|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:33:00 GMT -5
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:06 AM EDT Msg. 761912 of 761933 Jump to msg. # SEC SAID BONAFIDE = REGISTERED
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:33:29 GMT -5
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:07 AM EDT Msg. 761913 of 761933 Jump to msg. # EXPOS - U HAVE ANY MORE STUPID REMARKS WHILE IM HERE
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:34:46 GMT -5
By: exposingpumpers 07 Sep 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 761905 of 761929 Jump to msg. # There are not 40,000 - 50,000 shareholders that is a fact. At best there are 10,000 bonafide shareholders of this company. The problem the company is having is the "straw" shareholders have changed hands so many times that they are trying to track these illegal shareholders backwards. If you bought from Deli you have a illegal cert. Think of it this way. You receive a counterfeit $100.00 bill from a store. You do not now it is counterfeit but that bill has changed hands 20 times. Now you being unaware that the bill is fake use it at the local Walmart to buy some clothes for your kids. The cashier checks it and low and behold the bill is fake. Guess what happens? Nothing to you legally if you are not a crook of course once they investigate you. But they take the bill away and you get nothing. Enjoy your prosperity with the certs bought from Deli. By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:03 AM EDT Msg. 761907 of 761932 (This msg. is a reply to 761905 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # expos -not true -i already confirmed with helen from 1st global By: exposingpumpers 07 Sep 2008, 10:05 AM EDT Msg. 761909 of 761932 (This msg. is a reply to 761907 by lillburrito0.) Jump to msg. # Helen is under investigation do you think she would tell you the truth? By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:05 AM EDT Msg. 761911 of 761932 (This msg. is a reply to 761909 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # EXPOSING -SEC ALSO CONFIRMED TO ME By: exposingpumpers 07 Sep 2008, 10:08 AM EDT Msg. 761915 of 761933 (This msg. is a reply to 761911 by lillburrito0.) Jump to msg. # The SEC is confirming what the Transfer Agent is confirming to you. This is the reason for the problem of proving who is a "bonafide" shareholder. For example: Nobody knew Ian McIntyre was John Edwards not even the company. Yet Ian McIntyre was involved with CyberMark. Not hard to forge certs with fictional characters but then they tried to legitimize those fictional characters. By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:09 AM EDT Msg. 761916 of 761933 (This msg. is a reply to 761915 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # TRANSFER AGENT WAS NEVER DISCUSSED WITH THE SEC LADY
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:36:00 GMT -5
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:10 AM EDT Msg. 761917 of 761934 Jump to msg. # IF U HOLD SHARES N CERT FORM U R REGISTERED - CONFIRMED BY THE SEC AND 1ST GLOBAL
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:11 AM EDT Msg. 761919 of 761934 Jump to msg. # CORRECTION -U R BONAFIDE WHICH EQUALS REGISTERED - BLAAAAAAA
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:38:07 GMT -5
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:12 AM EDT Msg. 761920 of 761935 Jump to msg. # I CAN POST THAT BECAUSE I HAVE CONFIRMED THAT INFO
By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:12 AM EDT Msg. 761921 of 761935 Jump to msg. # JUST LIKE THE COMPANY CONFIRMED AL HODGES WORKED FOR CMKM:
Subject: File No. S7-08-08 From: AClifton Hodges, Esq. Affiliation: AttorneyMarch 27, 2008 To The SEC Commission and Financial Industry at Large: Naked shorts in the United States = "counterfeit shares." The case of CMKX represents the greatest "counterfeit shares" fraud in the UNITED STATES. CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY. Trillions of stock shares traded and changed hands UNTIL CMKX revoked itself and had every stock holder pull physical stock certificates out of brokerages, and out of street name, to trap those whom had committed fraud. CMKX is also the LARGEST STOCK CERTIFICATE PULL IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES" Naked short selling is a case of short selling the shares without first arranging a borrow. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 stipulates a settlement period up to three business days before a stock needs to be delivered, generally referred to as "T+3 delivery". The SECs public position as of the Spring of 2005 was that naked shorting did not exist. With enactment of Regulation SHO, the subsequent elimination of the SHO grandfather exemption, and now the promulgation of this rule, the SEC has finally admitted the error of its ways. The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation has also been criticized for its approach to naked short selling. DTCC has been sued with regard to its alleged participation in naked short selling, and the issue of DTCC's possible involvement has been taken up by Senator Robert Bennett and discussed by the NASAA and in articles -- disagreed with by DTCC -- in the Wall Street Journal and Euromoney Magazine. Robert J. Shapiro, former undersecretary of commerce for economic affairs, has, however, found that naked short selling has cost investors $100 billion and driven 1,000 companies into the ground. Naked shorting is illegal because it allows manipulators a chance to force stock prices down without regard for normal stock supply/demand patterns. It is in fact, institutional fraud further, counterfeiting of securities is a crime of U.S. Constitutional magnitude. This criminal conduct, once asserted by the SEC not to exist, has destroyed many, many companies, lives and opportunities. But now the word is out on naked shorting it must be stopped, and all whom conspired put in jail. This naked shorting fraud rule must be passed - NOW. Sincerely, A. Clifton Hodges HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:39:30 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 07 Sep 2008, 09:59 AM EDT Msg. 761904 of 761929 (This msg. is a reply to 761900 by msdonnaharrison.) Jump to msg. # msdonna, whatdo you see happening at the shane/star/united meeting? anything strongly suggestive of events on the ground here? any obvious links to cmkx of old or new? By: msdonnaharrison 07 Sep 2008, 10:14 AM EDT Msg. 761922 of 761936 (This msg. is a reply to 761904 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # I only see what is listed in the shareholder meeting proxy election of diretors appointment of auditors continuance of the company in sask stock option plan other business
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:41:13 GMT -5
By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 761906 of 761929 (This msg. is a reply to 761896 by msdonnaharrison.) Jump to msg. # MsHarrison,,,,All the Illegal shares has to be paid....and they can't just disappear.....that would make the O/S = 100B.... When everyone gets paid....they can make the O/S whatever number they want but 100B seems to be O.K to me...
By: msdonnaharrison 07 Sep 2008, 10:16 AM EDT Msg. 761924 of 761939 (This msg. is a reply to 761906 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin, what illegal shares are you referring to? All the Bona Fides hold certs now.
By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:39 AM EDT Msg. 761938 of 761945 (This msg. is a reply to 761924 by msdonnaharrison.) Jump to msg. # msdonnaharrison...We are safe... The system won't tell us how many NS....622B is just probably 1/2 of the real NS....
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 7, 2008 9:41:29 GMT -5
I sure am glad I FORCED the BROKERS/TA to issue my CERTS...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:43:05 GMT -5
By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:10 AM EDT Msg. 761918 of 761939 (This msg. is a reply to 761905 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # EP...Not so simple as you described... By: exposingpumpers 07 Sep 2008, 10:21 AM EDT Msg. 761926 of 761939 (This msg. is a reply to 761918 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # It is that simple aladin99 the issue is people like yourself try to see something that is not there. This is why your boss Urban pays people like yourself to be here on the boards. Is aladin admitting that he is PAID???
By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:32 AM EDT Msg. 761933 of 761941 (This msg. is a reply to 761926 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # EP...so you are working here voluntarily??? By: exposingpumpers 07 Sep 2008, 10:38 AM EDT Msg. 761936 of 761943 (This msg. is a reply to 761933 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Actually aladin99 we know you are Cindy Casavant. By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:42 AM EDT Msg. 761940 of 761946 (This msg. is a reply to 761936 by exposingpumpers.) Jump to msg. # EP...unfortunately.... ..................... By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:49 AM EDT Msg. 761945 of 761948 Jump to msg. # EX, IF ALADIN IS A CASAVANT THEN IT IS A PLEASURE TO HAVE HER ON THIS BOARD :-))))
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:44:00 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 07 Sep 2008, 09:45 AM EDT Msg. 761894 of 761940 (This msg. is a reply to 761882 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin,
how does the SEC cancel shares owned by retail investors like you and me? to get down to 100b the SEC would have to clear 500b shares out of the market. i'm not quite sure how they'll do that. who's certs/shares get cancelled? how? are there only 100b worth of shares owned by retail investors? i thought frizzells first fax campaign proved there were many tens of thousands of retail investors that hels well over 100b shares. in short, how do you take those shares away from those small investors?
i don't see how the OS gets reduced to 100b. what's the mechanism?
By: my69z 07 Sep 2008, 10:22 AM EDT Msg. 761927 of 761940 (This msg. is a reply to 761894 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rosen,,,come on dude...this is why u have to pay attention to tha "legal stuff".
The Texas Lawsuit is an example of how 703B can be not what it seems....the SEC isn't the only route who can cancel shares.
" etiher sold into the market or various third parties "
By: rosencrantz2010 07 Sep 2008, 10:27 AM EDT Msg. 761930 of 761940 (This msg. is a reply to 761927 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z, lol, that's why i count on you! i don't know that legal #####. too many ins and outs for me. plus, i don't get the jargon, even the simple stuff.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:44:35 GMT -5
By: msdonnaharrison 07 Sep 2008, 10:22 AM EDT Msg. 761928 of 761940 Jump to msg. # interesting,
A) The ETGMF certificate is being held by Donald Stoecklein because he was initially entrusted with its care by CMKM and Entourage Mining. Mr. Stoecklein has made known to current management that he will release the certificate to the Company with a court order to do so. The certificate cannot be negotiated in any way because it is restricted and it is also involved in a legal dispute. The certificate is in the name of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. No one, except CMKM Diamonds, Inc. can negotiate this certificate. Securities Law Institute is simply named as the custodian. Securities Law Institute has no ownership interest in the certificate or the shares it purports to represent. At this time, there is no need to ask any court for an order to take physical possession of this certificate.
**Why would Tyler need a court order to get a cert "in the name of CMKM Diamonds, Inc" hmmmmm
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:46:47 GMT -5
By: jonas-dclxxxvii 07 Sep 2008, 10:29 AM EDT Msg. 761932 of 761941 Jump to msg. # Nuffie just got bounced from Pro66 PT room. ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!! By: mkaykay0 07 Sep 2008, 10:48 AM EDT Msg. 761943 of 761946 (This msg. is a reply to 761903 by jonas-dclxxxvii.) Jump to msg. # lol jonas, did you get me kicked out? By: jonas-dclxxxvii 07 Sep 2008, 10:51 AM EDT Msg. 761946 of 761946 (This msg. is a reply to 761943 by mkaykay0.) Jump to msg. # Chrisl bounced Nufced and MKayKay
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:53:59 GMT -5
I wish someone in the know would call me!!!! LIke Uc, or the SEC biggies or the DOJ or even the FBI!!! ANyone who can tell me FOR SURE what is going on, PLEASE CALL!!! By: lillburrito0 07 Sep 2008, 10:40 AM EDT Msg. 761939 of 761946 Jump to msg. # ALADIN/CINDY - URBAN CALLED ME A FEW MONTHS AGO - TELL HIM I SAID THANKS :-))))
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 9:59:10 GMT -5
By: my69z 07 Sep 2008, 10:56 AM EDT Msg. 761948 of 761949 (This msg. is a reply to 761927 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Rosen...certs/brokers/shares...remember these from the past,,,,,and it was always said...Bill Frizzell is investigating,,,,,now he's the only attorney in the Texas Lawsuit. But.....April 20, 2007: The Company has recently halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage firm from a third party. A specialist will be hired to completely research and investigate both sides of this transaction along with the many recent transactions of possible insider sales of large bulk certificates May 2, 2007: In the first of two CEO updates on 4/18/07, Mr. West mentioned an ongoing investigation by attorney Bill Frizzell “into the sale of bulk certs.” To this subject, Mr. West now adds, “We have evidence of the attempt by at least one specific large brokerage firm to purchase for itself, rather than simply transfer, such certificates. So,,,,look at Exhibit A from this Texas suit...the top 3 who had certs issued to'em make up almost 100B of the 171B,,,,,were those 3 part of the certs halted to a broker tryin to buy for themselves?? .....if so,,,,it's another example of how "703B" won't be "our" problem. Go back to what Frizz said in our SEC trial about brokers getting caught with "open orders"
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 7, 2008 10:00:36 GMT -5
By: aladin99 07 Sep 2008, 10:56 AM EDT Msg. 761947 of 761951 (This msg. is a reply to 761945 by lillburrito0.) Jump to msg. # LiLLB...If I were Casavant.... I would tell U guys 3 things...in one simple post~~ Thanks for your patience... Amount...54c... When...this year...
|
|