|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 3, 2008 9:29:32 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 10:28 AM EDT Msg. 747905 of 747905 Jump to msg. # and pedro why is bill sitting with leslie and team to discuss anything and why the helll is he bothering working with urban and why is leslie not laughing at this relentlessly as she has all the evidence mark showed on the net about the fraud. Why isn't this shut down, why isn't urban in jail instead of working with our lawyer. Why is bob maheu on here still saying all those nice things and the amazing team they put together, despite knowing the evidence of the fraud was already gathered and the gig was up. Why did bill pretend to know nothing and act like the first he knew of this was the boxes, why did they do the cert pull and precedent setting interplead with a criminal who just dumped unregistered shares to us after the sec caught them. Why did bill let our land go away since he knew this evidence and knew the fraud, wouldn't that mean knowing that he would protect our land he bragged about, wouldn't the silver platter be a littel different color knowing what he knew?
By: lilburrito0 03 Aug 2008, 11:19 AM EDT Msg. 747920 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747905 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Here’s what I think gus;
CMKM has consumed your life.
You invested money into CMKM based upon NSS comments made by Frizzel. You listened to “promoters” extrapolating “short squeeze” and “trust payouts.” You’re upset because you want your money back and you feel Tyler has harmed you.
You live in Canada. Tyler is in Texas. You must evaluate the costs associated with any litigation and compare those costs to how much money you actually have invested in CMKM and ask yourself; is it worth it!
Choice is yours!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 3, 2008 10:21:55 GMT -5
By: article1section8 03 Aug 2008, 10:53 AM EDT Msg. 747912 of 747920 Jump to msg. # So if urban was served by publication, and the affidavit was filed on July 29, does that mean he will respond within 20 days? just curious
By: rosencrantz2010 03 Aug 2008, 11:08 AM EDT Msg. 747916 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747912 by article1section8.) Jump to msg. # article1, urban should respond no later than Monday, September 18. That is the 20th day following the 29th of August.
we probably won't see anything from the judge until later that week.
i asked this same question of my69z, any idea why they waited until the very last day to serve urban by publication?
why didn't they serve him a month earlier, for example, or two months earlier? why wait until the very last day they were allowed to serve hem? what was to be gained by delaying?
By: klonopin2mg 03 Aug 2008, 11:17 AM EDT Msg. 747919 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747916 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen' as presumptuous as this sounds.....
it takes a great deal of time for "payback" when thinking in terms of how long has this corruption been taking place.....you know....the corruption that didn't exist, no?
must be pretty big, no?
perhaps even "HUGE", a word that's been thrown around for years as also being "nonexistent".
still...
"this isn't fun, is it?
Enjoy Your Sunday!
klon'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 11:19:07 GMT -5
By: article1section8 03 Aug 2008, 10:53 AM EDT Msg. 747912 of 747920 Jump to msg. # So if urban was served by publication, and the affidavit was filed on July 29, does that mean he will respond within 20 days? just curious By: rosencrantz2010 03 Aug 2008, 11:08 AM EDT Msg. 747916 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747912 by article1section8.) Jump to msg. # article1, urban should respond no later than Monday, September 18. That is the 20th day following the 29th of August. we probably won't see anything from the judge until later that week. i asked this same question of my69z, any idea why they waited until the very last day to serve urban by publication? why didn't they serve him a month earlier, for example, or two months earlier? why wait until the very last day they were allowed to serve hem? what was to be gained by delaying? By: klonopin2mg 03 Aug 2008, 11:17 AM EDT Msg. 747919 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747916 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen' as presumptuous as this sounds..... it takes a great deal of time for "payback" when thinking in terms of how long has this corruption been taking place.....you know....the corruption that didn't exist, no? must be pretty big, no? perhaps even "HUGE", a word that's been thrown around for years as also being "nonexistent". still... "this isn't fun, is it? Enjoy Your Sunday! klon' By: rosencrantz2010 03 Aug 2008, 11:46 AM EDT Msg. 747931 of 747944(This msg. is a reply to 747919 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # klon, thanks for responding. but i guess i'm not sure about what is really the reason for the delay. are we collecting money from shorty and that's the reason for the delay - that is, the longer it goes the more of the naked shorts pay up before we return to trading? but if that's not the reason then i'm not sure what would be the reason. it's as though we had an agreement with urban (and others?) to delay everything for as long as possible, and then, on the very last day we go ahead and serve urban by publication. hmm. seems contrived to me. like i've said, if i wanted to haul someone's assss into court i wouldn't have told my lawyer, "oh, don't worry about getting that paperwork completed. i'm in no hurry. let's let the guy breath easy for another couple of months. why not let the poor man get some rest?" LOL if you were really trying to sue the pants off some guy you wouldn't wait until the very last possible day and then serve the guy! no way. so, that's why i asked the question and i'm still not sure about the reason, although i guess the idea that it gives shorty more time to cover makes about as much sense as the notion that they just wanted to give urban more time to relax,,, lol,,, or maybe the lawyers weren't ready to file,,, lol,,,, or maybe they couldn't scape together enough cash to pay for the publication cost to file. lol take your pick.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 11:21:09 GMT -5
By: article1section8 03 Aug 2008, 11:51 AM EDT Msg. 747932 of 747946 (This msg. is a reply to 747916 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosen,
This is just a guess but I would imagine they were told to wait pending a few changes that needed to be done such as, announcing the star/shore decision, announcing the NSS emergency rule for 17 banks/Fanny & Freddy, Extending the same, then making it a global NSS ban (oops, ignore that last one, it has not been made public yet), also UUC had to move their annual mtg, campos needed to spin the story in mass media, nuclear expansion needed a little more time, iran needed to be negotiated with, iraq had to ship some uranium to canada, india/US deal needed more time, banks needed to fall, banks needed to be saved, oil pipelines needed to be approved, gas pipelines needed to be switched over to oil, hydro plants needed to be announced, senators needed to be indicted. It could have been a host of many different reasons, of course all are totally unrelated to CMKM....
Hey, have you seen my Entourage Cert and Other Assets?
Have a great day!
A1S8
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 11:23:02 GMT -5
By: iknowsheeeet 03 Aug 2008, 12:01 PM EDT Msg. 747935 of 747948 Jump to msg. # By: arasen 27 Sep 2007, 03:07 PM EDT Msg. 607340 of 747933 Jump to msg. # Prepare for the largest
makeover/restructuring, both political & economic in the history of the world. Sweeping changes forthcoming.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 11:25:37 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 10:28 AM EDT Msg. 747905 of 747905 Jump to msg. # and pedro why is bill sitting with leslie and team to discuss anything and why the helll is he bothering working with urban and why is leslie not laughing at this relentlessly as she has all the evidence mark showed on the net about the fraud. Why isn't this shut down, why isn't urban in jail instead of working with our lawyer. Why is bob maheu on here still saying all those nice things and the amazing team they put together, despite knowing the evidence of the fraud was already gathered and the gig was up. Why did bill pretend to know nothing and act like the first he knew of this was the boxes, why did they do the cert pull and precedent setting interplead with a criminal who just dumped unregistered shares to us after the sec caught them. Why did bill let our land go away since he knew this evidence and knew the fraud, wouldn't that mean knowing that he would protect our land he bragged about, wouldn't the silver platter be a littel different color knowing what he knew? By: lilburrito0 03 Aug 2008, 11:19 AM EDT Msg. 747920 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747905 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Here’s what I think gus; CMKM has consumed your life. You invested money into CMKM based upon NSS comments made by Frizzel. You listened to “promoters” extrapolating “short squeeze” and “trust payouts.” You’re upset because you want your money back and you feel Tyler has harmed you. You live in Canada. Tyler is in Texas. You must evaluate the costs associated with any litigation and compare those costs to how much money you actually have invested in CMKM and ask yourself; is it worth it! Choice is yours! By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 12:19 PM EDT Msg. 747946 of 747950(This msg. is a reply to 747920 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # littletaco you obviously have no answers at all and when you can't answer and when you rap now makes no sense, and when this ending makes no sense, you try to do the usual and just attack without any real answers. It is clear there is no answers for this, and skip cmkx, answer how the sec let all that happened after their evidence was gathered. Instead of arresting those running and caught for the biggest penny fraud ever, they let all those pr's and promotion happen with urban and bill and bob and don and roger and moran and the sec working together. Your lack of answers just proves my point, and yes I let cmkx consume too much of my life, but you post negative posts on here all day everyday so gfys
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 12:31:46 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 12:52 PM EDT Msg. 747954 of 747961(This msg. is a reply to 747953 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # chris maybe you can answer what the bashers can't wtf happened my friend since the sec had all that evidence in sept of 2004 and bill had all that evidence for sure as well as it was on the boards. If bud burrell wasn't right and this wasn't a scam that turned into a sting, then the sec screwed us with bill and bob and urban and don, we all know that didn't happen. So my friend would you agree that all the pr's have to be true given the facts as we know them know? Isn't it hard to try and put rationality on this when we now know the facts that everything changed in 2004 and all was known then, hmmm same time john edwards ran away and roger came on and bill worked with urban. I think we are just fine and can't wait to see the warehouse full of our core samples and the 500 million tonnes By: my69z 03 Aug 2008, 01:21 PM EDT Msg. 747960 of 747961(This msg. is a reply to 747954 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gus....SEC Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies,,,,look at them and figure out what they're about and if the SEC voted on their final rec's. You'll see "Kevin West Owners Group Inc., Universal City Texas"....was a member,,,not an analytical contributor.....but put 2 and 2 together. But "Gayle Essary"...: Investrend Communications, Inc. Gayle Essary, CEO www.investrend.com www.investrendresearch.com www.investrendbroadcast.com www.investrendforums.com www.investrendinformation.com www.financialwire.net www.streetsignals.com www.visitrade.net www.streetintel.com Member, Co-founder, Shareholders Research Alliance (www.shareholdersresearch.com) Member, Co-founder, FIRST Research Consortium (www.firstresearchconsortium.com) Member, National Investment Banking Association (www.nibanet.org) Member, National Investor Relations Institute (www.niri.org) Member, Online News Association (www.onlinenewsassociation.org) Member, Co-founder, CEO Council (www.ceocouncil.net) Sponsor,The Investor Relations Global Rankings and Awards Program (www.irglobalrankings.com) Listen to StreetSignals (Investrend "ON-THE-AIR") archived at www.StreetSignals.com --------------------------------------------- And Streetsignals' host was on that SEC Committee.....Drew Connoly ---------------------------------- Investrend’s Director of Corporate Development James A. “Drew” Connolly serves on the 21-member SEC Advisory Committee. Gayle Essary, CEO of Investrend Communications, Inc., testified before the committee to advocate support for research produced by independent research providers that adhere to a set of written ethical standards, including full transparency. --------------------------------------------- From The Shareholders Research Alliance ...." The Escrow Account will dispose of all stock in advance of any report or visibility project, and will pay the Alliance or the provider in cash. The Escrow Account, therefore, may not benefit from any increase in the price of the equities resulting from an Alliance or Provider report or shareholder service. The Shareholders Oversight Advisory Group may ask for and review the Escrow Account transactions at any time. " ------------------------------------------------------ " The Escrow Account is managed by the law offices of Marshal Shichtman & Associates, P.C., and neither the Shareholders Research Alliance nor any of its IRPs have any beneficial ownership in the account. " ----------------------------------------------------- Marshal Shichtman's SEC Comment letter:..... www.sec.gov/rules/sro/dtc200302/mshichtman031103.pdf ------------------------------------------------------ But if you look at all these,,,,,you'll see they cover the very stuff CMKX/Frizz have tlaked about for since '05.....all those Frizz OG etc...comments bout "small companies",,,,to just alot of stuff For me,,,,this explains why CMKX has just went dead quiet on so many things....."politically" wise. Hypothetically....the SEC opens comment period on "NSS"....goes on for what,,,6 months??.....that's right around Feb. '09.....our litigation day. If,,,IF...they actually close the remaining loop holes,,,,,which i don't see how they legally can't at this point....it'd be better sailing in the market than when we left it. I've always said CMKX was workin with the SEC to clean the market and that we'd slowly turn down any leverage if they continue to do what's right.......i understand,,,,NSS....is a non-debate.....but we're also talkin bout the worlds largest money wheel,,,,,it's not a simple thing. And Frizz said the SBC told him they wanted to see the media get involved to know it was real..........hmmmmmm LOL and more from my69z By: my69z 03 Aug 2008, 01:32 PM EDT Msg. 747962 of 747962(This msg. is a reply to 747960 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Remember the concept from the OG of knowing a company was clean.....and Kevin doing that one page article with Byrne in '05?? This is exactly along those lines..... (long post) ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=747962
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 12:39:28 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 10:28 AM EDT Msg. 747905 of 747905 Jump to msg. # and pedro why is bill sitting with leslie and team to discuss anything and why the helll is he bothering working with urban and why is leslie not laughing at this relentlessly as she has all the evidence mark showed on the net about the fraud. Why isn't this shut down, why isn't urban in jail instead of working with our lawyer. Why is bob maheu on here still saying all those nice things and the amazing team they put together, despite knowing the evidence of the fraud was already gathered and the gig was up. Why did bill pretend to know nothing and act like the first he knew of this was the boxes, why did they do the cert pull and precedent setting interplead with a criminal who just dumped unregistered shares to us after the sec caught them. Why did bill let our land go away since he knew this evidence and knew the fraud, wouldn't that mean knowing that he would protect our land he bragged about, wouldn't the silver platter be a littel different color knowing what he knew? By: lilburrito0 03 Aug 2008, 11:19 AM EDT Msg. 747920 of 747920 (This msg. is a reply to 747905 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Here’s what I think gus; CMKM has consumed your life. You invested money into CMKM based upon NSS comments made by Frizzel. You listened to “promoters” extrapolating “short squeeze” and “trust payouts.” You’re upset because you want your money back and you feel Tyler has harmed you. You live in Canada. Tyler is in Texas. You must evaluate the costs associated with any litigation and compare those costs to how much money you actually have invested in CMKM and ask yourself; is it worth it! Choice is yours! By: scruffy_too 03 Aug 2008, 01:19 PM EDT Msg. 747959 of 747963(This msg. is a reply to 747905 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gus, Proof that Urban was in fact under Federal protection would kinda cinch it, wouldn't it?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:24:12 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 01:40 PM EDT Msg. 747964 of 748017 (This msg. is a reply to 747959 by scruffy_too.) Jump to msg. # scruffy the og confirmed urban's protection and john told me all their lives were in danger as they were in fact changing the business was done, not just cmkx. cheers
By: nssgoingdown 03 Aug 2008, 01:46 PM EDT Msg. 747965 of 748017 (This msg. is a reply to 747964 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # GUS, John also told me just 4 months ago that he still believed the number of shareholders was still 70,000 +
By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 02:30 PM EDT Msg. 747995 of 748017 (This msg. is a reply to 747965 by nssgoingdown.) Jump to msg. # nssgoingdown, there were 59000 accounts with an average of just over 10 million shares, the short at the gemm divvies was 590 billion, and the short at the end of the official day of the cert pull was 590 billion, the true cmki short including john edwards who was given certs to cover his short.
Good ole Jonas..... Knows more than Frizzell, West & Hodges who all state there is a significant NSS on CMKX...... wtg Jonas !! By: jonas-dclvi 03 Aug 2008, 02:36 PM EDT Msg. 748000 of 748017 (This msg. is a reply to 747995 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gusjarhead- There was never a short on CMKX nor GEMM. Idiot.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:27:04 GMT -5
By: my69z 03 Aug 2008, 01:50 PM EDT Msg. 747969 of 748017(This msg. is a reply to 747962 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Investrend Research..."General Members, including individual shareholders, institutions and professionals, are: look at the last name...." Kevin M. West, The Owners Group, Inc., Universal City, TX " Excerpts from Investrend Research letter to Katz.....notice it says he "solicited" their views. Tuesday, September 13, 2005 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz " On June 17, 2005, you were kind enough to solicit my views, and the views of those of us in the legitimate independent sponsored research community, regarding the state of research for smaller public companies, "Hopefully, this simple solution will provide a means to extend coverage to even the smallest, developing public issuers that now have no prospects of professional research for their shareholders, while yet allowing the providers to maintain their positioning as not owning or trading in the shares of any public company under coverage, and banning such ownership and trading by the analysts assigned to the coverages as well." " Initial Providers offering their analytics under the Shareholders Research Alliance monitoring program include: Beacon Equity Research, Richardson, TX Burritt Research, Lake Park, FL Fundamental Research Corp., Vancouver....INVESTREND RESEARCH....., Forest Hills, NY SISM Research & Investment Services, Zurich " Does anyone reallly think CMKX's crap wasn't mentioned in these talks as a dam good example of market problems?? lol Always said.....CMKXs' info was in (a) think tank. Our "numbers" are the least of Kevin/Frizz/Koch's worries....CMKX under Kevin has always been about the market 1st. Like even he said...he's not a moving forward guy,,,,,hmm...new Chairman. By: my69z 03 Aug 2008, 02:20 PM EDT Msg. 747989 of 748017(This msg. is a reply to 747969 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # www.sec.gov/rules/other/265-23/gessary091305.pdf By: gusjarvis 03 Aug 2008, 02:35 PM EDT Msg. 747997 of 748017(This msg. is a reply to 747969 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # nice chris, but isn't it sad given all that the way the shareholers were treated by all involved, and this contrived ending is getting too much. They are trying to hard and insulting too many with the fake bullchit
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:30:15 GMT -5
By: nssgoingdown 03 Aug 2008, 01:52 PM EDT Msg. 747972 of 748017 Jump to msg. # NEVER FORGET THIS:
Robert Maheu, public records indicate Mr. Maheu held four positions in CMKM Diamonds, plus voluntarily forfeited his $40,000 per month salary …
1. co-Chairman CMKM Board of Directors
2. Head of CMKM Task Force
3. Chairman of the Audit Committee for CMKM
4. Trustee
Statements made by Robert Maheu while serving “with out pay” as co-Chairman on CMKM Diamonds Board of Directors, Head of CMKM Task Force, and Chairman of the Audit Committee for CMKM.
“Solving problems has been my occupation for many years,”
“Tough assignments are not solved by wishful thinking, but rather by tough action.” A new team of securities attorneys has been instructed that their prime assignment is to correct any deficiencies of the past and to cooperate fully with regulatory bodies both in Canada and the United States to minimize the possibility of such deficiencies in the future.”
“Like the SEC, protecting our investors is a primary concern. We have been aggressively gathering the essential information needed to comply with our public disclosure obligations and anticipate working with the SEC to ensure our compliance with all federal regulations,”
“We are not letting these regulatory matters impede our primary focus of creating stockholder value through the mining and development of our mineral assets,”
“When I joined the board one of my prime assignments was to improve corporate compliance. A prime component was to reinstate reporting status, which was efficiently and expeditiously handled by the Stoecklein Law Group,”
“We are extremely appreciative of Stoecklein Law Group’s immediate attention to our needs. I have worked with them in the past and they have always exceeded my expectations,”.
“When I initially took on the assignment of assisting CMKM with its compliance needs, of primary concern was doing the right thing for the stockholders.”
“I am fully committed to protecting the interests of bona fide CMKM stockholders, including if necessary, bringing appropriate federal or state court actions to ensure the appropriate distribution of the Entourage shares is made.”
“We faced a tremendous number of hurdles, including the trading halt, administrative hearing and let down of numerous professionals. However, with the continued commitment of Urban Casavant and diligent professionalism of Stoecklein Law Group, we are trying to overcome the obstacles of the past and look forward into the future towards distributing value to CMKM’s bona fide stockholders.”
“This is a time for the CMKM stockholders to look forward towards the future and forget the past. Working as a united front will allow us to extract all available sources of value for distribution.”
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:32:17 GMT -5
By: my69z 03 Aug 2008, 02:12 PM EDT Msg. 747978 of 748017 Jump to msg. # Last FAQ.. " The Company is continuing its investigation into these matters and will cancel such shares at the appropriate time. The Company will not approve the transfer of those shares to anyone else in the meantime. "
Lets see,,,,,other than sounding pretty comfortable about cancelling shares.....most likely cause they already know who's gettin cancelled.....it'll happen cause of that little itty bitty SEC agreement they signed. lol
Pretty dam ironic that after all that fightin wiht the SEC,,,,,u can now look to their agreemnt to justify things Kevin says.
L..............M............A................O!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:33:21 GMT -5
By: nssgoingdown 03 Aug 2008, 02:12 PM EDT Msg. 747979 of 748019 Jump to msg. # CMKM REPRESENTS THE BIGGEST SHORT N HISTORY - FROM AL HODGES OUR INSIDE ATTORNEY
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:34:55 GMT -5
By: leowanta 03 Aug 2008, 02:12 PM EDT Msg. 747980 of 748019 (This msg. is a reply to 747920 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # here's what i think lilburrito>>>
tyler is a bouncing ball
the sec is filing all necessary lawsuits to protect cmkx shareholders, not tyler
tyler is called cmkm diamonds, but the old company was wrapped up before it went to tyler....to include the shareholders of cmkx nevada, who own a trust...that tyler is not privy too
lilburrito is trying to pursuade folks that tyler is the big show, when tyler is a totally separete company with a completely different business model....in which tyler is trying to sue urban casavant for something they think they have a right too, which they do not.
lilburrito lives in an imaginary world created for a bouncing ball while the sec does the job that needs to be done....ignore lilburrito just like kevin west....who know nothing of value for cmkx shareholders.
lilburrito0 your domain is pb66...how come you be here?
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:39:02 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 03 Aug 2008, 11:08 AM EDT Msg. 747916 of 748020 (This msg. is a reply to 747912 by article1section8.) Jump to msg. # article1, urban should respond no later than Monday, September 18. That is the 20th day following the 29th of August.
we probably won't see anything from the judge until later that week.
i asked this same question of my69z, any idea why they waited until the very last day to serve urban by publication?
why didn't they serve him a month earlier, for example, or two months earlier? why wait until the very last day they were allowed to serve hem? what was to be gained by delaying?
By: leowanta 03 Aug 2008, 02:19 PM EDT Msg. 747988 of 748019 (This msg. is a reply to 747916 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen, you are off by one month..he he he
no matter, it doesn't matter what tyler filed....
we belong to the old cmkm diamonds and it 'wrapped up' last spring...tyler can file a suit against the trust, but they have no claim to the trust, it belongs to the shareholders ...not cmkm tyler...diversion...me thinks
fun and games with the court docket....bouncing balls...the real deal is what the sec did last week...and the nss emergency order ending august 12....
|
|