|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jan 12, 2010 15:04:04 GMT -5
If the SEC (or leaders of it) were responsible for allowing the NS of CMKX then possibly THEY (the Gov) had to PAY off the BANKS for allowing them to issue the NSS...that COULD be why the TARP had to be used to prop them up after THEY had to PAY...and they used a well known HARVESTING technique to get their money back using TARP funds...a WIN WIN WIN situation for US...the BANKS...and the CROOKS...just a thought no one has the TRUTH yet IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Jan 12, 2010 16:58:01 GMT -5
I think you may just be on the right trail 100to1...weird we agree LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on Jan 12, 2010 17:24:52 GMT -5
This is THE zone of confluence where all is possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 12, 2010 21:46:30 GMT -5
By: nufced
12 Jan 2010, 06:29 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 900157 of 900217
this is interesting, remember the 21 days in the lawsuit? was it filled out incorrectly?
TO: DEFENDANT(S): <J
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it), you
must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached Cf complaint • amended complaint
• counterclaim • cross-claim or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer
or motion must be served on the plaintiffs attorney, A. Clifton Hodqes , whose address is
• . If you fail to do so,
judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file
your answer or motion with the court.
Clerk
because the fine print says..........[Use 60 days if the defendant is the United States or a United States agency, or is an officer or employee of the United States, Allowed
60 days by Rule 12(a)(3)],
|
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Jan 13, 2010 8:01:17 GMT -5
zanmia Administrator Posts: 6,722 Lawsuit is Now Online -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Schmedrick posted this on the Millionaires' Board... Lawsuit is Now Online The lawsuit has been entered into the system, and the ball is officially rolling. There is a 21 day response time. Scroll to the bottom to read the initial comments. We're on our way folks *** viewer.zoho.com/docs/aJdcqc *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=28796 |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 16, 2010 22:48:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 21, 2010 11:31:01 GMT -5
By: oreodiamonds
20 Jan 2010, 03:15 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 903128 of 903365
(Reply to 903108 by pontiyak)
Pontiyak - looks like Hodges will use this lawsuit (evidence of WellsFargo) in the CMKX complaint - sorta piggybacking on BMCS.
Gotta love it!
The evidence is coming to the surface!
By: rosencrantz2010
20 Jan 2010, 03:19 PM EST
Rating: Msg. 903131 of 903365
READ THIS ONE paragraph in the announcement,,,
BioTech claims Wells Fargo provided John M. Edwards of Nevada, (who is also under criminal indictment and been incarcerated in England awaiting extradition), and Helen G. Bagley of 1st Global Stock Transfer with the authority and ability to accomplish their illegal acts by guaranteeing Edwards' authority to sign stock powers and other similar documents even though Edwards had neither the legal capacity nor authority to do so
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2010 19:29:00 GMT -5
Posted by: denver54
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:39:28 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 291199 just out by email worldreports.org/news/265
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 28, 2010 17:42:49 GMT -5
ocd
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Hodges and Associates Update
« Reply #164 Today at 2:30pm »
When the DTCC or the SEC cites this case as "national security issues", then full discovery won't be allowed. That's their ace in the hole. That one phrase alone will cause delays until we are all blue in the face.
Now watch the pumps continue about "soon" by our favorite posters. They'll be running the air conditioners this summer and we'll be reading "soon" once again.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 2, 2010 15:07:47 GMT -5
Posted by: Pedro2004
Date: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:39:12 PM
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 295764 Post # of 295900 Al Hodges Lawsuit ** New Filing 03/01/2010 viewer.zoho.com/docs/wM0cO
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2010 17:03:17 GMT -5
IceCrush
Mod Squad
Re: Okay , here is a "what if" scenerio
« Reply #12 Yesterday at 10:29am »
I can understand the what if's of life, it's natural, considering the time frame that we've been involved with cmkm.
Al said there is money for us and he has the goods to nail them to the wall. I believe him. Why would he file something that he knows has nothing to back it? He wouldn't! He has the goods.
Should your scenario about court come to fruition, which I can't see happening, prior to a judge making a decision, there must be a dicovery process....where I personally would love to see all the names of those involved, the companies, government departments, etc and what I want to see and want the world to see is exactly what they can't afford to let the world/markets/brokerages/bankers/government agencies...to see. So........they can pay us now or go to jail, ruin the markets, take down the foundation of trust, hurt the government, etc.
I'd say the odds are in our favour.......plus Al has said the money is there for us. It's just a matter of time.......and the Biven's (thank God) is ticking away on our behalf.
Waiting sucks but we're in exciting times
|
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Mar 28, 2010 19:34:44 GMT -5
f*cking A.....lets go for the jugular.....  |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 23, 2010 12:49:23 GMT -5
There has been some chatter on the different boards, discussing if the defendants have/had been served or served correctly...... Much different to what some were claiming... It Seems it has been verified ......
Thanks nufced
23 Apr 2010, 12:30 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 927960 of 927993
klono....
I contacted a government individual this morning, and asked if the defendants had been served.
LOL..not a very friendly guy either.
When I tried to ask a follow up question, his reply was
Mam, they have been served...click
you know goodolboy...unlike "others" who run paltalk rooms, I have to learn to verify through REAL sources. DOJ, SEC, OIG, etc. And while I thought that Hodges had not served the defendants, at least I try and post the truth.
I don't sit on my laurels and wait for joe blow to FEED me garbage that I then spew to my minions.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 23, 2010 14:07:24 GMT -5
There has been some chatter on the different boards, discussing if the defendants have/had been served or served correctly...... Much different to what some were claiming... It Seems it has been verified ...... Thanks nufced
23 Apr 2010, 12:30 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 927960 of 927993 klono.... I contacted a government individual this morning, and asked if the defendants had been served. LOL..not a very friendly guy either. When I tried to ask a follow up question, his reply was Mam, they have been served...click you know goodolboy...unlike "others" who run paltalk rooms, I have to learn to verify through REAL sources. DOJ, SEC, OIG, etc. And while I thought that Hodges had not served the defendants, at least I try and post the truth. I don't sit on my laurels and wait for joe blow to FEED me garbage that I then spew to my minions.
Here's another answer Nufced rec'd...... talk about incompetence !! By: nufced
23 Apr 2010, 02:44 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 928032 of 928033 Update on Service...differing stories.Just received a call from Richard Humes, in D.C., he stated some of the defendents have been served, some have not. so ALL the defendents have not been served. He was rushed, so I couldn't get any more question to him Whereas Keith Staub just said Mam, they have been served. Followup if you want to. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXas for my update, I have asked a few more people to call, and try and get the left coast straightened out with the right coast. one is in California and the other fellow is in D.C. |
|
