seagull
Board Addict
Re: gossip 3/14/09
« Reply #1 Yesterday at 7:48am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
statute of limitations??
By: Ines
**Smoking Gun, 622 Unreg, part of 703 or Above?
« Thread Started Yesterday at 1:44pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have a smoking gun here fellow shareholders..
SEC puts out info in their lawsuits on april 07 2007 against the Cmkx company that we have 622 billion unregistered shares.
SEC does not want to answer the shareholder whether 622 unreg shares, is part of or Above the 703 billion.
Statue of limitations to market participants and SEC own wrongdoing is ticking away while they keep it quiet.
When asked by a shareholder in an email.. whether those 622 billion "unregistered shares" are part of 703 billion os, or are they ABOVE 703 billion we have,
they, SEC, responded that we should ask the company.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When a shareholder asked Mark Faulk in his last Toginet monthly radio show for the shareholders..
whether he has ever asked this information of SEC or not..
Mark said no.
And he promised he would ask.
We still dont have the answers , neither the shareholder that asked Mark Faulk to ask about it has the answers.
----------------
www.zshare.net/audio/5699031737045d8f/mp3 of partial discussion on the subject
Format letter to send to the company:
Dear Mr. Faulk,
My name is ........ I am a shareholder of CMKM and here is my cert number to verify my position. I am requesting for the company to distinguish based on the SEC stating that there is 622 billion unregistered securities in the market.
Is this 622 billion part of the 703 billion or is it above the 703 billion?
Sincerely
......... First name, last name
email, fax or mail this off.
EMAILS:
4justice@cmkmdiamondsinc.com
faulkingtruth@gmail.com
questions@cmkmdiamondsinc.com
or CMKM Diamonds, Inc. 615 S. Broadway Tyler, TX 75701
questions@cmkmdiamondsinc.com
-------------------------------
I completely agree that this is something all of the shareholders should undersand and focus on as it is the smoking gun in this whole game.
One shareholder already emailed SEC and asked them whether the 622 billion unregistered shares that SEC claims and has put out information out in their lawsuits against Cmkx , whether those 622 billion shares are PART OF 703 billion OS or outstanding shares , or are they ABOVE the 703 billion OS or outstanding shares?
SEC replied to shareholder that they have to ask the company for that information.
Basicaly, then the shareholders first have to try to get company officials ( cmkx management)to get official reply and information on those shares.
Why would keeping it secret benefit SEC ?
Well basicaly they fliped the rules and subject of the game here.. from NSS to "Unregistered Shares" ...
And it looks like SEC wants to keep this under the wraps .. hoping that some kind of Statue of limitations expires.. . for their wrong doing and responsability in this.
If they alowed 622 billion unregistred shares ABOVE 703 billion to be sold to shareholders , when in fact the brokers have the obligation to check themselves that they are not selling "unregistred shares" then they are complicit too.
Also,
Those same shares that were sold were they certed?
Were those shares later on registered?
Who registered them? Who had the right?
ETC ...
These are the old games of SEC,, keep things extending until all statues of limitations expire. I am quite clear on this as i have read the complete Aquirre case when they refused to interview Mack.. and they finnaly intervied the guy one year after they fired Aquirre and 5 days after statue of limitations expired for Mack to be able to be criminaly charged.
Then they closed the case. When senators opened the investigation into this.. SEC reopened the investigation themselves again, trying to tell the Senators .. its an ongoing investigation again and they should get no info from SEC on the case.
SEC will play any and all dirty games in the book and outside.
finance.senate.gov/sitepages/leg/LEG%202007/Leg%20110%20080307%20SEC.pdf pdf file aquirre investigation senate.. pequot
Same thing with Overstock Vs Gradient.
SEC closed the investigation in Overstock VS gradient.. saying they could not find gradient do anything wrong, even though Gradients own employees testified otherwise.
Lady from NCAN's sued gradient along with Overstock.
When she requested FOIA on this already closed invesitigation , SEC broke every rule in the book not to give her the FOIA documents on how .. they actualy went about investigating and deciding on Gradient case.
She finnaly sued SEC for their conduct.
I could not find anything more on it. This is very recent. summer 2008.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The point is, SEC is hiding this informatoin and not for our benefit.. but to protect their own wrong doing and market participants.
But if they voluntary put the information out that we have 622 billion unregistered shares, then they have to explain it.
And it seems that we have to first address the company to ask for that information. And we have to be aware of the time component here with "Statue of limitations".
We have concluded that Statue of limitations should start ticking at the moment that SEC exposed the "622 billion unregistered shares" which would be on april 07 2007, when they officialy put that information out in the lawsuits against Cmkx.
----------------------
From proboards 70:
622 Billion Unregistered Securities
« Thread Started Today at 10:05am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is very simple and yet shareholders make it very hard. On all the boards you have the simpletons who seem to have all the answers. They confuse the situation to where nobody knows if they are coming or going.
Here is the rule of thumb.
K.eep I.t S.imple S.tupid
The SEC has stated that "622 Billion Unregistered Securities" were put into the market illegally. Ok we know who did this no reason to dwell on the crooks like Urban, John Edwards and friends. Move past this point.
Remember the K.I..S.S. theory.
Is the 622 Billion Unregistered Securities part of the 703 Billion? Cause if so then there is only 81 Billion legitimate shares in the market. Or is the 622 Billion Unregistered Securities above the 703 Billion which would make this 1.325 Trillion Shares out there.
Not hard is it. Pretty easy question to be asking of the SEC. The company is the only entity that can do this. Now the simpletons will say we can ask and of course that is how they think. You are wrong only the company can ask.
See the company needs to know this.
Remember the past if you can. Judge Murray stated at the hearing get your finances in order and get current on your filings and you can continue to trade. Well we know what Urban did right move on.
So if the company right now got their house in order and applied to trade is the company responsible for the 622 Billion Unregistered Securities? My answer to that is no. See they are "Unregistered" the SEC has stated this. Now some simpletons will say once you buy them they become registered again that is not true. Only the company can register the shares and the SEC says they are not.
So if the company did start to trade tomorrow they possibly can move forward with the registered securities which is approximately 81 billion. Now the simpletons will say how can they determine who is registered and who is not. They could but it would take years.
Now if the 622 Billion Unregistered is not part of the current share structure then the SEC just handed you the goose that laid the golden egg.
See it is a win win for the company if the company forces the SEC to quantify the 622 Billion Unregistered Securities.
703 billion - 622 billion unregistered = 81 billion legitimate
703 billion + 622 billion unregistered = 1.325 trillion
Win Win but the simpletons has everyone going in different directions.
I hope the company comes out and says they do not have to honor those 622 billion unregistered cause I know what I will be doing.
When you ordered your cert and if that cert is unregistered and it was sent thru the mail do any of the simpletons know what this is called and what law has been broken?
If you answered mail fraud you are correct.
Pretty simple isn't it. It is one or the other nothing in between.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 8:02am by seagull »
cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=21120