Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 30, 2008 19:55:18 GMT -5
By: leowanta
30 Jun 2008, 08:33 PM EDT
Msg. 737803 of 737807
Jump to msg. #
this is completely false under the law...
By: factanonverba13
30 Jun 2008, 05:06 PM EDT
Msg. 737529 of 737742
(This msg. is a reply to 737445 by leowanta.)
Jump to msg. #
Perhaps you are under the impression that the "cert pull" exercise had some actual affect on reality. It did not. It was completely unnecessary and a waste of time & money. All shareholders, with or without certs must be treated the same under law. A cert means nothing ... except $50.00 income for the TA, and in your case, additional time for Urbie to hide his stolen
the certificate is solid evidence of shares owned and traded for our cash...evidence of counterfeiting...which is treated under the law in the U.S. Code...not SEC regulations...the DTCC is subject to counterfeiting laws..if charged it's much more money, then if they just pay the requested amount and settle it.
the shareholders who did not follow the demand for the certificate pull are ON THEIR OWN TO RECOVER ANY RESTITUTION...they must hire a lawyer and fight with the broker...frizzel and his 5 attornies are simple ambulance chasers, seeing opportunity to make some cash helping those unregisterred shareholders recover....none the less, they are on their own and have no bearing on holding up our distribution....frizzell has no jurisdiction over shareholder TRUST...that was wrapped up with cmkm nevada...and needs to be disbursed toute suite.
please quite spewing garbage about this situation, cause you are totally mistaken about your ASSUMPTION of the situation.
leowanta
30 Jun 2008, 08:33 PM EDT
Msg. 737803 of 737807
Jump to msg. #
this is completely false under the law...
By: factanonverba13
30 Jun 2008, 05:06 PM EDT
Msg. 737529 of 737742
(This msg. is a reply to 737445 by leowanta.)
Jump to msg. #
Perhaps you are under the impression that the "cert pull" exercise had some actual affect on reality. It did not. It was completely unnecessary and a waste of time & money. All shareholders, with or without certs must be treated the same under law. A cert means nothing ... except $50.00 income for the TA, and in your case, additional time for Urbie to hide his stolen
the certificate is solid evidence of shares owned and traded for our cash...evidence of counterfeiting...which is treated under the law in the U.S. Code...not SEC regulations...the DTCC is subject to counterfeiting laws..if charged it's much more money, then if they just pay the requested amount and settle it.
the shareholders who did not follow the demand for the certificate pull are ON THEIR OWN TO RECOVER ANY RESTITUTION...they must hire a lawyer and fight with the broker...frizzel and his 5 attornies are simple ambulance chasers, seeing opportunity to make some cash helping those unregisterred shareholders recover....none the less, they are on their own and have no bearing on holding up our distribution....frizzell has no jurisdiction over shareholder TRUST...that was wrapped up with cmkm nevada...and needs to be disbursed toute suite.
please quite spewing garbage about this situation, cause you are totally mistaken about your ASSUMPTION of the situation.
leowanta