I don't associate with negative people. It's contagious. Nothing and I mean nothing has ever been accomplished by a negative person, just gloom and despair. I'm not talking about people who post their honest viewpoint with the reasons stated. I'm talking about people who never have anything positive to say. And this is coming from a positive person who has doubts but will never lose faith that there is money for us. The SOB's who are holding this up are fighting hard and we need to fight them back by any means possible which includes all the efforts stated above.
All IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2013 16:01:33 GMT -5
RoughCut DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by RoughCut on 44 minutes agoWhy do we have to pick one or the other to support? Rather than campaign for your pick by talking about why you think the others are not the one to support, support them all. After all these years of delay it looks like we should get behind anyone who is trying to help. I support Oldepro and Mr. Gates. Just take the time to read about all the things over his career he has had firsthand experience with -- he has been at the forefront of some very high level investigations. And Oldepro has been a leader for years in verifiable DD about CMKX. Just take the time to read about both of them before you make judgments. And if the money is bothering you just send in 10 or 20 bucks -- good grief folks. I certainly support Bob H.(and always have) in his latest efforts to get info from Wells Fargo about any trust for us under their keeping. Rather than point out reasons why that wouldn't be possible like you are an expert in this situation, just let him try. At least he is trying for goodness sakes. I support SK in trying to get us back to trading. What else has anyone else done on our behalf who have run CMKM Diamonds all these years? And of course I support Al Hodges. I have been a supporter since he first published his intentions on Dec 16, 2009 to pursue all legal means if necessary to get what is rightfully ours. Seems I read Mr. Mahue's comment along those lines in 2005. In real life I don't associate with negative people. It's contagious. Nothing and I mean nothing has ever been accomplished by a negative person, just gloom and despair. I'm not talking about people who post their honest viewpoint with the reasons stated. I'm talking about people who never have anything positive to say. And this is coming from a positive person who has doubts but will never lose faith that there is money for us. The SOB's who are holding this up are fighting hard and we need to fight them back by any means possible which includes all the efforts stated above. All IMO. Hmmmm. Sounds like diversification. Mike
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 6, 2013 6:13:50 GMT -5
RoughCut DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by RoughCut on 44 minutes agoWhy do we have to pick one or the other to support? Rather than campaign for your pick by talking about why you think the others are not the one to support, support them all. After all these years of delay it looks like we should get behind anyone who is trying to help. I support Oldepro and Mr. Gates. Just take the time to read about all the things over his career he has had firsthand experience with -- he has been at the forefront of some very high level investigations. And Oldepro has been a leader for years in verifiable DD about CMKX. Just take the time to read about both of them before you make judgments. And if the money is bothering you just send in 10 or 20 bucks -- good grief folks. I certainly support Bob H.(and always have) in his latest efforts to get info from Wells Fargo about any trust for us under their keeping. Rather than point out reasons why that wouldn't be possible like you are an expert in this situation, just let him try. At least he is trying for goodness sakes. I support SK in trying to get us back to trading. What else has anyone else done on our behalf who have run CMKM Diamonds all these years? And of course I support Al Hodges. I have been a supporter since he first published his intentions on Dec 16, 2009 to pursue all legal means if necessary to get what is rightfully ours. Seems I read Mr. Mahue's comment along those lines in 2005. In real life I don't associate with negative people. It's contagious. Nothing and I mean nothing has ever been accomplished by a negative person, just gloom and despair. I'm not talking about people who post their honest viewpoint with the reasons stated. I'm talking about people who never have anything positive to say. And this is coming from a positive person who has doubts but will never lose faith that there is money for us. The SOB's who are holding this up are fighting hard and we need to fight them back by any means possible which includes all the efforts stated above. All IMO. ChuckWheat DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Post by ChuckWheat on 13 hours agoI found Roughcut's post below in the Buzz Chat rather inspirational today, so I've borrowed it to help start a new conversation...I hope you don't mind Roughcut. I've said for some time that we shareholders have more in common than we have that separates us, because no matter what happens we all will share the same fate. Believe we're scammed? If we get paid you'll be as happy as the strongest believer. Believe that we're due for untold wealth? If we don't get paid you'll be on your own as much as the strongest conspiracy theorist. Where is this going? We have choices about certain aspects of our journey, as much as we have beliefs. No one (myself included) can tell another that they are wrong in their feelings...and no one should be trying to force their perspectives on their communities, either directly (kicking people off for having opinions) or indirectly (claiming you value respect while indifferently watching as other members of the community attack, hound, and bully others holding a different perspective). Respect isn't just avoiding confrontation or vulgarity...it is a mindset and a choice. It starts internally, respecting yourself enough to recognize you're not the authority about all things CMKX...no average shareholder is, even with the time we've all spent watching things happen over the years. Respecting yourself is a necessary element of being able to extend respect to others. Respecting others is the foundation that allows us to strip away the comfortable fiction many of us have wrapped ourselves in, and see things from new (and hopefully more accurate) ways of looking at the same information we've all seen over the years. Of course there are those who will return our respect with disrespect...those who will lie to us, tell us partial truths wrapped authoritatively in creative opinions, and those who can't demonstrate respect for others no matter how many chances they are given. In those cases where we show respect but it cannot or will not be reciprocated, then perhaps it's time to determine if we should let those folks go...but no one should feel happy about the loss of a member of our community. I believe we we were to remove ego and limited thought from our perspectives, we may well find as a group we can start making more sense of the things we have been subjected to, and potentially may have in store. I commend Roughcut for his post below, and others who also expressed similar thoughts. We aren't fenced by artificial distinctions (positive or negative, basher or sheep, etc) unless we give value to those attributes...and as mentioned earlier we're all heading for the same fate in the end. Personally I'd prefer that end be one that I meet with head held high, with knowledge that our contributions on these message boards helped the maximum number of people possible...regardless of whether that end is one we'd prefer, or one we wouldn't. We've been here a long time...we should start seeing one another as assets that can help us get through our wait, rather than targets of our impatience and disrespect. I plan to start working toward this goal, and I invite all shareholders to do the same. With Respects, C-Dub debintex DIAMOND JEDI MASTERGood post Roughcut and I agree with you 100%. Just because I support the Tom Gates initiative, doesn't mean I don't support Bob or Al. Heck, I think Bob said it best in his last post. "Hello Shareholders, Time to press on. There will be a designated person flying up next week to meet with the WF bank executive. What transpires from this meeting will dictate what directions and measures we will take to release the funds. I briefed oldepro with what I know.| I will continue to support actions that will release the funds. Thank you. All the best, BHollenegg"
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 9, 2013 8:31:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Nov 10, 2013 10:15:10 GMT -5
16 hours agojohn3339 said:
It seems to be disappointingly apparent you may be correct about the alleged trust. I just wish if it were indeed correct, Mr. Hodges would do us the courtesy of providing us with his final report as per his communications plan, rather than leave us to the whims of the gurus to continually lead us on with the dangling carrot on a stick.
That being said, I also have doubt about the business plan of trying to return to trading. 800 billion shares authorized for a new company that plans to operate marginal oil fields that will pump contingent on the PPB being high enough to continue to make such an enterprise viable does not sound too solid. I doubt there will be new investors coming on board with enough gusto to make our shares worth enough to bring much of an ROI...certainly not enough to permit shareholders to bail with any profit. And for those wanting to ride it out, the production level of such an oil field will have to be pretty durn significant to cover all of the corporate expenses plus provide for any kind of cash dividend before another decade passes.
And all of that is dependent on whether the SEC will actually let this new named company return to trading, with all of its past baggage of scandal and corruption...I seriously doubt that will occur. imo
sptrader DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
* What's our alternative to trying to return to trading with a "Proven reserves" oil and gas property (with 6 tril Cu/ft in untapped natural gas reserves)? This is the LAST chance we have as shareholders, to get an ROI. If SK doesn't try to make CMKX_NHHI successful, we have nothing anyway...SK has a history of successful business ventures, so I think he deserves a chance and support.. Yes, it will require, "taking on some debt", to get started, but that's only because of the endless court delays with the Wells Fargo case and asset recoveries.... CMKX_NHHI has a "potential $150 million due in court ordered judgements and the Wells case, so the possibility is there, that the loans could be paid off within a year or so, with just a little luck... The main thing is to acquire the property, generate revenue and return to trading ASAP... Trading at any price, is better than where we are today, even at $.0001 you can get at least 1/3 of your money back that you have no access to today... Remember inspite of the original CMKX, with no business, no income, just debt and insiders stealing shareholder money, CMKX still sold for at least $.0024, with hundreds of billions of shares outstanding... This time, we will have a business run by an honest Christian man, positive cash flow from day one, from an oil property currently pumping oil, a legitimate BOD and up to date financials, not to mention the "possibility" of the largest outstanding naked short in the history of the stock market, that will need to be covered..... For those dis-believers out there SK said "just watch and see it happen".... SK has also agreed (my suggestion), that a live webcam be installed at the oil and gas property, so shareholders can monitor the oil and gas drilling activity in "real-time"... jmho
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 11, 2013 6:42:38 GMT -5
swather DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by swather on 4 hours ago
maybe you should file a lawsuit against Bill frizzell if you want the naked shorting data...............all that info obtained by the owners group belongs to Bill Frizzell and not to CMKX...........Bill Frizzell obtained that info while working with John Martin and had no relationship with CMKX.............he appeared at that hearing representing shareholders only and as an "interested party" to the hearing and not as a representative of CMKX
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 11, 2013 6:46:28 GMT -5
taskforceviking DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by taskforceviking on Nov 6, 2013 at 11:24pm
Time to Listen to Steve Kirkpatrick...
Long overdue for many... "Forgetting the past and looking forward to what lies ahead"...
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Nov 11, 2013 7:00:35 GMT -5
swather DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by swather on 4 hours agomaybe you should file a lawsuit against Bill frizzell if you want the naked shorting data...............all that info obtained by the owners group belongs to Bill Frizzell and not to CMKX...........Bill Frizzell obtained that info while working with John Martin and had no relationship with CMKX.............he appeared at that hearing representing shareholders only and as an "interested party" to the hearing and not as a representative of CMKX Bill is still with the Co.. Ask Steve K.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Nov 11, 2013 7:06:45 GMT -5
taskforceviking DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by taskforceviking on Nov 6, 2013 at 11:24pmTime to Listen to Steve Kirkpatrick... Long overdue for many... "Forgetting the past and looking forward to what lies ahead"... What LIES ahead Yea, I wonder about that too.
|
|
cano1
Dr. Of Diamonds
Posts: 211
|
Post by cano1 on Nov 11, 2013 15:09:57 GMT -5
Or, more lies ahead! At this point we don't really know who is the goods guys or bad anymore!
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Nov 11, 2013 16:31:25 GMT -5
Or, more lies ahead! At this point we don't really know who is the goods guys or bad anymore! That was my point and why I capitalized the word "LIES" I should have written it this way: What lies (are) ahead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2013 19:36:44 GMT -5
Or, more lies ahead! At this point we don't really know who is the goods guys or bad anymore! That was my point and why I capitalized the word "LIES" I should have written it this way: What lies (are) ahead. MBC, All things considered, a completely reasonable stance. Mike
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 12, 2013 7:20:31 GMT -5
Bill is still with the Co.. Ask Steve K. John, But is it more as a consultant to the lead Lawyers? Where I got this?? I dunno..... but I think the lead lawyers would only take the case if Bill Frizzell stayed on to consult as he was the most informed and they would need his input?? SINGLE
|
|