|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 29, 2009 21:13:51 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 29 Nov 2009, 11:09 AM EST Rating: Msg. 887746 of 888063 (Reply to 887717 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # ROSEN...SO MQ is saying that CMKX took the 'high road' to not crash the system, yet the 'sub-prime' mess and naked shorting of the bank stocks did it anyway! What good was taking the 'high road' if the same players are continuing the same games with all the other stocks? Maybe CMKX should have stuck them all with a naked short cover to teach them all a leason in 'actions have consequences'. Seems all we did is to allow the game to continue. Of course, without all the details, I could be wrong, but if we had the opportunity to take a few brokers down, maybe we should have taken it. It happened anyway. Hope we got paid first. All IMO. eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 29, 2009 21:24:02 GMT -5
y: gusjarvis 28 Nov 2009, 12:58 PM EST Rating: Msg. 38225 of 38228
Jump to msg. # our group has sued the sec for aiding counterfeiting
we are not only suing for cmkx but for the market as the market was counterfeited into the trillions. We are waiting for the response from the sec and the judge in the british columbia supreme court.
I am a shareholder of gwgo, not ffgo really. I have requested records for cmkx to show who counterfeited their stock and to what degree. I will make a request on behalf of the gwgo shareholders to ask exactly how many shares of gwgo were grandfathered and who sold those shares. Every single share that was grandfathered was an illegal act by the sec and those they colluded with to keep this concealed from the public.
I will say this, the gwgo shareholders better be taken care of in all this and not just those that bought into ffgo.
- - - - -
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 30, 2009 16:56:58 GMT -5
smegadild DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Did we miss something here with CITI? « Thread Started Today at 12:08am » From the Stand... A quote from Bud Burrell.. "He entered the transaction after CITI-Group had one of their lawyers look into the company. I think they found substantial assets. " He says CITI Group.. Have we all been waiting for CITI Bank to fold when in fact it WAS CITI Group as per Bud?? Well.. CITI Group did file. The financial crisis created one of the worst periods in U.S. history for corporate bankruptcies, felling the likes of Circuit City Stores Inc., General Motors Corp. and CIT Group Inc., the giant lender to small businesses. online.wsj.com/article/SB125833287457849697.html?mod=googlenews_wsjwww.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/15/tarp-failures-keep-taxpay_n_358566.htmlOn the day that news broke about CIT's bankruptcy filing, The New York Times' Gretchen Morgenson wondered if CitiGroup, another bailed out institution, could "carry its own weight." In just 80 years, the federal government has bailed out CitiGroup four times. Citigroup has ominously been called "the queen of the zombie dance," by Chris Whalen, editor of the Institutional Risk Analyst. There are doubts that CitiGroup can survive, even after its most recent $45 billion federal bailout. Whalen in the Times: Sooooooo.. Somebody talk to me... ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORDYup I remember that one. Bud Burrell. Hey he is friends with Mark Faulk Yes it was bud burrell that got info from mark faulk when suposedly brokers wanted to buy cmkx certs.. and he gave it to mark faulk who shared that with usxp shareholders concerned group. Off course nobody shared it with cmkx concerned group. And that was when bud burrell responded to cmxk shareholders emails and said... that unlike usxp shareholders ... we did not listen.. that we were supposed to organize.. bla bla bla. Anyway i wrote about this already. I am not very hot on these market activists any more after watching them over time and how they have treated cmkx shareholders. And by the way, usxp shareholders are not going after their prior management but only after the nss situation they had. Meanwhile +in cmkx we have frizzell and kevin .. who were part of task force that pulled certs.. and these guy along wtih mark faulk- suposed market activist that took ceo position for a while, Never Ever took our Nss situation to the public .. or against sec. Bud Burrell.. yes he said that in regards maheu coming in. And after all that we had the interview with Maheu and Mark faulk. And no place does mark faulk ask any of these questions of Maheu nor he asks alot of other very pertinent questions. In the end of all ends.. all of these guys are not very truthfull at all.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 30, 2009 17:02:37 GMT -5
jfarn DIAMOND MINER Frizzell and Faulk. ? « Thread Started on Nov 26, 2009, 12:03am » CMKM friends. Below is a note sent to Bill Frizzell today. I have heard word from David Kotz earlier today that the investigation is NOT closed as I was previously told by his office and that it is in fact ongoing.? I don't have any more information to provide other than that. Sorry for the inconsistent messages but I am scratching my head as well. jf --- On Wed, 11/25/09, Bill, file attached.Investigation is still ongoing per Mr. Kotz as of today. Give Leslie and Molly my best. Happy Thanksgiving 09. JF ----- Original Message ----- December 23, 2008Dear Mr. Kotz: Thank you for taking the time to look into the many concerns involving how the CMKM Diamonds situation was handled. I have attached some documentation for your review. I am at a loss as to why CMKM Attorney Bill Frizzell and CEO Mark Faulk are not on a first name basis with you and those in your office considering the effort that these men have put forth over the last 4.5 years in dealing with not only corruption within CMKM but the gross malfeasance that they have expressly decried about the SEC. It has me perplexed to say the least that these gentlemen have not been as aggressive in contacting your office as one would think. CEO Mark Faulk has provided an extensive review of said concerns in his newly released book The Naked Truth that details the "negligence" of SEC officials in dealing with the CMKM case. I would hope you will ask Bill and Mark why they have been hesitant/reluctant to share these allegations in a formal manner with your office. The attached files/pages include:a. information from CEO Mark Faulk re: SEC negligence ---pages 357-358 b. Notice of In Limine Motion By the Div. of Enforcement To Exclude All Evidence of Naked Short Selling in Respondent's Securities -May 2, 2005 c. Bill Frizzell's letter to self-clearing firm Ameritrade re: Naked Short Selling Concern - May 25, 2005 d. Letter from Jefferies and Company to NASD - re: 112 BILLION shares that were not reported to the tape-"Ex-clearing" e. Bill Frizzell's letter to self-clearing firm Etrade re: Naked Short Selling Concern May 25, 2005 You already are in possession of Dave Patch's commentary to the Chief Editor of the New York Times business section indicating that the SEC was the "real criminal who witnessed and authorized the sale" of billions of shares of CMKM and that there is evidence in phone records to support this claim. Please feel free to contact me should you have any additional questions, Sincerely, alrich DIAMOND MINER Re: Frizzell and Faulk. ? « Reply #6 on Nov 28, 2009, 7:24pm » jfarn, you know what you can tell kotz.............. jfarn, DIAMOND MINER Re: Frizzell and Faulk. ? « Reply #7 on Nov 28, 2009, 10:52pm » No Alrich, what can I tell him? Shall I tell him to call off the dogs due to the SEC's fine handling of our plight over the last five years? Shall I tell him to not ask why a former SEC Enforcement Division attorney and lead CMKM attorney was not included in the SEC complaint? ..This is the gent who wrote opinion letters authorizing billions upon billions of shares to become free trading. Shall I tell him to not investigate why only one small non self-clearing broker was included in their complaint? Shall I tell him to disregard the Jeffries letter and the billions that were cleared off the tape? Help me out Alrich.~ Provide some insight for me to share with Mr. Kotz. He is very nice guy that has demonstrated a serious concern about what went on. The 2003 letter out of the SEC's Utah office to the transfer agent re: the trading records is only one indicator how that agency fell asleep at the wheel and/or led via "orchestration". The oddities and disturbing timeline(s) will need to be explained somehow. Let's see how the picture is painted.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 30, 2009 17:12:35 GMT -5
ty rosen.. By: eshill 16 Mar 2007, 10:33 AM EDT Rating: post rating 0 Rate this post: Msg. 17609 of 39581 (Reply to 17591 by morg38off) Jump to msg. # I bought because 15 years ago I heard faint whispers about FALC... tales in the wind which told of great riches to be found in the area. I watched closely over the years as 'The Explorers' began to take tentative but firm steps into the area...risky at best...moose pasture. Buzz...buzz...buzz...on the Canadian boards.. )) I love a good exploration/mining play, most especially when you can get in.....CHEAP.....I found this jewel..... You see...this company is perfectly situated to manifest great riches for it's 'Shareholders of Record' and I have no doubt about that outcome in spite of what may 'appear' to be obstacles. An explorer (UC) does not spend 20 years accumulating land rights, the bulk of which is in one area, to throw it all away...an explorer (UC) knows and feels the land intimately...this explorer (UC) staked FALC ahead of the crowd. All ya need is ONE STRIKE out of the millions of acres staked...IF... anything is out there...the odds ARE in your favor...EVEN...if it takes 10 years to find that...ONE STRIKE. With every Shore Gold pr MY odds get better and better... A funny thing happened on the way to 'The Forum' everyone had a different experience. Have A Great Day, Everyone... By: mquietstorm3 16 Mar 2007, 10:39 AM EDT Rating: post rating 0 Rate this post: Msg. 17613 of 39581 (Reply to 17609 by eshill) Jump to msg. # eshill, That quote could make the cmkx hall of fame some day! Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 30, 2009 17:44:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 30, 2009 22:54:48 GMT -5
Ok... so whose room is the sour grapes room?? MateFeedKillRepeat DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: The Buzz Chat 11/30/09 « Reply #7 Today at 10:14pm » New mp3 from the sour grapes room. Fast forward to about the 1 hour mark for the juicy parts. www.sendspace.com/file/krpfln
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Dec 1, 2009 22:57:15 GMT -5
Another day... another week... another month... and, well, another year looms on the horizon... 50,000 shareholders waiting for closure, justice, or compensation in this festering wound called CMKX.
Thank you, SEC, for the great work you have done. I especially love this part of your mission statement: The mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation.
Folks, the system isn't just damaged. It's truly broken.
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Dec 2, 2009 7:39:08 GMT -5
The SEC is not perfect by any means but the company is the one that issued the 800 billion unregistered shares, either UC knew or he didn't doesn't matter the company is still to blame.
I am as mad as anyone but it what it is and that is not going to change, believe what you know is factual not what you hear in a chat room.
What I always come back to is "What happened first...the shares or the SEC" the shares always is the answer...
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Dec 2, 2009 9:18:40 GMT -5
Richy update from 12-2-09.
The Toronto contact wanted to get in touch with the Timmins contact on Thursday because their was suppose to be an anouncement made Friday. It didn’t happen. On Sunday nite he said everything is still good for us and waiting for that news to come out in the near future. He is not going to give any dates.
There is a rumor that he is also hearing of a possible buy out. It does not have anything to do with nss -- it’s separate. He is still very positive for cmkm getting paid. The contact is still trying to get confirmation on many issues and can’t see things going past Dec 30 in his opinion.
That’s it. Hopefully he will be in touch in the next few days. This info comes from his sources in Europe. They are still holding back on some information until it is confirmed.
No questions please.
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Dec 2, 2009 11:54:35 GMT -5
Richy update from 12-2-09. No questions please. Don't worry. There's not much to ask a turd. It is what it is.
|
|
|
Post by tchrguy on Dec 2, 2009 13:19:55 GMT -5
Richy update from 12-2-09. No questions please. Don't worry. There's not much to ask a turd. It is what it is. It always amazes me there are still posters here who resort to name calling. Most of us have outgrown this need. Others obviously have not.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 2, 2009 15:52:29 GMT -5
By: aladin99 01 Dec 2009, 10:40 PM EST Rating: Msg. 888909 of 889122 I called Moran and Moran said... CIM will be big and CIM is now same as NewCorp...what have you done?
Stockrich - Yes, Moran said CIM will be big....
By: stockrich0 01 Dec 2009, 10:53 PM EST Rating: Msg. 888916 of 889123 Is CIM, NewCorp or...
...is that an assumption?
By: CHICPICK 01 Dec 2009, 11:02 PM EST Rating: Msg. 888919 of 889123 (Reply to 888916 by stockrich0) CIM is as defunct as CMKX and as defunct as Entourage will be shortly. NewCorp means a brand new company with NO ties to the past other than some of the shareholders might be the same,,,,,,,,
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Dec 2, 2009 17:28:20 GMT -5
CMKX is dead and CIM as the worthless divy is as dead as well...Newcorp what the hell is that? How do you create a new company from a failed company that never had what they said in the first place? Nice thougts but the reality is our fate was sealed years ago and not in a positive way.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Dec 2, 2009 18:30:42 GMT -5
Varnson, you're ignored by all the members of this board, so why bother posting? Keep the thoughts to yourself, pleaseeee!
|
|