|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 28, 2011 11:59:22 GMT -5
richerob DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Al filed « Reply #21 Today at 10:40am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you guys still believe? People just don't get it....step back and look at the whole picture here: Has anybody really questioned what Al Hodges motive is here and the scripted setup. You have a BS bivens lawsuit, you have ridiculous figures: 3.87 Trillion (come on), You setup a TA as a front, you get Deli to unload the shares, but you are told to believe it is national security and we can't show you any evidence. Then you have a bs SC directive but again we can't show you the paperwork because (oh yeah national security) and oh yeah it really worked we all got paid right BS. Then you hire fresh Guru's, tramp, chucky, deltadon, Bob H keeps pumping air up your A** and you guys keep believing. Now where did Bob H go...now he shows an old 7 year old document we have already seen with no purpose. Hey bob is the jig up did the Cat get your tongue? Now ask yourself why Treffey and Salty left....they figured it out...it is all BS. Can someone show me the 2010 TA list of transactions for selling shares and you will have your answer as to what the purpose of Hodges and team were doing. Anyone can prove otherwise? Richerob millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37139&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 28, 2011 12:07:55 GMT -5
gusjarvis King of Diamonds Re: Appeal filed~ « Reply #4 Today at 9:56am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- how is it possible to appeal when the sec is not even involved in this, why is al not going after the trustee. In any event this is beyond a joke and we all know now that melvin was right and he knew exactly what was up, meaning everything we were fed was complete and utter bullchit. Ya thanks al, thanks dennis, and thanks bob you all strung us along like monkies and lied to us relentlessly with your team of liars, time to move on with our lives like dennis said. Can't wait to hear the spin of how this is good for us, what a fing joke cmkx and all involved in it are. « Last Edit: Today at 9:57am by gusjarvis » tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15937
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 28, 2011 12:12:10 GMT -5
ming117 Diamond Finder and Miner Re: Appeal filed~ « Reply #8 Today at 10:37am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i can't imagine that all of this is a scam... why would mr Hodges risk his reputation and career??? problem is, for us shareholders, very little hard evidence of trusts etc is available. are there any trusts? is there a SC order? is the money with Peter Maheu? did his company G.I. get a fine of x amount of dollar? do this WGS really exist? i have no proof to conclude one way or the other... and so the saga continues. it can be over tomorrow. it can be over in months or even years. if people could come together and put the available pieces of the puzzle together, linked to the names of serious and honorable people as there are mr Hodges himself, the plaintiffs, and some other names from the past, at some point it should be possible to generate some serious interest by the bigger mainstream media. maybe we can start from Europe. and by all means make the story known as widely as possible.
50.000 shareholders waiting for more than 7 years, without any serious information, constantly controlled by "positive" messageboards and paltalkrooms, being told they are part of history in the making, the building of a new world financial system, and a never-seen-before global transfer of wealth...all very well possible, and what a nice and intriguing series of articles this could become...we start in europe. i wish mr Hodges and his team the very best. my sincere gratitude for what they did up till now and for what they still are going to do. and parallel to this legal work, we develop a new line of action... tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15937
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 28, 2011 12:13:59 GMT -5
lt.kk Senior Diamond Miner Re: ALL PALTALK UPDATES HERE.. « Reply #817 Today at 6:00am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Chinese are in charge of the distribution. If they wanted to be more efficient in doing so it will be better for us. I guess anything that is posted from now on will be viewed as bad. Some will be happy but I think it is best that I go the route of Chucky and just wait till this ends ( Soon). It is hard for me to stay positive here and personally I see no use for this board if every message is twisted toward someones negative attitude. I tried to make this a place of hope but it seems I am outnumbered by those that want this board to be a vehicle to complain and vent anger. Between you and I it is getting really dark and even creepy. To all that feel as I do, that we are blessed to be here, good luck with your new wealth and please try to think of others and help them with your windfall. Lt.KK tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1267&page=41
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 15:15:27 GMT -5
dn242 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Al filed « Reply #55 Today at 11:48am »
This was Expected !!! Relax.....
As per a previous post by B Hollenegg:
These are the facts as I know to date.
Funding for the The CMKX Payments are in place. First payment packets 80 cents pps enclosed. Packets released to distribution holding centers of a well known carrier, (security..name is not provided for public dissemination) Packets are ready for release, awaiting permission. CMKX is not the only payment distribution. This is the first distribution packet of more to come.
Attorney Hodges has an appeal ready and will file the appeal to ensure future deliveries are completed satisfactory. Tightened security in place, including communications. Attorney Hodges because of his close involvement cannot release details.
Attorney Hodges will not update the Plaintiffs because a Shareholder posted a copy of one of the updates which was marked Private and not for public knowledge. The update had highly sensitive information. As a result, no updates.
What can the Shareholders do? The amount of funds involved, the amount of entities involved both civilians and governments, the amount of recipients involved, there are some issues and concerns are being addressed. I do not know what the issues are or what it will take to make it copacetic. If I believe harassing those involved, calling my congressman, calling the authorities, hiring more lawyers would release the funds any quicker, I would be the first to advocate this.
When will the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet arrive at the final destination? The delivery should have occurred already. Based on this, and the above information, I expect the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet any time. If I receive any information which I can share I will. I have provided what I know at this point.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 15:28:28 GMT -5
Warren_Pease God of Diamonds Did Hodges Withhold Evidence from Salty? « Thread Started Today at 3:06pm »
It's being said that Saltydog (the plaintiff Patrick Cluney) visited Paltalk last night to explain why he dropped out from the legal action. Reportedly, Salty said he reached that decision when Hodges refused to show him proof of a trust.
I'd like to know a couple of things. First, is this true? Did Salty say these things on Paltalk?
Second, is it ethical for an attorney to withhold this kind of information from his client? If it's not unethical, why not? What are the circumstances that would support the withholding of information?
...Warren
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 17:35:11 GMT -5
goldengriff Dr. Of Diamonds Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread*** « Reply #4 Today at 4:00pm »
Hello Everyone! Just saw that Al Hodges has appealled the Bevins suit. And didn't pay the fee btw. Anyway I just wanted to let you good folks know that I have been following not only many of the CMKX lawsuits but those of other conglomerate companys like Overstock, CSHD, as well as companies not known to be among the conglomerate. Other than being in a federal court, being sued or charged by the government, they all have one very important issue in common...DELAY. And they all seemed to be delayed often and all around the same time. That is not coincidental, I assure you...way too frequent and timing is too close. As you all know in this country you have a constitutional right for a speedy trial unless you refuse it. In all the cases I follow it is very obvious that the wrong doing was not done by the defendents but by the government along with their mafia wall street buddies. The government is guilty of neglect while the wall streeters are gulity of market manipulation, fraud, bribery, and god knows what else. So the defendants have nothing to hide and you would expect these defendants to open their arms to a speedy trial but they don't, they actually forefeit that right in every case. BUT WHY? The answer to that question is very simple, these court cases are not about proving innocent, it has to be about so much more like this:
I have posted here before, "nothing will happen until we get announcements" Announcement about the gold standard, currencies revaluing, USTREASURY, USTREASURY BANKS, and so much more including the return to CONSTITUTIONAL LAW There you have it folks, the return to CONSTITUTIONAL LAW....BINGO case dismissed And like this:
EXPOSURE! The government nor the wall street mafia types want their crimes to go main stream. So the defendants open their arms to forefeiting a speedy trial to keep the pressure on Like an ace in the whole, or a royal straight flush. Like the lone cowboy facing down an army of bad guys knowing all along there are 3 armies of good guys just over the hill. Their venue is federal court, how more public can you get. It would be impossible for the media to ignore the type of evidence that would be presented in a federal court given the subject matter
Now this Bevins suit is alittle different than the others I follow in context. It seems to be just the first round of exposure, and a shot wizzing by the ear so the "delayers"get the message load and clear. You know like the lone cowboy I mentioned. And this case too has been extended, delayed from its conclusion. Got to love patterns, they tell you so much
So my point is this, and thanks for hang-in with me. Don't put to much importance on the court issues other than understanding their implied purpose. The worst case is more time is needed to get the details worked out to bring this part of our journey to a conclusion. And that time needed is probably defined in days, maybe weeks, not in months or years as the court cases imply. Just wanted to add my two cents GG
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 17:45:05 GMT -5
ty sunbeam777... By: cbaughan 28 Jan 2011, 03:41 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 991143 of 991148 Jump to msg. # What kind of man is Peter Maheu If you are like me, with all the recent public reports from Al, etc. regarding Peter Maheu, you might be wondering..what kind of person is he anyway? Would he be so unlike his father Bob? Would he really try to hold up our money for crooked reasons? I believe if you read this ENTIRE article published Jan 22, 2011 I think you will bet a big clue despite the fact that this article has nothing to do with our stock. www.lvrj.com/news/team-effort-pro....04.html?ref=004 Mona PS. It appears we are still in good hands! But you did not have to hear that from the latest greatest guru.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 17:56:24 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 28 Jan 2011, 04:23 PM EST Rating: You rated it: Msg. 991153 of 991153 Jump to msg. #
THE WHOLE LAST YEAR HAS BEEN TOTALLY FAKE
from portrush to me, and yes this was a private message but at this point who really cares anymore, the whole thing is a complete joke:
"I haven't heard that stated by anyone, but you can sure see it by the way things are taking place. Someone you would know and is pretty involved in this asked me..."what if you found out everything this past year was all fake...just a smoke screen to cover up what was really happening?" I replied, I would be glad this is over--would be pissed--and would never forget. And if the smoke and mirror show is real, why should the plaintiffs not end up confused too? My guess is they will.
Is that true...its all fake? I don't know. But I DO know this: it will NOT be public, ever. Got that from the alphabet. I understand it completely. It cannot. You know this...you KNOW this, Dave. They cannot ever admit to having sold counterfeit stock or paying a penalty for it. It would rattle the very core of economies around the world. And THAT'S a big reason why I am confident your friend is spinning wheels with the AG effort. I know he has some willing to investigate. Let's see if he gets as far as you did in Canada before getting shut down, or in the least...ignored."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 17:58:25 GMT -5
briwadd God of Diamonds Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread*** « Reply #8 Today at 4:36pm »
FWIW:
Just had an interesting conversation with Cottrell. It was initially profanity laced; however, he eventually calmed down and apologized..lol
I'll cut to the chase. He has not been funded/paid. However, today is the deadline set by the Chinese. He made it abundantly clear, he is not an obstacle to us getting paid anymore. He said our dealings are with Maheu!! Take it worth what its worth!!
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 18:03:11 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 28 Jan 2011, 05:00 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 991162 of 991164
all shareholders should contact keith staub, doj
that is involved in our case and ask him how it is possible to file an appeal in this case when the doj has signed off on this case and our trustee has the money.
Los Angeles, California 90012. Telephone: (213) 894-7423. Facsimile: (213) 894-7819. Email: Keith. Staub@usdoj.gov
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 18:32:34 GMT -5
Today at 3:52pm, wolfbela wrote:KD, The reason it is backwards is because the company should have been doing this instead of playing lawsuit playground. Instead they let a shareholder attorney, with no accountability to anyone, including the company run with this..
Another big question.. since Attorney Hodges has pointed the finger at Peter Maheu as the entity blocking the release of the money... this should be more than enough "reason or evidence" that the company has always needed to get involved..since they couldn't find any on their own.. Let's see how eager Tyler is to go after Maheu..
Thank god, the shareholders have an opportunity for truth through other means..
J WB
Today at 6:11pm, georgie18 wrote: Jerry....please reread the last update and tell me where you saw Peter Maheu's name.....or anything that states Peter Maheu as the entity blocking the release of the money......I believe you are mistaken......I do not see where Al has pointed his finger at Peter Maheu.....
briwadd God of Diamonds Re: Did Hodges Withhold Evidence from Salty? « Reply #24 Today at 6:23pm » Come on Georgie, pointing the finger at GI is the same as pointing the finger at Peter Maheu. In fact, anyone contacting GI regarding CMKX was forwarded to Maheu's voicemail. Not to mention, Cottrell has told me several times that Maheu is the one blocking our funds.
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 18:53:10 GMT -5
deltadon30228 I have worked hard for over 9 years now and have talked with many people and yes, i trust my sources 100%, my source have nothing to do with AL, i can't do anything about the time frame. My time frame is still out yet, it's still early 2011.
As far as when the money is released is out of all of our hands and our sources. Trust me there is a ton of misinformation been put out. You just have to sort through it.
I never give specific dates for the main reason that this is fluid, I'm told Chucky's source is good and IF the directive was ignored, that's huge and I'm betting that it's not anyone in our government that disobeyed it.
Don, IMHO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 29, 2011 11:58:19 GMT -5
Tom wrote: you seem to have alot of anger towards Hodges. How bout your anger towards Tyler? Surely youre not gonna let them slide? I know many shareholders (if not all) want answers to the valuation of our "existing samples" that KW announced in 7/2009 why we arent permitted to see the evidence regarding the NSS leading up to the "silver platter" statement that BF announced in 2005. CMKXers have been dying for this information much longer than info debunking Hodges. Please pursue and respond. Thanks victorious aka Tom
By: trixijude 29 Jan 2011, 10:29 AM EST Rating: Msg. 991257 of 991261 (Reply to 991195 by trixijude) Jump to msg. # We are a pack of whinnying wimps! What is possible to do we don't grasp. For years we sit looking at our screens, chasing fantasies, & ignoring the possible. We're going public, with what? What do the cores contain? Who are our JV's? What claims do we have? Did the Chinese by some of our claims? This is our company... this info should not be kept from us.
Good for Tom for jumping on this.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 29, 2011 12:12:58 GMT -5
ty sweetsp7 ATL Dr. Of Diamonds Posts: 129 Re: Al Filed « Reply #1 Today at 10:09am » Salty & Allan dropped out? Thanks Briwadd......... From: IBAFT (Rep: 0) Date: 01/28/2011 17:51 Forum: Cmkm Diamonds Inc - Msg #240 Thread #673154060 Here we go again... The latest false rumor is that Allan Treffry has been removed from the lawsuit/appeal because he is being charged with something (nobody seems to know what) at the State Bar and that Salty has been removed because he is in bankruptcy, not the truthful story that we are no longer plaintiffs/appellants for the reason that we demanded to be removed. First off, the truth of the matter is that Allan Treffry is not up for charges of any sort with the California State Bar and Salty has not filed bankruptcy, and that BOTH Allan Treffry and Salty demanded to see the evidence involved in the lawsuit or that their names be removed from the appeal. No evidence was presented by AH so both followed through with their demands to be removed from the appellate process. That is the sole reason why Allan Treffry and Patrick Cluney (Salty) are not on the appeal. The evidence? In an email of Wednesday, January 26, 2011, Al Hodges indicated that ALL plaintiffs would be included in the appeal, but as stated above, both Allan and Salty said absolutely not. Here are the communications to Al Hodges (emails) to that regard: Here is the key excerpt from Al Hodges' email, dated Wednesday, January 26, 2011, at 4:07:40 pm, where Al stated that he intended to include all names in the appeal:". . . Secondly, as far as I know, the caption of the Complaint, as it now stands, is the complaint which will be reviewed and analyzed by the Court – your names are all included. .." Here is the language from the responsive email, sent to Al Hodges from Allan Treffry, dated Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 7:15:18 pm:"Al, As I have stated multiple times, I DO NOT want to be on the appeal. Please remove my name from it before filing. Thank you, Allan T" Here is the language from the responsive email , sent to Al Hodges from Salty, dated Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 7:28:28:"To Al Hodges and Plaintiffs: The answer to #4 is unsatisfactory. Therefore please remove my name from the Appeal process. I will no longer be represented by Hodges Law Firm, as of January 26th 2011. Patrick Cluney" Here is the State Bar's website for Allan Treffry, indicating that other than an oversight, leading to a late payment for bar dues, which made AT ineligible to practice law for a total of 12 days (the time it took for AT to find out and he immed. cleared up the matter), AT's license is free of any disciplinary actions for 18 years. members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/164979Just for the record, here is AT's California Real Estate Broker's license, also active and free of disciplinary actions for over 26 years: www2.dre.ca.gov/PublicASP/pplinfo.asp?License_id=00878272____________________ So, here are the real questions. Who are the liars here and why? Who looks to benefit if Allan Treffry and Pat Cluney are looked upon in a negative light for not staying with the lawsuit? Which individuals have lied about Allan and sometimes even Pat, right from the start of them raising logical questions about simple issues such as seeing evidence, getting the truth, having the plaintiffs cease in their evil manipulation of the shareholders with countless false dates and more? The question answers itself. Perhaps these losers who feel the need to lie and harm the shareholders, even when many have serious medical conditions and cannot handle the stress of the lies, need to exposed and punished. Certainly, they need an education of the most simple of moral laws, those common to all decency in the world, those elements of decency that can be found in God's Word that God "hates a lying tongue" and will destroy them: See Psalms 5:5, also "Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who deal faithfully are His delight" (Prov. 12:22). A righteous man hates falsehood, but a wicked man acts disgustingly and shamefully (Prov. 13:5). A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who tells lies will perish (Prov. 19:9). The acquisition of treasures by a lying tongue is a fleeting vapor, the pursuit of death (Prov. 21:6). What is desirable in a man is his kindness, and it is better to be a poor man than a liar (Prov. 19:22). These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood . . " (Prov 6:16-17). There is MUCH more on the subject, all consistent with the teachings above. What can be said, these are faithless and deceitful people who would continue to make up such lies about innocent people who have not done anything deserving of such defamation, unless you consider seeking the truth and wanting this charade to come to an end as bad things. Clearly, these people are looking to create yet another diversion so that people will not focus on the real issue - the fact we are still not paid and that the lies continue - but on the controversy they create with their lies. By the way, congratulations to the Paltalk Admins and especially the secret agenda room of the Grapevine, who continue to foster these liars and their lies about innocent people - people who have been clearly fighting for truth so that we may be set free of this charade. "You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." John 8:32 People, we invested in a mining company with the hopes of a decent ROI and hopefully, a nice short squeeze reflecting the huge naked short position. We did not get into this stock to be used as a tool for some unknown reason, to harm people or even to save the entire financial world. Further, people are not "bad people" and worthy of relentless defamation of their good character simply because they want the truth and for this heartless roller coaster ride to end. If you feel that this inhumanity and the lies about decent people is wrong, do not let these acts go unchallenged. Thank you for your consideration.
|
|