|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:27:48 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 08:10 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831808 of 831922
Jump to msg. # Jumbo what did UC mean when he said "Our mining costs and specific drilling sites are CONFIDENTIAL, as a measure of SECURITY to protect our SHAREHOLDERS interest?
By: newtopennies 09 May 2009, 11:15 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831827 of 831922 (Reply to 831808 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...IT'S all about the Nuclear Materials. It's not about Diamonds. Although, 45 carat diamonds that have been broken off larger diamonds may be worth cutting and polishing, wouldn't you say? em.
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 11:20 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831829 of 831922 (Reply to 831827 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # ntp, who said it was all about nuclear materials?
By: newtopennies 09 May 2009, 11:38 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831830 of 831922 (Reply to 831829 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...FOR ME, it explains much of the secrecy, and why the information to the shareholders has been so limited. The counterfeiters have had dozens of bashers representing them, while we have had Tyler updates and a handful of seemingly well-informed posters such as yourself with very interesting opinions. Mostly what we have had is disinformation, nasty-mouthed bashers, and rumors. Looking back, you can almost see a plan to completely wipe out any public idea of value on CMKX leased land in Canada. In fact, we even have lost all the leases according to some! I'd say that could be a well-orchestrated front to protect what the drills discovered. It's my opinion. eom.
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 11:41 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831832 of 831923 (Reply to 831830 by newtopennies)
Jump to msg. # ntp
"I'd say that could be a well-orchestrated front to protect....."
yup,
and imagine if it's bigger than that...
we are in good hands
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:29:23 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 11:38 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831831 of 831923
Jump to msg. # Interesting
1/28/09 2:41 PM CST Mark Faulk conversation with Morris Richards, DTCC
Richards: I was told not to speak about it, there may not have been a court order but I was told not to say anything about it, because at that time there was a distribution that was done with CMKM Diamonds, there was a stock distribution that we did, and after that I was out of the whole situation.
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 11:51 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831833 of 831923
Jump to msg. # interesting
FACTS 14. In 2002, CMKM, via its predecessor entities,accumulated over 1,000,000 acres of mineral claims in and around Saskatchewan, Canada. CMKM was formed to develope those claims.
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 11:59 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831834 of 831923
Jump to msg. # interesting
There are issued and outstanding certificates for billions of shares that were not purchased nor legally acquired from CMKM.
I hope there aren't 622 billion of them
he he he ms
By: newtopennies 09 May 2009, 12:08 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831835 of 831923 (Reply to 831834 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # SHIFT...DOES this happen a lot, or has CMKM been especially attractive to men who print phony stock certificates in their closets? How did they think no one would notice? TIA. eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:30:08 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 12:12 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831837 of 831924
Jump to msg. # Interesting
in the texas_lawsuit_09_05_08, Exhibit A listing all the illegal shares they are hoping to "Upon trial hereof, Plaintiff requests the Court to render its decree canceling CMKM share certificates set out in Exhibit "A".
I can't find UC's name. Can someone help me out?
tia ms
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:30:36 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 12:37 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831842 of 831925
Jump to msg. # interesting
Hi HH It took me some time. I had almost 200,000 pages of documents to go through. LOL. You are right The British Columbia Supreme Court website is not easy. I could only find info on cases that have been decided. Nothing on cases in progress.I was able to determine a couple of things. I searched through the almost 1500 (no lie) cases that have been decided since This proceeding began in August, thats right August 30th 2007. No Entourage, No CMKX, NO 101047025(1010). I also earned that the designation S075800 is not case number. The case numbers begin with BCSC. S075800 is the Vancouver Registry file number for the appearence document. So all we know for sure is that some guy named Gerry Cuttler was in Vancouver on October 25th 2007. I checked the Vancouver Registry website and found no record of S075800
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:30:59 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 12:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831844 of 831927
Jump to msg. # Interesting
I just noticed the "articles-of-inc.pdf" for CMKM Diamonds Inc in Tyler and it says they can issue 800,000,000,000 shares.
How is that possible?
must be an error
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:31:23 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 01:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831847 of 831927
Jump to msg. # Interesting,
As reiterated by SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt during his 1995 testimony before the United States House of Representatives, the Pecora Investigation uncovered a wide range of abusive practices on the part of banks and bank affiliates. These included a variety of conflicts of interest such as the underwriting of unsound securities in order to pay off bad bank loans as well as "pool operations" to support the price of bank stocks. The hearings galvanized broad public support for new banking and securities laws. As a result of the Pecora Commission's findings, the United States Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Banking Act of 1933 to separate commericial and investment banking, the Securities Act of 1933 to set penalties for filing false information about stock offerings, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which formed the SEC to regulate the stock exchanges
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:31:59 GMT -5
By: restripe2007 09 May 2009, 01:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831848 of 831929
Jump to msg. # will we trade again or will we get a settlement or both and will the shareholder ever really know what went on with cmkx
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 01:26 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831849 of 831929 (Reply to 831848 by restripe2007)
Jump to msg. # yes, yes, yes, no
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:33:31 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 01:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831847 of 831927 Jump to msg. # Interesting, As reiterated by SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt during his 1995 testimony before the United States House of Representatives, the Pecora Investigation uncovered a wide range of abusive practices on the part of banks and bank affiliates. These included a variety of conflicts of interest such as the underwriting of unsound securities in order to pay off bad bank loans as well as "pool operations" to support the price of bank stocks. The hearings galvanized broad public support for new banking and securities laws. As a result of the Pecora Commission's findings, the United States Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Banking Act of 1933 to separate commericial and investment banking, the Securities Act of 1933 to set penalties for filing false information about stock offerings, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which formed the SEC to regulate the stock exchanges By: mquietstorm3 09 May 2009, 01:32 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831852 of 831931 (Reply to 831847 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # MS: "All that stemmed from the Harding administration with the collapsing of banks " I shared with the group many times over to go study that 1929 market collapse and how things were orchestrated intentionally, but no one listened. Roosevelt "NEW DEAL and REFORMS" help to set the table for corrections. Now lets see if the words "NEW DEAL" comes up again in the not so distant future: By the way let me not allow you to forget that more millionaires per capita were created during the great depression than any other time in modern day history. Could there be a re-occurence of such a feat? I say yes and positioning has a lot to do with it! By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 01:37 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831854 of 831931 (Reply to 831852 by mquietstorm3) Jump to msg. # MQ, History repeats itself.... ;-) By: restripe2007 09 May 2009, 01:51 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831857 of 831932 (Reply to 831852 by mquietstorm3) Jump to msg. # MQ, Is this where we need to be positioning or some place eles if so where? help a brother cmkx'er out By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 01:54 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831859 of 831932 (Reply to 831857 by restripe2007) Jump to msg. # position'ed <----as in past tense
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:34:06 GMT -5
By: redtopbill539fl 09 May 2009, 02:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831867 of 831935
Jump to msg. # Anyone really know who regulates the "market makers" on the OTC board? If so, why are they allowed to trade "unregistered" shares? Isn't that what happened with CMKX?
HELLO KK!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:34:37 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 02:58 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831871 of 831935
Jump to msg. # When you mention
deleting that 622 billion it shore ruffles the feathers of some folks on this board...
wonder why?
he he he
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:36:18 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 04:26 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831879 of 831935 Jump to msg. # no mis-leading here. bona fides are safe and sound in entourage. you are trapped in the 622b. pretty easy to understand hey chump. lol By: lion3047 09 May 2009, 04:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831882 of 831936 (Reply to 831879 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # How we know who is who (bona fide)? For example what about me? Sooner says.....Was wondering the samething myself!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:36:45 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 04:35 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831883 of 831936
Jump to msg. # shara your constant crying is getting old. your story has no foundation. it's quite obvious the bona fides are in entourage now and the forensic team is gutting the slime within the 622 billion. you too, will be exiting the board soon.
take care
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:37:11 GMT -5
By: aladin99 09 May 2009, 07:17 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 831801 of 831937
Jump to msg. # Just wondering where is pedro? lol
By: planter82 09 May 2009, 06:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831899 of 831937 (Reply to 831801 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # aladin99 he signed a NDA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:37:53 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 06:20 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831898 of 831937
Jump to msg. # is that all you guys do is attack positive posters. what in the world has you little negatives so upset?
bah wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
is it ENTOURAGE or the deleting of the 622 billion NSS shares?
come on, don't be shy. Let's talk about it
;-)
By: planter82 09 May 2009, 06:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831900 of 831937 (Reply to 831898 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # wait till the negative ones see how many shares get canceled LOL
By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 06:31 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831901 of 831937 (Reply to 831900 by planter82)
Jump to msg. # they will cry for a week
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 10, 2009 15:39:17 GMT -5
By: TFKIDD 09 May 2009, 06:48 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831902 of 831938 Jump to msg. # By: Bellingus HEY (MONETARY,S) WILL THESE EVENTS EVER COME ABOUT? 31 Mar 2007, 02:56 PM EDT Msg. 18304 of 18305 (This msg. is a reply to 18294 by zahnj.) Jump to msg. # Well... The main event has two parts. A lot of ppl have been talking about a cash dividend coming our way. I doubt that. What I think we will see is a tender offer for our shares. Don't know when. Don't know how much. Many ppl will sell. This, in part, is what helps to right the share structure. But even then, it won't be completely corrected. That's where part two comes in and I believe it will be a share swap for a trading company - and again, it will carry the short with it. Ppl who didn't sell out completely in the TO will have free trading shares in the marketplace. Whatever company it is will hold significant value and tied to many other familiar companies and JV partners. Then the PRs will begin to fly. One would do well to review jcline’s posts of PRs (and a few of SBG’s) from many of the players in Canada to get an idea as to how this might play out. The above is what I've been talking about for the last two years. I've also been known to say that no one but the insiders will ever know exactly how big the short was. There will be no visible justice other than what Frizzel manages to create – the company has always figured justice would come in the market. I believe we will get an "updated" share count after all of the above takes place - and that the final share count will surprise the snot out of almost everyone. As for the derivative suit, that's Frizzel's baby. If you've noticed the company's posture through all of this, you'll know that they havn't even hinted at a short (officially or otherwise) since late 03, early 04. That doesn't mean there isn't one - just that they ain't talking about it. If you ever talked to Andy Hill back in 05 he was actually saying there was no short. It wasn't until wild Bill showed up and began counting shares etc. that we started hearing about the huge short. Go back to the administrative hearing. Frizz was the only one talking about the NSS. Stocklein never mentioned it. UC stopped talking about it. There's good reason for this but beyond the scope of this post. ;o) AMHO By: monetaryshift 09 May 2009, 07:00 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 831904 of 831937 (Reply to 831902 by TFKIDD) Jump to msg. # I like this part only... That's where part two comes in and I believe it will be a share swap for a trading company <---THINK CONSOLIDATION OF A SPECIFIC CERT - DELETE THIS LINE-->and again, it will carry the short with it. - DELETE THIS LINE---> Ppl who didn't sell out completely in the TO will have free trading shares in the marketplace. ENJOY FROM HERE FORWARD----->Whatever company it is will hold significant value and tied to many other familiar companies and JV partners. Then the PRs will begin to fly. One would do well to review jcline’s posts of PRs (and a few of SBG’s) from many of the players in Canada to get an idea as to how this might play out. Hope that helps ms
|
|