|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 7, 2008 18:32:53 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 7,246 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #318 on Today at 4:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- leon5 Junior Miner Re: UPDATED..SEC v Cmkm Diamonds Stock,YES,Finaly « Reply #9 Today at 1:08pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- by grnfrst from pal : AS FAR AS GETTING PAID, WE HAVE TO BE HARMED ! THIS IS A CIVIL COMPLAINT ISSUED BY THE SEC ! CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE PASSED ON BY THE SEC ! HOWEVER, THE "FAIR FUNDS" DISBURSEMENTS ARE HANDLED BY THE SEC ! GET READY TO CEIVE YOUR CHECKS ! IN OTHER WORDS, WE DON'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, ELSE, WHY GIVE THE SEC THE POWER TO DISBURSE FUNDS ! CHECKMATE also from pal : dck004: (2:42 PM) Sweeet_Time: BadBassPlayer: hawkeye1 - I said " It's also my understanding chairman Mr. Cox was going to make restitution to damaged shareholders." He said " That is correct. I ask if CMKX was on the list of damaged shareholders and he said "No, not until criminal charges are filed. Well, """ criminal charges are filed"""" imo « Last Edit: Today at 1:11pm by leon5 » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4758
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 7, 2008 18:33:34 GMT -5
soonerlew Diamond Wiz (Moderator) member is online Joined: Apr 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 7,246 Location: Oklahoma Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #319 on Today at 4:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tramp Administrator Re: UPDATED..SEC v Cmkm Diamonds Stock,YES,Finaly « Reply #13 Today at 2:15pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=699177-- From the conglom board. abad's opinion: So Urban Casavant tells the world his stock is being manipulated January 7, 2003, because he & some criminal cabal put out un-registered shares all over the place. UC even names the brokerages in the Jan. 3 2003 PR. Yes, that is what I would do if I was throwing around unregistered shares. I would engage in this wrongdoing and then complain that my stock was being manipulated. Then in the Fall of 2003, I would announce that I was buying the very unregistered shares I gave to brokerages to sell and put them back into the treasury. Also, in the fall of 2003, while engaged in this sordid activity, I would make a world wide announcement that I was awaiting a response from the DTCC; so that I could see how many shares were outstanding. Wouldn't want to draw attention to my criminal endeavors. I would put out all of these unregistered shares to make $64 million dollars, only to spend $64 million buying them back. Yep, that makes a world of sense. Then, I would throw more wood on the blaze, start a race team, tour all over the United States and promote the purchase of CMKX for TWO YEARS. I would continue this bold maneuver under the eyes of several esteemed attorneys and professionals. Namely: Roger Glen, IBM and Stoecklein, the SEC, DOJ, Federal Reserve, Congress... etc. Yep, first I sell them to make all kinds of money, only to turn around and buy them all back to retire them.... funny, the SEC had no problem with allowing the continued trading of over a trillion shares...and handing out dividends on markers....failing to enforce the 1976 Securities Processing Laws.... and the list goes on. At least in SEC court hearing, UC has the ultimate trump card. He is not worthless, the claims are very real, the SEC, Federal Reserve, Congress, failed to enforce laws and regulations to protect investors and the SEC continues today to run a fractional securities system... Heck, in my opinion, all the shares being traded daily are counterfeit imo. The real shares are in global cert form held by the private investment banks...and their criminal corporate clients. This hearing ought to be a real fun exercise for the SEC and Congress! UC! put me on the witness list for you!!! they don't stand a chance. - - - - - tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4758
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:53:58 GMT -5
snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER A pump "sting" cmkm « Thread Started Today at 4:23pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you are still doubting this was not a sting operation and I believe the "sting" involved more than one stock. Go to Nevada state website and research JE, sergey, santos, and others connected to them through other companies. Have a sheet of paper with you and plan on being on the site for a few hours before you get through all the names and companies. The amount of money laundering that went on is huge. Also go look at a law suit by California Software Corporation in the 90s and their connection to nevwest. Actually, you will need a book to write all the names and companies names. By the way ALL the companies have been revoked in 2006, 2007, and 2008. Also don't know if Nevwest Insurance had any connection to Nevwest Securities, but the people involved with that are last names of Salim, Khanmohamed (WHAT). « Last Edit: Today at 4:29pm by snoopstock5 » snoopstock5 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: A pump "sting" cmkm « Reply #1 Today at 4:54pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC had to have known about Nevwest before 2001. Catching them is another story. skoondog DIAMOND MINER Re: A pump "sting" cmkm « Reply #2 Today at 5:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I say Nevwest will be part of the lawsuite too right>>?? tuscansun DIAMOND MINER Re: A pump "sting" cmkm « Reply #3 Today at 5:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yup..............!! millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19008
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:55:08 GMT -5
By: Bellingus 07 Apr 2008, 07:03 PM EDT Msg. 30950 of 30950 Jump to msg. # Jeopardy Alex T: All right folks. This is the Final Jeopardy Round. Please mark your cards as to how much you’d like to wager. ~goofy Jeopardy ‘ticking clock’ music~ Alex T: Okay everyone, time’s up. Tonight’s answer falls under the category, Stock Fraud in the New Century. And the question is: “In what famous stock scandal of the new century was every piece of ‘official news’ ever released absolutely the opposite of what eventually turned out to be true?” ~goofy Jeopardy ‘ticking clock’ music~ Alex T: All right everyone, time’s up. We’ll start with Bob. Bob, what did you have? Bob turns over his card, which reads: Who is Martha Stewart? Buzzzzzzzzz! Alex T: Oh no, Bob. I’m sorry. How much was your wager? Bob’s podium panel lights up. Alex T: Ouch, Bob. Bob bet the whole amount which leaves him with zero. We’ll go now to our current runner-up, Betty. Betty what did you come up with? Betty turns over her card: What was Enron? Buzzzzzzzzzz! Alex T: No, Betty that’s not correct, I’m sorry. How much was your wager? Betty’s podium panel lights up. Alex T: Betty bet $2001, leaving her with $6,880. And now to our current champion. Jack, what was your answer? Jack turns over his card, which reads: What is The Stock Play of A Lifetime? Alex T, looking perplexed turns to the judges, and says: “Judges?” The judges quickly rule and Alex turns back to the audience with a big smile saying, we’ll accept that answer Jack! The actual answer is, what is CMKX? Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Alex T: What was your wager, Jack? Jack’s podium panel lights up. Alex T: Jack bet it all leaving him with a grand total of cash and prizes… Scene fades to credits with the Jeopardy announcer’s voice trailing off saying, “Promotional consideration was given to…” ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01247&read=30950
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:55:56 GMT -5
vngntn1 vegas member Re: The Rumor Mill...."Smoking Hot!" « Reply #1099 Today at 5:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WELL if my numbers are correct from SEC thread $64.2m(disgorgement ) / 622b = .00013. Maybe damages another .0003 ??. OR are we waiting for UC to appear at hearing with different figuress?? WondER why Desormeau not mentioned. « Last Edit: Today at 5:43pm by vngntn1 » camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=576&page=74
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:56:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:56:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:57:04 GMT -5
ocd Diamond Finder and Miner Re: UPDATED..SEC v Cmkm Diamonds Stock,YES,Finaly « Reply #17 Today at 4:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Boy, I just read some of the trash on the other boards. The "fence sitters" are getting to show their anti-Urban side finally. You guys have to know that a picture must be painted showing guilt by insiders. I realize all the moron bashers out there will say the SEC has all the "facts" but just when have they ever been right? We see their slanted justice every time they hand out a fine to their coveted Wallstreet buddies. You know that Urban will be cast as a criminal. If the SEC revealed the number of investment bankers involved in counterfeit shorting what would that do to investor confidence? The SEC has to save face and this is how they will do it, by vilifying Urban. Now the interesting part. We either are paid some low amount by the SEC because they are only going after roughly $64 million. What's 64 million divided by 703 billion? Or here's the worst case scenario...Kevin (clearly a puppet) has been hammering the "we're gonna trade again in the future" drum since day 1. My thoughts? This is the way the shorts get to cover. In that scenario, we get paid .000000001 per share. So, do you trust the SEC? I HIGHLY RECOMMEND EVERYONE TO ATTEND THE COURT CASE...FULL BLOWN PICKET SIGNS.......MAKE IT VISIBLE!!!!!!! ocd Diamond Finder and Miner Re: UPDATED..SEC v Cmkm Diamonds Stock,YES,Finaly « Reply #18 Today at 4:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The best part about this to me is the SEC was just slammed by the Sec of the Treasury for being inept in their duties. If they were so good at administering justice for the shareholders then why did the Federal Reserve receive Paulson recommendation to take over the SEC's responsibilities? The unit that is being replaced for its corruption and "leaning" justice is the one that will be taking CMKX to court? If we're not careful they will sweep us under a rug and put us in a nice big warehouse. I'm telling you all right now....you can't yell loud enough and long enough to your congressmen and the media. You need to show up to the court. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4758
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 18:57:28 GMT -5
timewilltell Ace of Diamonds Re: SEC charges 14 Defendants In Scheme in CMKM « Reply #14 Today at 3:49pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i have to remark about the item that gusjarvis wrote a couple years back were he noted that glenn rodgers... approached uc , about the 622 billion shares and told him too retire those shares ,....or other wise he would wind up being the bad guy , now if that statement was true ..... i cant believe that mr. rodgers would let uc.do such a thing knowing he could be charged with a fraud charge and a jail sentence,.... i just cant buy into the fact that he knew the consequences, and.... didnt abide what mr. rodgers told him, .....this info was all out there years ago. some of us have been told by the sec from our phone calls to them they couldnt give any info out, because the co. was being investigated , , i dont see this as a road block , unless we are only getting a small part of the story, key players such as mahue ,stoeklien ,and glenn rodgers , , are named , these to me are the key people in this scenario, . who better than mahue,to take charge ,god bless us all & mgnt. .....twt. if uc. has to step down , of which i still have my doubts , cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=19543
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:07:25 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 05:38 PM EDT Msg. 699320 of 699514 Jump to msg. # "INDICTMENTS"....since '06 by Frizz,,,a few months ago by Kevin,,,and now we see why Kevin lied through his teeth about never having been in contact with the SEC to HELP them with THEIR INVESTIGATION(s).
Compare the April '07 pr to his recent denial comments
LOL.
Think i'll go actually read it now.....LOL
Good ol CMKX,,,,i tell ya
GLTA....& #### on all who are guilty
Chris
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:08:17 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 05:41 PM EDT Msg. 699328 of 699516 Jump to msg. # "CMKM" won't get any fines from the SEC outta this....Seaboard Ruling is a good precedent why.
Chris
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:13:45 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 05:56 PM EDT Msg. 699355 of 699528 Jump to msg. # Urban made MORE than Edwards???..thats just red*mn diculous!
Urban also ripped off Edwards cause the 4th paragraph says Edwards was the mastermind! LOL,,,so he made less for do most tha work??
LMAO
Edwards don't seem so smart no mo! L...M...A...O !
dand,,,and still got 24 pages to go! LOL
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:14:32 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 06:05 PM EDT Msg. 699368 of 699529 Jump to msg. # "Disgorgement" will = a Fair Fund Distribution.I'am not happy bout that route,,,,,but oh well.....i'll take it. And notice it didn't name CMKM for a disgorgement??,,,,that's very very good....and hey,,,why no namin Maheu or Glenn???...pointed out NUMEROUS reasons/comparisons why they wouldn't be. LOL And seein alot of contradcitions already in relation to some things that Kevin has said He couldn't just have been keepin us busy? ....naaaaa LOL
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:15:29 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 06:11 PM EDT Msg. 699372 of 699533 Jump to msg. # So Bagley won't be allowed to handle pennies anymore......ouch,,,hope they eventually toss her azz in jail too for all I care. good
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 19:16:17 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Apr 2008, 06:22 PM EDT Msg. 699387 of 699533 Jump to msg. # Bagley is a pos,,,the SEC did their homework and are layin it out very clear....and her azz needs to spend the rest of her days in prison too.
|
|