|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 14, 2009 20:52:51 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 14 Mar 2009, 11:30 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 817143 of 817218
Jump to msg. # eight months since this second to last post of his,,,
By: jay_adobe 25 Jun 2008, 12:11 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 735543 of 817142 (Reply to 735356 by restripe2007) Jump to msg. #
restripe,
From this shareholder's quiet vantage point, it doesn't appear to be, although it sure feels like it ought to be after all these years. Still a few more Humpty Dumptys to tumble from the top yet to go, I think. Be kind to your fellow shareholder and remember that 'tis darkest before the storm. imo
his last one seven months ago,,,
By: jay_adobe 07 Jul 2008, 10:34 AM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 739853 of 817143 (Reply to 739800 by jlecks) Jump to msg. #
jlecks,
Things are surprisingly well, thanks for asking. I've no comment on what is happening. It is pretty much self-explanatory throughout the big picture of the financial market and situation. Just wait and see. IMO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 14, 2009 20:58:41 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 14 Mar 2009, 06:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817208 of 817218 (Reply to 817204 by stockrich0) Jump to msg. # STOCK...YOU ask too much! Did you forget this is the super-duper secret stock play of a lifetime? We just don't know if it's in OUR lifetimes, or our great grand children's. eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 14, 2009 21:03:56 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 14 Mar 2009, 07:27 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817216 of 817219
Jump to msg. # Personally speaking, I think MONETARY...
...has been quite 'revealing' lately.
Of course, I'm always gonna shoot for more information.
However, he's been quite specific and 'on time' with everything he's said.
I've become a full-fledge believer in the "sting"...
...believing that the SEC has been around since the beginning.
...That is the 'secret' that must be kept!
If the 'alphabet agencies'...[SEC, IRS, DOJ...etc] purposely brought
down the highly destructive derivative chaos by throwing a 'poison pill'
pill' (CMKX) monkey wrench in the works. That is a FACT that can
never be known.
No one who was selling derivatives was going to stop.
Madoff only turned himself in because the money dried up. People were probably
asking to liquidate and he couldn't do it. No new money coming in the door to
payout to ol' timers.
Some very powerful people saw the end coming and decided,
a controlled strategic death would [that would hasten a new beginning]
would be better than a catastrophic uncontrolled death that would plunge
the world into the apocalyptic days of Mad Max.
People cannot know the government was behind this....(in even
the smallest way). In order to fix this people are going broke, but there was
no other way. The leaders aren't looking for 'no casulties'...there looking for as few as
possible.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 14, 2009 21:08:09 GMT -5
ty pennypauly
Re: Weekly Buzz 3/6 « Reply #43 Today at 7:19pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
unreal Ty snoopstock5 Re: **Smoking Gun, 622 Unreg, part of 703 or Above « Reply #40 Today at 12:23pm »
Many people are not going to like this post, but post it again I will. It is rumored that UC increased the A/S and put them into trusts or other companies. If this is true, the O/S is far less than everyone thinks. Also, when crooks to pump and dump scams and short sales, they do "box jobs". In these "box jobs", the shorted shares are not sold to individuals, they are sold in different offshore accounts. It was and still is my belief that there are way less shares that everyone things there are. It was NOT the task force job to collect from the shorts. The task force does not have the authority to get after the shorts. Only the SEC and DOJ. All the info from the Task force stated that only BONA FIDE would be accepted. I highly doubt that the brokers would have sent our naked shorted certs. We have an unshareholder website. Therefore the conclusion that we held naked shorted shares is false. If the task force did make brokers pay for our shares, that is aiding and abetting crooks. I highly doubt IBM, DS, RG, and others would have done this. UC bought back shares in 2004. There were 16.5 billion, 1.8 billion, 4.4 billion, 9.02 billion, and 6 billion.
Lastly, if this stock is/was worth as much as everyone is telling you, then they would not have thrown the shares to the general public. The idea was a hostel takeover of the company. Destroy it through naked short selling and buy it cheap. Acca has stated numerous times that 634 billion is not the O/S. He has also stated that 97% would take the money for CIM instead of the shares. If you reread the shareholder derivative letters, you will see what I am talking about and be able to know how many of the 39,995 shareholders sent in STATEMENTS instead of CERTS. Also, the task force never stated if UC's shares or other companies that still held were included in the numbers. Mass majority of investors buy low and sell high. I am sure many of them sold CmKx in Oct of 04 before CIM. Then they may have bought it back. However, I doubt the ones they bought back would count as bona fide. Jay was always telling other posters this same thing. He also stated that we shouldn't worry if he held the stock. At one time he stated something similar to this, "If you didn't follow the urge to push the sell button, then you are alright. I don't think UC scammed us. He stated many times that we would be very happy with the O/S. Acca keeps talking about the "MANY BAD ACTORS THAT ARE INVOLVED IN THIS STOCK."
by seagul
Also... I know we discussed this a couple of years ago... but
My certs that I got in summer '05 (before the cert pull) did not have my name number code on it as did those I did not get until after the cert pull........ still the number is low and I am wondering if it is because of when I got my first certs
My son's shares purchased from Deli in Oct/Nov '06 have a high name/number code ... at almost 50k... and the number of the cert is near 90k...
indicating to me there are more than 50,000 shareholders who had certs at that time and more around 90,000 certs issued (since some have several certs)
by snoopstock5
Seagull, there are shareholders that called for their certs, but were denied. They sent in a copy of their monthly statement that they received from the brokers.
Ameritrade:
We have received to date 2,593 Ameritrade statesments. These statements confirm ownership of 109,213,056,640 of Cmkm stock.
Etrade
We have received to date 1357 Etrade statements.
Charles Schwab
We have received numerous monthly statements from customers of Schwab.
They included the info from Jefferies 111.7 billion shares.
TD Canada
We have received hundreds of monthly statements from customers of TDWaterhouse Canada.
|
|