|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 11:51:39 GMT -5
July 17th, I think, would be 35 days. Hopefully it will not take 6 months for this to happen. I could make it until the end of July!! My birthday is July 16th, so maybe I will get a really GOOD present this year!!!!!LOL
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 13:28:40 GMT -5
By: DrillBit 13 Jun 2007, 02:08 PM EDT Msg. 560344 of 560346 (This msg. is a reply to 560330 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # Abad, they called him Sandy on the street and he Was the saviour of CitiBank...............HOW? .............GEE, let me think back to 2000. He orchastarted NSing to SAVE CITI IMO!, but I digress.
The vote today was d**n interesting to me...again...why?.........not one member voted against the repeal. Fummy that IMO like..........OH, I don't know.................a plan was in place. Dennis pointed out to me that one member of the SEC last year claimed no NS and today spoke about the theft.
35 days! Important that IMO as the others must fight for covering.
CMKX has been/IS in the forefront on this issue but PLEASE know this...............NOT IN THE PUBLIC EYE! Why is that of interest? LOL, easy deal that because WE WILL BE PAID! Not through a trading stock but under the radar of the public..............AND that is KEY! I love these jokers that are saying, paraphrasing here, 'But CMKX is restricted so today's ruling does nor apply' TOO d**n FUMMY!
I guess that Roger Glenn, a man that was high up in the SEC and wrote definitive papers about tradin while there, was asleep as to any plan. Too, Mr. Mahue NEVER aqnticipated todays action!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 14:02:22 GMT -5
noczs4me DIAMOND DIGGER Member Info Status: online Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Karma: 0 [ Exalt | Smite ] Contact Icons Reg SHO & The Details ? « Thread Started on Today at 2:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It certainly sounds like today's ruling in eliminating the GFC will serve to straighten out a lot of securities, and I hope CMKX will be one of them! I've read several threads today that say "....yes it will" or "....does not apply to CMKX because....." I found the text of Reg SHO at www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-50103.pdf which is 17 CFR parts 240, 241 and 242 then used the Adobe Search tool and entered the words 'Pink Sheet' and found 6 references to Pink Sheet stocks being included but with the caveat that it may be impossible to determine the number of failures due on any non-reporting company. If someone would take a mintue and check that document, explain to me how elimination of the GFC would NOT help us? Trading records are kept in the various brokerages, the TA and Heaven forbid, the DTCC, are they not? Seems like this would just force the issue of A/S and O/S Thanks in advance, NoCZs4Me millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1181761287
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Jun 13, 2007 17:52:07 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 13 Jun 2007, 05:58 PM EDT Msg. 560507 of 560539 Jump to msg. # Suppose Mr. C and his close allies own the entire or almost the entire float. Suppose we all own the naked shares. Suppose we start trading again with our naked shares. With GF clause gone, naked shares would have to be covered, especially those which were previously exempt from the SHO list, as we were. Suppose valuation came out just as we were to start trading again and a cover is mandatory. Suppose...... We are and always have been in good hands. Interesting times indeed. imo By: elo54 13 Jun 2007, 06:06 PM EDT Msg. 560513 of 560539 (This msg. is a reply to 560507 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # A distinct possibiliy another entity is holding a hand at the table.em ELO
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 18:54:34 GMT -5
By: elo54 13 Jun 2007, 05:25 PM EDT Msg. 560498 of 560499 (This msg. is a reply to 560477 by outsidelookinin1.) Jump to msg. # Outside-IMO-We are going thru a process of rebirth.I firmly believe we have substantial assets still covered up or in other safe hands.We are still having to deal with major villians wanting us dead as a company. As for payouts,discovery granted by the Court this week will soon shine light on where the money is or went,then we can talk about distribution plus possible settlements. ELO
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 18:55:07 GMT -5
By: elo54 13 Jun 2007, 05:48 PM EDT Msg. 560503 of 560503 (This msg. is a reply to 560502 by JUMBOJET.) Jump to msg. # I love it!!!!!!when I see you creeps still here bashing away.Means the probability of compensation payouts is 99%.Thank you for asking about my UK friend.She is very well enjoying a wonderful semi retirement.I hope to see her this summer.BTW,not being insiders, is therefore not a problem for either of us. ELO
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 18:56:15 GMT -5
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=560539By: gusjarvis 13 Jun 2007, 06:41 PM EDT Msg. 560539 of 560545 Jump to msg. # THIS SAYS IT ALL, IT HAS BEEN WORKED OUT ALREADY and the only reason they are able to get rid of grandfather is because it is fixed already, they can't handle the runs that would happen as everyone would know it was happening: In September 2005, the Federal Reserve Board and other regulators including the SEC called together 14 major OTC derivatives dealers to address these operational issues. The focus at that time was on OTC credit derivatives. Of course, the SEC does not necessarily have jurisdiction over OTC credit derivatives, but the firms subject to SEC supervision through our Consolidated Supervised Entity program are dealers in that market, and so it was important for the SEC be involved in overseeing the cleanup process. In addition, the SEC does regulate OTC equity derivatives, which were affected by many of the same operational maladies suffered by credit derivatives. The dealers agreed after the 2005 meeting to develop processes for reducing the operational risks associated with the documentation backlog, and established a timeline that would allow regulators to track their progress. At a follow-up meeting in early 2006, the dealers reported significant progress in cleaning up aged unconfirmed trades, and committed to future deadlines for further reductions. The dealers also committed to objectives for increasing the electronic settlement of eligible trades, and began to work with DTCC to build upon its Deriv/SERV platform by establishing a "Trade Information Warehouse" to automate and standardize post-trade processes and to store copies of each contract. I understand that new enterprises, such as Swapswire, have entered the market to provide centralized, automated trade processing, and I assume that such competition will encourage and drive innovation in this area. Today, due in large part to the increased use of electronic settlement systems and standardized contracts, the number of aged unconfirmed OTC credit derivative trades at the CSE firms supervised by the SEC has been reduced by approximately 90% since the September 2005 high. That is truly a success story, and I applaud both the principled regulatory approach and the tremendous efforts of the market participants
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 13, 2007 19:27:37 GMT -5
gusjarvis Board Addict Status: Offline Joined: Sept 2005 Posts: 7,168 we couldn't admit we were covered until now « Thread Started on Today at 4:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nor could any other company that was covered before this. Imagine we were probably covered in 2004 but just couldn't admit it then as that just wouldn't be right to be the only company covered at the time when they made this grandfather clause that said you didn't have to cover, but now we can and so can many others. And since the sec has admitted they have been clearing these old fails for with the help of the federal reserve for years they can now announce just how they did that. There will be no runs, the market can't cover trillions of shares, so bring on some announcements of buyouts and dividends and lets just see what they paid for these. It is time for our company to release the real news and they just couldn't before this, not really any way imo. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1181774114
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 13, 2007 23:54:23 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 13 Jun 2007, 07:43 PM EDT Msg. 560560 of 560615 (This msg. is a reply to 560507 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Suppose.......'Tis precisely why we cannot trade again under the old cusip and ticker symbol. The market cannot and has never been able to cover our unprecedented situation on the open market, thus occurrences behind closed doors were completed. The master has executed the ultimate plan for the benefit of the shareholders and the overall market. Yes indeed, we are in good hands. Brilliantly so. imo
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 13, 2007 23:55:11 GMT -5
By: sparkysantos 13 Jun 2007, 08:33 PM EDT Msg. 560600 of 560615 (This msg. is a reply to 560553 by oil.ipo.) Jump to msg. # Excellent points OIL.PRO:
What even some of the most vocal observers don't seem to realize is that all the money in the world doesn't "technically" solve a naked short.
Specifically, in exchange for the "settlement," a shareholder would also have to either (1) surrender his/her shares, or (2) agree to a reverse split that would then "dilute" the shareholder's initial ownership percentage in the company, not to mention any related entitlements.
Put another way, it often seems that many are completely overlooking the second dimension of this "settlement" equation; the one that will involve a vote, a required decision.
In fact, that is no doubt precisely why seasoned pros like Jonas are always bashin this revoked stock, 24/7; to continually foster seeds of doubt, doubt designed to cloud our decision-making capabilities.
And a realization of this is probably why those handling Roddy - excuse me, Acca, have always stressed how we will all be receiving a 0"packet."
To conclude, IMHO we shareholders will in fact eventually receive an offer; but if we get a check, there will be conditions associated with it.
Sparky
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 13, 2007 23:58:37 GMT -5
desperado2100 DIAMOND DIGGER New Acca mp3 tonight (6-13-07) 11PM« Thread Started on Yesterday at 10:46pm » Be advised that Acca had me do a "pipe-in" to the 500 room tonight (at aproximately 11PM (EST)... in lieu of coming on, in-person. He was traveling. He was extremely upbeat (more than ever)... and indicated we should still look for a newswire story (as early as) tomorrow (expected). Following that, he intends to visit in the 500 room tomorrow evening and answer any/all questions (gloves off), at aproximately 8PM (EST). He assured that we will be ecstatic with our outcome... and after "today's" event, the positive outcome that we've all waited so long for, is about to happen! EOM ~ Des' Here's the mp3 "link" (from tonight)... www.zshare.net/audio/2264736f010992/ BUTLet's not forget this... CEO Update #2 "No Money Coming" « Thread Started on Apr 18, 2007, 2:45pm » To all CMKM shareholders:- 4-18-07 Update #2It has come to my attention that the Abadgoodgirls, Jay Adobes and Acca Dacca’s of this world are spinning my updates as they have done with every update or press release of the past. * The things these individuals are saying are false. There is no delivery coming to your house after the PR on Friday. Please do not listen to rumors of fortunes waiting just around the corner nor rumors of large trust accounts that have been set up with money or other assets to be delivered to shareholders. *These rumors are simply not true.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 14, 2007 0:22:29 GMT -5
144r DIAMOND JEDI Re: UC spotted at Harrahs Casino.« Reply #55 on Yesterday at 8:40pm » During the night of the hearing of the 11th, I was having dinner with whitefeather and suecmkx ... I left to go to the restroom, and when I returned I told them both I just thought I saw UC getting his shoes shined ... I've met UC a couple of times; I think I could identify him easily. Funny thing was the casino was the golden nugget. The same place whitefeather and Sue ran into BF @ the bar the night before.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jun 14, 2007 0:50:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 14, 2007 7:59:07 GMT -5
Be advised that Acca had me do a "pipe-in" to the 500 room tonight (at aproximately 11PM (EST)... in lieu of coming on, in-person. He was traveling. He was extremely upbeat (more than ever)... and indicated we should still look for a newswire story (as early as) tomorrow (expected). Following that, he intends to visit in the 500 room tomorrow evening and answer any/all questions (gloves off), at aproximately 8PM (EST). He assured that we will be ecstatic with our outcome... and after "today's" event, the positive outcome that we've all waited so long for, is about to happen! EOM ~ Des' Here's the mp3 "link" (from tonight)... www.zshare.net/audio/2264736f010992/ ...................................................................................... ACCA RECAP : SHO had to take place for us to move on, we are soooooooooooooooo close, very articulated play, bottom line......... we will be very very wealthy, he will be in tomorrow night ( 8PM EDT Tentative) He will answer questions point blank then. "We are there. next thing is payment" LOOK FOR NEWS WIRE TOMOROW
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jun 14, 2007 8:00:41 GMT -5
144r DIAMOND JEDI Re: UC spotted at Harrahs Casino.« Reply #55 on Yesterday at 8:40pm » During the night of the hearing of the 11th, I was having dinner with whitefeather and suecmkx ... I left to go to the restroom, and when I returned I told them both I just thought I saw UC getting his shoes shined ... I've met UC a couple of times; I think I could identify him easily. Funny thing was the casino was the golden nugget. The same place whitefeather and Sue ran into BF @ the bar the night before. ocd DIAMOND JEDI *** Well, this tells me everything I already believed I knew. Urban, Kevin and the Friz are, and have always been, on the same team. Some will dispute this but I don't care. I'm close. Closure is on it's way.
|
|