|
Post by hundredtoone on Apr 28, 2008 20:11:32 GMT -5
I like anything above .54 if it is going to be a rumor might as well be a good one...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 20:14:54 GMT -5
John Winston Lennon O'BoogieTruth Seeker ] This just in..... Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee « Thread Started Today at 2:27pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 08-A-561516-C Status ACTIVE Plaintiff Brewer, Steven M Attorney Pro Se Defendant Kay, Robert B Attorney ## Unknown ## Judge Herndon, Douglas W Dept. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total of 2 entries, presently displaying 1 through 2. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Party Name Party Type Status Attorney Bar# Attorney Name Total Attorneys Answer Date Answer Type Summons Filed Summons Served Address Phone Brewer, Steven M PRIMARY PLAINTIFF ACTIVE as of 04/23/2008 PRO SE Pro Se 0 Kay, Robert B PRIMARY DEFENDANT ACTIVE as of 04/23/2008 courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us:8490/DistrictCourt/asp/Parties.asprobert b kay+west america securities ////////// oops lookie here section C(ii)(b) of the tro against urban. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents....dTRO6-08-07.pdfwonder if this has anything to do with mr casavants share movements. cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1858
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 20:17:42 GMT -5
I like anything above .54 if it is going to be a rumor might as well be a good one...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) Agreed....Tell a good one if you are going to tell one.....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 28, 2008 20:29:53 GMT -5
By: my69z 28 Apr 2008, 06:56 AM EDT Msg. 346139 of 346139 (This msg. is a reply to 346137 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # So look at the timelines...CMKX moves to drop the Pendens on the 18th,,,,the friday before monday's hearing.
So they obviously did this by at least the 16th.....how does Eton know not to show up on monday to contest when the judge had only recieved a letter??
Riigght around the same time CMKX filed to remove,,,,Eton was filin to contest.
So within 2 days,,,, Eton/CMKX came to an agreement and contacted the judge to get his unoffical approval??....instead of goin through a normal process of just submittin to the judge an agreement??
Especially with only 2 days til court??.....why would Denton give such priority to this "letter"??
It wouldn't be to keep the "story" from comin out cause CMKX had already laid out how everything went down.
hmmm
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 28, 2008 20:34:46 GMT -5
Yesterday at 2:16pm, PORTRUSH wrote:
It is what it is and it will happen when it happens. No one can change anything at this point, pr
Rapturo59 Due Diligence Analyst Re: Mona says« Reply #47 Today at 6:16pm » portrush, that is a fatalist point of view.
I certaintly don't believe that way, I'm sure it matters none to you and most others.
you got to see through the BS being slung at us and then fight back, Pick up a stick and beat someone's azz.
you are way to nice of a person
btw, mona and her sidekicks are FOS, liars or not, they are FOS
Tony
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 20:39:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 20:43:54 GMT -5
twistcapper Administrator Re: OT: Star Uranium « Reply #1 Today at 10:06am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The company is still awaiting the judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in the appeal by Shore Gold Inc. (SGF-TSX), heard February 11, 2008. This appeal stems from a decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Queens Bench which decided a dispute over ownership of 25 claims in the Fort à la Corne area in favour of Star Uranium Corp. and United Uranium Corp. (UUC-TSX.V) in 2003. C'mon already............................. TC Brigantine Board Addict Re: OT: Star Uranium « Reply #2 Today at 10:23am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After reading all the nonsense on the boards today and yesterday, I have come to this conclusion. Apparently, there is a snag in the dotting of the Is and crossing of the Ts in the conglomerate event that needs to follow shortly after our payment event. So our payment event will remain on hold until it can coincide correctly with the next event. If that is the announcement, rollout of the conglomerate, in which they would dearly like us to invest our money, then so be it. But enough with the bullschit, already. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=19657
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 22:42:09 GMT -5
snifferpup Mod Squad gossip c message to be removed please « Message sent Today at 9:03pm » --------------------------------------------------------------------------------hello snifferpup, I am Jen/onceuponatime. I am an admin in the Tree House in Paltalk. Tonight someone posted a message here in the Millionaire to come join a party in the Tree House and .75 cents coming on Weds. from the SEC. We are trying to squash this rumor so would like to have someone remove this message from the board please. I also sent an IM to Dave, but he may not be online tonight, so thought I would make my request to you also. Thanks for your assistance. Jen millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19512&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 22:52:09 GMT -5
By: bobhwang 28 Apr 2008, 07:12 PM EDT Msg. 713037 of 713109 Jump to msg. # Dummies: Go back and look @ the irish miracle, then look at 3-17, st paddies day...
1907 2007... THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE...
i HOLD CMKX AND GOLD... END OF STORY.
By: pickleman77360640 28 Apr 2008, 11:17 PM EDT Msg. 713099 of 713109 (This msg. is a reply to 713037 by bobhwang.) Jump to msg. # bobhwang, knowing you hold CMKX is like music to my ears. Your post was the best one of the day!
Thanks! pickleman773
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 22:54:14 GMT -5
By: aladin99 28 Apr 2008, 10:45 PM EDT Msg. 713094 of 713109 Jump to msg. # We plan to leave no stone unturned in our search for CMKX - Remember that?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 23:00:27 GMT -5
By: aladin99 28 Apr 2008, 04:29 PM EDT Msg. 712978 of 713112 Jump to msg. # CMKX has no other choices... but to win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If we trade again I bet you bashers will buy our stock and I am sure they will...
A Tremendous Opportunity for everyone!!!!!!!!! - - - - -
By: brushmouth 28 Apr 2008, 04:38 PM EDT Msg. 712983 of 713112 (This msg. is a reply to 712978 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Only after a complete inventory of our assets,maybe a CNBC special.?? Sounds like fun to me. LOL
By: leowanta 28 Apr 2008, 04:40 PM EDT Msg. 712984 of 713112 (This msg. is a reply to 712983 by brushmouth.) Jump to msg. # How about 60 Minutes...Maheu already has the connections,
a follow-up would be super at this time....
Leslie Stahl....isn't it
leowanta
By: brushmouth 28 Apr 2008, 09:23 PM EDT Msg. 713084 of 713112 (This msg. is a reply to 712984 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # Could be arranged even as we speak? Fall out would be awesome. LOL BM
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 23:02:35 GMT -5
By: my69z 28 Apr 2008, 11:58 PM EDT Msg. 713110 of 713112 Jump to msg. # There is a way that "Urban" wouldn't have to be served until May 19th '08.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 23:05:33 GMT -5
By: cmkx4eva017981 28 Apr 2008, 07:22 PM EDT Msg. 713044 of 713113 Jump to msg. # LEO, On the other hand, I do believe this so-called mortgage meltdown is none other than the fallout associated with rampant naked shorting and the chickens coming home to roosts with all of the risk derivatives created to stave off so many FTDs. You know, the credit default swaps and the like are really nothing more than covered call markers on so much naked shorted underlying. And as ABGG said one time, notice how covered calls were exempt from the provisions of SHO?
Too smart by half.
By: leowanta 28 Apr 2008, 07:33 PM EDT Msg. 713053 of 713113 (This msg. is a reply to 713044 by cmkx4eva017981.) Jump to msg. # well, it's not Reg Sho...it's the banking regs that allow off the book markers,(level III) naked shorting was the tool used to create an empire of loan sharks...using naked shorting money to loan to the motherbanks at a very profitable interest rate, in turn the banks used it as risky loans, hoping for forclosures to get the property, the asset, to resell ....it's the same as naked shorting, only on a much grander scale....bank mortgage loans that were not justified...the banks force foreclosures...just like naking shorting a stock taking it to the cellar forever until the company folds and shareholders loose their investment...
homeowners are at the mercy of a bank if the loan is risky, the bank already knows how they are going to shake out the money on the loan when they make it....best save up and buy your property without a bank.
By: cmkx4eva017981 28 Apr 2008, 07:36 PM EDT Msg. 713054 of 713113 (This msg. is a reply to 713053 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # leo, but I once heard you state that the meltdown was a complete cover story for naked shorting. MAybe it wasn't you but someone quite respected around here said that suprime really meant naked short.
Just trying to get that clear up.
By: leowanta 28 Apr 2008, 07:40 PM EDT Msg. 713056 of 713113 (This msg. is a reply to 713054 by cmkx4eva017981.) Jump to msg. # it is a cover...all the counterfeit derivatives started with naked shorting...that's the proximate cause of all of the subprime slime.
the bankers are not stupid, they saw the hedgfunds making a profit from the shorting system...they just improvised and taylored it to mortgage loans...same songscam, 2nd verse, on a different level of banking but works the same...investor/homeowner lose it all, banks win
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 28, 2008 23:08:02 GMT -5
By: pontiyak 28 Apr 2008, 06:43 PM EDT Msg. 713024 of 713113 Jump to msg. # And as far as Leslie H. of the SEC is concerned.....
I gave her just enough time to warm up that new leather office chair, before I informed her that.........
We were NOT going away, and that even though Annette and a bus load of others have bailed out the door..............
The SEC failed in their mandate to protect us.....
Even after massive amounts of documented correspondence, on this ring of crooks, and others...
Yak
By: gusjarvis 28 Apr 2008, 08:38 PM EDT Msg. 713074 of 713113 (This msg. is a reply to 713024 by pontiyak.) Jump to msg. # pontiyak I commend you and will try to see just what info we can request from freedom of information act, the same info bill got we should have immediately, all of it. It is not his right to hide the info he got while the shareholders lawyer
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 29, 2008 0:38:16 GMT -5
|
|