Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 3, 2008 14:44:49 GMT -5
By: my69z
03 Aug 2008, 01:50 PM EDT
Msg. 747969 of 748017
(This msg. is a reply to 747962 by my69z.)
Jump to msg. #
Investrend Research..."General Members, including individual shareholders, institutions and professionals, are:
look at the last name...." Kevin M. West, The Owners Group, Inc., Universal City, TX "
Excerpts from Investrend Research letter to Katz.....notice it says he "solicited" their views.
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Mr. Jonathan G. Katz
" On June 17, 2005, you were kind enough to solicit my views, and the views of those of us in the legitimate independent sponsored research community, regarding the state of research for smaller public companies,
"Hopefully, this simple solution will provide a means to extend coverage to even the smallest, developing public issuers that now have no prospects of professional research for their shareholders, while yet allowing the providers to maintain their positioning as not owning or trading in the shares of any public company under coverage, and banning such ownership and trading by the analysts assigned to the coverages as well."
" Initial Providers offering their analytics under the Shareholders Research Alliance monitoring program include:
Beacon Equity Research, Richardson, TX Burritt Research, Lake Park, FL Fundamental Research Corp., Vancouver....INVESTREND RESEARCH....., Forest Hills, NY SISM Research & Investment Services, Zurich "
Does anyone reallly think CMKX's crap wasn't mentioned in these talks as a dam good example of market problems?? lol
Always said.....CMKXs' info was in (a) think tank.
Our "numbers" are the least of Kevin/Frizz/Koch's worries....CMKX under Kevin has always been about the market 1st.
Like even he said...he's not a moving forward guy,,,,,hmm...new Chairman.
By: my69z
03 Aug 2008, 02:20 PM EDT
Msg. 747989 of 748017
(This msg. is a reply to 747969 by my69z.)
Jump to msg. #
www.sec.gov/rules/other/265-23/gessary091305.pdf
By: gusjarvis
03 Aug 2008, 02:35 PM EDT
Msg. 747997 of 748017
(This msg. is a reply to 747969 by my69z.)
Jump to msg. #
nice chris, but isn't it sad given all that
the way the shareholers were treated by all involved, and this contrived ending is getting too much. They are trying to hard and insulting too many with the fake bullchit
By: gusjarvis
03 Aug 2008, 02:37 PM EDT
Msg. 748001 of 748023
(This msg. is a reply to 747989 by my69z.)
Jump to msg. #
mr. katz to chris, he who revoked us and sggm
who we now know seeing mark's evidence that sggm was part of the plan and ok'd by the sec for sure. Old mr. katz also worked with don and took shawn hackman's testimony.
By: my69z
03 Aug 2008, 03:04 PM EDT
Msg. 748013 of 748023
(This msg. is a reply to 748001 by gusjarvis.)
Jump to msg. #
Gus,,,,how far do Katz and Hack go back together...?
By: gusjarvis
03 Aug 2008, 03:13 PM EDT
Msg. 748015 of 748023
(This msg. is a reply to 748013 by my69z.)
Jump to msg. #
at least since this, and now we know why bud said
the informants were in cmkx before it even traded
www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-46478.htm
By: my69z
03 Aug 2008, 03:17 PM EDT
Msg. 748017 of 748024
(This msg. is a reply to 748015 by gusjarvis.)
Jump to msg. #
Yep...KCI,,,and according to that last SEC doc,,,,his "deal" actually hasn't been approved yet....lol
Look at the wording of that doc
lol