Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2010 9:07:32 GMT -5
Did you stop and think for one second how stupid it is to think AL and the plantiffs filed this suit so they could create some rumors to dump thier own shares?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:17:54 GMT -5
By: normiecraig 11 Jul 2010, 12:07 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 946205 of 946407 Jump to msg. # Someone let me know when they plan to hire a PI to check out these blowhards. I would gladly donate By: tuscan9 11 Jul 2010, 08:50 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 946298 of 946407 (Reply to 946205 by normiecraig) Jump to msg. # about hiring a PI, normie,.. we already have one !
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:21:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:26:10 GMT -5
By: notagolfer0 12 Jul 2010, 02:17 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946378 of 946407 Jump to msg. # LOL, goodnite all! sweet dreams! funny how you can take it out on the world but still speak your heart! God Bless you ALL CMKX shareholders, I pray for you all...all the time. We're in this boat together and we WILL prevail, don't forget it. We did it, they have no choice and that's the secret, they don't want to pay, they HAVE to PAY! That's it. Hang in there, we already WON, just use your foot to get the payout to commence.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:29:45 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 12 Jul 2010, 06:10 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946382 of 946407 (Reply to 946191 by oil.ipo) Old Team used the (threat), dynamics and leverage of 'the dividend' payment in order to collect NS damages. On many occasions this occurred targeting those financially liable. Shareholders were the vehicle. They waited for dividends many days throughout the years, via 'the word'. ACCA exposed the 'relief payment' way back initially as one more catalyst, apparently because shareholders never received that payment as promised. Did they? With all of these revenue streams, how can it be that shareholders NOT have at least one reliable source (today) of available, immediate access for a funds release not continually impeded by Government, or not requiring the authorization of any Government entity, as in separate funds. Remembering this entire plot has been seeded in utilizing the shareholders as leverage, bait if you will, always with promise of imminent dividend payment , 'relief payment', and always having the appropriate access to such payments if all other terms failed to be met by parties sought after. Where'd that access go? All the while knowing the difficulties CMKX families were having OLD TEAM! So with that said there is no way there can be so many hindrances to the release of funds in part (in theory) now that the collection has been consummated in total. Even Jay Adobe alluded to multiple payments as far back as May of 2006, and so this All In One, one for one, or none at all BLOCK PAYMENT is a BLOCK BUSTER EXCUSE in the never ending systematic way of delaying the CMKX tribe for some other entity, and their dime. Back to the 'rumor room' rumors, no date court dates, ACCA transcribe, and End of month promises! I don't think so, but I hope so like you all do. Nothing in writing YET guys, nada! ALL HYPE! BS! Would you say that the OLD TEAM respects the CMKX Shareholders?(The ones still alive) Or should 'we' all just dance right around that cheet also..on Monday, July 12, 2010? at 6:01 AM EST? BTW- My family was targeted by someone who I believe was associated with this scam of a lifetime, (in or around it I believe). I am watching carefully. I protect my family. GLTUA! AIMHO, Oil- 'RELIEF PAYMENT' ________________ By: jay_adobe 05 May 2006, 05:02 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post:
"I see a lot of discussion about the trusts. All this discussion is very good cognitive calisthenics. One of the major purposes of presenting the information, allowing it to be recorded and reproduced, and ultimately distributed, is so that each person can have the necessary information so that when the time comes and the resources are available, you can make the right decision for your own personal wealth and asset protection. This is a good discussion and exercise.
Ponder this. Suppose that you will get paid in multiple installments. Suppose that you will be given a proportionate amount of money to enable you to exercise all of your allotted CIM rights. Suppose that you may even have money left over should you choose to purchase all your CIM rights. Suppose you have, let's say, ten days to two weeks to make the decision to either exercise the right by buying shares or selling rights. Suppose during that short time, while money is in your possession, you choose to set up a dynasty trust first, and then purchase the rights at a discounted rate, prior to IPO. If you were, in this example, to sell your CIM shares into the trust prior to the IPO, would it not be protected once it IPOs?
Just something to ponder. The decision is an individual one, but you are being fed the information and the path to follow should you choose it. Watch the tidbits, discuss them, and then back up and look at the whole forest.
I hope you all, even the naysayers like burnie, have a great and wonderful and prosperous weekend.Enjoy your weekend. Time to get off the computer and relax. Sip some iced tea. "
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=231933 - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:32:45 GMT -5
By: e362 12 Jul 2010, 07:52 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946390 of 946410 Today is the deadline to respond to the MTD. This could be a very telling day in this battle.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 9:36:26 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 12 Jul 2010, 08:54 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946395 of 946410 (Reply to 946382 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # If you are connected to this referenced by so very many "STING" operation by definition, and you have lied (through association or directives) deliberately for some monetary gain (yourself), or for some other reasons, I could care less at this point in time which of the two;
- Then you are complicit/culpable beyond (coin toss), for not following through and communicating truths, conveying in clear and concise language about what transpired from MR. MAHEU'S call for mandatory certificate pull, and most importantly paying forward on aged old collected damages. (Let me take in some air now... gaspppp) Betterrrr...
- Shareholders were used as the sole vehicle, and conduit to valuation, but in doing so they leveraged their, in some cases only assets. (Not me this was one of literally thousands of trades, but now paramount in importance. GO CMKX..) Those assets were announced to be frozen in CMKX time warp until further notification.
Waz up good people?
AIMHO,
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Jul 12, 2010 10:37:22 GMT -5
AH has already responed to the dismissal with a portion of his evidense and now the judge decides if the evidense is strong enough to warrant a trial or if the evidense is weak he dismisses and its over as far as Fed court goes.
However we don't find out until Aug 2, 2010 so we have a bit of a wait.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 12, 2010 11:09:26 GMT -5
TY Bikinipro..... He's referring to the WR update, I didn't post it here to avoid criticism. I brought TRJB's post over because of the last sentence. TheRealJBond Diamond FinderSomeone has been smoking the wacky weed here... Really????You all are not that dumb in here to actually believe this stuff.... Yes there has been some DRASTIC MEASURES taken but nothing like what is written here. Men with guns...LOL..It is more like men with VIDEO TAPES and copies of papers. The shake up started years ago and should be about to end (I HOPE) As far as CRACKA ACCA...well Ill just leave it at that. Yes I have been quite and now I come in here and I post this which Tramp may bounce me for (hopefully not) but I have been logged on just reading what has been posted and the LEGAL MATTERS are forcing the REACTIONS and causing ACTIONS~ Don't take your eyes off the real prize and fall victim to any false promises from the crackpots. YES we will reap the reward and maybe not as large as we would all like to see but remember what your initial investment was at the time. We should be looking at the $1______ but that may be a maximum and who know how long they will drag out the payment. These are just my speculations and are not based off anything anyone told me on the inside, outside or even from MARS.... I have been here since 2003 and have seen too many people being scammed and those scammers are paying now...that is fact jack. Stay tuned for news to be released potentially Tuesday or Wednesday (and you know Ill be a day or two off as it always happens that way) but we should be hearing something regarding a grand jury decision, arbitration or other court ruling concerning CMKM or NEW CORP. This will not be news out of the US but potentially out of Canada. (This is something I have been told)I think I commented on this before but...... Has anyone else noticed that it seems... when news is anticipated or comes from Hodges , it very frequently evokes news from Tyler? Or is it just me? SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Jul 12, 2010 12:26:18 GMT -5
Got a link? AH has already responed to the dismissal with a portion of his evidense and now the judge decides if the evidense is strong enough to warrant a trial or if the evidense is weak he dismisses and its over as far as Fed court goes. However we don't find out until Aug 2, 2010 so we have a bit of a wait.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 12, 2010 12:32:21 GMT -5
lizzo Diamond Finder Re: gossip 7/12/10 « Reply #21 Today at 9:53am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:16am, lizzo wrote: So what your saying it that you seen it on a paper copy or computer screen, but nobody ever e-mailed it to you..... Oh ok, I get it now, crystal clear... Thanks Mona you've been very helpful... p.s. you seem to have a very quick trigger on that temper of yours, anytime someone questions you on your facts....smile life's to short, have a good day. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=13246&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 12, 2010 12:36:36 GMT -5
monalisasmiles Diamond Finder Re: gossip 7/12/10 « Reply #13 Today at 8:29am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 7:56am, seagull wrote: I have to agree with LT KK...why post fear mongering from a totally unknown poster? People don't need senseless acts of cruelty and lies being posted as a valid thought to consider. But to post something from a nobody never been a poster before is..senseless imo. The only reason I am inserting my 2 cents here is that people have been through enough ..they don't near fear and lies. « Last Edit: Today at 8:32am by monalisasmiles » tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=13246&page=1
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 12, 2010 12:42:46 GMT -5
By: radioguts 12 Jul 2010, 10:27 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946409 of 946453 (Reply to 946407 by normiecraig)
Jump to msg. # By: normiecraig 12 Jul 2010, 10:07 AM EDT Msg. 946407 of 946407 (Msg. is a reply to 946403 by radioguts.) radio why am I sick. You see this is where the problem lies - too many shareholders keep sucking up to someone who seems to know something. Is Bob a good guy, no doubt but unfortunately I think he was played by Al and others because of his upstanding reputation but since what he has conveyed has produced zilch, his reputation or shall I say the reliability of what he has said is equal to that of Mona, Shiela, Treffrey, Acca, Gus, Al, Dennis and all the others who keep saying soon.
Remember Al is an attorney and he well knows that if someone's "word" never comes true, than regardless of how sincere, you are no longer considered a "credible" or "reliable" source - think about. ========================================================= Normie, Look what you just said: "Al is an attorney...." Are you an attorney ? I'm not an attorney. HOW do you know what an Attorney thinks, does, acts in a given situation let alone THIS very unique situation ?
Has it ever occured to you that for every 1 thing YOU know AH knows, there may be TEN things Al knows that you Don't KNow that he knows ?
I really despise Donald Rumsfeld, but he did say somethign that was good, funny and had some truth to it, AND applicable in many areas too: (paraphrasing): "There are things that we know, adn things that we dont know, and things that we dont know that we dont know, adn things that we do know that we dont know, but what the main problems we are having is those things that we dont know, which we dont know that we dont know'..... along those lines..
How much do you know ?
How can you possibly think you can outguess Al Hodges?
By: radioguts 12 Jul 2010, 11:00 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946416 of 946454 (Reply to 946412 by normiecraig)
Jump to msg. # normie, you pretend you know everythign that Al Hodges knows.
I make no pretense of the sort for myself.
We are all impatient, the outcome is YEARS past due.
But without TOTAL ILLUMINATION ON EVERYTHING,
How can you (with a straight face) "second-guess" the one guy we know of who has seen everything relevent ??
I want my money just as much and fast as you do, but attacking those whose motives you cannot understand, because you dont know what they know is ludicrous.
The ONLY thing that makes sense to do in our situation is to support that "loose cannon" GUS JARVIS, as what he is actually DOING about it, is a lot more than whining and name-calling.
/radioguts
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 12, 2010 12:43:18 GMT -5
By: aladin99 12 Jul 2010, 10:32 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 946411 of 946453
Jump to msg. # If there wasn't trillions in NSS....Tyler would not give a sh......it...for sure!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 12, 2010 12:48:54 GMT -5
By: leowanta 12 Jul 2010, 01:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 946449 of 946455
Jump to msg. # Varnson says Hodges has responded to the MTD...not true!
Pacer doesn't show any response...Hodges e-filed it...or faxed it ...then the Clerk gets it before the Judge gets it...the Clerk file marks it; enters it into the docket before sending the pleading to Judge Selna........i do not know why Varnson misleads folks, i do believe he has a vested interest in cmkxers not getting paid.
here is what he stated on pb29>>>>>>>>>>>>
varnson God of Diamonds member is offline Joined: May 2005 Gender: Male Posts: 539 Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #70 Today at 10:37am » ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AH has already responed to the dismissal with a portion of his evidense and now the judge decides if the evidense is strong enough to warrant a trial or if the evidense is weak he dismisses and its over as far as Fed court goes.
However we don't find out until Aug 2, 2010 so we have a bit of a wait.
******************************************** THE JUDGE HAS TO DISMISS THIS CASE; IT'S FILED IN THE WRONG COURT. YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK. HODGES IS OUT OF THIS GAME ... WHEN THE JUDGE IS TOLD TO DISMISS THIS CASE BY THE SEC; IT WILL BE DONE. SEC GENERAL COUNSEL IS VERY AWARE THIS CASE IS BOGUS/FRIVILOUS/FILED IN THE WRONG COURT...IT'S NOT GOING ANYWHERE!
ONLY THOSE WHO CMKXERS WHO REQUESTED THEIR CERTIFICATES BY THE DEADLINE; MAY 31, 2006 ARE TO BE PAID...
---- MINUS THE FREE SHARES; ---- MINUS THE DAY TRADERS WHO SOLD/PROFITED (NOT BONA FIDE LEGIT) ---- MINUS URBAN'S COMPANIES (NEVADA MINERALS, UCAD, ETC) ---- NO DELIDOG SHARES WILL PAID-SHARES ARE NOT CERTIFIED-DIDN'T GO THROUGH THE SYSTEM...JOHN EDWARDS PROVIDED DELIDOG THE SHARES TO SELL. ---- THE SEC IS WELL AWARE DELIDOG IS SELLING/SOLD SHARES BILLIONS TO AL HODGES...HODGES HAS ZERO CREDIBILITY TO GET YOU PAID; HE IS NO BETTER, MORALLY, THAN DELIDOG...AIDING AND ABETTING SECURITIES FRAUD...HE COULD END UP IN JAIL NEXT TO DELIDOG-CONTEMPT OF COURT FILING A FRIVOLOUS SUIT IN THE WRONG COURT TO GET HIS BILLIONS OF DELIDOG SHARES IS NOT TOO BRIGHT! I HEAR JUDGE SELNA IS TOUGH AS NAILS...IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IN THE LEAST IF HE FOUND HODGES IN CONTEMPT.
-----DON'T LISTEN TO FOLKS WHO SAY THEY KNOW DAY/DATE OF PAYOUT...(MONA) BECAUSE NOBODY IN CMKXLAND KNOWS
********************************************
HERE IS THE COURT DOCKET SHEET AS OF 12:26 CST...REMEMBER LOS ANGELES TIME NOW IS: 07/12/2010 10:26:58a.m....the courts open at 8:00 a.m. ....Al Hodges has not submitted anything as of right now.
Date Filed # Docket Text 01/08/2010 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Christopher Cox, Mary L Schapiro, Cynthia A Glassman, Paul S Atkins, Roel C Campos, Annette L Nazareth, Troy A Paredes, Luis A Aguilar, Elisse B Walter, Kathleen L Casey, Does.(Filing fee $ 350 paid) jury demand., filed by plaintiffs Allan Treffry, Reece Hamilton, David Anderson, Nelson L Reynolds, Sheila Morris, Patrick Cluney, Robert Hollenegg.(twdb) (twdb). (Entered: 01/12/2010) 01/08/2010 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs Allan Treffry, Reece Hamilton, David Anderson, Nelson L Reynolds, Sheila Morris, Patrick Cluney, Robert Hollenegg, (twdb) (twdb). (Entered: 01/12/2010) 01/08/2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), 1 as to defendants Christopher Cox, Mary L Schapiro, Cynthia A Glassman, Paul S Atkins, Roel C Campos, Annette L Nazareth, Troy A Paredes, Luis A Aguilar, Elisse B Walter, Kathleen L Casey, Does. (twdb) (Entered: 01/12/2010) 01/15/2010 3 Initial ORDER Following the Filing of Complaint by Judge James V. Selna. (ade) (Entered: 01/15/2010) 02/19/2010 4 Letter regarding 21 days summons issued improperly. Pursuant to Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States or an officer or agency thereof shall have sixty(60) days after service of the complaint to answer or respond. (nca) (Entered: 02/19/2010) 03/01/2010 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Anderson, Patrick Cluney, Nelson L Reynolds, Reece Hamilton, Robert Hollenegg, Allan Treffry, Sheila Morris, upon Per FRCP Rule 4(i)(1)(B) Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Frank B. Kawano, Mail Clerk, c/o Civil Process Clerk. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: # 1 signed return receipt)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 03/01/2010) 03/25/2010 6 ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 4/26/2010 10:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (kt) (Entered: 03/25/2010) 03/30/2010 7 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from April 26, 2010 to July 26, 2010 Re: Scheduling Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings 6 filed by Federal Defendants Christopher Cox. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Staub, Keith) (Entered: 03/30/2010) 03/30/2010 ORDER to Continue Scheduling Conference by Judge James V. Selna. The scheduling conference set for April 26, 2010 is hereby continued to July 26, 2010 at 11:00 a.m.(db) (Entered: 03/31/2010) 05/28/2010 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Luis A Aguilar, Paul S Atkins, Roel C Campos, Kathleen L Casey, Christopher Cox, Cynthia A Glassman, Annette L Nazareth, Troy A Paredes, Mary L Schapiro, Elisse B Walter. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Staub, Keith) (Entered: 05/28/2010) 06/16/2010 9 STIPULATION to Continue Briefing Schedule and Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss from June 28, 2010 to July 12, 2010 Re: MOTION to Dismiss Case 8 filed by Defendants Luis A Aguilar, Paul S Atkins, Roel C Campos, Kathleen L Casey, Christopher Cox, Cynthia A Glassman, Annette L Nazareth, Troy A Paredes, Mary L Schapiro, Elisse B Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Staub, Keith) (Entered: 06/16/2010) 06/17/2010 10 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna to Continue Deadlines and Hearing on Motion to Dismiss 8 . The Court orders as follows. 1. The hearing date of July 19, 2010 is vacated. 2. Plaintiffs opposition to the Motion to Dismiss will be due no later than July 12, 2010. Defendants reply brief will be due no later than July 19, 2010. 3. The hearing on defendants Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued to August 2, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. (db) (Entered: 06/18/2010) 06/30/2010 11 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures Deadline from July 26, 2010 to October 25, 2010 filed by Plaintiff David Anderson, Patrick Cluney, Reece Hamilton, Robert Hollenegg, Sheila Morris, Nelson L Reynolds, Allan Treffry. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 06/30/2010) 07/01/2010 12 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna Continuing Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures Deadline. The Rule 26 Scheduling Conference date of July 26, 2010 is vacated. The deadline for Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures exchange is extended to October 4, 2010. The Rule 26 Scheduling Conference is hereby set for hearing on October 25, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. (db) (Entered: 07/02/2010)
|
|