|
|
Post by lurknomore on Oct 15, 2010 7:27:27 GMT -5
Question the last Memo is dated Sept. 22nd ..... Right. I didn't have my coffee yet.. ;D 1 More question... Please.... When did Al go to Va....? If it was after Sept 22nd, maybe these memos are obsolete and we have the check in hand..? JMHO  Re: Rumors & Anecdotal info ....Believe em' or NOT « Result #54 on Sept 22, 2010, 10:00pm » thanks endless mccurdydon1: ming said al flew to richmond to meet with bonney todaymccurdydon1: Allan said last night he was going to a meeting today (The search feature is working just fine. And I just finished my coffee.) |
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Oct 15, 2010 7:30:40 GMT -5
Funny.... I've never seen you post anything without words.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D   Who loves you baby...?  I would think that if Hodges was put there to make sure Bonney doesn't run away with our money, that's what Al will do.. IMO Al was placed there to make sure we get our due... Give us some News Al.. Make my weekend...  |
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Oct 15, 2010 7:31:51 GMT -5
A little refresher.. this email was directed to me by Bonney and sent to Granny....she in turn sent it to me...a while back
J WB
From: ######@aol.com
Subject: Hi this is Carlain let me know you got this, thanks
Date: July 5, 2010 7:45:59 PM EDT
To: #########
> Mr. #####
>>
I have never been the paymaster for CMKX. Your threatening FAX is
> very inappropriate and I take threats very seriously. I advice you
> not to propegate any reference to my name being involved with
> CMKX. I am not and have never been involved with CMKX. I was
> asked resently to potentially help resolve the CMKX issue but
> considering the intellect of the individuals like you, I will not
> help. Consider this a Cease and Desist order from any further
> contact with me or propegation of my name or personal information.
> I have your contact information and will take additional means if
> necessary to make sure you understand this point. Stop immediately!!!
>>
Mr. Bonney
|
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Oct 15, 2010 7:32:12 GMT -5
I have always wondered about this..Let's just say we get some type of payment..This payment has to be funneled through the co., I would assume, to facilitate its distribution to all the shareholders.. Al Hodges is not, unless unknown to me, an officer of the co. He basically has a third party action going here. He is attempting for his clients to get the money released, and brought us along for leverage, but can't act on our behalf.. This is where the idiocy of Tyler pisses me off. Any right thinking co., who wants to protect and do right by the shareholders would be on this situation like white on rice.. They would want and need to know where, when and how these funds are so they can be distributed properly and not let a third party seek control over them.. So who is going to control the release, if it happens.. the SEC directly to the transfer agent...or will the funds be put under the control of Tyler. That is something that I personally don't want.. If you didn't believe they were there, but were willing to let someone else chase them for you.. keep your hands out of the till. If Tyler has had investors to keep them afloat, they may have promised those investors a percentage of any monies recovered, including our trusts, if they exist.. I would want to make sure that a definite share price is guaranteed to the shareholders before Tyler gets their grubby little hand on any trust. Hopefully the SEC would step in and mandate that... The SEC should directly distribute the money to the shareholders via the Transfer Agent. That has to be the only viable reason for the transfer agent and perhaps the SEC is footing the $6000.00 plus a month bill , I believe it was, when I researched... Frizzell wouldn't answer that question for me... Just some thoughts... Jerry WB Jerry, if you recall Kevin West did go to Mr. Hodges office to discuss this very issue, and Mr. Hodges refused to provide him with any evidence that the alleged trust exists. So, it would be my opinion that as a shareholder and an Attorney it would have been Mr. Hodges fiduciary responsibility to have provided the company with any and all information that would ultimately benefit the entire shareholder base and not just his 7 plaintiffs. Yet, that was not the road traveled was it? Now, ask yourself what reason would Mr. Hodges have for neglecting his fiduciary duty even though he has a very solid relationship with Tyler? |
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Oct 15, 2010 7:32:18 GMT -5
Question the last Memo is dated Sept. 22nd ..... Right. I didn't have my coffee yet.. ;D 1 More question... Please.... When did Al go to Va....? If it was after Sept 22nd, maybe these memos are obsolete and we have the check in hand..? JMHO Re: Rumors & Anecdotal info ....Believe em' or NOT « Result #54 on Sept 22, 2010, 10:00pm » thanks endless mccurdydon1: ming said al flew to richmond to meet with bonney todaymccurdydon1: Allan said last night he was going to a meeting today (The search feature is working just fine. And I just finished my coffee.) Thanks.. I never used the search on the boards before... I'm half way done with my coffe and feel pretty good..  |
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Oct 15, 2010 7:34:14 GMT -5
Re: Rumors & Anecdotal info ....Believe em' or NOT « Result #54 on Sept 22, 2010, 10:00pm » thanks endless mccurdydon1: ming said al flew to richmond to meet with bonney todaymccurdydon1: Allan said last night he was going to a meeting today (The search feature is working just fine. And I just finished my coffee.) Thanks.. I never used the search on the boards before... I'm half way done with my coffe and feel pretty good.. It's not the coffee, it's the Baileys that makes you feel good. |
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Oct 15, 2010 7:35:23 GMT -5
I have always wondered about this..Let's just say we get some type of payment..This payment has to be funneled through the co., I would assume, to facilitate its distribution to all the shareholders.. Al Hodges is not, unless unknown to me, an officer of the co. He basically has a third party action going here. He is attempting for his clients to get the money released, and brought us along for leverage, but can't act on our behalf.. This is where the idiocy of Tyler pisses me off. Any right thinking co., who wants to protect and do right by the shareholders would be on this situation like white on rice.. They would want and need to know where, when and how these funds are so they can be distributed properly and not let a third party seek control over them.. So who is going to control the release, if it happens.. the SEC directly to the transfer agent...or will the funds be put under the control of Tyler. That is something that I personally don't want.. If you didn't believe they were there, but were willing to let someone else chase them for you.. keep your hands out of the till. If Tyler has had investors to keep them afloat, they may have promised those investors a percentage of any monies recovered, including our trusts, if they exist.. I would want to make sure that a definite share price is guaranteed to the shareholders before Tyler gets their grubby little hand on any trust. Hopefully the SEC would step in and mandate that... The SEC should directly distribute the money to the shareholders via the Transfer Agent. That has to be the only viable reason for the transfer agent and perhaps the SEC is footing the $6000.00 plus a month bill , I believe it was, when I researched... Frizzell wouldn't answer that question for me... Just some thoughts... Jerry WB Jerry, if you recall Kevin West did go to Mr. Hodges office to discuss this very issue, and Mr. Hodges refused to provide him with any evidence that the alleged trust exists. So, it would be my opinion that as a shareholder and an Attorney it would have been Mr. Hodges fiduciary responsibility to have provided the company with any and all information that would ultimately benefit the entire shareholder base and not just his 7 plaintiffs. Yet, that was not the road traveled was it? Now, ask yourself what reason would Mr. Hodges have for neglecting his fiduciary duty even though he has a very solid relationship with Tyler? A little white lie can go long way.. IMO |
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Oct 15, 2010 7:40:33 GMT -5
GOB,
My answer would be.. I don't know Hodges' intentions, but the minute this was being discussed in the background, Tyler should have been all over it, before it was filed.They knew what Hodges was going to go..
They should have walked into the same court and filed a suit on behalf of the remaining shareholders. But they don't want to do that.
They would rather keep Frizzell employed chasing BS..and I am sure they probably have investors..Why don't you check that one for me for sure, as I am busy with other things right now.. and those investors are entitled to a percentage of whatever is recovered..
I would seriously doubt that any other co. in America would sit idly by and not take the action I am talking about.. That would show real concern for the shareholders, though...
They also should take action against Hodges, if they are still out of the loop to demand in court, as the functioning company entity at this point, that he share any pertinent information pertaining to the co. and its shareholders. I would say this is pretty pertinent.
But they are off chasing a trail that is 6 years old and trying to sell abandoned property somewhere... but they hired an new executive in the last year.. for what??
Sorry, GOB.. you can't sell me Tyler right now..
J WB
|
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Oct 15, 2010 7:45:19 GMT -5
GOB, My answer would be.. I don't know Hodges' intentions, but the minute this was being discussed in the background, Tyler should have been all over it, before it was filed.They knew what Hodges was going to go.. They should have walked into the same court and filed a suit on behalf of the remaining shareholders. But they don't want to do that. They would rather keep Frizzell employed chasing BS..and I am sure they probably have investors..Why don't you check that one for me for sure, as I am busy with other things right now.. and those investors are entitled to a percentage of whatever is recovered.. I would seriously doubt that any other co. in America would sit idly by and not take the action I am talking about.. That would show real concern for the shareholders, though... They also should take action against Hodges, if they are still out of the loop to demand in court, as the functioning company entity at this point, that he share any pertinent information pertaining to the co. and its shareholders. I would say this is pretty pertinent. But they are off chasing a trail that is 6 years old and trying to sell abandoned property somewhere... but they hired an new executive in the last year.. for what?? Sorry, GOB.. you can't sell me Tyler right now.. J WB I'm not trying to sell you anything. But, Tyler obviously had the same issues as we did concerning the evidence. You just can't file something like this without it, so why would Tyler have filed any coattail suit if Mr. Hodges was not willing to cooperate? |
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Oct 15, 2010 7:46:28 GMT -5
Jerry, if you recall Kevin West did go to Mr. Hodges office to discuss this very issue, and Mr. Hodges refused to provide him with any evidence that the alleged trust exists. So, it would be my opinion that as a shareholder and an Attorney it would have been Mr. Hodges fiduciary responsibility to have provided the company with any and all information that would ultimately benefit the entire shareholder base and not just his 7 plaintiffs. Yet, that was not the road traveled was it? Now, ask yourself what reason would Mr. Hodges have for neglecting his fiduciary duty even though he has a very solid relationship with Tyler? A little white lie can go long way.. IMO Not sure I follow. What what lie and who may have said it? |
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Oct 15, 2010 7:53:27 GMT -5
Random thoughts, observations and IMHOs re: Fax to Ben
CMKX shareholders ARE mentioned.
" I also represent certain other payees of the World Global Settlement funds; each of these payees have exhausted their ability to continue waiting for distribution of the funds to which they are entitled."
Why are we not mentioned by name? Because the fax is NOT ABOUT US. It's about Bonney getting HIS money. Maybe his is the LAST TRUST to be funded. Remember no release until ALL TRUSTS are funded?
"Mr. Bonney has both a personal ownership interest and a fiduciary interest in such funds."
Personal ownership = Bonney's Trust?
Fiduciary interest = His Trust triggers ER for everyone?
Maybe the SEC lawsuit WILL go away, because it's NO LONGER NEEDED.
"we have now received confirmation that the FED has in fact received payment."
Personally, I really LIKE this fax.
(Sorry if anyone posted anything similar already. I might have missed it.)
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Oct 15, 2010 7:53:58 GMT -5
GOB,
Tyler filing the suit would have lent credibility that the company is behind this action..What would it matter anyway.. You are either right or wrong.. It would have produced more pressure to have another lawsuit piggybacked on the Hodges one.. They could have joined in..
Screw the evidence...They could have at least tried.. and showed us something.. They aren't doing one thing for us.. The paperwork that they are working on should have been done years ago..
When a co. who was surviving on $500.. goes 5 more years and won't be honest at all with the shareholders and always has a smart### response.. who cares about them.. they don't care about us..But when I started sniffing around, Frizzell couldn't get on the phone to me quick enough to put out the fire...
This co. is going nowhere as it is..
Whatever happens with this lawsuit, the only thing left standing will be our AG action.. If we are successful in anyway, we shall see.
The only other option is Tyler.. I am telling you....nothing is going to happen with Tyler.. It is dead in the water..It has its eggs in this lawsuit basket too, they just didn't want to put their ### on the line...
J WB
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Oct 15, 2010 7:56:24 GMT -5
A little white lie can go long way.. IMO Not sure I follow. What what lie and who may have said it? You really think after all these years that Mr. West and Co. was telling us the truth about trading again..? It's been almost 6 or 7 years, correct me if you can on that.. So you really think they know nothing about what Hodges holds in his safe as far as evidences goes.. You can, but I won't... JMHO |
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Oct 15, 2010 8:02:07 GMT -5
Here's how I'm seeing this: Bivens Lawsuit? MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. SEC gave in. That's why no evidence presented. That's why case will be dismissed. OK, what's the next hold-up? Oh, BEN...... AL IS RELENTLESS!  |
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Oct 15, 2010 8:04:45 GMT -5
GOB, Tyler filing the suit would have lent credibility that the company is behind this action..What would it matter anyway.. You are either right or wrong.. It would have produced more pressure to have another lawsuit piggybacked on the Hodges one.. They could have joined in.. Screw the evidence...They could have at least tried.. and showed us something.. They aren't doing one thing for us.. The paperwork that they are working on should have been done years ago.. When a co. who was surviving on $500.. goes 5 more years and won't be honest at all with the shareholders and always has a smart### response.. who cares about them.. they don't care about us..But when I started sniffing around, Frizzell couldn't get on the phone to me quick enough to put out the fire... This co. is going nowhere as it is.. Whatever happens with this lawsuit, the only thing left standing will be our AG action.. If we are successful in anyway, we shall see. The only other option is Tyler.. I am telling you....nothing is going to happen with Tyler.. It is dead in the water..It has its eggs in this lawsuit basket too, they just didn't want to put their ### on the line... J WB Respectfully, you are letting emotions interfere with objectivity. There has been a great deal of information put out lately if one chose to see it for what it is. No reading between the lines, no connecting the dots, just follow along. And, while you are certainly entitled to your opinions and feelings, I will tell you in no uncertain words that you have biased your views and minimized your efforts by doing exactly what you just accused Tyler of doing. You are putting all of your eggs in on basket... the AG effort. And, that will go nowhere if you have no evidence as well, or no one willing to share the evidence. |
|
