|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 16:12:15 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010
24 Mar 2009, 05:07 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819184 of 819187
Jump to msg. #
if SHORE finds value in the former CMKX claims and urban didn't do a deal with them beforehand then he will certainly go down in history as the dumbest man on the planet in the 20th and 21st centuries.
no one will be able to top him for stupidity. no one
his grave stone will read, "here lies URBAN CASAVANT the dumbest man in modern history."
and the boys from TYLER?
"here lie cowboys from texas who thought they had the equipment between their legs and in their heads to get the job done. sadly for the shareholders they had neither."
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 16:28:23 GMT -5
ming
DIAMOND JEDI
somebody knows something?
« Thread Started Today at 4:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ENMGF.OB&t=1d john3339
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: somebody knows something?
« Reply #4 Today at 4:15pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Entourage is artificially high. What that pps is showing is a small buy at the ASK....$.75! Try selling a share. the BID is $.13! What that means, is that Entourage doesn't want to SELL any shares, but they'll be perfectly happy to take yours off your hands for a song. It's like when Chuckie Schwabb wouldn't let me buy into CMKX when I first started buying. I was in their office in Harrisburg, and filling out the forms to open an account, we were talking about what I wanted to invest in. The guy stopped me short and said if I wanted to buy CMKX, it would cost me about $675 per share to buy...but the bid price was (at the time, $.0012) perfectly acceptable if I had any shares to sell. That's when I decided to go to online brokerages. john
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 16:40:23 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1
Date: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:58:12 PM
In reply to: TSXminer who wrote msg# 269495 Post # of 269553 Thats nothing compared to what CMKX will be worth one day. Hold on to every share you have and you will become a Millionaire! Its only a matter of time. 
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 16:46:44 GMT -5
Posted by: goodolboy
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:14:29 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 269553
GM Nufced! How'd you like Pedro and Chrisl's new plan?
Posted by: nufced
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:22:51 AM
In reply to: goodolboy who wrote msg# 269520 Post # of 269553
Its not new, they talked about it long ago. I think its a waste of money. No skin off our noses to let Tyler proceed
it will all come out in the wash anyway.
Put CMKM into BK/recievership.
Posted by: goodolboy
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:24:29 AM
In reply to: nufced who wrote msg# 269523 Post # of 269553
Not BK as that does nothing. Receivership takes the ball away from Frizzell and sends him on his merry way.
Posted by: goodolboy
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:45:01 AM
In reply to: nufced who wrote msg# 269522 Post # of 269553
That is where I will respectfully disagree with you Nufced. Letting Tyler proceed only to benefit themselves is "skin off our noses." Actually it's more like rubbing salt in the wound no different than what Marco did.
They can no longer hide behind "This is an ongoing litigation matter and the Company has no response to questions that, if answered fully, might disclose trial strategies, tactics or other matters to the opposing parties." as they haven't actually pursued any insider since the summary default judgement against JE. These petty suits they are involved with now only prove their intentions as self serving.
If Chrisl and Pedro decide not pursue this, I know someone who will.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 16:54:07 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010
24 Mar 2009, 05:07 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819184 of 819187 Jump to msg. # if SHORE finds value in the former CMKX claims and urban didn't do a deal with them beforehand then he will certainly go down in history as the dumbest man on the planet in the 20th and 21st centuries. no one will be able to top him for stupidity. no one his grave stone will read, "here lies URBAN CASAVANT the dumbest man in modern history." and the boys from TYLER? "here lie cowboys from texas who thought they had the equipment between their legs and in their heads to get the job done. sadly for the shareholders they had neither."
24 Mar 2009, 05:26 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 819189 of 819192 (Reply to 819184 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # rosen our connections to shore are huge Franko10 ™
Re: Fact Sheet
« Reply #1 on Sept 20, 2004, 12:15pm » President and C.E.O of shore gold,... Mr. Kenneth E. MacNeill Guess what has ties to some of our old friends as well. Everest Energy Corporation Life Sciences Institute Inc. Santoy Resources Ltd. Shore Gold Inc. Skeena Resources Limited *Life Sciences Institute Inc. *Red-Tail Infotech Inc. *Cyprus Capital Corporation *Sparling Capital Corporation *Claude Resources Inc. Link to Post - Back to Top Logged There is only one way to happiness, and that is to cease worrying things which are beyond the power of our will. to read the entire post..... click the link ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=819189 |
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Mar 24, 2009 19:33:37 GMT -5
I don't think Obama's peeps are going to let him answer questions like this too much in the future so I was thinking that maybe someone (much smarted than I) might want to try and get involved in one of those online townhall meetings he is going to have. I heard them say he is having one this thursday, didn't here a link. I guess he is going to take questions from the public, how can a cmkx'r get to ask a question? Like, where frick is my money? You know the cmkx money?
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:13:04 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010
24 Mar 2009, 05:07 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819184 of 819187 Jump to msg. # if SHORE finds value in the former CMKX claims and urban didn't do a deal with them beforehand then he will certainly go down in history as the dumbest man on the planet in the 20th and 21st centuries. no one will be able to top him for stupidity. no one his grave stone will read, "here lies URBAN CASAVANT the dumbest man in modern history." and the boys from TYLER? "here lie cowboys from texas who thought they had the equipment between their legs and in their heads to get the job done. sadly for the shareholders they had neither."
24 Mar 2009, 05:26 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 819189 of 819192 (Reply to 819184 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # rosen our connections to shore are huge Franko10 ™
Re: Fact Sheet
« Reply #1 on Sept 20, 2004, 12:15pm » President and C.E.O of shore gold,... Mr. Kenneth E. MacNeill Guess what has ties to some of our old friends as well. Everest Energy Corporation Life Sciences Institute Inc. Santoy Resources Ltd. Shore Gold Inc. Skeena Resources Limited *Life Sciences Institute Inc. *Red-Tail Infotech Inc. *Cyprus Capital Corporation *Sparling Capital Corporation *Claude Resources Inc. Link to Post - Back to Top Logged There is only one way to happiness, and that is to cease worrying things which are beyond the power of our will. to read the entire post..... click the link ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=819189
24 Mar 2009, 07:33 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819275 of 819307
(Reply to 819189 by gusjarvis) Jump to msg. # gus, this is a significant link,,, « Reply #6 on Oct 7, 2004, 10:37am » I sent an Email to Shore gold in regards to my findings with the board members and I got a respones today. Good Morning Francis, Ken MacNeill of Shore Gold asked me if I would respond to your e-mail. Claude Resources is a gold mining company (50,000 ounces per year) with oil and gas assets (600 barrels of oil equivalent), a strong balance sheet (no long term debt) and is listed on both the TSX and AMEX. Claude's Chairman Bill MacNeill is the father of Shore's Chairman Ken MacNeill and Bill MacNeill founded Shore Gold. Claude Resources owns about 1 million shares of Shore and the two companies own 1 gold property together, the Jojay (25% Shore, 75% Claude). Three of Claude's directors are also Shore directors but there is no management overlap and there are no apparent conflicts of interest. The management of the two companies are good friends, and we're located in the same building. Claude's website is www.clauderesources.com. Thanks for your interest. Neil McMillan President/CEO
cont'd |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:14:24 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010
24 Mar 2009, 07:34 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819277 of 819307
(Reply to 819275 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # and the follow on to that link,,,, « Reply #3 on Sept 20, 2004, 12:23pm » From SHANE RESOURCES Filing, SHORE GOLD CONNECTION. Go here, click on "view this public company's documents", and read the Aug. 23rd 2004 MD&A! MONROE LAKE SECTION..Shore Gold info is there! www.sedar.com/DisplayProfile.do?lang=EN&issuerType=03&issuerNo=00004138 SURROUND PROJECT, SASKATCHEWAN Pursuant to an agreement dated September 18, 2003 with Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, the company will have an option to earn a 10% interest in 82 claims in the Fort a la Corne area of Saskatchewan. The interest will be earned by the Company providing $100,000 in 2003 and $200,000 in 2004, to be spent on exploring the claim for diamonds. In addition, the Company has agreed to grant Casavant Mining Kimberlite International a right of first refusal to earn up to a 49% interest in any Diamond properties the Company may hold and seek to joint venture. so CMKX has first refusal rights to 49% through Shane of shore's claims By: rosencrantz2010
24 Mar 2009, 07:37 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819281 of 819307
(Reply to 819277 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # maybe the links between CMKX and SHORE GOLD are so old they don't need to PR anything? maybe SHORE will claim they made this public back in 2003 and so there is no need to reveal the deal they made with CMKX back then in 2008/2009? how is it that SHORE could acquire exactly what CMKX use to hold in 2004 and today not say anything about that acquisition? maybe because they made the deal public six years ago?
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:19:00 GMT -5
By: aladin99
24 Mar 2009, 08:30 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 819305 of 819307
Jump to msg. #
if CMKX is another RTP....
then we will be all RICH...period
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:22:16 GMT -5
diamondbilly
Diamond Miner
Mark Faulk ... GET REAL OR RESIGN
« Thread Started Yesterday at 9:12pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark what is the company position on the latest SEC boast that naked shorts don't matter and are in check??? cmkxunitedforum.proboards70.com/i....ay&thread=14136Quit with the cover up!!!!!!! YOUR SUPPOSED TO BE ON OUR SIDE> WE WERE SHORTED TO DEATH AND YOU AND BILL FRIZZEL KNOW IT FOR A FACT! YOU EVEN WROTE A BOOK ON IT REMEMBER??? GET REAL WITH US OR RESIGN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Billy goodolboy
Diamond Driller
Re: Mark Faulk ... GET REAL OR RESIGN
« Reply #1 Today at 9:48am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have this sneaking feeling Mark is about to get quite real. LOL! I believe it is quite possible Chrisl and Pedro just put him in check(mate).
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:26:30 GMT -5
victorious
Kimberlite Rookie
Re: Mark Faulk ... GET REAL OR RESIGN
« Reply #2 Today at 3:20pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Billy good to see you. According to Mr. Chrisl, Mr. Frizzell miscalculated the NSS. I don't know Chrisl except from this board. He's been to Tyler FWIW. O BTW IMO he's full of it!
goodolboy
Diamond Driller
Re: Mark Faulk ... GET REAL OR RESIGN
« Reply #3 Today at 4:51pm »
I call BS...
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 24, 2009 20:28:44 GMT -5
Ric Cannoneer Re: Pedro and I have plans « Reply #29 Yesterday at 9:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 12:26pm, dazen wrote: I don't know if a receivership will work or not but I do know that Bill and Kevin haven't done anything. The way they did the default is a very legal iffy at best. There were several suits that had no problems in serving Edwards while they claimed they couldn't. If they could ever caught up to Edwards, if he ever came back to the US, I would think he had very could grounds in having the default thrown out. Shoot, if you could do what they did then I could sue anyone and claim I couldn't find them and get a default judgment. The way they did that was very unethical at best. As far as Urban, Mark has already stated they are not going after him. He said there was nothing to gain. So there will not be a default and if the truth be known they never intended to go after Urban. But it has been known that they wanted the entourage shares to pay their bills for a long time. They even told shareholders that went to Tyler that they had the right to take the cert even thought the contract was clear that they were CMKM shareholders and not the companies. Those shares were never given to the company then to us. They were meant to go directly to the shareholders through Koch. Yet now, from leaked information from Entourage, not our management, that there is a deal in progress. Might even already been done and the cash done spent. Amazing that the biggest deal that we have had since revocation is being kept a secret from us and the company has gone deaf. Thats not even going into the fact that because of Frizzell, people spent more money on a cert pull that made Bagley and Urban another million, or the trillion short causing many to hold or even by more through Deli and Brewer. Not to mention Kevin's, Urban is a godly man. They have caused a lot more harm then I have seen them cause good at this point. Just remember, people met Urban too and after meeting him thought we would be rich. They never expected that he was ripping them off. People also trusted Roger Glenn and Maheu and we seen how that worked out. Shoot many still believe just because of RG and Maheu. Near future PR, We tried but they skiped the country and we just didn't have the resources to get them. We had to use what little money we could get out of the Entourage shares to pay our expenses but there just isn't anymore money to continue. Goodbye. « Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:11pm by Ric » cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=58392&page=2 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 24, 2009 20:40:03 GMT -5
chrisl Mercenary Oh Oh 622 Bill Unregistered « Thread Started Today at 1:23pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Who is responsible for this "622 billion unregistered security"? A. The company B. Brokers C. T/A D. SEC If you said all of the above you are right to a certain extent. Who is the responsible the least? If you said the SEC (Wrong) If you said the brokers (Wrong) If you said the T/A (Wrong) If you said the company (You win a part in my midget porn movie). See the company gave the individuals and they put them out into the market. The company never said put those unregistered securities out there. Or did they? But see that does not matter cause it is not illegal to give restricted shares to individuals with an agreement that states you cannot sell these for 2 years. The company is absolved of this at that point. So if the individuals figured out how to dump these unregistered shares into the open market with the help of a broker and T/A the company is not guilty of this regardless of what you might think. It might be time to seek legal counsel since it is a possibility we are holding unregistered securities and the company imo is not responsible. What do I know? I am a basher. scottbro2 Matey Re: Oh Oh 622 Bill Unregistered « Reply #1 Today at 4:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Along this line of thinking I would surmise then that Urban is not responsible for the dumping of unregistered shares on the market. John Edwards and Co. are. Edwards was in posession of the stock ledger - UC was too stupid to know what he was doing behind his back and probably even gave the MFer the right to sign his name. Bottom line, Tyler Tx is lying to us when they say they don't know who holds the unregistered shares - it is all of us mushrooms!! I am all in for your legal effor Chrisl. Just tell me where to be and who to write the check to . Scottbro2 mretgnol Pirate Re: Oh Oh 622 Bill Unregistered « Reply #2 Today at 5:20pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- one problem Chrisl. The company is not responsible for third party fraud. However, in this case, most of the "third parties" were shell corps registered/owned/benefit of the company insiders. So, legally, the company is/was responsible for those shares entering the market. Especially when Urban allowed the T/A to allow those shares into the market based upon opinion letters on behalf of company insiders. And for the last time, the shares were properly registered with the Nevada Secretary of State's Office. The problem is whether they should have legally been issued. Big difference between illegally registered and illegally issued. « Last Edit: Today at 5:21pm by mretgnol » scottbro2 Matey Re: Oh Oh 622 Bill Unregistered « Reply #3 Today at 5:26pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MRetgnol, How can illegally issued shares be legally registered? Those shares were NOT registered and therefore do not exist in the "float" Tyler won't tell us what the float is - hmmmmmmm........ Scottbro2 tec1958 Global Moderator Re: Oh Oh 622 Bill Unregistered « Reply #4 Today at 5:28pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LT if you get Ric started I will thwack you cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=58399 |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 24, 2009 20:40:24 GMT -5
Posted by: janice shell
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:30:41 PM
In reply to: nufced who wrote msg# 269558 Post # of 269560
I'm guessing Faulk only wanted to be CEO because he thought he could use the position to grandstand himself to some kind of prominence.
Ain't working.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 24, 2009 20:46:22 GMT -5
Diamondeye Rumrunner Re: Mark Faulk 622 Billion Question « Reply #23 Yesterday at 10:14am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tyler isn't scum, just inept. There is huge difference, the company is building up huge debts to Tyler, and for what? What have they accomplished in the years they've been at it? I'm not picking on them, I just want to know.. And don't direct me to the website... chrisl Mercenary Re: Mark Faulk 622 Billion Question « Reply #24 Yesterday at 10:27am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't worry I will bet we get an update today or this week sometime. Especially if Pedro and I do what we are considering at this point. cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=58386&page=2 |
|
