|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2009 19:58:37 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 07 Sep 2009, 07:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865495 of 865535
Jump to msg. # Martha went to Jail, UC had to payback a portion of what was given to him. Hummmm
We're waiting on restitution, these naysayer say aint coming....
Then why dont they leave, what about these CMKX guys make them so attentive.
I just want to know what kind of decision do we have to make, that keeps these guys around....cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2009 19:58:56 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 07 Sep 2009, 07:11 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865496 of 865535
Jump to msg. # Yeap, what decision is in our future that's of interest to these naysayers?....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2009 20:00:20 GMT -5
By: tenn21 07 Sep 2009, 06:18 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865492 of 865535 (Reply to 865452 by trixijude) Jump to msg. # trixi, "I believe we will only get shares of the new corp, on a pro rata basis. I'm convinced they proved there was a huge naked short, & were paid something," "they"---who are "they" As far as your post goes, you have said or shown NOTHING. Please reiterate, thank you. tenn21 By: trixijude 07 Sep 2009, 07:30 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865508 of 865535 (Reply to 865492 by tenn21) Jump to msg. # ten21, if there is a naked short, the team proved it with the cert pull. We're they paid for, who knows, & probably we will never know. If they were, will we get a disguised distribution? If we do get one, it will be imo a token amount like $.005. I recall Andy saying that amount way back, when everyone including me jumped all over him. We will get shares of the new 1010 corporation or whatever it's finally called, based on the amount of CMKX shares we have. I think that we're in for a huge, astounding surprise when we find out the size of the new conglomerate. Hope this helps. Trixi
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 9:48:59 GMT -5
cmkxdiamonds DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: The Buzz Chat 9/7/09 « Reply #12 Today at 5:51am » heres some buzz for ya...we got our pr on july 3rd then the judge made his final ruling and the sec posted it on september 3rd which was rxactly 60 days from the pr so maybe just maybe october 3rd which would make it a full 90 days from the first pr we will hear something...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 10:01:23 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 07 Sep 2009, 09:57 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865567 of 865807 (Reply to 865508 by trixijude)
Jump to msg. # Trixi.. I have always trusted the team.. old/new.. whatever.. we are now just along for the ride.. we have no control.. no amount of lawsuits or whatever will alter the outcome.. so we can only sit back and enjoy the ride.. and I do believe that this week coming and the following one will be mind blowing.. but that is just IMHO.. Lord knows.. we need closure..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 10:15:49 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 08 Sep 2009, 09:13 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 865649 of 865808 (Reply to 865375 by oil.ipo) The timing. Shareholders were summoned once before. In order to pull certificates as mandated by Mr. Robert Maheu.
Now this;
"Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and other Relief Against Urban Casavant." Nothing to do with the SEC, DTCC et al having culpability, and being complicit in paying all injured CMKM DIAMONDS Legal shareholders of interest? Let me reword that. One thing has nothing to do with the other legally, morally so there is no connection other than redirection of attention. The paper trail at the tale end of something.
What this could very well mean is one more summoning of the shareholders left to go, and timed for such an event to occur near term. Again, the timing was correct. I will explain further..
A "Paper trail" is documentary evidence of one's actions when you have established a story of criminal overtones, where one character, among others is painted as odious, flagrant, foul, egregious, some motive (not really in this case as UC IMO is a good guy), but escapes prosecution for some really good closure? Possibly as we shall see. This "LEGAL PLAY" of public consumption is not what consumes those who know better. Remember, "you" have been brought to a place in time this day of Tuesday, September 8th 2009. That is the main focus here. Why now I would be asking? Why the judgment closure now? There is a very strong statement (here) for many shareholders waiting for larger events of epic proportions market wide, globally timed to the monetary system of many countries realigning in order to realize what they wait on..(Now)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Although when all is finished, said and done (whew) there remains... what happened to the plane the plane! NO, I meant the CLAIMS of course the CLAIMS! Those dam*N claims! The shareholders will be needed one more time by Shore Gold Inc., and Newmont Mining Corp. if our GURUS are correct to turn around and send you notice of pending Buy Out? Again, Why the final draft of judgment now on seemingly minor amount of funds, paper trail, by comparison to heinous trade, to " CRIME " by all who really ARE complicit on the GRAND "FEDERAL LEVEL", and with such paltry penalty and interest, and focus? Tsk, Tsk., Let's keep this all low key and under the radar, and tabloidish, no BORING!. It aint no MADOFF story- now is it???, or is it really larger than that of the BERNIE MADOFF scandal in actuality if you drew an arc between those BILLIONS SERVED DAILY, and those Newly announced Valuations reporting by SHORE GOLD!?
I just get the feeling that maybe 40-50k shareholders are NEEDED all of the sudden again. There might be a need for a signature or sumptin legally.. for some big company(s) out yonder.
Regarding UC though; He is innocent of the legal issues he is (supposedly) involved in. He is however committed to those implications he is innocent of for cause. For these LEGAL SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD! I say he is a PRIZE himself! Yes, a GOOD MAN!
AIMVHO2~
|
|
|
Post by sweettime on Sept 8, 2009 11:27:04 GMT -5
New Corp.? anybody have any ideas how we can find out if and where New Corp is registered? i doubt that "new corp" was used. and that might be why they don't want to tell us the official name bc maybe its registered to Urban?
later if possible...... i'm going to give it a shot doing corp searches in texas under frizzell and kevin west's names and up in Prince Albert under casavant names
also why did they need a new entity? why not just do a straight 80-20 deal between Emmerson's 1010 and CMKM Diamonds....why the intermediary?
|
|
|
Post by sweettime on Sept 8, 2009 11:48:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 14:56:58 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300] If it was already posted..... worth a repost imo[/glow] wilkman DIAMOND MINER Re: The Buzz Chat 9/7/09 « Reply #17 Today at 12:05pm » Was this posted already? Nufced, I went over the subject matter concerning Urban Casavant in my post “The Stand“. Do I believe Urban is guilty of the items you mentioned; "illegal sale of shares, wire fraud,postal fraud, forgeries, comingling of funds, kick backs from sales of shares, or any others I have missed"? No. My post covers this. Does this sound like a SCAM?... 1. Acquire 1.9 million acres of claims 2. Pay for an extensive Airborne Survey 3. Hire a firm to film and document your activities. 4. Hire top Security Attorneys 5. Put out a Press Release (2003) with steps on stopping NSS 6. Advertise on numerous billboards, TV, Race cars 7. Have your Family members in the public limelight. 8. Operate not off the SEC RADAR, but right in the middle 9. Provide the SEC with reports explaining what has and is transpiring 10. The FBI, who protected Urban due to death threats, who were present at the hearings, who have the responsibility and authority to arrest those who have committed internet crimes like stock fraud has not taken any action against Urban... 11. Pay the expenses for a Cert Pull 12. Do all your banking on US territories where the US has jurisdiction instead of offshore banks.... There are more items. The point is there is more to this than what we are being told. For instance , over 29,000 hits in 24 hours on "The Stand" post on just one board is not indicative of a SCAM. cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/inde....ead=4033&page=1 Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 18:08:27 GMT -5
Posted by: nufced Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:51:16 PM In reply to: None Post # of 277515
Dale Casavant Federal Court Sept 2 2009..IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. v. DALE CASAVANT, CORRINE WARD, ERIC REID, MARGARET REID, CAROLYN CASAVANT, RON CASAVANT, VICTOR CASAVANT, MAX CASAVANT
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-391
ORDER AND ADVISORY Before the Court is the above styled and numbered case. The Court has received Defendants' Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 1) and therefore enters the following Order and Advisory. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require parties to replead following removal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2). However, the parties should note the different pleading standards in state and federal court. In particular, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b) mandates that a defending party admit or deny each allegation against it. Also, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9 sets forth heightened pleading requirements for certain matters. In the interest of efficient management of its docket, the Court ORDERS the parties to replead as necessary to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules. Plaintiffs amended complaint is due twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Defendants' amended answer is due fourteen (14) days from receipt of the amended complaint. The Court also directs the parties' attention to Local Rule CV-7. While the parties should be familiar with all the Federal and Local Court Rules, the Court points to this rule specifically as it renders moot all motions urged prior to removal. Accordingly, the Court will only consider motions reurged in this Court. It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 2nd day of September, 2009. MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Posted by: nufced Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:53:02 PM In reply to: None Post # of 277515
Dale Casavant District Court Smith County Texas
Events and Orders of the Court 09/04/2009 SCHEDULING ORDER 09/04/2009 MEDIATION ORDER 08/21/2009 SPECIAL APPEARANCE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 21:35:58 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 08 Sep 2009, 09:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865958 of 865970 take these posts and know there is a grand jury then read it and think about it again cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4006 By: gusjarvis 08 Sep 2009, 09:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865960 of 865970 now take this phxgold old post, and pedro's new post and see the bullchit we went through right to today, you have to think on this one by the way so baloney you are out phxgold (OLD POST) Ace of Diamonds member is offline Joined: Sept 2005 Posts: 1,231 on Today at 2:39pm » ill say it again you cannot find a single issuance to cede and co. directly from the company to raise capital. since 2002 before uc came along. see. every shares issued had a name on it. every share issuance can be traced to a certificate issued to a person not to cede. from start to finish. every share started in someones hands directly from the company in cert form. either the sec ignored thousands if not hundreds of thousands of violations of rule 144 or something else is happening. Pedro posted some info about the share releases from the a/s increase to 800b but quickly removed it as it proved the shares were issued to specific individuals in cert form in canada. and not dumped by the co on the market. but that proved something other than his point. once realized it was removed quickly. much like the actions of the dtcc on their site. Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:50:45 PM In reply to: Chas56789 who wrote msg# 277211 Post # of 277249 Read this reply from Dale Casavant -- viewer.zoho.com/docs/ltUye Then look at this -– viewer.zoho.com/docs/wlEdv And maybe you can answer the question -- Is Dale Casavant lying? Or did Urban Casavant screw over his brother and forged his name? Posted by: jimmym4 Date: [size32]Saturday, August 29, 2009[/size] 6:31:36 PM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 277212 Post # of 277249 [/b] Of did someone ELSE forge him name?? By: lilburrito0 08 Sep 2009, 09:35 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 865962 of 865970 (Reply to 865960 by gusjarvis) gusjarvis Let's see if you can figure this out. Posted by: nufced Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:41:24 PM In reply to: None Post # of 277515 GREAT Pedro document. Dale did not get the shares..friggen crook Urban viewer.zoho.com/docs/fadfCj [glow=red,2,300] again...[/glow] Posted by: jimmym4 Date: [size32]Saturday, August 29, 2009[/size] 6:31:36 PM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 277212 Post # of 277249 [/b] Of did someone ELSE forge him name??
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 21:40:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 21:42:59 GMT -5
carlos DIAMOND JEDI Re: Other Gossip,etc.9/7/09--> « Reply #19 Today at 8:54pm »
My brother is working on a shutdown at Conoco-Philips refinery in Wood River Il. He told me over the weekend that he was told they are having to update the refinery to be able to refine the oil they are extracting from the oilsands in Canada. I'm sure he said Saskatchewan. I will double check, tho, because he asked me if that was from the area where "my stock was from".
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 8, 2009 21:44:38 GMT -5
ty seagull.... By: dyemenz Re: We Can Sue DTCC-SEC but...... « Reply #6 Today at 4:58pm »
Don't think we're gonna need this anyway, just wanted to show how they stack or implement it against shareholders imo. We're the Exception to the Rule in many instances! They will be standing naked because we will have won their pants and what was in those pockets thru a different means.
By: cmkxdiamonds thats why your cert is worth more then you can imagine.....ask the dtcc why they wont let you get certs anymore....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 9, 2009 5:48:59 GMT -5
ty bikinipro
freshideas DIAMOND JEDI Re: TA ? « Reply #3 Yesterday at 8:00pm »
The transfer agent has not returned any of my family's calls over the past three weeks after they found we were calling about CMKX. I'm trying to assume that means all addresses are locked pending a disbursement.
|
|