|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 26, 2009 11:43:28 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 26 Aug 2009, 08:43 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862365 of 862434 (Reply to 862063 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # Btw- that is the leverage that these Loyal, LEGAL CMKM Shareholders have. (reference 2 last post of Oil.Ipo)- The commonalities or thread that joins 40-50,000 INVESTORS who participated by means of an investment. Set up for failures. Yet, they did not know the extent of the failure (they were set up for), because they were busy looking at a huge BILL BOARD in front of them, while being sold on VALUATION, CREDIBILITY of the INTERESTS of those names being brought in, a real future in a mining concern, Royalties for Life. Promotional PR's if you will... When you have credibility in name selling you it really helps you to take that wallet out of your pocket, and spend a little more on shares. Could be an honest thing??? The historical volume reports at the DTC reflect the work done by the pr campaign. That is some fine advertising agency. That crew got top billing, and were paid top billing if we are not paid IMVHO. Where is it? Is it soup yet?
Now today to hear from some that no one knows what happened to "a plan." Hilarious. The reliance on a "NEW CORP" to decide on the OLD TEAMS cleaning up house is irresponsible, and wanton abandonment for a Legal Group of CMKX LONGS of good standing who know all about the REALITY of the VALUATION, NS, collection of damages, and what Mr. MAHEU set out to be accomplished, and has been done so. Go back and remind yourself with my last post. Slap yourself in the face , lightly. Pour cool water on your head if that does not wake you up.
Do these shareholders; At a time when these answers (the only one Notice/Payment) would provide the transparency and insight to give them what they know to be true seem legally appropriate? Go back and look through that last post that I made. Remembering that some shareholders are in a very bad way, and that should not even be needed as consideration. No one seems to care anyway. You done, did your part. Spent your doe on "GOT CMKX?"
That's how abject some shareholders have become in their feelings and really they should be powering up for the fight of their lives, because they have earned it, and have all of the proof that they need at least to show how misinformed they were relative to DAMAGES. Just business. Find an attorney and he would love that one. Many are more than ready. The question is are "THEY" ready. Is it time?
AIMVH0~
Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 26, 2009 13:35:01 GMT -5
By: jfarn 25 Aug 2009, 06:38 PM EDT Msg. 862220 of 862395 (Reply to 862214 by nufced) Do I have enough equity in the "trustworthy" bank to tell you in a public forum that Don Stocklein told me a few months ago that Ent was used as a go-around to deal with the SEC via the old Team's continual attempts to highlight the short. Simply another frontal assault Nuf. with friendly cover. Don mentioned Andy P.'s little threat in the conversation I had with him. If you still communicate with any of the current management ask them about this. Bill was at the meeting. Secondly, what you say about Don sharing an office space with Gary A. Interesting to say the least. Multiple targets identified in this endeavor Nuf. Big Game~ Big Wait~ By: nufced 26 Aug 2009, 01:17 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 862448 of 862479 Jump to msg. # jfarn I called the Donald. I got his secretary. I explained the theory about Gary Aguirre and Don being in the same office and possibly working together.(donald was in meeting) and she said, no contact with Gary Aguirre. And I apologized for taking up her time, that I just wanted to get it straight from the horses mouth, and she said, "well,you did!" Gary Aguirres number isn't available that I can find. And Donalds San Diego number rolls over to Las Vegas. I believe he lives in Vegas too.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Aug 26, 2009 14:07:44 GMT -5
Personally I wouldn't believe ANYTHING Nuffy said...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Aug 26, 2009 14:20:13 GMT -5
Nuffy............................. On June 4th in the thread, "Gary and Don"...we probed the fact that Don and Gary occupy the same office building on the same floor.......................Allot of other attourney's are on that same floor also..................................................Just a co-winky-dink...
Lot's of good info here along with the infamous Led Zepplin phrase, "Where's that confounded Bridge"~millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=25982I posted this in the perp walk thread a couple day's ago and feel it needs it's own discussion place as you will see, it has a connection to us~ Very interesting last paragraph from Gary~Whistle-Blower Claims New Retaliation By SECLiz Moyer, 06.02.09, 02:50 PM EDT Former SEC lawyer Gary Aguirre says the agency withdrew a settlement offer after he criticized them in a Forbes story.Gary Aguirre, a whistle-blower fired from his job as a lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2005, is again crying foul, alleging the agency pulled the plug on settling his long-running dispute with them after he criticized the SEC in a Forbes story last month. Aguirre claims the breakdown in the proposed $2.1 million settlement was a form of retaliation, possibly for his remarks in a May 15 article about an inquiry by the agency's inspector into whether lawyers at the SEC's enforcement arm were trading stocks while on the job. (See "Watchdog Alleges Insider Trading At SEC.") Yahoo! BuzzIn the article, Aguirre told Forbes the charges were "not surprising. It would be the next logical step in the SEC's mission reversal: from protecting investors to protecting Wall Street." The settlement was nearing completion that week, with both sides appearing to reach agreement on the amount and details of the payment to Aguirre, according to a series of e-mails between Aguirre and Mark Cahn, the SEC's deputy general counsel. Then it all broke down. "After careful consideration, we cannot agree to your proposed terms," Cahn wrote in an e-mail dated two hours after the news article was published. "Unfortunately, we are unable to reach a settlement on mutually acceptable terms." The SEC wouldn't comment on the timing or reason for its withdrawal. In a statement Monday evening, John Heine, an SEC spokesman said, "We were engaged in negotiations for a period of time in an effort to put this four-year-old matter behind us and focus our resources on our mission of protecting investors. We have been unable to reach agreement on terms that we find acceptable. We continue to believe that the claims are without merit." Aguirre, who was a California trial lawyer before joining the SEC in 2004, went public three years ago with his explosive allegations about an SEC cover-up of his investigation into possible insider trading at Pequot Capital, a powerful Wall Street hedge fund. He contends he was fired for daring to interview John Mack, now the chief executive of Morgan Stanley ( MS - news - people ), during his investigation. The SEC initially dropped the investigation of Pequot after Aguirre left the agency. But his allegations prompted a Senate investigation, which resulted in a 2007 report that painted a d*mning portrait of an agency mired in political favoritism and captured by the brokerage industry it is supposed to regulate. The report backed Aguirre's version of events. Perhaps not endearing himself to his former colleagues, Aguirre gave Sen. Charles Grassley, ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, information that led to that Senate investigation along with other probes. The SEC has faced a barrage of criticism in the last few months. It is accused of mishandling an investigation that could have uncovered Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme years before it unraveled in December. It is fighting continued embarrassing revelations, including a recent report by its own inspector general detailing allegations of insider trading by two SEC staff attorneys. That probe, begun by the inspector general at Grassley's request, resulted in the matter being referred to the Department of Justice for further investigation. The SEC, now under new leadership, has tried to look like it is taking a more active investigative role. Last month, Pequot Capital founder Arthur Samberg announced he was shutting down his $3 billion fund and returning money to investors, citing intensifying scrutiny by regulators of his trading for the firm in 2001, the period that was the focus of Aguirre's original insider trading probe. Aguirre and the SEC have been locked in a bitter fight over the last four years over his termination. He says throughout that time he was never subject to a gag order about the SEC. Settlement discussions began in earnest six months ago and appeared to be headed to a resolution according to the e-mails, which Aguirre supplied to Forbes. Cahn, who joined the agency in March from the prestigious law firm WilmerHale, sent a seemingly conciliatory e-mail to Aguirre on March 24 saying the negotiations had been productive, with "substantial movement from both parties" over the last few months. By mid-April, Aguirre was complaining about the SEC dragging its feet again. But a flurry of e-mails between the parties in early May appeared to close the remaining gaps. The remaining issues related to the tax treatment of the settlement and whether and how much of it would be designated to cover medical expenses incurred by Aguirre, who says the saga has been intensely stressful and even has caused him to require spinal surgery. An e-mail from Cahn to Aguirre on May 7 referenced an agreed-to lump sum payment of $2 million plus attorney fees. Subsequent e-mails over the next week quibbled over $300,000 to be designated to the medical expenses, with the SEC demanding doctor verification. On May 12, Cahn noted in an e-mail to Aguirre that he hoped to "bridge this last gap" in the negotiations. Aguirre sent Cahn his final proposal containing the negotiated wording for signature on May 13. E-mails between the two sides the next day focused on the SEC's inability to meet Aguirre's demand for a response by the end of the day on May 14, with Cahn saying he was not going to be in the office but that he intended to give the details of the final proposal "the attention they deserve." Aguirre extended his deadline to 5 p.m. on May 15. The SEC inspector general's report that raised questions about possible insider trading by SEC staff lawyers was made public by Sen. Grassley's office on May 14. The Forbes article was published at 1 p.m. on May 15. Cahn's e-mail breaking off the talks came at 2:59 p.m. that day. Aguirre says the case now goes to trial, and he has moved to Washington, D.C., from San Diego to prepare for it. "If the SEC is ready to pay $2.1 million to settle a 'groundless' lawsuit, how much would they pay to settle one that has merit?" he sayswww.forbes.com/2009/06/02/sec-gary-aguirre-business-beltway-sec.htmlAnd here's why... Gary Aguirre Sec Whistle blowerAguirre Law Firm 402 West Broadway Suite 400 San Diego, Ca. 92101www.marketrap.com/oversight/home/71/gary-aguirreStoecklein Law Group 402 West Broadway, Suite 400, San Diego, California 92101www.stoeckleinlaw.com/index.jsp
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 26, 2009 21:22:05 GMT -5
By: aladin99 26 Aug 2009, 06:22 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 862511 of 862599
Jump to msg. # No one will get paid until we trade again because it's illegal to get paid under revoked status...Shareholders will get new shares and money will be distributed to us based on old ratio...
By: oil.ipo 26 Aug 2009, 08:56 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 862575 of 862599 (Reply to 862511 by aladin99)
Jump to msg. # Hey Aladin- Always appreciate reading your posts. You seem to be someone who many respect and watch. That is the first time ever that I have seen this sort of a statement, and it might very well be true if something were executed after revocation status, but certainly not something like a mandated certificate pull prior to revocation status. Anything prior to revocation whether by negotiation between two amicable parties, or stipulation, or mandated would stand up against whatever legalities that are in question. The mere fact that the "GOT CMKX" boat was loaded up in a massive Promotion, and then shareholders participated in that promotion by purchasing shares only after heavy campaigning, with celebrity status blows all of the precedent out of the water anyway. These shareholders of legal record were treated poorly, and are injured, damaged, beaten down, and are certainly not the liable ones.
Regards always 2 you!~
AIMHO2~ Oil
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 26, 2009 21:23:27 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 26 Aug 2009, 09:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 862592 of 862599 (Reply to 862585 by leowanta)
Jump to msg. # Leo.. no one.. and I mean NO ONE is going to scr@w with CMKX in any way, shape or form.. we are so under the microscope.. so relax girl and just enjoy the ride.. it is out of our hands.. I trust THE team..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 26, 2009 21:29:36 GMT -5
By: retflyr Sandia labs, 1 mission is development of energy « Result #14 Today at 7:05pm » 1 building is 4.4 miles square. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandia_National_LaboratoriesCMKM must have oil or uranium!!!!! Perhaps Kryptonite. Retflyr2 P.S. Has 7,450 employees, annual US budget 2.25 billion.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Aug 26, 2009 21:47:27 GMT -5
Of course we COULD get paid for our CERTS without trading again IMO...Aladin is FOS on this one IMO...we did the CERT PULL just so we COULD get penalties and a DISTRIBUTION...be it ENT SHARES...or $$$ for penalties on the NS value...if we ever DO trade again it will be nearly impossible to get everyone to send in CERTS or get a TA to take them IMO...and I for one will NEVER put out ONE THIN DIME to ANYONE for ANYTHING to do with this ISSUE...no one WANT'S to trade again I doubt or not many anyway...NEVER would I want a company associated with TYLER...either we get PAID for our CERTS or I will FRAME THEM FOREVER...there is no RULE you have to be TRADING to get a settlement...I don't know WHERE Aladin got that CRAP from...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 27, 2009 10:13:13 GMT -5
By: e362 27 Aug 2009, 07:14 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862618 of 862668 (Reply to 862611 by aladin99) Jump to msg. # Aladin, you say our certs were paid for and we are due that money, correct? IF, the shorts covered the shares by paying the company for them, wouldn't that be the same as a company issueing more shares to the public? Now once a company offer shares for sale to the public, the money earned from the share sale is the companies to use for capital expenditures, not to be given back to the shareholders, right? If you have cert, which I do, I have what I paid for, if the company was to pay me the money they were paid for the short shares wouldn't that be akin to refunding the shares? Where is it written except for on this board that any money given to the company to cover FTDs or NSS must be given back to the ones holding shares? By: stkupnc 27 Aug 2009, 07:53 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862620 of 862668 (Reply to 862618 by e362) Jump to msg. # e362....you make an excellent point. One which I believe to be legally correct. These funds would translate to a PPS when we become trading again. The funds could, be used for mining purposes. However, I also believe that there would have been a premium paid for those shares and that premium should be shared with the shareholders. That said the company is under no obligation to share. One way or another we would directly benefit from this. Personally, I'd like to get some money back, do the reverse split to get the shares manageable and start mining. The PPS would then take care of itself. Who knows what this crazy situation has in store for us? LOL What a mess! By: e362 27 Aug 2009, 08:08 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862621 of 862669 (Reply to 862620 by stkupnc) Jump to msg. # stkupnc, Thats what makes this stock so tough to figure out. I too would love to see some money come my way prior to a possible RS, than trade at value. Problem is, IF money was paid as premium, how much and how much will actually be left after all these lawyers/experts and everyone else that has a hand out gets paid? It has been a LONG battle to rebuild this company, it can't come cheap after all these years. GLTUA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 27, 2009 10:19:16 GMT -5
By: nufced 27 Aug 2009, 10:18 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862634 of 862670
Jump to msg. # Edwards, Casavant, and their nominees and associates "sold" their shares into the public markets for at least $64.2 million in profit, much of which was paid to Casavant to support his extravagant lifestyle. In aggregate, Edwards made about $26.4 million, Casavant made about $31.5 milion, and Casavant's nominees made about $6.3 milion.
By: gusjarvis 27 Aug 2009, 10:26 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862639 of 862670 (Reply to 862634 by nufced)
Jump to msg. # problem with that nuf is that info you just wrote is from the silver state bank, and that info was gather in sept 2004, and that info was used in bill's nasd letter.
after bill had that info bill worked with urban side by side for years so bill is just as guilty as urban or there is another explanation, no other way
By: calvinwinters 27 Aug 2009, 10:39 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862643 of 862671
Jump to msg. # One minute Tyler's great, the next their criminals, who knows who's on first..., maybe all this shuffling is to confuse our future choice?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 27, 2009 12:09:49 GMT -5
By: nufced 27 Aug 2009, 10:18 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862634 of 862670 Edwards, Casavant, and their nominees and associates "sold" their shares into the public markets for at least $64.2 million in profit, much of which was paid to Casavant to support his extravagant lifestyle. In aggregate, Edwards made about $26.4 million, Casavant made about $31.5 milion, and Casavant's nominees made about $6.3 milion. By: gusjarvis 27 Aug 2009, 10:26 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862639 of 862670 (Reply to 862634 by nufced) Jump to msg. # problem with that nuf is that info you just wrote is from the silver state bank, and that info was gather in sept 2004, and that info was used in bill's nasd letter. after bill had that info bill worked with urban side by side for years so bill is just as guilty as urban or there is another explanation, no other way By: calvinwinters 27 Aug 2009, 10:39 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 862643 of 862671 Jump to msg. # One minute Tyler's great, the next their criminals, who knows who's on first..., maybe all this shuffling is to confuse our future choice? By: klonopin2mg 27 Aug 2009, 12:02 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 862700 of 862708 (Reply to 862639 by gusjarvis hiyah gusjarvis' what....no reponse or she's checking notes to see what the 'script' dictates. you requested a reply... "info you just wrote is from the silver state bank, and that info was gather in sept 2004, and that info was used in bill's nasd letter. after bill had that info bill worked with urban side by side for years so bill is just as guilty as urban or there is another explanation" the casualty list should be clear...obviously there is logic behind the illogical missing members on that list. i knew glenn would have to be added, hakala next? then who? though i expect them to get the same treatment as UC..... back to waiting.. K2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 27, 2009 12:18:02 GMT -5
By: pontiyak 26 Aug 2009, 08:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 39160 of 39165 (Reply to 39153 by bluetripp)
AT&T used to be the repository of "anything" the Goverment thought was "world changing" and worth protected for themselves.
Sandia National Labs is one of the current "repository".
Thus Sandia's possible curiosity about significant info leading to any asset or value CMKX might have.
IMHO yak
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 27, 2009 19:41:13 GMT -5
leadorfollow DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Roger Glenn and E & A gets named in suit! « Reply #90 Today at 4:07pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rg's response should be due within 30 days from service if I remember proceedure correctly unless there is a request for an extension but why give one when this has already been extended for years...he has already been deposed as well prior so he should be able to comply...imo
I think the filing was around the 12th so a few more weeks...plus casavant family et al responses should also be due within a few weeks...
many more pieces of the puzzle may be revealed....lets see who turns on who first...!?
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Aug 28, 2009 10:01:43 GMT -5
Salty, everyone knows that I deal with facts. Salty, I’m going to bring you a FACT Read the old Pr’s and think about things people have said to you Here is a fact NY Joe is a fireman in NY He is starting a ½ way house One day he was talking to Ed Donhue Ed was giving donation for the ½ way house Ed told joe, don’t worry about the rumors just watch Shore Gold…FACT Next FACT 1010 claims are 360* around shore gold The top and the sides changed to shoregold The buttom is still 101025 That is a FACT! So, I think we are part of Shoregold The judge in Tampa has proven the case for BMCS BMCS has a case against Global T for allowing 150m share on the market 150m share have to be bought back in the market That is a fact!
Salty two more facts! 1. Those claims changing over mean we have some sort of royalty coming 2. Shoregold is involved with Kensington &NM Citi bank payouts…if you look at preferred shares…they are good through the third week of sept. so we have a ways before there finished Probably going through Broadridge CITI bought 30m share of NM that is over a Billion dollars They did this in Feb. It is not to hard to put two and two together CITI owns the derivatives. New Mont shore gold Kensington in one preferred share Kensington selling Which goes to Entourage then us. Valuation then royalties Please look at the BMCS lawsuit involving Pacer No way out! They are nailed We have to be settled out from somewhere I think CITI is right in the middle of it.
Gman_G: Salty..... u think that we will get packages from citi through Broadridge? Salty, Yes! I believe so
ty friends for your excellent notes.
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 28, 2009 12:59:07 GMT -5
easy, 100to1... we all get irritated from time to time (including you)... and, let's face it, this has been a pretty frustrrating ride...
|
|