|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 9, 2010 17:03:52 GMT -5
here ya go..... fire away !!
|
|
|
Post by woutcome on Dec 9, 2010 17:22:42 GMT -5
What happened to page 29?
|
|
|
Post by ksirc1 on Dec 9, 2010 17:32:53 GMT -5
This place is a ghost town...
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on Dec 9, 2010 17:50:02 GMT -5
For the ghosts:
Has anyone heard about the new DOJ order regarding the case against defendants Edwards, Casavant, Bagley, Dvorak, Guitierres, Kinney, Turno, Vissokovsky, Spooner, and Mitchell?
I'm told that the defendants have until December 17 to file an objection to a trial. If they fail to file a response, a hearing will take place January 6th. A trial date is then likely to be scheduled.
My source, who I will not name, has a theory regarding Acca's latest word salad in the context of this news.
-3bid
[unconfirmed information]
"It seems to me, the defendant crooks may have prepared a settlement on the order of less than a penny a share. It's up to Tyler to accept the offer or go to trial. I think that's why acca also indicated that Tyler was now in the mix.
I'm told the DOJ issued an order on Tuesday regarding defendants Edwards, Casavant, Bagley, Dvorak, Guitierres, Kinney, Turno, Vissokovsky, Spooner, and Mitchell.
The order stipulates that the defendants have until December 17 to file an objection to a trial. If they fail to file a response, a hearing will take place January 6th. A trial date is then likely to be scheduled.
My source speculates that acca's latest droppings may be related to this event. Specifically, he may be hinting that the defendants have offered a less-than-one-penny settlement in exchange for dropping charges. It's up to Tyler to accept the offer or go to trial. My source thinks that's why acca also indicated that Tyler was now in the mix."
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Dec 9, 2010 18:14:03 GMT -5
It will be interesting to see if they settle as a group, go to trial as a group, etc.
I can't believe that after all the imminent BS we have endured this past year, we still have to wait on this mess... sigh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2010 18:58:56 GMT -5
PJ King of Diamonds
Re: ALL PALTALK UPDATES HERE.. « Reply #715 Today at 9:04am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (10:24 AM) royalstarofthelion: (7:52 AM) BATES BATES: mac14922 Mac ..cmkx packets will be received starting saturday 12/10/2010 according to congressmen Dennis kucinich!!!!! (7:53 AM) BATES BATES: got that from twitter « Last Edit: Today at 9:24am by PJ »
12/10/10 is a Friday. They cant even get their lies right....
D4E
|
|
|
Post by humbledd on Dec 9, 2010 19:04:56 GMT -5
???SOMETHINGS GOTTA GIVEEEEEEEE..............................
|
|
|
Post by byroan on Dec 9, 2010 19:05:25 GMT -5
I tried going to that twitter account.
"Hold up!
Sorry, the profile you are trying to view has been suspended."
I wonder why...
|
|
|
Post by NobleForce2 on Dec 9, 2010 20:12:06 GMT -5
Probably why Acca said no payment before Christmas and first payment would be small.
|
|
|
Post by dljazz on Dec 9, 2010 21:04:51 GMT -5
For the ghosts:Has anyone heard about the new DOJ order regarding the case against defendants Edwards, Casavant, Bagley, Dvorak, Guitierres, Kinney, Turno, Vissokovsky, Spooner, and Mitchell?
I'm told that the defendants have until December 17 to file an objection to a trial. If they fail to file a response, a hearing will take place January 6th. A trial date is then likely to be scheduled.
My source, who I will not name, has a theory regarding Acca's latest word salad in the context of this news.
-3bid[unconfirmed information] "It seems to me, the defendant crooks may have prepared a settlement on the order of less than a penny a share. It's up to Tyler to accept the offer or go to trial. I think that's why acca also indicated that Tyler was now in the mix.
I'm told the DOJ issued an order on Tuesday regarding defendants Edwards, Casavant, Bagley, Dvorak, Guitierres, Kinney, Turno, Vissokovsky, Spooner, and Mitchell.
The order stipulates that the defendants have until December 17 to file an objection to a trial. If they fail to file a response, a hearing will take place January 6th. A trial date is then likely to be scheduled.
My source speculates that acca's latest droppings may be related to this event. Specifically, he may be hinting that the defendants have offered a less-than-one-penny settlement in exchange for dropping charges. It's up to Tyler to accept the offer or go to trial. My source thinks that's why acca also indicated that Tyler was now in the mix."Thank you for the information.
|
|
|
Post by ohiogirl on Dec 9, 2010 21:54:09 GMT -5
3 bid, can you change that yellow print to another color, my nose is right up to the computer trying to read it!
|
|
|
Post by pootsa on Dec 9, 2010 22:00:08 GMT -5
Just hold your left mouse button over the text and highlight it. Anytime I see a post from 3bid that is what I have to do. 3 bid, can you change that yellow print to another color, my nose is right up to the computer trying to read it!
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Dec 9, 2010 22:04:52 GMT -5
remembering the good 'ol days. From sometime last May Attorney Hodges objective is to release of the funds to the CMKX Shareholders as quickly as possible. The stipulation of the trust funds requires Economic Receipt to release the funds. Economic Receipt occurs when all trustees have access to all of the funds they are responsible for. My understanding is that the Trust Funds are placed in 10 to 12 Tiers. They are funded with Treasury Bonds. There are several trust funds under each Tier. In one of the Tiers are the CMKX Funds. Each of the Tiers have to be funded to cover the Treasury Bonds. Then the funds are transferred to the control of the trustees. When all the trustees have access to all of the funds they are responsible for, then the Economic Receipt (permission) is received to release the funds to the the recipients. In February 2010, seven of the Tier Funds were funded. One of the Tiers funded contained the CMKX Trust Funds. An exception to the stipulation was made for the CMKX Trust Funds. The Funds were ready to be transferred to the control of the trustees and then released to the CMKX Shareholders. The transfer was delayed because the other fund representatives wanted to make sure they were totally funded and not left fending for themselves. In April 2010, the CMKX Funds were transferred to the control of the Trustees. The trustees are waiting for the Economic Receipt to release the funds to the CMKX Shareholders. There were some obstacles, but each one was resolved. Presently, we are waiting for the Economic Receipt, which can happen at any moment. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by scorpion on Dec 9, 2010 22:09:41 GMT -5
I wonder what ever happened with this letter. no one really talked about it much.
hodges leter to the ny attorney general « Thread Started on Mar 1, 2010, 12:00am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: carlene.brown@ag.ny.gov
For: David A. Markowitz, Esq. Special Deputy Attorney General for Investor Protection
Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10001
Dear Ms. Brown:
Thank you for speaking with me earlier today and explaining that Mr. Markowitz was out for the rest of the day. We discussed briefly the nature of my request and you suggested that I forward the appropriate information to your attention via e-mail for Mr. Markowitz’s review on his return Monday, March 1, 2010. The information is as follows:
• I am a California trial attorney with some 40 years experience in State and Federal Court, as well as other jurisdictions.
• In January of this year I filed a Bivens Class Action against the five sitting SEC Commissions and five past SEC Commissioners seeking some 3.87 Trillion Dollars in damages for the taking of property by unconstitutionally withholding consent to distribute such sums as had previously been collected for the benefit of 50,000 + shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.; a conformed copy of the complaint is attached.
• The SEC Office of General Counsel has agreed to accept service on behalf of the sitting Commissioners; the other commissioners are currently being served.
• The weight of opinion is that this litigation will not be allowed to proceed into the discovery stages and/or to trial; there is mounting evidence that a distribution of funds to the shareholders is on the near horizon.
• I am advised that a portion of trust funds previously ear-marked for distribution to support the U.S. Domestic Settlement Fund Program currently in process were distributed to the United States Treasury facility in New York City on December 31, 2009 through and with the assistance of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in New York City.
• I am advised that these trust funds totaled 4.2 Trillion Dollars and were paid into the U.S. Treasury as and for taxes due to be paid from the trust(s) upon distribution of the trust assets.
• I am further advised that pursuant to Federal Banking Regulations, New York State Banking Regulations, and the Martin Act, inter alia, the transferred funds could be held without return for a maximum period of time under any circumstances for forty-five days or until midnight February 14, 2010.
• I am further advised that the U.S. Treasury has not remitted these funds, is still possessed of these funds and more importantly the trust(s) assets have not been distributed.
• The above circumstances, upon proof, demonstrate serious criminal violations of the statutes referred to above.
• I represent, at least as the Class Counsel, a number of New York residents who are beneficiaries of these trust(s) and are among the 50,000 + shareholders. I know many of these people on a personal basis in addition to being their counsel of record and can attest to their severe and continuing damage suffered and being suffered as a result of the non-distribution and non-receipt of the afore mentioned trust assets; some of them are also anxious to visit you in person and describe their continuing outrage.
Demand is hereby made that your office initiate, at the earliest possible time, an investigation into the criminal activities of those persons within your jurisdiction whom have contributed to and otherwise facilitated these criminal acts. I would be happy to discuss these facts with you at your early convenience. Please feel free to contact me directly at: (626) 564-9797. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.
A. Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803) HODGES AND ASSOCIATES 4 East Holly Street, Suite 202 Pasadena, CA 91103-3900
Tel: (626) 564-9797 Fax: (626) 564-9111 E-Mail: al@hodgesandassociates.com
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 9, 2010 22:22:32 GMT -5
I wonder what ever happened with this letter. no one really talked about it much. hodges leter to the ny attorney general « Thread Started on Mar 1, 2010, 12:00am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: carlene.brown@ag.ny.gov For: David A. Markowitz, Esq. Special Deputy Attorney General for Investor Protection Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10001 Dear Ms. Brown: Thank you for speaking with me earlier today and explaining that Mr. Markowitz was out for the rest of the day. We discussed briefly the nature of my request and you suggested that I forward the appropriate information to your attention via e-mail for Mr. Markowitz’s review on his return Monday, March 1, 2010. The information is as follows: • I am a California trial attorney with some 40 years experience in State and Federal Court, as well as other jurisdictions. • In January of this year I filed a Bivens Class Action against the five sitting SEC Commissions and five past SEC Commissioners seeking some 3.87 Trillion Dollars in damages for the taking of property by unconstitutionally withholding consent to distribute such sums as had previously been collected for the benefit of 50,000 + shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.; a conformed copy of the complaint is attached. • The SEC Office of General Counsel has agreed to accept service on behalf of the sitting Commissioners; the other commissioners are currently being served. • The weight of opinion is that this litigation will not be allowed to proceed into the discovery stages and/or to trial; there is mounting evidence that a distribution of funds to the shareholders is on the near horizon. • I am advised that a portion of trust funds previously ear-marked for distribution to support the U.S. Domestic Settlement Fund Program currently in process were distributed to the United States Treasury facility in New York City on December 31, 2009 through and with the assistance of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in New York City. • I am advised that these trust funds totaled 4.2 Trillion Dollars and were paid into the U.S. Treasury as and for taxes due to be paid from the trust(s) upon distribution of the trust assets. • I am further advised that pursuant to Federal Banking Regulations, New York State Banking Regulations, and the Martin Act, inter alia, the transferred funds could be held without return for a maximum period of time under any circumstances for forty-five days or until midnight February 14, 2010. • I am further advised that the U.S. Treasury has not remitted these funds, is still possessed of these funds and more importantly the trust(s) assets have not been distributed. • The above circumstances, upon proof, demonstrate serious criminal violations of the statutes referred to above. • I represent, at least as the Class Counsel, a number of New York residents who are beneficiaries of these trust(s) and are among the 50,000 + shareholders. I know many of these people on a personal basis in addition to being their counsel of record and can attest to their severe and continuing damage suffered and being suffered as a result of the non-distribution and non-receipt of the afore mentioned trust assets; some of them are also anxious to visit you in person and describe their continuing outrage. Demand is hereby made that your office initiate, at the earliest possible time, an investigation into the criminal activities of those persons within your jurisdiction whom have contributed to and otherwise facilitated these criminal acts. I would be happy to discuss these facts with you at your early convenience. Please feel free to contact me directly at: (626) 564-9797. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. A. Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803) HODGES AND ASSOCIATES 4 East Holly Street, Suite 202 Pasadena, CA 91103-3900 Tel: (626) 564-9797 Fax: (626) 564-9111 E-Mail: al@hodgesandassociates.com Al <Al@hodgesandassociates.com>View Contact To: Brian Waddell <waddellbrian@att.net> Cc: particleswaves@yahoo.com; Gina <Gina@hodgesandassociates.com> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Waddell – I am not interested in either direct or indirect support of this endeavor. I have, as you may know, already filed a complaint with the AG in New York; to date, I have received essentially no real response. Accordingly, I do not believe this venture will serve my temporal priorities. Thanks for your inquiry. Regards, Al Hodges -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Brian Waddell [mailto:waddellbrian@att.net] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:18 AM To: Al Subject: Attorney General Mr. Hodges: As you know, there is an effort to contact every Attorney General's office in America and file a complaint against the Federal Government. The goal is to apply a massive amount of pressure against the SEC in hopes that it will hasten the release of funds. While many individuals state that this effort is independent of your Bivens Action and that your involvement in this matter is not necessary, I disagree. In my a opinion, your involvement in this matter is crucial. I don't believe that an AG's office would even consider looking into this without talking to you first. There has been speculation on whether or not you would cooperate or even talk to a State Attorney General. So I respectfully ask this question of you: If an AG was to contact your office, would you take the call? Would you cooperate or ask for their assistance? I am sure that if the shareholders knew you were behind our efforts, we would have a far greater response. Thank You Brian Waddell
|
|