|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:00:47 GMT -5
By: runningrich 30 Jun 2008, 07:09 PM EDT Msg. 737745 of 737793 Jump to msg. # CMKX Shareholder Email Group Thread Started Yesterday at 6:58am
TIME'S UP. NO MORE WAITING. NOTIFY THOSE WHO CANNOT HEAR.
MAKE NO MISTAKE WITH 50 THOUSAND PLUS, WE WILL BE HEARD.
(this thread is to be used for information, instructions, market news, and the collection of thoughts to engage in proactive pursuits.
(Make no mistake, I believe we are there. We will be the voice to finalize past actions and rightly so be paid for our involvement)
Any thoughts can be forwarded to gotcmkx1@aol.com
Spread the word tirelessly. We can gather thousands of those available in a single day. Forward this message to CMKX shareholders you know! But let's do it and join now.
Send an email to gotcmkx1@aol.com to be added to mailing list, to be able to distribute information directly and quickly.
All emails remain private be assured. We need to make our voices heard now in a BIG way. Join us today. And remember, those that are on the CMKX fringes, those that don't read the boards, TELL them!
Get on this list to be a soldier for CMKX and the dream we had when we got in this battle...
Email with subject: Add me to gotcmkx1@aol.com
AS YOU WERE.
FAST FORWARD INTO THE FUTURE.
(This is as real as it gets.)
No cost. This is only about being able to deligate information on a moments notice directly to shareholders. Thus when needed in example, dispersing emails on a dime instead of sporatically delivering. By the thousands we are better able to assess the battle and win.
Be assured you can unsubscribe at absolutely any time. No other information is needed.
But we need not only those who read the boards but those friends, family and others who own CMKX but don't follow as we do. If we reach the shareholders at those depths we then build a formidable force and thus develop more of a collective voice.
That is my only motive.
Post this, send the links to those you know and let's move forward. Email with subject: Add me to gotcmkx1@aol.com
Most shareholders are not on this board. So with my internet marketing background I intend to connect the vast majority of shareholders and use our affiliations to our benefit. Now and beyond CMKX. Anyway feel free to submit your email.
Again this is without motive except to unite those who wish to stay informed and connected before and after the fact.
My two cents. Response has been great. No spam, nothing but direct contact if such a venue is needed.
SPREAD THE WORD. POST ON EVERYBOARD. GATHER ALL, AND I MEAN ALL SHAREHOLDERS.
HELP US BUILD OUR VOICE. COPY AND PASTE TO HELP.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:02:17 GMT -5
By: lefty-jargon 30 Jun 2008, 07:11 PM EDT Msg. 737747 of 737795(This msg. is a reply to 737745 by runningrich.) Jump to msg. # runningrich lets get some facts straight here first: There are not 50,000 shareholders get that straight. Next you will be lucky to get 50 to do what you are requesting. Good luck to you though let us know how this works out for you.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:03:48 GMT -5
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:12 PM EDT Msg. 737750 of 737797 (This msg. is a reply to 737747 by lefty-jargon.) Jump to msg. # hey lefty -john martin told me he still believes there are 70,000 shareholders
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:04:10 GMT -5
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:12 PM EDT Msg. 737751 of 737800 Jump to msg. # didnt Al Hodges say this cmkm was the biggest short n history
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:14 PM EDT Msg. 737754 of 737800 Jump to msg. # and y did urban call me regrading CIM - :-))))))
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:08:34 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 30 Jun 2008, 07:51 PM EDT Msg. 737786 of 737800 Jump to msg. # David Stevens, awhile back...
...you calculated .83 cents a share with your dedicated [DD] analysis.
Still sound about right, in your opinion.
Stockrich.
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:53 PM EDT Msg. 737787 of 737800 (This msg. is a reply to 737786 by stockrich0.) Jump to msg. # stock -u have me confused with somebody else
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:55 PM EDT Msg. 737788 of 737800 Jump to msg. # stock - n my opinion depending when u bought and what diviews u have - its worth much more then .83
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:13:11 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 30 Jun 2008, 07:51 PM EDT Msg. 737786 of 737800Jump to msg. # David Stevens, awhile back... ...you calculated .83 cents a share with your dedicated [DD] analysis. Still sound about right, in your opinion. Stockrich. By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:53 PM EDT Msg. 737787 of 737800(This msg. is a reply to 737786 by stockrich0.) Jump to msg. # stock -u have me confused with somebody else By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:55 PM EDT Msg. 737788 of 737800Jump to msg. # stock - n my opinion depending when u bought and what diviews u have - its worth much more then .83 By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 07:58 PM EDT Msg. 737789 of 737800 Jump to msg. # heres where i get this from: people involved - maheu,glenn, stoeklien others: DTCC and SEC claims to 1.9 million acres of wealthy rich land Al Hodges -largest short n the history of the stock market Frizzell has made many statements proving a large short frizzell closes his practice to the public 2 represent cmkm the list goes on and on e-trade hand delivers certs by private jet to make a dealine -hmmmm brokers waived their fees when shareholders requested certs maheu stated he will use state and federal courts 2 make sure shareholders r certed
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:14:13 GMT -5
By: david_stevens 30 Jun 2008, 08:02 PM EDT Msg. 737797 of 737800 Jump to msg. # i never seen another sub penny stock with the following this stock has had -i like it
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jun 30, 2008 19:15:08 GMT -5
This david_stevens spends his whole day posting on RB, every day; the man has no life. I would not trust one word he says.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:21:33 GMT -5
A few days old but not sure if this was posted.....
from the Clubhouse...
Jun 25, 2008, 7:16am, MineralsRus wrote: Why Did Gary G Hurd drop his Lawsuit? ...If I missed the reasons why, I apologize.
He purchased over 200 Million Shares and lost at the very least, $20,000 if he purchased those shares at .0001 , but I think it's more since he purchased those shares between June and Oct 2004 which in June and July were major runs after the announcements of the Carolyn Pipe and D. Roger Glenn anouncement, as well as the pumps by Sterling, Pedro, Willy, Melvin and Andy.
Rapturo59 Due Diligence Analyst Re: I'm Curious...Mr. Hurd. « Reply #12 on Jun 25, 2008, 10:32pm » mins, i will try to answer your Q's.
firstly, Mr. Hurd is my Father inlaw. He bought those worthless shares starting on june 4, 04. bought all the way up and back down to oct 04. he spent about 105K ( i think, but close enuff).
in the cmkx response to the suit, KW said some BS about not knowing if Hurd owned shares LOL (btw KW wasn't supposed to even respond to the suit, by law) KW only had to check his own TA to see it was true.
I stopped Mr Hurd from getting his certs. No need to spend more money on a bad thing.
you need to go to pacer and read the motion to dismiss, all i will say about that. he neva got paid off, its BS
I know you talk about filing a suit. I suggest you take our suit to your attorney and also the "9 page doc". You wont talk about filing a suit after that, I'm sure. If your lawyer is worth a chyt.
we had the BEST legal strategist anywhere to be found. read our motions to intervene in friz's BS suit's. Read the SEC's suit, exactly same as our suit. Our's was filed first.
we spent real money on asset locators and private (ripoff) eyes. I went to vegas 8 times during that time. not always for the suit. After I filed the suit I didn't need no viagra, my new name was "The Rock". I went mostly to screw vegas hores and gamble the backers money.
we served Edwards twice and an agreement for UC's attorney to accept service the day before we dropped the suit.
we kicked Mahue's fat azz, read his responses and what his tard lawyer filed. that sorry basty is now in a assisted living home for rich fat oatmeal eating thieves.
we had desourmeu (sp) ?¿ totally screwed. read his response.
we had the ugly rich old nobel haitian scammer whipped.
we had em all, read the suit we filed and try to shoot a hole in it.
now do some real DD, read our suit and motions to intervene in friz's suit and all the responses and you wont like the tyler bunch. read tylers suit and you will see that they intentionally let UC go free without having to respond.
I am tired of typing to you bastys, you sorry sumableesches
Tony
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:27:37 GMT -5
from Yesterday.....
By: rosencrantz2010 29 Jun 2008, 02:08 PM EDT Msg. 737126 of 737293 Jump to msg. #
why have SHORE, STAR URANIUM, SHANE, UNITED CARINA and ENTOURAGE been engaged in so many claim swaps in the FALC this past year?
compare the most recent properties map from SHANE with a similar map from 6-12 months ago and you will be surprised at the number of changes. Most of the change is in the form of SHORE acquiring most of ENTOURAGE claims, but not always. sometimes SHORE swaps with ENTOURAGE or SHANE giving up what once was theirs (SHORE's). in other words, the claims are clearly being switched around. one time its SHORE's and it goes to SHANE, or ENTOURAGE and then to SHORE.
FOREST GATE and GREAT WESTERN claims are fairly stable. I see few changes in ownership of claims involving either of these two companies.
and then there is the "OTHERS" category. the claims in that category have also undergone considerable change in ownership. but without knowing who the players are in that general category its difficult to figure out what might be involved.
but without a doubt, the biggest and most dramatic switch has been in the ownership of the ENTOURAGE claims over to SHORE. the switch is dramatic and right along the edges of the old ENTOURAGE lines. i'd say ENTOURAGE gave up, sold, lost, swapped, whatever you want to say, roughly half of all its claims to SHORE and about another 10 percent to SHANE. The most recent map of the FALC shows what appears to be a real consolidation of the diamond claims with SHORE holding 80%, SHANE 10% and the other juniors controlling the remaining 10% of the claims.
By: sharasilva 29 Jun 2008, 02:14 PM EDT Msg. 737128 of 737293 (This msg. is a reply to 737126 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. #
rose, claims cost money to hold on to and shore has the money and legs and the longterm commitment it will take to explore this high risk moose pasture
By: rosencrantz2010 29 Jun 2008, 02:25 PM EDT Msg. 737132 of 737293 (This msg. is a reply to 737128 by sharasilva.) Jump to msg. #
SHORE has already flown that moose pasture. it knows what is there, as did CMKM and ENTOURAGE earlier.
that moose pasture, initially claimed by CMKM and now SHORE, tracks perfectly the FALC kimberlite trend.
that URBAN is one dumb fellow to have once controlled all that land and then given it all away to SHORE. can you believe anyone would be that dumb?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:28:57 GMT -5
snifferpup Re: Weekly Buzz - w/o 06.30.08 « Reply #3 Today at 11:37am » (11:42 AM) tired_o_workin_1: Big Picture with Jim Poplava and John Loeffler , unbelievable listening about mining stocks and how they are NSS, Start with June 14th,2008 and listen in the back ground: podcast.streetiq.com/streetiq?GUID=3400264&Page=MediaView
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:35:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:43:09 GMT -5
By: jfarn 30 Jun 2008, 10:13 AM EDT Msg. 346307 of 346314 Jump to msg. # JCLINE, I am right there with you in our mutual support and respect for BHollen's DD and posted commentary. We also share mutual respect for Dave Patch's work. I don't know if you saw my question to you back in April re: how Dave perceives our mutual CMKM situation. I happened to stumble across some of his commentary that he posted on Floyd Norris's blog in the NY Times Online business section. My question to you is: How do you reconcile what Dave opines re: CMKM and what you highlighted from BHollen? Would love to hear/read your thoughts about the two disparate view points and have discussed CMKM with your friend Dave as of late. JF~ By: jfarn 24 Apr 2008, 03:25 PM EDT Msg. 31434 of 32605 Jump to msg. # JCLINE, norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/jail-for-altomare/#comments I have been asking for your thoughts as to where D. Patch lined up re: CMKX. I was reading the Times yesterday and stumbled across these comments from Dave to Floyd re: our mutual interest. Feel free to follow-up with clarification if you feel it's warranted. Dave wrote: "Companies that want to jump on the “I have been abused” bandwagon of naked short selling must be as transparent as they expect the market participants they allege wrongdoing to be. It can’t be a one way street. Without full transparency members of the financial press have the opportunity to highlight the failures without ever addressing the potential realities. USXP and CMKX are now the ‘poster child’ of naked shorting by guys like Floyd because they are used as the examples that the entire issue is bogus. USXP and CMKX were the most vocal and both have regulatory issues in front of them. A Poster Child can have no skeletons and both of these companies have unveiled a mass grave of skeletons." April 23rd, 2008 8:56 am — Posted by Dave “Sometimes focusing on 1 company instead of the bigger issue is a quicker fix.” Only if you are 100% sure that the company is on the up and up and with no skeletons in the closet. When the poster child companies have huge issues internally, where insiders dump massive quantities of shares into the market without filings, and where the executives are taking most of that money home with them, it sours any that are willing to listen. Congress and regulators only need a small reason to focus on something else and what has transpired in both USXP and CMKX are those distractions. Writing your memo’s to Congress and Regulators is exactly what investors who are concerned about this issue should do but do it responsibly. By: jcline 30 Jun 2008, 11:12 AM EDT Msg. 346308 of 346314(This msg. is a reply to 346307 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jfarn.. I do not speak for Dave. If you want his opinion, you will need to talk to him. thanks By: jfarn 30 Jun 2008, 11:43 AM EDT Msg. 346310 of 346314 (This msg. is a reply to 346308 by jcline.)Jump to msg. # JC, I know you don't speak for Dave. I was asking you for your opinion about his commentary. If one of my chums/friends/business partners/associates/colleagues/etc.. put out what Dave did in writing I would be willing to shed some light with my thoughts on his/her perspective considering our viewpoints might be starkly different. You have recently highlighted BHollen's thoughts for board members to read. I presumed from your posting of Robert's thoughts that you support and/or gave tacit approval to the gist of BHollen's thoughts. B.Hollen and Dave appear to be at a different place @ this juncture. Here is what I gleaned from Dave's comments in the TIMES: A. CMKM is/was used by the financial press ( Floyd Norris et al) because of all of the skeletons in the CMKM closet B. CMKM has huge internal issues C. CMKM was a massive pump and dump where insiders pocketed money and company executives committed fraud D. Write to Congress and/or regulators responsibly...however CMKM and the illegality mentioned in C will be something for the regulators/Politico's to "hang their hat on" as a reason for focussing on something else in lieu of naked shorting
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:45:04 GMT -5
regarding above post.....By: gusjarvis 30 Jun 2008, 04:10 PM EDT Msg. 346313 of 346314(This msg. is a reply to 346310 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jfarn great questions and points to the same things I have said, there was the past they could all talk about and what they did, and since the new cmkx, nothing. Many have had to go to neutral or not talk or pretend even the work they did and what they said didn't happen or meant nothing. It is a case of the nda's and not being able to talk about sealed information they know. It is the sad way they have had to end this with the games, when we all know different. Your point can be said about many different people and posters in the game. By: gusjarvis 30 Jun 2008, 04:43 PM EDT Msg. 346314 of 346314(This msg. is a reply to 346313 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # also isn't patch about to audit naked shorts it will be interesting to see what numbers they really come up with, but also at the same time after all the changes we have seen, this historic change: Embarrassing Investigation Some of Bernanke's personal adversaries are also contributing significantly to his current humiliation. In the past, the chairman of the Federal Reserve was a pope among the priests of the financial elite. But unlike his predecessor Alan Greenspan, Bernanke is finding that his policies are not universally accepted, even within the Fed. The last seven decisions reached by the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets monetary policy, were accompanied by a growing number of dissenting votes. Bernanke's critics say that with his policy of cheap money -- in other words, recurring rate reductions -- he in fact helped fuel the inflation problem he is now trying to combat. Another problem for Mr. Dollar is that it will be several months before his actions take effect. Officials with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have informed Bernanke about a plan that would have been unheard-of in the past: a general examination of the US financial system. The IMF's board of directors has ruled that a so-called Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) is to be carried out in the United States. It is nothing less than an X-ray of the entire US financial system. As part of the assessment, the Fed, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the major investment banks, mortgage banks and hedge funds will be asked to hand over confidential documents to the IMF team. They will be required to answer the questions they are asked during interviews. Their databases will be subjected to so-called stress tests -- worst-case scenarios designed to simulate the broader effects of failures of other major financial institutions or a continuing decline of the dollar. Under its bylaws, the IMF is charged with the supervision of the international monetary system. Roughly two-thirds of IMF members -- but never the United States -- have already endured this painful procedure. For seven years, US President George W. Bush refused to allow the IMF to conduct its assessment. Even now, he has only given the IMF board his consent under one important condition. The review can begin in Bush's last year in office, but it may not be completed until he has left the White House. This is bad news for the Fed chairman. When the final report on the risks of the US financial system is released in 2010 -- and it is likely to cause a stir internationally -- only one of the people in positions of responsiblity today will still be in office: Ben Bernanke. Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,druck-562291,00.html
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:54:04 GMT -5
By: sharasilva 30 Jun 2008, 08:14 PM EDT Msg. 737801 of 737807 (This msg. is a reply to 737779 by david_stevens.) Jump to msg. # I reckon Kevin West will resign by Labor Day No hope and only crazy shareholders left getting more crazy.
|
|